il piano di lavoro nmbp 2017 - polito.it · ain/h2020-wp1617-intro_en.pdf. a deeper and fairer...

Politecnico di Torino10 Giugno 2016

IL PIANO DI LAVORO NMBP 2017

Nanotecnologie, materiali avanzati, biotecnologie, manifatturiero e processi

avanzati Serena Borgna

National Contact Point Bioeconomy – NMBP - ERC

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Agenda

• Overview policies and key elements of interest for NMBP area

• Statistics about last call NMBP – 2014/2015

• Work programme 2017 – list of topics

• Eligibility criteria and type of actions

2

Europa2020

InnovationUnion

Horizon 2020

3

NMBP

JUNCKER Presidency

priorities

CONTESTO POLITICO/1

4

Five of the JUNCKER PRESIDENT'S PRIORITIES: To boost jobs, growth and investment;

To realise a connected digital single market;

To implement a resilient Energy Union with a forward looking climate change policy;

To develop a deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened industrial base;

To make Europe a stronger global actor

Strategic priorities of COMMISSIONER MOEDAS:

Open innovation, Open science, Open to the world

CONTESTO POLITICO/2

5

Sustainable jobs and growth: Boost jobs, growth and investment Deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened industrial base

Re-industrialisation of EU: towards a strong industrial base

Digital Single Market: Factories of the Future, '4th industrial revolution' – link to Digital Single Market

EU Energy Union: Energy-efficient Buildings, Materials for Energy, etc.

Circular economy: boosting growth and renewing industrial capacities in a world of finite resources

H2020 WP 2016-17 Introduction

6

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-intro_en.pdf


A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market witha Strengthened Industrial Base*

• The internal market is one of Europe’s best assets in times of increasing globalisation and provides a strong basis for our companies and industry to thrive in the global economy. To reach its full potential, European industry needs to combine advanced manufacturing with sustainability and the solutions developed for societal challenges. This Work Programme will contribute to maintaining and reinforcing a strong and high-performing European industrial base and primary sector. The research and innovation activities will help maintain our global leadership in strategic sectors with high-value jobs by stimulating investment in new technologies, processes and business models, easing access to finance and up-scaling investment in the development of innovative skills.

7


1. The Industry 2020 in the Circular Economy call will contribute to boosting and renewing Europe's industrial capacities and the real economy, while ensuring economic, environmental and social sustainability, in the context of the circular economy, and providing the basis to the transition towards a smart, dynamic, competitive, resource-efficient and low-carbon European industrial economy. While the engagement of industry is essential, full societal success will depend upon a systemic approach, including new production, consumption and behaviour patterns, with strong multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary involvement and engagement of civil society.

8


2. Promoting healthy ageing and personalised healthcare

3. Blue Growth

4. Sustainable Food Security

5. Mobility for Growth

+Key enabling technologies (KETs) supporting the development of new goods, industrial processes and services as well as product-service systems, and including cross-cutting KET actions, with the potential to create unforeseen advances and new markets, will also help strengthen Europe industrial base.

9

H2020 WP 2016-17 Strategic orientation in NMBP

10

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit_en.pdf


STRATEGIC ORIENTATION

A great number of activities aim to develop innovative technologies bringing them closer to the markets, including a progress towards higher Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs).

This will help the manufacturing sectors to adapt to global competitive pressure by improving their technological base. As proposed in the European KET Strategy, the KET parts of this work programme use TRLs where relevant.

This Work Programme addresses TRLs from 3-4 up to 7, with an overall centre of gravity in the range from 5-6, with the highest level reserved for cases where there is strong industrial commitment.

11

STRATEGIC ORIENTATION/2Aspects to be considered by proposals:

Well-targeted value chains enable to capture value to Europe –this aspect should be reflected in the quality of the consortium and the work plan to ensure optimal structure to maximise impact.

Adequate balance of industrial and research partners for the delivery of the expected outcome beyond the end of the project.

In order to facilitate up-scaling, aspects such as demonstration, transfer and piloting should be included as a part of the R&D&I actions. Where standardisation needs are identified, they should be followed up.

The integration of business development, time to market, and market understanding, together with the understanding and exploitation of customized and personalized products and services in the business-to-business context is necessary to meet innovation needs in the range TRL 5-7.

12

STRATEGIC ORIENTATION/3 Proof-of-concept prototypes, demonstration, assessments,

platform-building activities, and pilots help to overcome the acceptance barrier, increase trust and convince potential users, express additional value benefits for diversified communities, provide seeds for new projects of the proposers also in other parts of Horizon 2020, and develop mechanisms for facilitating value creation in the real economy.

Non-technical and regulatory issues regarding health, safety and the environment should accompany the development of industrial applications, especially in fields such as nanotechnologies, where potential risks and public concerns have been identified.

Including social sciences and humanities (SSH) expertise in the approach can provide a constructive and critical accompaniment of the scientific and technological developments in funded projects 13

CROSS-CUTTING KETSCross-cutting KETs bring together and integrate different KETs and reflect the interdisciplinary nature of technological development. They have the potential to lead to unforeseen advances and new markets, and are important contributions to new technological components or products. The integration of different KETs represents a vital activity in Horizon 2020. Over the course of Horizon 2020, around 30% of the budget allocated to KETs will go to integrated KETs projects. Cross-cutting KETs activities will in general include activities closer to market and applications ( ex. pilot lines and demonstrator). Manufacturability will often be a key issue on the innovation path towards the market, and pilot activities will normally combine at least two different KETs and integrated advanced manufacturing technologies/processes, in a way that value is created beyond the mere addition of the individual technologies for a component or product. 14

Europa2020

InnovationUnion

Horizon 2020

15

NMBP

Key Enabling Technologies – KEThttp://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/key-enabling-technologies/european-strategy/high-level-group/index_en.htm

EU Industrial Policyhttp://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/eu/index_en.htm

LEIT introductionhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit_en.pdf

Recommendationhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/policy/commission-recommendation-on-the-definition-of-nanomater-18102011_en.pdf

Regulatory Aspectshttp://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/policy_en.html

European Technologies Platformshttp://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=etp#etps

ERANEThttp://netwatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/key-enabling-technologies/european-strategy/high-level-group/index_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/eu/index_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/policy/commission-recommendation-on-the-definition-of-nanomater-18102011_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/policy_en.html

http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=etp#etps

http://netwatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

Joint Research Center (JRC)

Excellent Science

European Research Council

Frontier research by the best individual teams

Future and Emerging Technologies

Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation

Marie Skłodowska Curie actions

Opportunities for training and career development

Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)

Ensuring access to world-class facilities

Societal Challenges

Health, demographic change and wellbeing

Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy

Secure, clean and efficient energy

Smart, green and integrated transport

Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials

Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies

Security society

European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)

Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation

Science with and for society

16

Industrial Leadership

Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies

ICT, nanotechnologies,

materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space

Access to risk finance

Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation

Innovation in SMEs

Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs

LEIT – NMBPNanotechnologies, Advanced Materials,

Biotechnology and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing

H2020 structure

Excellent Science











ICT, nanotechnologies, materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space



Innovation in SMEs


Societal Challenges







Security society




Joint Research Center (JRC)17

H2020 structure

SME INSTRUMENTFAST TRACK TO INNOVATION

Excellent Science














Innovation in SMEs


Societal Challenges







Security society





BOTTOM UP

TOP -DOWN

BOTTOM UP

(SME)

TOP -DOWN

BOTTOM UP

(SME)TOP -DOWN

H2020 structure

Excellent Science














Innovation in SMEs


Societal Challenges







Security society





H2020 structure

SME INSTRUMENT FAST TRACK TO

INNOVATION

COLLABORATIVE PROJECT (RIA –IA –CSA- …)


Excellent Science









Societal Challenges







Security society




20



ICT,

NANOTECHNOLOGIES,

MATERIALS, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, space



Innovation in SMEs

Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEsLEIT – NMBP

Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced

Manufacturing and Processing

H2020 structure

Industrial Leadership (LEIT NMBP)

Rationale: Gli investimenti strategici nelle tecnologie-chiave (es.

tecnologie industriali avanzate, microelettronica) rafforzano l’innovazione nei settori già maturi e in quelli emergenti

L’Europa ha bisogno di attrarre ulteriori investimenti privati in ricerca e innovazione

L’Europa necessita di un numero maggiore di PMI innovative capaci di stimolare la crescita e creare posti di lavoro

21

Policy developments, to create favourable conditions

• Stimulate demand-side actions

• Better collaboration between the public/private sectors to stimulate investments (e.g. links between Horizon 2020 and European Fund for Strategic Investments – EFSI)

• Financing (e.g. new approaches for SMEs, risk-sharing, risk-financing)

• Better regulation

• Standardisation

• New skills / training / education

• Promoting entrepreneurship (e.g. KIC on Added Value Manufacturing)

• Knowledge and risk management for products and industries

• Public procurement

• Programme evaluation of FP7 / Mid-term review of Horizon 2020

23

LEIT – NMBP part of Horizon 2020

• Guiding principles:• Partnership with industry, to stimulate private investment• Targeting value chains• Demonstration and piloting

• Support for 4 of the 6 Key Enabling Technologies (KETs)• Nanotechnologies• Advanced Materials• Biotechnology• Advanced Manufacturing / Processing Technology Readiness Levels: Bridging TRLs from 3 to 6-7, with

emphasis on expected impact (business cases)

• Focus on EU Manufacturingin the context of '4th industrial revolution'

• Enhanced synergies with Societal Challenges / FETs

23

DEFINITIONKey Enabling Technologies

Knowledge-intensive technologies associatedwith high R&D intensity, rapid and integratedinnovation cycles, high capital expenditure andhighly-skilled employment

Enable process, goods and service innovationthroughout the economy and are of systemicrelevance

Multidisciplinary, cutting across many technologyareas with a trend towards convergence andintegration“

*Current situation of key enabling technologies in Europe, SEC (2009)

Photonics

Manufacturing

Nanotechnologies

Biotechnology

Micro/Nanoelectronics

Advanced Materials

24

A large part of Industrial Leadership (~6Bio€) is about mastery and deployment of Key Enabling Technologies (KETs)

What are KETs?

• Six strategic technologies

• Driving competitiveness and growth

• Contributing to solving societal challenges

• Knowledge- and Capital- intensive

• Cut across many sectors

European KET Strategy

• EC Communications (2009)512 & (2012)341

• KET High-level Group

– final report 'KETs: Time to Act', June 2015

• Nanotechnologies• Advanced Materials• Micro- and nano-

electronics• Photonics• Biotechnology• Advanced


Societal

Challenge

Example - combining several KETs for advanced

productsAdvanced materials

Photonics

Microelectronics

Nanotechnologies

Biotechnologies

New nanotechnology-

based diagnostics

New target drug

delivery and release

Regenerative medecine

27

TRL 1 – basic principles observedTRL 2 – technology concept formulatedTRL 3 – experimental proof of conceptTRL 4 – technology validated in labTRL 5 – technology validated in relevant environment (industrial environment inthe case of key enabling technologies)TRL 6 – technology demonstrated in relevant environment (industrial environmentin the case of key enabling technologies)TRL 7 – system prototype demonstration in operational environmentTRL 8 – system complete and qualifiedTRL 9 – actual system proven in operational environment (competitivemanufacturing in the case of key enabling technologies; or in space)

STATISTICS:NMBP WP 2014-15

28

WP 2014-15 thanks to Prof. Donata MedagliniItalian rappresentative LEIT NMBP programme committeee

29

Budget/ Calls 2014-2015

Budget 2014-2015 : 992,2 € million

Budget NMBP Calls

Budget 2016-2017 : 966,9 € million

No.

Partecipanti

italiani in

proposte

presentate

No. Partecipanti

italiani

finanziati

Tasso di

successo

partecipanti

Italiani

813 122 15%

No. Proposte

presentate a

coordinament

o italiano

No.

Coordinamenti

italiani

finanziati

Tasso di

successo

coordinatori

Italiani

76 11 14,5%

Partecipazione

Coordinamento

Contributo finanziario

per l’Italia

48.03 M €(~10% del budget totale)

~ 13% Progetti finanziati sono a Coordinamento Italiano

No. proposte

presentate

No. Proposte

finanziate

Tasso medio

di successo

603 96 16% (tasso medio di successo

del programma NMBP: 8%)

Calls NMBP 2014: RESULTS

No.

Partecipanti

italiani in

proposte

presentate

No. Partecipanti

italiani

finanziati

Tasso di

successo

partecipanti

Italiani

1045 107 10.2%

No. Proposte

presentate a

coordinament

o italiano

No.

Coordinamenti

italiani

finanziati

Tasso di

successo

coordinatori

Italiani

106 7 6.5%

Partecipation

Coordination

Contributo finanziario

per l’Italia

45.7 M €(~10.7% del budget

totale )

Calls NMBP 2015: RESULTS

NMBP WORK PROGRAMME 2014-2015

PPPs in NMBP 2014-2015

FoF SPIREEeB

% of EU funding to ITALY

topics 2014 topics 2015

FoF 7 19 % 7 16.9%

SPIRE 4 3% 4 9.6%

EeB 4 10,0% 4 10%

EU funding for cPPPs in H2020 per country

PPPs in NMBP 2014-2015

Results NMP 2014 – 2015 (2 stage)

2119

13 12

97 7 6

0

5

10

15

20

25

Participation in retained proposals

2014

2015

Year Topics IT Participants

success rate*

IT Coordinators

success rate*% EU funding

2014 8 29% 57% 14.3%

2015 10 24% 21% 10.3%

2015

* Success rate = selezionate / presentate

LEIT-BIO IN NMBP 2014 - 2015

38

Retained: 2

Funding: 15.1 M€Pass: 6

Funding: 38.8 M€

STAGE 2

Received: 12

Eligible: 12

Funding: 85.3 M€

Success rate ~17%

STAGE 1

Received: 52

Eligible: 51

GO: 12

Reserve: 1

Funding: 6 M€

Retained: 3

Funding: 22.5 M€Pass: 6

Funding: 49.7 M€

STAGE 2

Received: 14

Eligible: 14

Funding: 108.1 M€

Success rate ~21%STAGE 1

Received: 45

Eligible: 43

GO: 14

Reserve: 2

Funding: 17.8 M€

BIOTEC 1-2014: Synthetic biology

BIOTEC 3 – 2014 Widening industrial application of enzymatic processesBIOTEC 4 - 2014 Downstream processes unlocking biotechnological transformations

EU Funding to Italy: ~3% of EU funding

LEIT-BIO IN NMBP 2014: results (2 stage)

39

8.4

02

.31

3 €

4.3

51

.28

0 €

2.4

89

.86

0 €

2.3

77

.55

1 €

1.8

74

.81

6 €

1.7

77

.09

9 €

1.2

09

.37

5 €

1.0

96

.78

1 €

86

1.4

13

€

53

6.8

75

€

0 €

DE ES DK NO UK FR NL PT SE SI CH

2 topics

Eligible proposals: 22

Call budget 28.840.000 €

Requested EC funding

177.912.669 €

Average size 8.045.866 €

3 retained for funding

proposals

24,977,363 € EC Funding

Success rate: 14.2 %

IT participants in submitted proposals: 6Funding to Italy: 0 %

LEIT-BIO IN NMBP 2015: results (2 stage)

BIOTEC-2 : New bioinformatic approaches in service to biotechnologies

BIOTEC 5: Metagenomics as innovation driver

1° stage NMBP 2016

Topic Code

Number of Proposals Italian Coordination

EvaluatedRetained for

FundingSuccess Rate Reserve List Number Acronym

NMBP-01-2016

Novel hybrid materials for heterogeneous

catalysis

25 9 36,0% 0 2

MULTI2HYCAT

BUSYCAT

NMBP-02-2016

Advanced Materials for Power Electronics based on

wide bandgap semiconductor devices technology

17 6 35,3% 0 2InRel-NPower

CHALLENGE

NMBP-03-2016

Innovative and sustainable materials solutions for the

substitution of critical raw materials in the electric power

system

37 12 32,4% 0 1 IMMENSA

NMBP-09-2016

Biomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of

demyelination disorders of the Central Nervous

System

17 8 47,1% 0 2

NANO T-FACTORY

PIEZOTREND

NMBP-10-2016

Nanoformulation of biologicals60 8 13,3% 0 1 CUPIDO

NMBP-17-2016

Advanced materials solutions and architectures for

high efficiency solar energy harvesting42 13 31,0% 0 1 NEXTOWER

NMBP-18-2016

Advanced materials enabling the integration of

storage technologies in the electricity grid 4 3 75,0% 0 0 0

NMBP-23-2016

Advancing the integration of Materials Modelling in

Business Processes to enhance effective industrial

decision making and increase competitiveness

9 4 44,4% 0 1 MatMod4Biz

NMBP-26-2016

Analytical techniques and tools in support of

nanomaterial risk assessment

16 5 31,3% 0 1 IDnano

IT Coordinators: 11/68 1° stage score ≥ 8,0

41

5 topics (RIA)

114 eligible proposals

Call budget 78.8 M€

Requested EC funding 563.9 M€

Average size 5.4 M€

36 invited to 2nd stage (35%)

Requesting 205.3 M€

Overall threshold = 8

NMBP topics (materials/modelling/risk assessment)

Overview

42


Invited to 2nd stage proposals

26%

21%28%

8%

17%

NMBP-01-20169 projects





2 IT Coordination1 IT Coordination

NMBP-01-2016: Novel hybrid materials for heterogeneous catalysis

NMBP-02-2016: Advanced Materials for Power Electronics based on wide bandgap semiconductor devices technology

NMBP-03-2016: Innovative and sustainable materials solutions for the substitution of critical raw materials in the electric power system

NMBP-23-2016: Advancing the integration of Materials Modelling in Business Processes to enhance effective industrial decision making

and increase competitiveness

NMBP-26-2016: Analytical techniques and tools in support of nanomaterial risk assessment

2 IT Coordination

1 IT Coordination

1 IT Coordination

7/36 (19,4%) IT Coordination

43


Invited to 2nd stage proposals - Country

14

24

0 0

6

64

10

0

8

48

6

38

02

12

41

03

0 0

14

02

0

14

41

47

35

1

17

1

17

1 2 35

AT…

BE

BG CY

CZ

DE

DK EE EL ES FI FR HR

HU IE IT LT LU LV MT

NL

PL

PT

RO SE SI SK UK IL

…

NO CA

…

CH

CN JP KR

MX

RU US

Number of participants

44

NMBP topics (healthcare)

Overview

2 topics (RIA)


Call budget 32 M€




requesting 97.7 M€


45



53%47%



1 IT Coordination

2 IT Coordination

3/16 (19%) IT Coordination

NMBP-09-2016: Biomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of demyelination disorders of the Central Nervous

System

NMBP-10-2016: Nanoformulation of biologicals

46



2

11

0 0

4

27

20

2

21

1

14

02

8

19

01

0 0

8

10 0

21

0

30

32

02

AT…

BE

BG CY

CZ

DE



NL

PL

PT

RO SE SI SK UK IL

…N

O TR CH

…


47

NMBP topics (energy)

Overview

2 topics (IA)


Call budget 32 M€




Requesting 78.3 M€


48



75%

25%

NMBP-17-2016

13

NMBP-18-2016

3

1 IT Coordination

NMBP 17-2016Advanced materials solutions and architectures for

high efficiency solar energy harvesting IA

4,target 6

1st Stage:

8/12/15

2nd

Stage:24/5/16NMBP 18-2016Advanced materials enabling the integration of

storage technologies in the electricity grid IA

5,target 6

1/6 (17%) IT Coordination

49



0

11

0 01

16

5

0 0

28

4

19

0 01

15

10 0 0

10

1

4

0

6

12

10

1

42 2

13

AT…

BE

BG CY

CZ

DE



NL

PL

PT

RO SE SI SK UK IL

…N

O TR CA

…C

H


50

BIOTEC-02-2016 (2 stages) Bioconversion of non-agricultural waste into biomolecules for

industrial applications

BIOTEC-03-2016 (2 stages) Microbial chassis platforms with optimized metabolic pathways

for industrial innovations through systems biology

2 topics (RIA)


Call budget 32 M€

Requested EC funding 480 M€



Requesting 102 M€

Overall threshold = 8,5

Two stage:

1° STAGE 8/12/2015

2° STAGE 24/5/2016

BIOTEC topics

1° stage BIOTEC 2016

(preliminary results)

IT Coordinators: 3/17

IT Participants: 25/209 - circa 12% 1° stage score ≥ 8,5

Topic Code


Evaluated %Retained for

Funding%

Success

RateReserve List Number Acronym

BIOTEC-02-2016

Bioconversion of non-

agricultural waste into

biomolecules for

industrial applications

47 61,8% 10 58,8% 21,3% 0 3

COFFEE BREAK

BioLC-Tech

MADELINE

BIOTEC-03-2016

Microbial chassis

platforms with optimized

metabolic pathways for

industrial innovations

through systems biology

29 38,2% 7 41,2% 24,1% 0 0 0

52

BIOTEC topicsInvited to 2nd stage proposals

58%

42%

BIOTEC-02-201610 projects

BIOTEC-03-20167 projects

3 Coordinanti IT

53

6

25

0 0

5

27

8

0

7

20

4

10

0 02

25

1 10 0

11

0

15

2

6

20

15

13

2

7

31

AT

BE

BG CY

CZ

DE



NL

PL

PT

RO SE SI SK UK IL

NO TR CH IS US

1 3 4


BIOTEC-02-2016

BIOTEC-03-2016Invited to 2nd stage proposals

54

PILOTS-01-2016 Pilot lines for manufacturing of materials with customized

thermal/electrical conductivity properties

PILOTS-02-2016 Pilot lines manufacturing of nanostructured antimicrobial

surfaces using advanced nanosurface functionalization technologies

Overview

2 topics (IA)


Overall thresholds: 96 M€ (=8.5/10)

GO proposals: 15 (101.3 M€)

Overall threshold = 8,5

Available budget: 32 M€

59 received proposals requesting 387 M€

Average size: 6.6 M€

PILOTS topicsInvited to 2nd stage proposals

1° stage PILOT 2016

(preliminary results)

Topic Code


Evaluated %Retained for

Funding%

Success

Rate

Reserve

ListNumber Acronym

PILOTS-01-2016 27 45,8% 8 53,3% 29,6% 0 0 0

PILOTS-02-2016 32 54,2% 7 46,7% 21,9% 0 721005 PILATEX

TOTAL 59 100,0% 15 100,0% 25,4% 0 1 1

HORIZON 2020 – WORK PROGRAMME 2016-2017 - General Annexes – ANNEX H

For the evaluation of first-stage proposals under a two-stage submission procedure, only the criteria

‘excellence’ and ‘impact’ will be evaluated. Within these criteria, only the aspects in bold will be considered.

The threshold for both individual criteria will be 4. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the two

individual scores, will be set at the level such that the total requested budget of proposals admitted to

stage 2 is as close as possible to three times the available budget. The actual level will therefore

depend on the volume of proposals received. The threshold is expected to normally be set at 8 or 8.5.

IT Coordinators: 1/ 15

Final score: 8,5 – 9,5

56


53%47%

PILOTS-01-20168 projects

PILOTS-02-20167 projects

1 IT Coordinantor

57


65

0 0

3

21

11

0 0

27

7

20

0 0

3

15

0 0 0 0

10

3

5

0

5

10

25

9

3

6

1

AT…

BE

BG CY

CZ

DE



NL

PL

PT

RO SE SI SK UK IL

…

NO CH

…

RU


Foresight and stakeholder consultation

(Advisory Groups)

Consultation Member States

Strategic Priorities

Development and adoption of work

programme

01-06/2016 04-09/2016 10/2016 11/2016…

TOWARDS THE NMBP WP 2018-2020


Excellent Science









Societal Challenges







Security society




59



ICT,

NANOTECHNOLOGIES,

MATERIALS, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING, space



Innovation in SMEs

Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEsLEIT – NMBP

Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced


H2020 structure

WORK PROGRAMME NMPB - Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing

Calls

2016/2017

60

NANOTECHNOLOGIES,

ADVANCED MATERIALS

AND PRODUCTION

PILOTS

BIOTECHNO-LOGIES

FACTORIESOF THE FUTURE

SPIREENERGY-EFFICIENT

BUILDINGS

http://ec.europa.eu/research

/participants/data/ref/h2020/

wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-

wp1617-leit-nmp_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research

/participants/data/ref/h2020/

wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-

wp1617-focus_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit-nmp_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-focus_en.pdf

WP NMBP 2016-17

61

• Final version soon available (2017): http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/funding/reference_docs.html#h2020-work-programmes-2016-17

• LEIT-NMBP part, including EeB call and main NMBP call (+ BIO)

• Cross-Cutting part , including PILOTS, Factories of the Future (FoF), and Sustainable Process Industries (SPIRE)

(Focus Area 'Industry 2020 in the Circular Economy')

• Publication: July 2016

• Deadlines:

• NMBP two-stage: 27 Oct 2016/ 04 May 2017

• PILOTS (two-stage): 27 Oct 2016/ 04 May 2017

• EeB, FoF, SPIRE: 19 Jan 2017

• NMBP CSAs, ERA-NETs, NMBP-08: 19 Jan 2017

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/funding/reference_docs.html#h2020-work-programmes-2016-17

WP NMBP 2017

62

• Budgets:

• NMBP: 254,39M€ (incl. BIOTEC, CSAs, ERA-NETs)

• EeB: 54M€

• PILOTS: 48M€

• FoF: 85M€ (+ 33 M€ for ICT topics)

• SPIRE: 80M€

• Types of action

• RIA: Research and innovation actions (100% funding)

• IA: Innovation actions (70% funding for profit-making partners)

• CSA: Coordination and support actions

• ERA-NET Co-fund: to support public-public partnerships

50

0 M

€

WP approach

63

• A strong challenge-based approach, allowing applicants to have considerable freedom to come up with innovative solutions

• Simplified list of possible types of action (e.g. research and innovation at 100%; innovation actions at 70%,…)

• Strong emphasis on expected impact, less prescription

• Cross-cutting issues mainstreamed (e.g. social sciences, gender, international co-operation…)

• Work programmes with 2-year duration

IMPACT in NMBP WP

64

• Impact for most topics is to be demonstrated by Business cases and exploitation strategies for industrialisation(outlined in LEIT Introduction)

• Should be realistic and credible

• Exploitation strategies are to be developed further during projects

• In NMBP calls, the impact criterion is always the first criterion used to resolve proposals with equal overall scores

• For IAs, the impact criterion is weighed by 1.5

65

NANOTECHNOLOGIES, ADVANCED MATERIALS, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTIONhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit-nmp_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-leit-nmp_en.pdf

ENERGY-EFFICIENT BUILDINGS

Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline

2016

EEB-01-2016 Highly efficient insulation materials with improved properties IA 5-7

21/1/16

EEB-02-2016Performance indicators and monitoring techniques for energy-efficiency and environmental quality at building and district level

CSA

EEB-03-2016Integration of advanced technologies for heating and cooling at building and district level

IA 5-7

EEB-04-2016New technologies and strategies for the development of pre-fabricated elements through the reuse and recycling of construction materials and structures

RIA 4-6

2017

EEB-05-2017Development of near zero energy building renovation

IA 5-7

19/1/17

EEB-06-2017

Highly efficient hybrid storage solutions for power and heat in residential buildings and district areas, balancing the supply and demand conditions

RIA 4-6

EEB-07-2017Integration of energy harvesting at building and district level

IA 5-7

EEB-08-2017New business models for energy-efficient buildings through adaptable refurbishment solutions

CSA

ADVANCED MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES FOR HIGH ADDED VALUE PRODUCTS AND PROCESS INDUSTRIES


2016

NMBP 01-2016 Novel hybrid materials for heterogeneous catalysis RIA 3-5

1st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage: 24/5/16

NMBP 02-2016Advanced Materials for Power Electronics based on wide bandgap semiconductor devices technology

RIA 4-6

NMBP 03-2016Innovative and sustainable materials solutions for the substitution of critical raw materials in the electric power system

RIA 3-5

2017

NMBP 04-2017

Architectured /Advanced material concepts for intelligent bulk material structures

RIA 4-6

1st Stage: 27/10/162nd Stage:

4/5/17

NMBP 05-2017

Advanced materials and innovative design for improved functionality and aesthetics in high added value consumer goods

IA4-6,

target 7

NMBP 06-2017

Improved material durability in buildings and infrastructures, including offshore

RIA 4-6

NMBP 07-2017

Systems of materials characterisation for model, product and process optimisation

RIA 4-6

ADVANCED MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES FOR HEALTHCARE


2016

NMBP 09-2016Biomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of demyelination disorders of the Central Nervous System

RIA3, target

51st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16

NMBP 10-2016 Nanoformulation of biologicals RIA 3/4-5/6

NMBP 11-2016 ERA-NET on NanomedicineERA-NET cofund

21/1/16

2017

NMBP 12-2017

Development of a reliable methodology for better risk management of engineered biomaterials in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and/or Medical Devices

RIA4,

target 6

1st Stage: 27/10/16

2nd Stage: 4/5/17

NMBP 13-2017

Cross-cutting KETs for diagnostics at the point-of-care

RIA3/4-5/6

19/1/17

NMBP 14-2017

Regulatory Science Framework for assessment of risk benefit ratio of Nanomedicines and Biomaterials

IA 5-61st Stage: 27/10/16

2nd Stage: 4/5/17

NMBP 15-2017

Nanotechnologies for imaging cellular transplants and regenerative processes in vivo

RIA3/4-5/6

1st Stage: 27/10/16

2nd Stage: 4/5/17

NMBP 16-2017

Mobilising the European nano-biomedical ecosystem

CSA 19/1/17


2016 NMBP-08-2016Affordable weight reduction of high-volume vehicles and components taking into account the entire life-cycle

RIA 4-6 21/1/16

GREEN VEHICLES

ADVANCED MATERIALS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY APPLICATIONS


2016NMBP 17-2016

Advanced materials solutions and architectures for high efficiency solar energy harvesting

IA4,

target 6 1st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16

NMBP 18-2016Advanced materials enabling the integration of storage technologies in the electricity grid

IA5,

target 6

2017

NMBP 19-2017

Cost-effective materials for “power-to-chemical” technologies

IA3,

target 5

1st Stage: 27/10/16

2nd Stage: 4/5/17

NMBP 20-2017

High-performance materials for optimizing carbon dioxide capture

IA5,

Target 6

BIOTECHNOLOGY


2016

BIOTEC-01-2016

ERA-NET Cofund on BiotechnologiesERA-NET Cofund

3-6 21/1/16

BIOTEC-02-2016

Bioconversion of non-agricultural waste into biomolecules for industrial applications

RIA 3-51st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage: 24/5/16BIOTEC-03-

2016Microbial chassis platforms with optimized metabolic pathways for industrial innovations through systems biology

RIA 3-5

BIOTEC-04-2016

KET Biotechnology foresight identifying gaps and high-value opportunities for the EU industry

CSA 21/1/16

2017

BIOTEC-05-2017

Microbial platforms for CO2-reuse processes in the low-carbon economy

RIA 3-5


4/5/17

BIOTEC-06-2017

Optimisation of biocatalysis and downstream processing for the sustainable production of high value-added platform chemicals

IA 5-7

BIOTEC-07-2017

New Plant Breeding Techniques (NPBT) in molecular farming: Multipurpose crops for industrial bioproducts

RIA 3-5

BIOTEC-08-2017

Support for enhancing and demonstrating the impact of KET Biotechnology projects

CSA 19/1/17

MODELLING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND ADVANCED MATERIALS


2016

NMBP-23-2016Advancing the integration of Materials Modelling in Business Processes to enhance effective industrial decision making and increase competitiveness

RIA 51st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16

NMBP-24-2016Network to capitalise on strong European position in materials modelling and to allow industry to reap the benefits

CSA 21/1/16

2017NMBP-25-2017

Next generation system integrating tangible and intangible materials model components to support innovation in industry

IA 6


4/5/17

SCIENCE-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES, ADVANCED MATERIALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES


2016

NMBP-26-2016Analytical techniques and tools in support of nanomaterial risk assessment

RIA 5-61st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage:24/5/16

NMBP-27-2016Promoting safe innovation through global consolidation and networking of nanosafety centres and strengthening the European industry through cooperation in nanosafety

CSA 21/1/16

2017

NMBP-28-2017

Framework and strategies for nanomaterial characterisation, classification, grouping and read-across for risk analysis

RIA 5-7 1st Stage:27/10/162nd Stage:

4/5/17NMBP-29-2017

Advanced and realistic models and assays for nanomaterial hazard assessment

RIA 4-6

INNOVATIVE AND RESPONSIBLE GOVERNANCE OF NEWAND CONVERGING ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES


2016

NMBP-30-2016Facilitating knowledge management, networking and coordination in the field of formulated products

CSA

21/1/16

NMBP-31-2016 Presidency events CSA

NMBP-32-2016 Support for National Contact Points CSA

NMBP-33-2016Networking and sharing best experiences in using regional clusters strategies with a focus on supporting innovation in the NMBP thematic area

CSA

NMBP-36-2016 Policy support for Industry 2020 in the circular economy CSA

2017

NMBP-31-2017

Presidency events CSA 19/1/17

NMBP-34-2017

Governing innovation of nanotechnology through enhanced societal engagement

CSA 19/1/17

NMBP-35-2017

Innovative solutions for the conservation of 20th century cultural heritage

RIA4,

target 6


4/5/17

SME INSTRUMENT

Year Topic Topic Title Instrument

2016 2017

SMEInst-02-2016-2017

Accelerating the uptake of nanotechnologies advanced materials or advanced manufacturing and processing technologies by SMEs

SMEInst

20162017

SMEInst-03-2016-2017

Dedicated support to biotechnology SMEs closing the gap from lab to market

SMEInst

INDUSTRY 2020 IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY

CROSS-CUTTING CALL

PILOTS


2016

PILOTS-01-2016

Pilot lines for manufacturing of materials with customized thermal/electrical conductivity properties

IA4/6,

target 71st Stage: 8/12/152nd Stage: 24/5/16PILOTS-02-

2016

Pilot Line Manufacturing of Nanostructured Antimicrobial Surfaces using Advanced Nanosurface Functionalization Technologies

IA4/6,

target 7

2017

PILOTS-03-2017

Pilot Lines for Manufacturing of Nanotextured surfaces with mechanically enhanced properties

IA4/6,

target 7 1st Stage:

27/10/162nd Stage:

4/5/17

PILOTS-04-2017

Pilot Lines for 3D printed and/or injection moulded polymeric or ceramic microfluidic MEMS

IA4/6,

target 7

PILOTS-05-2017

Paper-based electronics RIA3,

target 5

FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE – FOF (2016)


2016

FOF-01-2016Novel hybrid approaches for additive and subtractive manufacturing machines

RIA 4-6

21/1/16

FOF-02-2016Machinery and robot systems in dynamic shop floor environments using novel embedded cognitive functions

IA 5-7

FOF-03-2016Zero-defect strategies at system level for multi-stage manufacturing in production lines

IA 5-7

FOF-04-2016Continuous adaptation of work environments with changing levels of automation in evolving production systems

RIA 4-6

FOF-05-2016Support for the further development of Additive Manufacturing technologies in Europe

CSA

FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE – FOF (2017)Year Topic Topic Title Instrument TRL Deadline

2017

FOF-06-2017New product functionalities through advanced surface manufacturing processes for mass production

RIA 4-6

19/1/17

FOF-07-2017Integration of unconventional technologies for multi-material processing into manufacturing systems

RIA 4-6

FOF-08-2017In-line measurement and control for micro-/nano-enabled high-volume manufacturing for enhanced reliability

IA 5-7

FOF-09-2017Novel design and predictive maintenance technologies for increased operating life of production systems

IA 5-7

FOF-10-2017New technologies and life cycle management for reconfigurable and reusable customised products

IA 5-7


2016 FOF-11-2016 Digital automation RIA, CSA 21/1/16

2017 FOF-12-2017 ICT Innovation for Manufacturing SMEs (I4MS) RIA, CSA 19/1/17

2016 FOF-13-2016 Photonics Laser-based production RIA, IA 21/1/16

ICT for FACTORIES OF THE FUTURE

SUSTAINABLE PROCESS INDUSTRIES – SPIRE (2016)


2016

SPIRE-01-2016Systematic approaches for resource-efficient water management systems in process industries

IA 5-7

21/1/16

SPIRE-02-2016Plant-wide monitoring and control of data-intensive processes

RIA 4-6

SPIRE-03-2016Industrial technologies for the valorisation of European bio-resources into high added value process streams

IA 5-7

SPIRE-04-2016Industrial furnace design addressing energy efficiency in new and existing furnaces

RIA 4-6

SPIRE-05-2016Potential use of carbon dioxide / carbon monoxide and non-conventional fossil natural resources in Europe as feedstock for the process industry

CSA

SPIRE-06-2016Business models for flexible and delocalised approaches for intensified processing

CSA

SUSTAINABLE PROCESS INDUSTRIES – SPIRE (2017)


2017

SPIRE-07-2017Integrated approach to process optimisation for raw material resources efficiency, excluding recovery technologies of waste streams

IA 5-7

19/1/17

SPIRE-08-2017Carbon dioxide utilisation to produce added value chemicals

RIA 4-6

SPIRE-09-2017Pilot lines based on more flexible and down-scaled high performance processing

IA 5-7

SPIRE-10-2017New electrochemical solutions for industrial processing, which contribute to a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions

RIA 4-6

SPIRE-11-2017Support for the enhancement of the impact of SPIRE PPP projects

CSA

SPIRE-12-2017Assessment of standardisation needs and ways to overcome regulatory bottlenecks in the process industry

CSA

TIPOLOGIE DI AZIONI

81 81

TIPOLOGIE AZIONI

CSA

Co

–Fu

nd

(+)I

nn

ova

zio

ne

Ric

erca

co

llab

ora

tiva

Research and innovationaction

Innovationaction

Strumento PMI

Eranet

Pre –commercial procurement

(PCP)

PubblicProcurementof Innovative solution (PPI)

Coordinationand SupportAction

Prize

SME Instrument

Fast track to innovation

82

Progetti collaborativi

Basic research, appliedresearch, technologydevelopment and integration, and testing e validation on a small scale prototype in a laboratory or simulated environment

Funding rate: 100% costi diretti, 25% costi indiretti

R&I actions

Prototyping, testing, demostrating, piloting, large - scale productvalidation and market replication

Funding Rate: 70% costi diretti (100% no profit); 25% costi indiretti

a. Demostration or pilot

b. Market replication

I actions

83

Work Programme TOPICSStructure

• sets the context, the problem to be addressed, why intervention is necessary

SPECIFIC CHALLENGE

• delineates the problem, specifies the focus and the boundaries of the potential action BUT without describing specific approaches

SCOPE

• describe the key elements of what is expected to be achieved in relation to the specific challenge

EXPECTED IMPACT

87

TOPIC NMPExamples

ELIGIBILITY & MINIMUM PARTICIPATION CONDITIONS

88 88

WHO CAN PARTICIPATE? Any legal entity , university or research

centre based in EU member or associated *countries

JRC (Joint Research Centre)

International organization of EU interest

International organization and entitiesfrom Third Countries: in addition to minimum conditions!

* Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Iceland, Israel, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Turkey

WHO CAN GET FUNDED? Any legal entity , university or research

centre based in EU member or associated *countries

JRC (Joint Research Centre)

International organization of EU interest

Entities from Third Countries: only ifICPC*

International organization and entitiesfrom Third countris not ICPC, only inexceptional cases ,if foreseeen in the WPor on the basis of bilateral-agreementor ifit is essential for the action

POSSIBILITY OF JOINT CALL WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION

ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDING

• Automatically for the following legal entities:

• Legal entities established in the Member States and

• International European Interest Organisations

• Legal entities identified in the work programmes

• Other legal entities if:

• Participation is deemed essential for carrying out the or the relevant funding body

• Provided for in an international agreement between the country or international organisation

THIRD COUNTRIES

• Industrialised countries and emerging economies - funded only in exceptional cases

• industrialised countries: for instance US, Canada, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Australia, Taiwan, New Zealand, Macao, San Marino, Monaco, Andorra, Vatican, etc.

• emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China and Mexico

• ICPC Countries, Automatically funded

MINIMUM CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATION

• Three legal entities. Each of the three shall be established in a different Member State or associated country. All three legal entities shall be independent of each other.• Research & innovation action• Innovation action• ERA-NET Cofund• Pre-commercial procurement (PCP) Cofund• Public procurement of Innovative solutions (PPI) Cofund

(ONE FOR CSA)

EVALUATION CRITERIA

93 93

Cri

teri

o 1 Eccellenza

Cri

teri

o 2 Impatto

Cri

teri

o 3 Qualità e

efficienza dell’attuazione

CRITERI DI VALUTAZIONE

PROCEDURA DI PRESENTAZIONE A DUE STEP: SOLO ECCELLENZA E IMPATTO

(THRESHOLD DINAMICO)

LIMITE PAGINA PROPOSTA 1ST STAGE: 10 PP (PARTNER DA INCLUDERE NEL FORM A E NON NELLA COVER PAGE PARTE B)

LIMITE PAGINE 2ND STAGE: 70 PP + SECTION4 CONSORTIUM E ETICA/SICUREZZA

AWARD CRITERIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS; INNOVATION ACTIONS; SME INSTRUMENTEX

CEL

LEN

CE Clarity and pertinence of the objectives;

Soundness of the concept, and credibility of the proposedmethodology;

Extent that the proposed work is beyond the state of the art, and demonstrates innovation potential (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches, new products, services or business and organisational models)

Appropriate consideration of interdisciplinary approaches and, where relevant, use of stakeholder knowledge.

IMPA

CT

The extent to which the outputs of the project wouldcontribute to each of the expected impacts mentioned in the workprogramme under the relevant topic;

Any substantial impacts not mentioned in the work programme, that would enhance innovation capacity, create new market opportunities, strengthen competitiveness and growth of companies, address issues related to climate change or the environment, or bring other important benefits for society;;

Quality of the proposed measures to:

1) Exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), and to manage research data where relevant.

2)Communicate the project activities to different target audiences

AWARD CRITERIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS; INNOVATION ACTIONS; SME INSTRUMENT

QU

ALI

TY A

ND

EF

FIC

IEN

CY

OF

IMP

LEM

ENTA

TIO

N Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including

extent to which the resources assigned to work packagesare in line with their objectives deliverables;

Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management;

Appropriateness of the allocation of tasks, ensuring that all participants have a valid role and adequate resources in the fulfil that role.

Complementarity of the participants and extent to which the consortium as whole brings together the necessary expertise;

AWARD CRITERIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS; INNOVATION ACTIONS; SME INSTRUMENT

HORIZONTAL ISSUES

98 98

Open Research

Data

Embedding SSH

Standards ARIAT

OPEN RESEARCH DATA• Open research data: A novelty in Horizon 2020 is the Pilot on

Open Research Data which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects. Projects funded under topics NMBP-23 to NMBP-29 inclusive, on modelling and nanotechnology safety, will by default participate in the Pilot on Open Research Data in Horizon 2020.

• Projects have the possibility to opt out of the Pilot, provided a justification is given for doing so. Participation in the Pilot is not taken into account during the evaluation procedure. Proposals will not be evaluated favourably because they are part of the Pilot and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.

SSH in Horizon 2020

100

COMPLEX

SOCIETAL

ISSUES

STEM disciplines (science, technology,

engineering and mathematics)

EMBEDDING SSH

solutions and products that are socially

acceptable, directly applicable or

marketable and cost-effective

SSH disciplines (social sciences and

humanities)

102

SSH aspects in LEITBackground: competitiveness as overallgoal, mainly technological approach, SSH is not everywhere

SSH aspects include mainly:

• User behaviour and acceptance

• Management and governance issues

• Risk assessment and management

• Development of business models

But also: Strengthening cultural and social aspects of innovations;

SSH as a source of creativity for developing new products /services

LEITLeadership in enabling and

industrial technologies

ICT, Nanotechnologies,

Materials, Biotechnology,

Manufacturing, Space

103

Human-technology-interaction, user perspectives, data protection

Societal needs, user acceptance, risk assessment, governance

Development of new business models, responsible consumer behaviour

New, sustainable business models

ICT

Nanotechnologies Biotechnology

Advanced Materials

Manufacturing

Space

?

Topic flagged

104

LEIT-NMB BIOTEC-01-2016 SSH




LEIT-NMB NMBP-30-2016 SSH







history

economics

administration

political science

philosophy

linguistics

theology

law

sociology

psychology

anthropology

cultural studies

communication

demography

education

ethics

SSH DISCIPLINES

Standards:both in Excellence and Impact

Standardisation issues have to be taken into account where appropriate

Proposals should focus on the development of new regulatory standards and tools that are based on scientific principles that already have a Proof-of-Concept at the laboratory scale.

To improve standardisation of regulatory practice at

the European and international level;

More effective execution of activities of common interest, such as

IPR management, standardisation and policy making.

The project should aim at agreement with

the wide European scientific and industrial

community a standard for organizing

modeling data needed to make search and

linking between different databases

effective and easy.

ARIaT – Horizon 2020 Annotated Research and Innovation Actions Template

• Innovation dimension in Horizon 2020 proposals: set of good practices to understand and write innovation related issues both in Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) and Innovation Actions (IA)

http://www.health2market.eu/results/h2020-

annotated-template

http://www.health2market.eu/results/h2020-annotated-template

H2020 KEY Performance Indicators

https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/horizon-2020-indicators-assessing-results-and-impact-horizon

https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/horizon-2020-indicators-assessing-results-and-impact-horizon

ESR EVALUATION SUMMARY REPORT (CALL 2014-2015 H2020)

PUNTI DEBOLEZZA E FORZA

109

ESR – debolezze: ECCELLENZA 1/2• Lack of credibility due to lack of details concerning the models to be

used.

• Limited overall ambition of the proposal/Innovation beyond the state-of-the-art is insufficiently developed.

• No clear evidence of innovation potential.

• No quantitative indicators for the proposed objectives.

• Specific objectives inconsistent with the target of the proposal.

• Objectives are not convincingly addressed, especially concerning the actual analysis of drivers of change and causalities.

• Lack of details on the mechanisms to implement some of the objectives.

• Some of the objectives are missing measurable targets to enable benchmarking of the project results against existing technologies

ESR – debolezze: ECCELLENZA 2/2

• The conceptual framework insufficiently elaborated.

• Disadvantages of the proposed approach are not considered enough in the proposal.

• Targeted TRL values are not consistent.

• The linkage with other on-going activities is provided. However the description on how to effectively build upon the achieved results and to cooperate with them is minimal.

• A clear sequence of coordination and support measures is outlined, even if these could have been presented in a more diagrammatic manner.

• The proposal could have developed the gender issues more clearly.

ESR – best practices: ECCELLENZA

• Strutturare chiaramente gli obiettivi (anche con l’aiuto di grafici), che siano rilevanti rispetto alla call e misurabili.

• Costruire su progetti EU in atto o conclusi.

• Descrivere I concetti base e le diverse componenti tecnologiche del progetto in maniera esaustiva ed organica in tutta la proposta.

• Stabilire un equilibrio credibile tra ricerca, dimostrazione e first market replication action (laddove applicabile).

• Interdisciplinarietà: combinare efficacemente diversi domini di expertise.

• Adottare un approccio interdisciplinare che includa per esempio ‘policy development, citizen science, data interoperability and capacity building’. Non trascurare end-users e/o technology transfer providers!

• Adottare una metodologia che si basi su un approccio step by step.

ESR – debolezze: IMPATTO 1/2• No significant environmental and social impacts beyond the call

targets.

• Not quantified impact/clear justification of the forecasts on impacts is missing.

• Provided numbers are not fully convincing, as supporting facts are missing.

• Enhanced citizen awareness and participation mentioned but not sufficiently developed.

• Little discussion about how the new knowledge produced by the project will be integrated to available data sets, and used in broader scale models.

• Insufficient/standard communication measures.

ESR – debolezze: IMPATTO 2/2

• In the dissemination strategy a clear targeted strategy to reach different stakeholders‘ groups is not well mentioned.

• The performance indicators for dissemination are not ambitious.

• The possibility to set up training workshops towards end users as a way to decrease the barrier for adoption of the project results is not considered enough.

• Ability to effectively replicate the concept and technology throughout Europe is not evident.

• Exploitation plan is absent/partial or vague.

• Lack of details on IPR management.

ESR – best practices: IMPATTO 1/3

• Descrivere gli impatti attesi in una tavola sinottica.

• Definire una exploitation strategy che contenga 4 elementi fondamentali: • analisi del mercato (e possibile impatto sullo stesso),

• management della proprietà intellettuale,

• innovation management

• business plan

• Non trascurare gli aspetti della standardizzazione (e.g. attraverso link con il CEN/CENELEC)

• Creare una connessione tra le azioni di disseminazione e di exploitation al fine di operare in vista di una futura commercializzazione del prodotto/servizio oggetto della proposta (a tal fine, eventualmente sviluppare una SWOT analisys).


• Laddove rilevante (principalmente IA NMBP), prevedere un business case preliminare che mostri i vantaggi in termini di costi del prodotto/servizio oggetto della proposta.

• Trattare esaustivamente gli aspetti dell’IPR e dei diritti di accesso per lo sfruttamento commerciale.

• Sviluppare misure di disseminazione e comunicazione modellate sulle esigenze dei vari target groups.

• Laddove possibile, promuovere il coinvolgimento della società civile (e.g. attraverso la citizen science).

• Prevedere il coinvolgimento degli attori impegnati nel policy e decision making.


• Coinvolgere direttamente PMI e centri di ricerca privati così che possano direttamente beneficiare dei risultati del progetto, generando nuova innovazione. Le potenzialità di sfruttamento in questo senso sono indice della futura capacità del progetto di generare opportunità di lavoro e benessere economico.

• Stabilire meccanismi di valutazione dell’efficacia delle misure di comunicazione lungo che operino durante tutto l’arco del progetto al fine di garantirne l’efficacia.

• Strutturare le attività di comunicazione e disseminazione in modo da permettere la validazione dei risultati del progetto da parte degli utilizzatori finali, massimizzado così il loro potenziale. Stabilire meccanismi che consentano agli end-user di dare il proprio feedback sul progetto.

• Fare un uso proattivo e mirato dei social media.

ESR – debolezze: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 1/3

• Workpackages do not build into a coherent approach.

• The logical flow of the work plan is not appropriate to the core objective of the proposal.

• The work plan is overloaded as well as tasks and deliverableslists./WPs’ and tasks’ overlap.

• The content of the work plan is unequal in the level of detailsprovided.

• Discrepancies between work packages, tasks and person months.

• The share of technical/research activities versus networking and dissemination ones and viceversa is sometimes imbalancedcomparing with the type of action considered.

• The allocation of person months for the project is overestimated.


• More public deliverables needed.

• Deliverables defined are limited to reports (e.g. demonstrator deliverables, both for technical demonstrations and for first market exploitation, are missing)

• Limited array of potential end-users included in the advisory board.

• Social scientists are insufficiently represented which raises questions as to the ability of the consortium partners in delivering the full range of expected impacts.

• Weak innovation management. It does not describe enough the potential impact of the project on the innovation capacity of every partner separately, nor is addressed the way new rising ideas will be handled during the project.


• Poor risk management.

• The consortium does not provide a exhaustive geographical coverage.

• Only a minority of the staff in the project teams consists of women.

ESR – best practices: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 1/3

• Descrivere logicamente e distribuire le attività dei Work Packages coerentemente lungo la durata del progetto assicurando la loro corretta implementazione, coordinamento ed integrazione

• Dividere budget e person-months equamente tra partners.

• Costruire un consorzio multidisciplinare ed integrato che copra tutte le task del progetto in termini di expertise e di posizionamento sulla catena del valore.

• L’interdisciplinarietà del consorzio deve servire a prendere in considerazione non solo gli aspetti tecnici , ma anche gli aspetti legati alla società, normativa e mercato.

• Il coordinatore deve preferibilmente avere esperienza pregressa nel coordinamento.

ESR – best practices: IMPLEMENTAZIONE 1/3

• Valorizzare il ruolo delle PMI nel consorzio.li.

• Laddove possibile, coinvolgere le autorità locali

• Definire chiare struttura e procedura di management (e.g. che coinvolgano ‘steering committees’ , ‘End-users committee’, un ‘communication manager’).

• Descrivere esaustivamente rischi e azioni di mitigazione.

• Allocare le risorse economiche in maniera appropriata e ragionevole.

• Non trascurare gli aspetti di genere.

RESEARCH PARTICIPANT PORTALhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

123

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home

GRAZIE PER L‘ATTENZIONE!

APREAgenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea

via Cavour, 71 00184 - Roma

www.apre.itTel. (+39) 06-48939993

Fax. (+39) 06-48902550

Serena [email protected] [email protected]



il piano di lavoro nmbp 2017 - polito.it · ain/h2020-wp1617-intro_en.pdf. a deeper and fairer...

Documents