ilc-americas program overview

53
Americas Region ILC-Americas Program Overview G. Dugan ILC/GDE and Cornell University DOE/NSF ILC Program Review Apr. 4-6, 2006

Upload: cedric-hicks

Post on 02-Jan-2016

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ILC-Americas Program Overview. G. Dugan ILC/GDE and Cornell University. DOE/NSF ILC Program Review Apr. 4-6, 2006. Outline. Overview of ILC and GDE GDE mission and goals, ILC challenges ILC baseline configuration ILC Reference Design Report (RDR) and cost estimate. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Americas Region

ILC-Americas Program Overview

G. Dugan

ILC/GDE and Cornell University

DOE/NSF ILC Program ReviewApr. 4-6, 2006

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region Outline• Overview of ILC and GDE

– GDE mission and goals, ILC challenges– ILC baseline configuration– ILC Reference Design Report (RDR) and cost

estimate.• Organization of the Americas Regional Team

– MoU process– WBS and FY06 budgets; WBS 1.x

• FY06 Program– FY06 ILC R&D program highlights, including

university R&D program– FY06 program concerns

• Outlook for FY07 and beyond

Americas Region

International Linear Collider:

The Global Design EffortMission

• Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan, and a siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope. • Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Formation of the Global Design Effort

• Director Barry Barish Appointed in March 2005 • Appointed Regional Directors (Gerry Dugan (Americas), Fumihiko Appointed Regional Directors (Gerry Dugan (Americas), Fumihiko

Takasaki (Asia), Brian Foster (Europe))Takasaki (Asia), Brian Foster (Europe))• Three regional directors identified GDE members (with agreement

from BB)• Currently 66 members, representing approximately 25 FTE• GDE Central Team consists of

– core accelerator physics experts– 3 Conventional Facilities experts (1 per region)– 3 Costing engineers (1 per region)– 3 Communicators (1 per region)– representatives from World Wide Study

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate

GDEExecutive Committee

GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board

GDEChange Control Board

GDEDesign Cost Board

GDE RDR / R&D Organization

GDE

ILCDesignEffort

ILCR&D

Program

Americas Region

International Linear Collider

Timeline 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Global Design Effort Project

Baseline configuration

Reference Design

ILC R&D Program

Technical Design

Expression of Interest to Host

International Mgmt

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Parameters for the ILC

• Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV

• Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years

• Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV

• Energy stability and precision below 0.1%

• Electron polarization of at least 80%

• The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Scope of the 500 GeV machine

•Main linacs length ~ 21 km, 16,000 RF cavities (total)•RF power ~ 640 10-MW klystrons and modulators (total)•Cryoplants ~ 11 plants, cooling power 24 kW (@4K) each•Beam delivery length ~ 5 km, ~ 500 magnets (per IR)•Damping ring circumference ~ 6.6 km, ~400 magnets (each)•Beam power ~ 22 MW total•Site power ~ 200 MW total•Site footprint length ~ 47 km (for option to future upgrade to 1 TeV)•Bunch profile at IP ~ 500 x 6 nm, 300 microns long

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Accelerator physics and engineering challenges

• Developing efficient high gradient superconducting RF systems – Requires efficient RF systems, capable of accelerating

high power beams (~MW).

• Achieving nm scale high-power beam spots – Requires generating high intensity beams of electrons

and positrons– Damping the beams to ultra-low emittance in damping

rings– Transporting the beams to the collision point without

significant emittance growth or uncontrolled beam jitter– Cleanly dumping the used beams.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Affordability

challengescf

31%

structures18%rf

12%

systems_eng8%

installation&test7%

magnets6%

vacuum4%

controls4%

cryo4%

operations4%

instrumentation2%

Civil

SCRF Linac

Pie chartFrom US Tech. OptionsStudy

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC Baseline configuration Document (BCD)

– A baseline configuration for the ILC machine, with a conceptual layout, and beam parameters, was defined at end of 2005.- The baseline made forward looking choices, consistent with attaining performance goals. The choices were understood well enough to do a conceptual design and reliable costing by end of 2006. - “Alternate” configurations were established, which may have cost and or performance benefits, but which need further R&D for validation.- The baseline is under “configuration control,”with a defined process for changes to the baseline.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC Baseline Configuration

• Configuration for 500 GeV machine with expandability to 1 TeV

• Some details (locations of low energy acceleration, crossing angles) are not indicated in this cartoon.

• Tor Raubenheimer will present more details on the BCD

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC Reference Design Report (RDR) and Cost Estimate

• Based on the Baseline Configuration, a reference design and cost estimate will be carried out in 2006. Technical performance and physics performance will be evaluated for the reference design report.• This process began after the Frascati GDE meeting and will conclude late in 2006.• This is a global effort, with participants from all three regions.• Tor Raubenheimer will describe the RDR process in more detail.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas RegionFrom Baseline to a RDR

Jan July Dec2006

Freeze ConfigurationOrganize for RDR

Bangalore

Review Design/Cost Methodology

Review InitialDesign / Cost Review Final

Design / CostRDR Document

Design and Costing PreliminaryRDR

Released

Frascati Vancouver Valencia

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC Value estimate

• The ILC will be built as an international joint project, in which the three regions will contribute mainly “in kind” (specific components)

• Cost estimates must be done in the context of the in-kind contribution model. We will need to secure regional component cost estimates and evaluate these in terms of a globally defined value unit. (ILC unit)

• The complete value estimate will be translatable into a given region’s currency and cost estimating methodology.

• Peter Garbincius will describe the plans and methodology for the value estimate in more detail.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC-Americas Regional Team Leaders

ANL-Kwang-Je Kim BNL-Mike Harrison

Fermilab-Bob Kephart, Shekar Mishra, Sergei Nagaitsev

Cornell LEPP- Hasan Padamsee, Mark Palmer

LBNL -Mike Zisman, Christine Celata

Jefferson Lab -Swapan Chattopadahay, Warren Funk

LLNL -Jeff Gronberg

SLAC -Tor Raubenheimer, Nan Phinney, Tom Himel

TRIUMF -Shane Koscielniak

In the Americas region, the ILC program (the RDR effort, and supporting ILC R&D), is executed by the Americas Regional Team.

ILC Program Execution

Universities- Project Leaders

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Organization of the ILC-Americas Program• The work is broken down into a series of technically-based work

packages. • GDE and each DoE lab sign MoU’s detailing the co-operative

arrangement for the execution of work packages at each lab.• Yearly scope of work is spelled out in Addenda to the MoU, which

detail the work packages.• For university R&D work, each university project is a work package.• Labs report financial status at the work package level quarterly, and

technical status semi-annually. (Actuals not yet available for FY06 for all work packages. Some actuals will be covered in presentations)

• About 100 work packages for FY06 are organized into a WBS.• The list of work packages, and associated resources, as well as the

MOU Addenda, are posted on the ILC-Americas web site:https://wiki.lepp.cornell.edu/ilc/bin/view/Public/Americas/WebHome

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region FY06 ILC-Americas Budget : Breakdown by WBS element

DOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06M&S Total

WBS Description WP leader FTE Direct Total1 Program direction and administration 9.50 $766 $3,006 $3262 Accelerator design, including RDR 34.24 $781 $6,235 $0

2.1 Management 3.30 $100 $630 $02.2 Global systems 1.75 $0 $288 $02.3 Electron sources 1.50 $0 $247 $02.4 Positron sources 5.55 $7 $734 $02.5 Damping rings 6.05 $79 $1,053 $02.6 Ring to Main Linac 1.30 $0 $214 $02.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 5.74 $75 $988 $02.8 Main Linacs: RF systems 1.05 $0 $1732.9 Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules

2.10 Beam delivery system 5.30 $0 $871 $02.11 Conventional facilities 2.69 $519 $1,039 $0

3 Research and development 37.44 $4,921 $12,076 $2423.1 Management 0.80 $0 $132 $03.2 Global systems 2.72 $519 $871 $03.3 Electron sources 1.85 $100 $411 $03.4 Positron sources 4.77 $152 $1,255 $03.5 Damping rings 2.53 $340 $783 $03.6 Ring to Main Linac 0.00 $0 $0 $03.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 0.00 $0 $0 $03.8 6.94 $612 $1,883 $03.9 11.40 $3,061 $5,511 $242

3.10 Beam delivery system 6.42 $137 $1,231 $04 Technical Systems engineering and cost estimation in support of RDR 0.00 $590 $870 $05 Infrastructure and test facilities 18.06 $2,068 $5,216 $0

5.1 Management $05.2 Global systems $05.3 Electron sources $05.4 Positron sources $05.5 Damping rings 1.05 $90 $299 $05.6 Ring to Main Linac $05.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation5.8 8.84 $839 $2,355 $05.9 5.50 $900 $1,869 $0

5.10 Beam delivery system 2.66 $239 $694 $05.11 Conventional facilities $0

6 Reserve $2,437

Total 99.23 $9,126 $29,841 $568

Main Linacs: RF systemsMain Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules

Main Linacs: RF systemsMain Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

FY06 ILC-Americas Budget:Breakdown by machine Area

DOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06MACHINE AREA M&S Total

FTE Direct TotalProgram direction and administration 9.50 $766 $3,006 $326Management 4.10 $100 $761 $0Global systems 4.47 $519 $1,158 $0Electron sources 3.35 $100 $658 $0Positron sources 10.32 $159 $1,988 $0Damping rings 9.63 $509 $2,135 $0Bunch compressor 1.30 $0 $214 $0Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 5.74 $75 $988 $0Main Linacs: RF systems 16.84 $1,451 $4,410 $0Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules 16.90 $3,961 $7,380 $242Beam delivery system 14.38 $376 $2,796 $0Conventional facilities 2.69 $519 $1,039 $0Technical Systems 0.00 $590 $870 $0Reserve $2,437

99.23 $9,126 $29,841 $568

Americas Region FY06 lab budgets

FY06 ILC-Americas Budget: Breakdown by LaboratoryDOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06

Lab/Univ M&S TotalFTE Direct Total

SLAC 56.18 $2,683 $12,300 $0FNAL 30.00 $6,046 $12,600 $0ANL 3.40 $27 $300 $0Jlab 1.00 $136 $400 $0Jlab (FNAL MOU) $600 $600 $0LLNL 2.25 $180 $1,000 $0LLNL (SLAC MOU) 0.42 $50 $200 $0LBNL 2.48 $30 $500 $0BNL 3.50 $25 $600 $0Cornell (FNAL MOU) $165 $165 $0UNIV 0.00 $0 $280 $568DOE/GDE $1,860 $0

sum 99.23 $9,126 $29,841 $568

Most labs are also putting additional funds into ILC R&D. For example, Fermilab is devoting an additional ~$12 M to developing SCRF infrastructure.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC-Americas University FY05 R&D Program

• SCRF materials and surface preparation: Wisconsin ($64K), Northwestern($40K), Old Dominion ($58K)

• RF power sources: Yale ($60K), MIT($30K)• Polarized electron source: Wisconsin ($35K)• Polarized positron source: Tennessee ($40K), Princeton• Damping rings: Illinois ($17K), Cornell ($75K, $46K) [NSF]• Instrumentation, diagnostics: Berkeley ($35K), Cornell ($24K) [NSF]• Mover systems: Colorado State ($49K) [NSF]• Radiation hard electronics: UC Davis ($38K), Ohio State ($75K)• Ground motion: Northwestern ($28K)• Linac beam dynamics design-Cornell ($21K)• High-gradient SCRF R&D- Cornell ($140K) [DOE]

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

WBS 1.xProgram direction and administration

DOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06M&S

WBS Description WP leader FTE Direct Total1 Program direction and administration 9.50 $766 $3,006 $326

1.1 Program management-SLAC Raubenheimer 4.20 $405 $1,1231.2 Program management-Fermilab Kephart 5.00 $301 $1,0991.3 Program management-LBNL 0.30 $10 $631.4 ILC public relations Jackson 0.00 $50 $581.5 ILC school Chou $501.6 GDE Director travel Barish/Caltech $1401.7 GDE Common fund Barish $4731.8 Americas Regional Director Dugan/Cornell $326

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

• WBS x.2.: Global Systems (Larsen, Himel, Ross)

• WBS x.3, x.4: Sources (Sheppard)

• WBS x.5: Damping rings (Kim)

• WBS x.6: Ring to Main Linac (Tenenbaum)

• WBS x.7, x.8, x.9: Main Linacs (Mishra, Solyak, Adolphsen, Kephart)

• WBS x. 10: Beam delivery systems (Seryi)

• WBS x.11: Site development (Kuchler)

During this review, the names in bold will discuss in detail the indicated WBS areas

ILC R&D and RDR efforts for FY06

I will give an abbreviated overview of the FY06 program by WBS category in the next few slides.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region WBS x.2: Global Systems

• System availability studies (SLAC)

• Design of high availability hardware (SLAC, LLNL)– Kickers, Power supplies, diagnostics, and control

system

• General control system design (ANL, Fermilab, SLAC)

Fast (redundant)

kicker for DR

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

• Laser and cathode for polarized electron source (SLAC)

• NC structures: design and test (SLAC)

• Undulator design, E166 (SLAC, Cornell)• Positron Source simulations (ANL)

• A comprehensive start-to-end simulation of conventional, polarized, and keep-alive sources.

• Positron target design (LLNL)– Detailed engineering– Target simulations

• Energy deposition • radiation damage, activation

WBS x.3, x.4: Sources

Positron capturestructures

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

• Damping ring component optimization: wigglers, fast kickers;s of the use of CESR as an ILC positron damping ring test facility (in 2008) (Cornell)

• Damping Ring Design and Optimization (ANL)– Lattice design and optimization; particle tracking for single-

bunch instabilities with 3-D wakefield; studies of ion instability in the APS ring; design of a hybrid wiggler satisfying the field quality tolerance

• SEY studies in PEP-II (SLAC)• ATF damping ring experiments (SLAC, LBNL, Cornell)• Lattice designs for damping rings and injection/extraction lines;

characterization of some collective effects, including space-charge, IBS and microwave instability; physics design of stripline kickers for single-bunch extraction at KEK-ATF (LBNL)

WBS x.5: Damping rings

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

• RTML design (SLAC, Cornell)• Main linac optics design (SLAC, Fermilab)• Low emittance transport simulations and BBA

design (SLAC, Fermilab, Cornell)• Wakefield calculations (SLAC)• Linac beamline Instrumentation (SLAC)

WBS x.6, x.7: RTML and Main Linac Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

x 10-4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

time - s

Vol

ts

signal from ACC1, cav 1, cplr 2 TTF HOM Signal

800 monitors installed

RF BPM for linac

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

• Linac rf sources (SLAC, LLNL)Marx generator modulator

WBS x.8: Main Linac RF sources

• SLAC End Station B (RF Test Fac.)

• Develop 5 MW station in FY06, and 10 MW station later

– Test rf system components

– Reuses extensive infrastructure

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region WBS x.8: Main Linac RF sources

• Coupler Test Stand (LLNL)– Evaluation and analysis of RF

coupler designs

– Linac SC quad and BPM (SLAC)–Studies of magnetic center stability with excitation

SC Quad for magnetic

center tests

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC Cavities and test facilities

• Industrial fabrication of cavities (12 cavities in FY06) (FNAL)

• BCP and vertical testing (FNAL, Cornell)

• EP process development and vertical testing (FNAL, Jlab).

• Joint BCP/EP facility being developed at ANL (late 06)

• Horizontal test facility @ FNAL (ILCTA-MDB) (complete Fall 06)

• Vertical test facility under development @ FNAL (ILCTA-IB1) (complete 07)

• Single/large grain Crystal cavity development (FNAL,Jlab).

Bead pull RF Testing @ FNAL

Joint ANL/FNALBCP/EP Facility

WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

PPD Machine shop (MAB)

TD MP9 Cryomodule Assembly

Facility (CAF)

AD Cryo Dept.

Cryomodule assembly and test infrastructure at Fermilab

MesonDetector Building (MDB)

First 1.3 GHz TESLA Cavity

in MDBCold and RF power in Dec

ILCTA-MDB CryogenicsInstallation

60 W @ 1.8 K

WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Cryomodule Design• Industrial fabrication and cost reduction of the ILC cryomodule are

both crucial issues for a realistic ILC cost estimate • In FY05 Fermilab started on converting drawings of the

DESY/INFN design of the ILC cryomodule (Type-III+) to US standards for U.S. vendor fabrication and for cost reduction.

• IN FY06, as part of a co-ordinated global effort, design has started for an improved ILC cryomodule (Type-IV).

WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Cryomodule string test: ILCTA-NML at Fermilab

Building a dedicated ILC cryomodule string test facility in the New Muon Lab – Building is cleaned out except for removal of CCM ( in progress)– Started to install cryogenic system-complete in FY07 – Move FNPL Photo-injector to provide electron beam (FY07)– Upgraded FNPL will provide beam tests of ILC cryomodules (FY08

and 09)

New Muon Lab (NML)

FNPL Photo-Injector

WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Fabricate, process and test cavities from large-grain/single-crystal material (JLab)

• Objectives:

– Several single cell and at least one multi-cell cavity made from large grain/single crystal niobium

– Improved BCP system for producing very smooth rf surfaces on large grain/single crystal material

– Test cavity for superconducting rf joint investigations

– Optimization studies of superstructure configuration based on superconducting joint

– Two cavities suitable to be combined into a superstructure

– Engineering package for the completion of a superstructure assembly ready for cold tests

WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Re-entrant Cavity Shape47 MV/m at Cornell…Later 52 MV/m at KEK

9-cell re-entrant cavity ordered from AES

Cornell LEPP ILC SCRF activities

WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region WBS x.10: Beam Delivery System

–Beam delivery system design (SLAC)–ATF-2 (SLAC)

• Construction of magnets, PS, and instrumentation

-ESA MDI Test Facility (SLAC)

ATF2 Optics

ESA Energy Spectrometer

- NanoBPM for ATF2 (LLNL)

Americas Region

ILC Final Focus Magnet Development (BNL)

FY06 goals:• Continue to support the baseline design efforts

• Support the development of the Conceptual Design/Cost Estimate for the Beam Delivery System

• Fabricate and test a short proof of principle shielded final-focus-like quadrupole coil

• Fabricate and test a short proof of principle sextupole/octupole corrector-like coil

WBS x.10: Beam Delivery System

Winding tests,

octupole coil - how small

can you go ?

Shielded quadrupole

proof of principle

coil fabrication

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

ILC Civil Design for the RDR

• Design to “sample sites” from each region– Americas – near Fermilab– Japan– Europe – CERN & DESY

• Americas Site - in Illinois– location may vary from the Fermilab site west to near DeKalb

• Design efforts ongoing at Fermilab and SLAC

WBS x.11: Conventional Facilities

Americas Region

Potential TRIUMF Accelerator R&D Resources for ILC

The specific nature of Canadian involvement is under development. Some potential collaboration areas have been identified, along with relevant LHC experience:

The design of kicker magnets and the construction of associated pulse-forming networks and fast switches using power semiconductors

Precision room temperature magnet systems e.g. 52 twin-aperture quadrupoles built at Alstom Canada

Beam instrumentation and readout systemse.g. 2000 matched-pair 70MHz low pass filterse.g. VME64x compliant Digital Aquisition Board (DAB)

Contributions to beam dynamics & lattice calculations for damping rings.

TRIUMF

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Building on expertise developed for TRIUMF ISAC radioactive beams accelerator, additional possible areas are:

Remote handling design/consulting of target stations possible applicability to conventional positron source

Peripheral aspects of superconducting r.f., such as cryogenic coolant distribution system, design/consulting, small quantity e-beam welding of niobium

UBC -Tom Mattison Vibration control systems and alignment of components for final focus system; also interest in abort kickers

TRIUMF

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region FY06 program concerns

• Do we have sufficient resources available to complete the RDR and cost estimate? Some funds have been held in reserve to pay for additional help, but also we will need to divert some effort from R&D program.

• Key R&D concerns:– Development of reliable high-yield processes for the

production of high-gradient ILC cavities remains a critical item. Cavity fabrication and studies of processing are high priority parts of the program.

– Thales klystron problems emphasize need to put more effort into klystron development. Difficult to do this before FY07.

• Additional efforts are needed to co-ordinate Americas R&D program and to plan for the future, both within the region, and with programs in other regions.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

FY07 outlook• PB doubles ILC program budget to $60M (This

includes ILC detector R&D at labs and universities)• However, the requested (“technically limited”) program

exceeds the available funding. A process of prioritization will be required.

• This process should look to GDE for guidance on priorities. Advice will be sought from GDE R&D Board for general ILC R&D efforts, and from Linear Collider Steering Group for the Americas (LCSGA) for region-specific Americas bid-to-host related activities.

• First steps: document FY07 lab program requests (April 26); Regional team meeting to discuss FY07 requests and future plans (May 3-4, SLAC)

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

FY07 program: lab requests

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

FY07 ILC program request: details

• TDR engineering efforts (~50 FTE)

• Cavity and cryomodule work

• RF system development

• Sources, Damping rings, beam delivery

• Global systems

• Americas region bid to host

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Cavities, cryomodules and test infrastructure• Fabricate (in industry) and process (at labs) 12 more ILC high-gradient

cavities.• Continue R&D on large-grain and high-gradient cavities.• Continue R&D on EP processing, field emission/dark current issues,

thin film systems.• Develop EP facility at ANL.• Horizontally test 10 cavities at Fermilab.• Build first US-built cryomodule and receive parts for 2nd cryomodule

(to be built in FY08).• Complete design of Type IV (ILC-style) cryomodule.• Complete vertical test facility, and second horizontal test facility, at

Fermilab (IB1).• Install cryogenic systems support for cryomodule tests in Fermilab’s

ILCTA-NML.• Upgrade and move Fermilab photoinjector to ILCTA-NML.• Purchase 10 MW klystron and another bouncer modulator for ILCTA-

NML at Fermilab

FY07 Lab requests

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Linac RF systems

• Continue development of Marx modulator, and evaluation of DTI and SNS modulators: downselect modulator choice by end of FY07.

• Purchase two 10 MW klystrons from CPI and Toshiba. Contract with CPI to develop a high-efficiency 5 MW klystron. Fabricate two sheet-beam klystron prototypes, following SLAC design (split funding in FY07 and FY08). Goal is klystron choice by end of FY08.

• Investigate cost reduction options for RF distribution system and couplers.

• Continue development of LLRF systems

FY07 Lab requests

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region FY07 Lab requests

• Electron source: develop improved photocathodes, more robust materials, laser system for polarized gun (using SLAC infrastructure), and investigate polarized RF guns.

• Positron source:– Optics and system design; study image current

heating of target in AMD field– Begin detailed design of undulators– Continue positron source simulations; construct

prototype AMD• Both: Design and build 4.3 m NC traveling wave

structure

Sources

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Damping rings• Continue detailed development of ring design and

simulations for the TDR• Pursue experimental and theoretical studies of electron

cloud effects• Begin detailed calculations of other collective effects in the

rings• Begin detailed engineering design of vacuum systems,

feedback systems• Continue and refine designs of fast damping ring kickers

and pulser systems• Conduct damping ring studies at ATF and ALS• Develop detailed plans for CESR conversion to a damping

ring test facility

FY07 Lab requests

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region FY07 Lab requests

Beam Delivery System

• Continue detailed development of optics design, collimators, etc.• Continue magnet fabrication for ATF2.• Continue experimental program at ESA.• Begin 3 year program to prototype and test QD0 (IR FF quad) at

BNL.• Begin engineering design of the FF region• Continue experimental vibration studies for FF quads.

Optics and beam dynamics for RTML and Main Linac

• Continue and expand tuning and BBA studies of LET.• Continue SC quad magnetic stability and alignment/vibration

studies.• Continue wakefield calculations for candidate structures.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Global systems

• Continue development of high availability programs in power supplies, damping ring kicker systems, diagnostic processors.

• Begin installation planning for TDR. Investigate new alignment techniques based on X-rays.

• Controls and instrumentation: continue development of ATCA hardware platform. Plan timing/rf phase demonstration.

• Diagnostics: develop laser system for laser wires, time resolved photon diagnostics; continue development of linac BPM system.

FY07 Lab requests

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region

Civil design• Begin design studies to fully develop an expression of interest for an

American site for the ILC

Americas Bid to Host

Industrialization

• Initiate procurements for the fabrication of the first of three complete RF units (cavities, cryomodules, RF system components) by industrial firms in the Americas. Cavity processing and cryomodule assembly would use existing lab infrastructure.

Preparing for the Americas Region Bid to Host

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region Conclusions

• The ILC Global Design Effort has co-ordinated the development of the ILC Baseline Configuration, is directing the production of a Reference Design Report and cost estimate this year, and is providing guidance on the overall ILC R&D program.

• In the Americas region, the Americas Regional Team is playing a major role in the development of the ILC RDR and cost estimate.

• A vigorous R&D program, in support of the GDE goals, is underway in FY06 at national labs and universities throughout the Americas region. You will hear the details of this program in subsequent talks at this review.

DOE/NSF ILC Program Review

Americas Region Conclusions

• Next year, as the project enters the TDR phase, a significant increase in resources will allow development of the TDR, expansion of the R&D program, and the start of efforts to develop the Americas region bid to host the ILC.

• The requested resources for an FY07 technically limited program exceed those expected to be available.

• Challenges remain in completion of the RDR and cost estimate this year, in cavity processing and klystron R&D, and in effective co-ordination of the regional R&D programs.