ilc-americas program overview
DESCRIPTION
ILC-Americas Program Overview. G. Dugan ILC/GDE and Cornell University. DOE/NSF ILC Program Review Apr. 4-6, 2006. Outline. Overview of ILC and GDE GDE mission and goals, ILC challenges ILC baseline configuration ILC Reference Design Report (RDR) and cost estimate. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Americas Region
ILC-Americas Program Overview
G. Dugan
ILC/GDE and Cornell University
DOE/NSF ILC Program ReviewApr. 4-6, 2006
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region Outline• Overview of ILC and GDE
– GDE mission and goals, ILC challenges– ILC baseline configuration– ILC Reference Design Report (RDR) and cost
estimate.• Organization of the Americas Regional Team
– MoU process– WBS and FY06 budgets; WBS 1.x
• FY06 Program– FY06 ILC R&D program highlights, including
university R&D program– FY06 program concerns
• Outlook for FY07 and beyond
Americas Region
International Linear Collider:
The Global Design EffortMission
• Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan, and a siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope. • Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Formation of the Global Design Effort
• Director Barry Barish Appointed in March 2005 • Appointed Regional Directors (Gerry Dugan (Americas), Fumihiko Appointed Regional Directors (Gerry Dugan (Americas), Fumihiko
Takasaki (Asia), Brian Foster (Europe))Takasaki (Asia), Brian Foster (Europe))• Three regional directors identified GDE members (with agreement
from BB)• Currently 66 members, representing approximately 25 FTE• GDE Central Team consists of
– core accelerator physics experts– 3 Conventional Facilities experts (1 per region)– 3 Costing engineers (1 per region)– 3 Communicators (1 per region)– representatives from World Wide Study
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDER & D Board
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDE RDR / R&D Organization
GDE
ILCDesignEffort
ILCR&D
Program
Americas Region
International Linear Collider
Timeline 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Global Design Effort Project
Baseline configuration
Reference Design
ILC R&D Program
Technical Design
Expression of Interest to Host
International Mgmt
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Parameters for the ILC
• Ecm adjustable from 200 – 500 GeV
• Luminosity ∫Ldt = 500 fb-1 in 4 years
• Ability to scan between 200 and 500 GeV
• Energy stability and precision below 0.1%
• Electron polarization of at least 80%
• The machine must be upgradeable to 1 TeV
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Scope of the 500 GeV machine
•Main linacs length ~ 21 km, 16,000 RF cavities (total)•RF power ~ 640 10-MW klystrons and modulators (total)•Cryoplants ~ 11 plants, cooling power 24 kW (@4K) each•Beam delivery length ~ 5 km, ~ 500 magnets (per IR)•Damping ring circumference ~ 6.6 km, ~400 magnets (each)•Beam power ~ 22 MW total•Site power ~ 200 MW total•Site footprint length ~ 47 km (for option to future upgrade to 1 TeV)•Bunch profile at IP ~ 500 x 6 nm, 300 microns long
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Accelerator physics and engineering challenges
• Developing efficient high gradient superconducting RF systems – Requires efficient RF systems, capable of accelerating
high power beams (~MW).
• Achieving nm scale high-power beam spots – Requires generating high intensity beams of electrons
and positrons– Damping the beams to ultra-low emittance in damping
rings– Transporting the beams to the collision point without
significant emittance growth or uncontrolled beam jitter– Cleanly dumping the used beams.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Affordability
challengescf
31%
structures18%rf
12%
systems_eng8%
installation&test7%
magnets6%
vacuum4%
controls4%
cryo4%
operations4%
instrumentation2%
Civil
SCRF Linac
Pie chartFrom US Tech. OptionsStudy
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC Baseline configuration Document (BCD)
– A baseline configuration for the ILC machine, with a conceptual layout, and beam parameters, was defined at end of 2005.- The baseline made forward looking choices, consistent with attaining performance goals. The choices were understood well enough to do a conceptual design and reliable costing by end of 2006. - “Alternate” configurations were established, which may have cost and or performance benefits, but which need further R&D for validation.- The baseline is under “configuration control,”with a defined process for changes to the baseline.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC Baseline Configuration
• Configuration for 500 GeV machine with expandability to 1 TeV
• Some details (locations of low energy acceleration, crossing angles) are not indicated in this cartoon.
• Tor Raubenheimer will present more details on the BCD
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC Reference Design Report (RDR) and Cost Estimate
• Based on the Baseline Configuration, a reference design and cost estimate will be carried out in 2006. Technical performance and physics performance will be evaluated for the reference design report.• This process began after the Frascati GDE meeting and will conclude late in 2006.• This is a global effort, with participants from all three regions.• Tor Raubenheimer will describe the RDR process in more detail.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas RegionFrom Baseline to a RDR
Jan July Dec2006
Freeze ConfigurationOrganize for RDR
Bangalore
Review Design/Cost Methodology
Review InitialDesign / Cost Review Final
Design / CostRDR Document
Design and Costing PreliminaryRDR
Released
Frascati Vancouver Valencia
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC Value estimate
• The ILC will be built as an international joint project, in which the three regions will contribute mainly “in kind” (specific components)
• Cost estimates must be done in the context of the in-kind contribution model. We will need to secure regional component cost estimates and evaluate these in terms of a globally defined value unit. (ILC unit)
• The complete value estimate will be translatable into a given region’s currency and cost estimating methodology.
• Peter Garbincius will describe the plans and methodology for the value estimate in more detail.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC-Americas Regional Team Leaders
ANL-Kwang-Je Kim BNL-Mike Harrison
Fermilab-Bob Kephart, Shekar Mishra, Sergei Nagaitsev
Cornell LEPP- Hasan Padamsee, Mark Palmer
LBNL -Mike Zisman, Christine Celata
Jefferson Lab -Swapan Chattopadahay, Warren Funk
LLNL -Jeff Gronberg
SLAC -Tor Raubenheimer, Nan Phinney, Tom Himel
TRIUMF -Shane Koscielniak
In the Americas region, the ILC program (the RDR effort, and supporting ILC R&D), is executed by the Americas Regional Team.
ILC Program Execution
Universities- Project Leaders
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Organization of the ILC-Americas Program• The work is broken down into a series of technically-based work
packages. • GDE and each DoE lab sign MoU’s detailing the co-operative
arrangement for the execution of work packages at each lab.• Yearly scope of work is spelled out in Addenda to the MoU, which
detail the work packages.• For university R&D work, each university project is a work package.• Labs report financial status at the work package level quarterly, and
technical status semi-annually. (Actuals not yet available for FY06 for all work packages. Some actuals will be covered in presentations)
• About 100 work packages for FY06 are organized into a WBS.• The list of work packages, and associated resources, as well as the
MOU Addenda, are posted on the ILC-Americas web site:https://wiki.lepp.cornell.edu/ilc/bin/view/Public/Americas/WebHome
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region FY06 ILC-Americas Budget : Breakdown by WBS element
DOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06M&S Total
WBS Description WP leader FTE Direct Total1 Program direction and administration 9.50 $766 $3,006 $3262 Accelerator design, including RDR 34.24 $781 $6,235 $0
2.1 Management 3.30 $100 $630 $02.2 Global systems 1.75 $0 $288 $02.3 Electron sources 1.50 $0 $247 $02.4 Positron sources 5.55 $7 $734 $02.5 Damping rings 6.05 $79 $1,053 $02.6 Ring to Main Linac 1.30 $0 $214 $02.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 5.74 $75 $988 $02.8 Main Linacs: RF systems 1.05 $0 $1732.9 Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules
2.10 Beam delivery system 5.30 $0 $871 $02.11 Conventional facilities 2.69 $519 $1,039 $0
3 Research and development 37.44 $4,921 $12,076 $2423.1 Management 0.80 $0 $132 $03.2 Global systems 2.72 $519 $871 $03.3 Electron sources 1.85 $100 $411 $03.4 Positron sources 4.77 $152 $1,255 $03.5 Damping rings 2.53 $340 $783 $03.6 Ring to Main Linac 0.00 $0 $0 $03.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 0.00 $0 $0 $03.8 6.94 $612 $1,883 $03.9 11.40 $3,061 $5,511 $242
3.10 Beam delivery system 6.42 $137 $1,231 $04 Technical Systems engineering and cost estimation in support of RDR 0.00 $590 $870 $05 Infrastructure and test facilities 18.06 $2,068 $5,216 $0
5.1 Management $05.2 Global systems $05.3 Electron sources $05.4 Positron sources $05.5 Damping rings 1.05 $90 $299 $05.6 Ring to Main Linac $05.7 Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation5.8 8.84 $839 $2,355 $05.9 5.50 $900 $1,869 $0
5.10 Beam delivery system 2.66 $239 $694 $05.11 Conventional facilities $0
6 Reserve $2,437
Total 99.23 $9,126 $29,841 $568
Main Linacs: RF systemsMain Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules
Main Linacs: RF systemsMain Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
FY06 ILC-Americas Budget:Breakdown by machine Area
DOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06MACHINE AREA M&S Total
FTE Direct TotalProgram direction and administration 9.50 $766 $3,006 $326Management 4.10 $100 $761 $0Global systems 4.47 $519 $1,158 $0Electron sources 3.35 $100 $658 $0Positron sources 10.32 $159 $1,988 $0Damping rings 9.63 $509 $2,135 $0Bunch compressor 1.30 $0 $214 $0Main Linacs: Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation 5.74 $75 $988 $0Main Linacs: RF systems 16.84 $1,451 $4,410 $0Main Linacs: Cavities and Cryomodules 16.90 $3,961 $7,380 $242Beam delivery system 14.38 $376 $2,796 $0Conventional facilities 2.69 $519 $1,039 $0Technical Systems 0.00 $590 $870 $0Reserve $2,437
99.23 $9,126 $29,841 $568
Americas Region FY06 lab budgets
FY06 ILC-Americas Budget: Breakdown by LaboratoryDOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06
Lab/Univ M&S TotalFTE Direct Total
SLAC 56.18 $2,683 $12,300 $0FNAL 30.00 $6,046 $12,600 $0ANL 3.40 $27 $300 $0Jlab 1.00 $136 $400 $0Jlab (FNAL MOU) $600 $600 $0LLNL 2.25 $180 $1,000 $0LLNL (SLAC MOU) 0.42 $50 $200 $0LBNL 2.48 $30 $500 $0BNL 3.50 $25 $600 $0Cornell (FNAL MOU) $165 $165 $0UNIV 0.00 $0 $280 $568DOE/GDE $1,860 $0
sum 99.23 $9,126 $29,841 $568
Most labs are also putting additional funds into ILC R&D. For example, Fermilab is devoting an additional ~$12 M to developing SCRF infrastructure.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC-Americas University FY05 R&D Program
• SCRF materials and surface preparation: Wisconsin ($64K), Northwestern($40K), Old Dominion ($58K)
• RF power sources: Yale ($60K), MIT($30K)• Polarized electron source: Wisconsin ($35K)• Polarized positron source: Tennessee ($40K), Princeton• Damping rings: Illinois ($17K), Cornell ($75K, $46K) [NSF]• Instrumentation, diagnostics: Berkeley ($35K), Cornell ($24K) [NSF]• Mover systems: Colorado State ($49K) [NSF]• Radiation hard electronics: UC Davis ($38K), Ohio State ($75K)• Ground motion: Northwestern ($28K)• Linac beam dynamics design-Cornell ($21K)• High-gradient SCRF R&D- Cornell ($140K) [DOE]
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
WBS 1.xProgram direction and administration
DOE FY06 DOE FY06 NSF FY06M&S
WBS Description WP leader FTE Direct Total1 Program direction and administration 9.50 $766 $3,006 $326
1.1 Program management-SLAC Raubenheimer 4.20 $405 $1,1231.2 Program management-Fermilab Kephart 5.00 $301 $1,0991.3 Program management-LBNL 0.30 $10 $631.4 ILC public relations Jackson 0.00 $50 $581.5 ILC school Chou $501.6 GDE Director travel Barish/Caltech $1401.7 GDE Common fund Barish $4731.8 Americas Regional Director Dugan/Cornell $326
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
• WBS x.2.: Global Systems (Larsen, Himel, Ross)
• WBS x.3, x.4: Sources (Sheppard)
• WBS x.5: Damping rings (Kim)
• WBS x.6: Ring to Main Linac (Tenenbaum)
• WBS x.7, x.8, x.9: Main Linacs (Mishra, Solyak, Adolphsen, Kephart)
• WBS x. 10: Beam delivery systems (Seryi)
• WBS x.11: Site development (Kuchler)
During this review, the names in bold will discuss in detail the indicated WBS areas
ILC R&D and RDR efforts for FY06
I will give an abbreviated overview of the FY06 program by WBS category in the next few slides.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region WBS x.2: Global Systems
• System availability studies (SLAC)
• Design of high availability hardware (SLAC, LLNL)– Kickers, Power supplies, diagnostics, and control
system
• General control system design (ANL, Fermilab, SLAC)
Fast (redundant)
kicker for DR
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
• Laser and cathode for polarized electron source (SLAC)
• NC structures: design and test (SLAC)
• Undulator design, E166 (SLAC, Cornell)• Positron Source simulations (ANL)
• A comprehensive start-to-end simulation of conventional, polarized, and keep-alive sources.
• Positron target design (LLNL)– Detailed engineering– Target simulations
• Energy deposition • radiation damage, activation
WBS x.3, x.4: Sources
Positron capturestructures
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
• Damping ring component optimization: wigglers, fast kickers;s of the use of CESR as an ILC positron damping ring test facility (in 2008) (Cornell)
• Damping Ring Design and Optimization (ANL)– Lattice design and optimization; particle tracking for single-
bunch instabilities with 3-D wakefield; studies of ion instability in the APS ring; design of a hybrid wiggler satisfying the field quality tolerance
• SEY studies in PEP-II (SLAC)• ATF damping ring experiments (SLAC, LBNL, Cornell)• Lattice designs for damping rings and injection/extraction lines;
characterization of some collective effects, including space-charge, IBS and microwave instability; physics design of stripline kickers for single-bunch extraction at KEK-ATF (LBNL)
WBS x.5: Damping rings
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
• RTML design (SLAC, Cornell)• Main linac optics design (SLAC, Fermilab)• Low emittance transport simulations and BBA
design (SLAC, Fermilab, Cornell)• Wakefield calculations (SLAC)• Linac beamline Instrumentation (SLAC)
WBS x.6, x.7: RTML and Main Linac Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
x 10-4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
time - s
Vol
ts
signal from ACC1, cav 1, cplr 2 TTF HOM Signal
800 monitors installed
RF BPM for linac
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
• Linac rf sources (SLAC, LLNL)Marx generator modulator
WBS x.8: Main Linac RF sources
• SLAC End Station B (RF Test Fac.)
• Develop 5 MW station in FY06, and 10 MW station later
– Test rf system components
– Reuses extensive infrastructure
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region WBS x.8: Main Linac RF sources
• Coupler Test Stand (LLNL)– Evaluation and analysis of RF
coupler designs
– Linac SC quad and BPM (SLAC)–Studies of magnetic center stability with excitation
SC Quad for magnetic
center tests
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC Cavities and test facilities
• Industrial fabrication of cavities (12 cavities in FY06) (FNAL)
• BCP and vertical testing (FNAL, Cornell)
• EP process development and vertical testing (FNAL, Jlab).
• Joint BCP/EP facility being developed at ANL (late 06)
• Horizontal test facility @ FNAL (ILCTA-MDB) (complete Fall 06)
• Vertical test facility under development @ FNAL (ILCTA-IB1) (complete 07)
• Single/large grain Crystal cavity development (FNAL,Jlab).
Bead pull RF Testing @ FNAL
Joint ANL/FNALBCP/EP Facility
WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
PPD Machine shop (MAB)
TD MP9 Cryomodule Assembly
Facility (CAF)
AD Cryo Dept.
Cryomodule assembly and test infrastructure at Fermilab
MesonDetector Building (MDB)
First 1.3 GHz TESLA Cavity
in MDBCold and RF power in Dec
ILCTA-MDB CryogenicsInstallation
60 W @ 1.8 K
WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Cryomodule Design• Industrial fabrication and cost reduction of the ILC cryomodule are
both crucial issues for a realistic ILC cost estimate • In FY05 Fermilab started on converting drawings of the
DESY/INFN design of the ILC cryomodule (Type-III+) to US standards for U.S. vendor fabrication and for cost reduction.
• IN FY06, as part of a co-ordinated global effort, design has started for an improved ILC cryomodule (Type-IV).
WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Cryomodule string test: ILCTA-NML at Fermilab
Building a dedicated ILC cryomodule string test facility in the New Muon Lab – Building is cleaned out except for removal of CCM ( in progress)– Started to install cryogenic system-complete in FY07 – Move FNPL Photo-injector to provide electron beam (FY07)– Upgraded FNPL will provide beam tests of ILC cryomodules (FY08
and 09)
New Muon Lab (NML)
FNPL Photo-Injector
WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Fabricate, process and test cavities from large-grain/single-crystal material (JLab)
• Objectives:
– Several single cell and at least one multi-cell cavity made from large grain/single crystal niobium
– Improved BCP system for producing very smooth rf surfaces on large grain/single crystal material
– Test cavity for superconducting rf joint investigations
– Optimization studies of superstructure configuration based on superconducting joint
– Two cavities suitable to be combined into a superstructure
– Engineering package for the completion of a superstructure assembly ready for cold tests
WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Re-entrant Cavity Shape47 MV/m at Cornell…Later 52 MV/m at KEK
9-cell re-entrant cavity ordered from AES
Cornell LEPP ILC SCRF activities
WBS x.8: Cavities and Cryomodules
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region WBS x.10: Beam Delivery System
–Beam delivery system design (SLAC)–ATF-2 (SLAC)
• Construction of magnets, PS, and instrumentation
-ESA MDI Test Facility (SLAC)
ATF2 Optics
ESA Energy Spectrometer
- NanoBPM for ATF2 (LLNL)
Americas Region
ILC Final Focus Magnet Development (BNL)
FY06 goals:• Continue to support the baseline design efforts
• Support the development of the Conceptual Design/Cost Estimate for the Beam Delivery System
• Fabricate and test a short proof of principle shielded final-focus-like quadrupole coil
• Fabricate and test a short proof of principle sextupole/octupole corrector-like coil
WBS x.10: Beam Delivery System
Winding tests,
octupole coil - how small
can you go ?
Shielded quadrupole
proof of principle
coil fabrication
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
ILC Civil Design for the RDR
• Design to “sample sites” from each region– Americas – near Fermilab– Japan– Europe – CERN & DESY
• Americas Site - in Illinois– location may vary from the Fermilab site west to near DeKalb
• Design efforts ongoing at Fermilab and SLAC
WBS x.11: Conventional Facilities
Americas Region
Potential TRIUMF Accelerator R&D Resources for ILC
The specific nature of Canadian involvement is under development. Some potential collaboration areas have been identified, along with relevant LHC experience:
The design of kicker magnets and the construction of associated pulse-forming networks and fast switches using power semiconductors
Precision room temperature magnet systems e.g. 52 twin-aperture quadrupoles built at Alstom Canada
Beam instrumentation and readout systemse.g. 2000 matched-pair 70MHz low pass filterse.g. VME64x compliant Digital Aquisition Board (DAB)
Contributions to beam dynamics & lattice calculations for damping rings.
TRIUMF
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Building on expertise developed for TRIUMF ISAC radioactive beams accelerator, additional possible areas are:
Remote handling design/consulting of target stations possible applicability to conventional positron source
Peripheral aspects of superconducting r.f., such as cryogenic coolant distribution system, design/consulting, small quantity e-beam welding of niobium
UBC -Tom Mattison Vibration control systems and alignment of components for final focus system; also interest in abort kickers
TRIUMF
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region FY06 program concerns
• Do we have sufficient resources available to complete the RDR and cost estimate? Some funds have been held in reserve to pay for additional help, but also we will need to divert some effort from R&D program.
• Key R&D concerns:– Development of reliable high-yield processes for the
production of high-gradient ILC cavities remains a critical item. Cavity fabrication and studies of processing are high priority parts of the program.
– Thales klystron problems emphasize need to put more effort into klystron development. Difficult to do this before FY07.
• Additional efforts are needed to co-ordinate Americas R&D program and to plan for the future, both within the region, and with programs in other regions.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
FY07 outlook• PB doubles ILC program budget to $60M (This
includes ILC detector R&D at labs and universities)• However, the requested (“technically limited”) program
exceeds the available funding. A process of prioritization will be required.
• This process should look to GDE for guidance on priorities. Advice will be sought from GDE R&D Board for general ILC R&D efforts, and from Linear Collider Steering Group for the Americas (LCSGA) for region-specific Americas bid-to-host related activities.
• First steps: document FY07 lab program requests (April 26); Regional team meeting to discuss FY07 requests and future plans (May 3-4, SLAC)
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
FY07 ILC program request: details
• TDR engineering efforts (~50 FTE)
• Cavity and cryomodule work
• RF system development
• Sources, Damping rings, beam delivery
• Global systems
• Americas region bid to host
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Cavities, cryomodules and test infrastructure• Fabricate (in industry) and process (at labs) 12 more ILC high-gradient
cavities.• Continue R&D on large-grain and high-gradient cavities.• Continue R&D on EP processing, field emission/dark current issues,
thin film systems.• Develop EP facility at ANL.• Horizontally test 10 cavities at Fermilab.• Build first US-built cryomodule and receive parts for 2nd cryomodule
(to be built in FY08).• Complete design of Type IV (ILC-style) cryomodule.• Complete vertical test facility, and second horizontal test facility, at
Fermilab (IB1).• Install cryogenic systems support for cryomodule tests in Fermilab’s
ILCTA-NML.• Upgrade and move Fermilab photoinjector to ILCTA-NML.• Purchase 10 MW klystron and another bouncer modulator for ILCTA-
NML at Fermilab
FY07 Lab requests
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Linac RF systems
• Continue development of Marx modulator, and evaluation of DTI and SNS modulators: downselect modulator choice by end of FY07.
• Purchase two 10 MW klystrons from CPI and Toshiba. Contract with CPI to develop a high-efficiency 5 MW klystron. Fabricate two sheet-beam klystron prototypes, following SLAC design (split funding in FY07 and FY08). Goal is klystron choice by end of FY08.
• Investigate cost reduction options for RF distribution system and couplers.
• Continue development of LLRF systems
FY07 Lab requests
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region FY07 Lab requests
• Electron source: develop improved photocathodes, more robust materials, laser system for polarized gun (using SLAC infrastructure), and investigate polarized RF guns.
• Positron source:– Optics and system design; study image current
heating of target in AMD field– Begin detailed design of undulators– Continue positron source simulations; construct
prototype AMD• Both: Design and build 4.3 m NC traveling wave
structure
Sources
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Damping rings• Continue detailed development of ring design and
simulations for the TDR• Pursue experimental and theoretical studies of electron
cloud effects• Begin detailed calculations of other collective effects in the
rings• Begin detailed engineering design of vacuum systems,
feedback systems• Continue and refine designs of fast damping ring kickers
and pulser systems• Conduct damping ring studies at ATF and ALS• Develop detailed plans for CESR conversion to a damping
ring test facility
FY07 Lab requests
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region FY07 Lab requests
Beam Delivery System
• Continue detailed development of optics design, collimators, etc.• Continue magnet fabrication for ATF2.• Continue experimental program at ESA.• Begin 3 year program to prototype and test QD0 (IR FF quad) at
BNL.• Begin engineering design of the FF region• Continue experimental vibration studies for FF quads.
Optics and beam dynamics for RTML and Main Linac
• Continue and expand tuning and BBA studies of LET.• Continue SC quad magnetic stability and alignment/vibration
studies.• Continue wakefield calculations for candidate structures.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Global systems
• Continue development of high availability programs in power supplies, damping ring kicker systems, diagnostic processors.
• Begin installation planning for TDR. Investigate new alignment techniques based on X-rays.
• Controls and instrumentation: continue development of ATCA hardware platform. Plan timing/rf phase demonstration.
• Diagnostics: develop laser system for laser wires, time resolved photon diagnostics; continue development of linac BPM system.
FY07 Lab requests
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region
Civil design• Begin design studies to fully develop an expression of interest for an
American site for the ILC
Americas Bid to Host
Industrialization
• Initiate procurements for the fabrication of the first of three complete RF units (cavities, cryomodules, RF system components) by industrial firms in the Americas. Cavity processing and cryomodule assembly would use existing lab infrastructure.
Preparing for the Americas Region Bid to Host
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region Conclusions
• The ILC Global Design Effort has co-ordinated the development of the ILC Baseline Configuration, is directing the production of a Reference Design Report and cost estimate this year, and is providing guidance on the overall ILC R&D program.
• In the Americas region, the Americas Regional Team is playing a major role in the development of the ILC RDR and cost estimate.
• A vigorous R&D program, in support of the GDE goals, is underway in FY06 at national labs and universities throughout the Americas region. You will hear the details of this program in subsequent talks at this review.
DOE/NSF ILC Program Review
Americas Region Conclusions
• Next year, as the project enters the TDR phase, a significant increase in resources will allow development of the TDR, expansion of the R&D program, and the start of efforts to develop the Americas region bid to host the ILC.
• The requested resources for an FY07 technically limited program exceed those expected to be available.
• Challenges remain in completion of the RDR and cost estimate this year, in cavity processing and klystron R&D, and in effective co-ordination of the regional R&D programs.