impact of pcos on sexual function of women with infertility
TRANSCRIPT
Impact of PCOS on
sexual function of
women with infertility
Aboubakr Elnashar
Mona Hassan
Egypt
Aboubakr Elnashar
PCOS is a common endocrine disorder that
affects approximately 6.5% of reproductive-
aged women (Azizz et al, 2004).
It is characterized by:
chronic anovulation, and
hyperandrogenism (Elsenbruch et al, 2003).
Aboubakr Elnashar
Many PCOS patients feel stigmatized in the
sense of a loss of feminine identity.
(Janssen et al, 2008)
Almost PCOS women have
negative emotions of frustration
anxiety, and,
to a lesser extent, sadness. (Sills et al, 2001).
Aboubakr Elnashar
The symptoms typically associated with
PCOS such as acne, hirsutism, irregular cycle,
obesity, and subfertility
can negatively affect
woman's self-esteeming,
quality of life, and
sexual satisfaction (Jone et al, 2008)
Though many studies have focused on
relationship between PCOS and subfertility,
only few studies investigated its impact on
sexual life of women.
Aboubakr Elnashar
The results of these studies are contradictory:
One study found that patients with PCOS had
significantly less satisfaction with their sex life (Elsenbruch et al, 2003)
Another study, found that patients with PCOS
did not differ from controls in the number of
sexual thoughts and fantasies or in their views
of the importance of a satisfying sex life (Hahn et al, 2005)
They also found no differences in the
frequency of sexual intercourse between
controls and women with PCOS Aboubakr Elnashar
Objective
To investigate relationship of different aspects
of PCOS
e.g. serum testosterone, acne, hirsutism, and BMI
with sexual function of women suffering from
infertility.
Aboubakr Elnashar
Material and Method
A cross-sectional study on 50 women
PCOS
infertility
were compared with a group of 50 women who
do not have PCO but, also
suffer infertility
{To avoid bias that may arise from possible
negative effect of subfertility on woman's sexual
function}.
Aboubakr Elnashar
Inclusion criteria: Cases were collected from Al- Ahram Fertility Center in Mansoura Study group inclusion criteria
Infertile
Age 18 to 40 years
Rotterdam diagnostic criteria for PCO.
Aboubakr Elnashar
Control group inclusion criteria:
• Infertile.
• No prior or current diagnosis of PCOS
• Age 18 to 40 years
• Nondiabetic
• Nonhirsute
• Regular monthly cyclic menses.
Aboubakr Elnashar
Exclusion criteria
•Prior or current use of oral hypoglycemic agents
or insulin
•Currently pregnant or breastfeeding during the
prior 30 days
Aboubakr Elnashar
Data Sources
Both hirsutism and acne were self-reported as
“yes” or “no.”
Height and weight were measured by a nurse for
all study participants.
BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms
divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2).
Aboubakr Elnashar
Assessment of Sexual Function The modified Arizona Sexual Experience Scale
(ASEX).
The original ASEX is made up of 5 items rated on
a 6-point Likert scale.
Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the
higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction (McGahuey et al, 2000).
Aboubakr Elnashar
An additional two points were added:
frequency of sexual intercourse and
occurrence of sexual pain
as they may help to understand magnitude of
sexual function.
Aboubakr Elnashar
PCOS
No (%)
Non-PCOS
No (%)
P value
Age
(year)
20 - 25 22 (42.3) 19 (37.3) <0.001
26 - 30 23 (44.2) 8 (15.7)
31 - 35 6 (11.5) 13 (25.5)
36 - 40 1 (1.9) 11 (21.6)
Education Non 0 (0%) 3 (5.9)
0.029 Moderate
level 25 (48.1) 31(60.8)
High Level 27 (51.9) 17 (33.3)
Job House Wife 43 (82.7) 39 (67.5) 0.347
Others 9 (17.3) 12 (23.5)
Income Sufficient 34(65.4) 19(41.7) 0.108
Insufficient 18(34.6) 28(58.3)
Duration
of Marriage
1 - 5 years 33 (63.5) 24 (47.1)
0.05 6 - 10 Years 15 (28.8) 14 (27.5)
11 - 15 Years 4 (7.7) 8 (15.7)
16 - 20 Years 0 (0) 5 (9.7)
Infertility
period
1 - 5 years 36 (69.2) 27 (54)
0.159 6 - 10 Years 13 (25) 15 (30)
11 - 15 Years 3 (5.8) 6 (12)
Table 1: Demographic Data
Aboubakr Elnashar
PCOS
No (%)
Non-PCOS
No (%)
P value
Irregular Menses 45 (56.5) 7 (13.7) <0.001
Hairsutism 28(53.8) 6(11.8) <0.001
Acne 16 (30.8) 9 (17.6) 0.12
FGM 42 (80.8) 39 (76.5) 0.595
Med/surgical 1 (1.9) 5 (9.8) 0.088
BMI (Mean ±SD) 30.13±6.09 24.12±2.1 0.03
Table 2: Clinical data
There were significant differences as regard cycle irregularity
(56.5% Vs 13.7%); hairsutism (53.8% Vs 11.8%) and BMI
(30.13% Vs 24.12%) in PCOS and non-PCOS groups Aboubakr Elnashar
PCOS
(Mean±SD)
Non-PCOS
(Mean±SD)
P value
Desire 2.33±0.65 2.41±0.67 0.756
Arousal 2.19±0.91 2.22±0.95 0.882
Lubrication 1.96±0.79 1.92±0.87 0.732
Orgasm 2.62±0.99 2.67±0.99 0.601
Satisfaction 1.83±0.83 2.16±1.02 0.083
Arizona score Total 9.09±2.34 9.11±2.77 0.966
Sexual dysfunction
(Arizona score>19)
1 (1.9)
1 (1.9)
0.99
Table 3: Arizona score
No significant difference were found between the 2 groups as
regard the 5 items of Arizona score or the total Arizona score Aboubakr Elnashar
PCOS
No (%)
Non-PCOS
No (%)
P
value
Sexual
intercourse/week 3.94±2.28 3.73±2.94 0.13
Dysparunia 18 (34.6) 10 (19.6) 0.079
Other sexual
complaint 8(15.4) 12(23.5) 0.296
Table 4: Frequency of sexual intercourse,
dysparunia and other sexual complaint
Aboubakr Elnashar
Arizona score FSH LH F.T BMI
Correlation Coefficient
1.000 .031 -.008 -.183 .024
Significance . .417 .480 .106 .435
N 52 49 48 48 51
Table 5: Correlations between the intensity of
Arizona score and clinical-Laboratory variables
in PCOS
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level
(1-tailed). *
Aboubakr Elnashar
Conclusions
No significant difference between infertile
women with and without PCOS as regard
5 items of Arizona score
Total Arizona score .
Dysparunia, other sexual complaints or
sexual dysfunction
Frequency of sexual intercourse
No correlations between sexual dysfunction
and clinical-Laboratory variables in PCOS
Aboubakr Elnashar