implementation of the minimum medical loss ratio
DESCRIPTION
Implementation Of The Minimum Medical Loss RatioTRANSCRIPT
Implementation of the Minimum Medical Loss Ratio
Timothy Stoltzfus JostWashington and Lee University
MLR familiar concept
NAIC: “A measure of relationship between A&H claims and premiums”
Traditionally used by:investors to track earningsinsurers to set premiumsregulators for rate regulation
State guidelines
• NAIC model guidelines, 50% to 60%• 34 states require reporting in individual
market• 14 states impose minimums, 50% to 80%• 20 states impose requirements in group
market• 6 states require refunds
State and federal MLR not the same
• Federal MLR excludes taxes and regulatory fees from denominator
• Federal MLR includes quality improvement expenses in numerator
• Federal MLR 2 to 12 points higher than equivalent state MLR calculations
2718 of the PHSA
• Part of title XXVII of the Public Health Services Act (HIPAA). (42 U.S.C. s. 300gg-18)
• 2718(a) requires reporting• 2718(b) requires rebates if MLR less than 80%
in nongroup and small group market; 85% in large group market
2718 Adjustments
• State may adjust upwards• HHS may adjust downwards for state if
statutory MLR minimum would destabilize market
• HHS may adjust for volatility after 2014
2718 Application
• Applies to nongroup, small group, and large group issuers
• Applies to grandfathered plans• Does not apply to self-insured; short-term
limited duration plans; or excepted benefit plans
Regulatory drafting process
• NAIC asked to establish definitions and methodologies
• Subject to certification by HHS• Methodologies to take into account situation
of small, newer, and different sorts of plans
NAIC and HHS process
• Final regulation approved by NAIC on October 27, 2010
• HHS issued interim final rule on December 1, 2010 certifying NAIC rule
Aggregation
• Aggregate by individual, small, and large group markets
• Aggregate by issuer (not plan or policy)• Aggregate by state– Multistate employer coverage can be aggregated
in state of employer– Group health plan with multiple affiliated issuers
can be aggregated• Mini-med and expatriate coverage separate
Denominator
• Premium: All monies paid as a condition of coverage
• Excludes federal and state taxes and regulatory fees
Numerator
• Includes expenses for quality improvement. Activities to– improve outcomes– Prevent hospital readmissions– Improve patient safety and prevent medical errors– implement and promote wellness and health– Enhance use of data to improve quality– Quality portion of HIT, accreditation, ICD-10
implementation up to .3%
Formula
Incurred claims + quality improvement _______________________________________
Premiums – taxes and regulatory fees +/- risk adjustment and reinsurance
Credibility Adjustments
• issuers < 1000, not credible• Issuers 1000 – 75,000, partially credible• Issuers > 75,000, fully credible• Adjustments up to 8.3%• Also adjusted for average deductibles 1000 to
10,000 (up to X 1.736)
Mini-med and Expatriate Plans
• Target MLR doubled (40% and 42.5%) for 2011• For 2012 and following, expatriate plans
doubled, mini-med plans multiplied by 1.75 for 2012, 1.5 for 2013, 1.25 for 2014.
• Student plans may also be treated differently
Rebates
• Paid pro rata to enrollees or employers• Paid by August 1• Usually by premium adjustments
Adjustments (Not Waivers)
• To avoid destabilization of individual market• 17 states (plus Guam) have requested• Most requested stepwise adjustment, some
total reduction• So far six states received adjustments, eight
denied, three still pending.
What will the rebates look like?2010 Data
% of carriers paying rebate
% members receiving rebate
Median MLR
Rebate $ millions
Rebate PMPM
Member months millions
Individual 14.2 52.9 73.6 978.3 8.09 121
Small group
15.7 22.8 82.3 447.4 2.13 210
Large group
15 14.7 89.4 526.7 1.13 465
How will Insurers Adjust?
• Reduce administrative costs• Reduce premium increases if medical costs
continue to moderate
How is it affecting agents and brokers?
• Reducing commissions?• Commissions have increased with premiums• Some insurers decreasing or changing to
pmpm in recent past• NAIC study shows decreases in 2011, but
many insurers have not reduced commissions, some have changed compensation structure
• States with high MLRs have not seen loss of access to producers
Agents and brokers• Consumers and insurance commissioners value
the services of producers• Producers believe that the MLR requirement has
reduced compensation• But why is compensation being cut?• And what will happen if taken out of premium
(Rogers bill)?– Will it will increase costs to consumers?– Will it increase the federal budget deficit– Will it increase producer compensation?