ihv regional conf: sally kendall - building evaluation into your practice
TRANSCRIPT
+
Evaluation of Health Visiting Practice
How should we go forward?
Prof. Sally Kendall, Associate Dean Research and Director, CRIPACC,
University of Hertfordshire
Trustee iHV
+ Current Policy: Why health visiting matters
In 2011 the Department of Health for England launched the
‘Health Visiting Implementation Plan’
The Government believes that strong and stable families are the
bedrock of a strong and stable society.
+The Healthy Child Programme
The Healthy Child Programme
(HCP) is led by Health Visitors and
consists of a programme of
evidence based activities across
the pregnancy and 0-5 year period
+Effective HCP should lead to…..
strong parent–child attachment and positive parenting, resulting in better social and emotional wellbeing among children;
care that helps to keep children healthy and safe;
healthy eating and increased activity, leading to a reduction in obesity; prevention of some serious and communicable diseases;
increased rates of initiation and continuation of breastfeeding;
readiness for school and improved learning; early recognition of growth disorders and risk factors for obesity;
early detection of – and action to address – developmental delay, abnormalities and ill health, and concerns about safety; • identification of factors that could influence health and wellbeing in families; and
better short- and long-term outcomes for children who are at risk of social exclusion.
+How do we evaluate effectiveness?
Six High Impact Areas for Health Visiting
+Public Health Outcomes Framework:
What is it?
+Public Health outcomes Framework
+Putting the family first
The families and children must be the first priority in all of what
the health visitors do. Within available resources, they must
receive effective services from caring, compassionate and
committed staff, working within a common culture, and they
must be protected from avoidable harm and any deprivation of
their basic rights.
Enhanced quality standards to promote improvement
Public engagement and partnership
Strong leadership in health visiting and other professions
+Ask Questions, Be Curious
“Be vigilant, curious and ask the ‘why’questions, because it’s when you stop
asking questions that things start to go
wrong.”
Mary Mumvuri, Head of Nursing and Patient
Safety at Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS
Foundation Trust (HPFT), told nursing students at
the University of Hertfordshire.
+ Enhancing quality standards through
evaluation
Evaluation
What? Intervention or change in practice
Who? Family, child, parents, community
How? What is involved? Break it down to component parts
When? At what stage, time, level
Where? What is the context, home, community, clinic
Measures? Do they already exist? Where can they be found?
Changes? Can the change be associated with the intervention or practice development?
Dissemination and communication?
+Improvement Science
What is improvement science?
The overriding goal of improvement
science is to ensure that quality
improvement efforts are based as much
on evidence as the best practices they
seek to implement
Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based
quality improvement: the state of the science.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 24(1):138-50.Improvement science aims to
create practical learning that can
make a timely difference to
patient care. It is characterised by
its large domain of interest, its applied nature,
and its commitment to generation of practical
learning that can be applied in real-life situations.
Improvement science recognises and integrates many
contributions, similar to the way that engineering science
uses scientific knowledge and theories to address real-life problems
Marshall et 2013 www.thelancet.com
+ Terms used for improvement science
implementation science
science of improvement
translational research
translational science
measurement for improvement
quality improvement methods
quality improvement science
science of quality improvement
evidence-based practice
knowledge translation
research utilisation
+Evaluation approaches
Kirkpatrick (1988) Framework for Evaluation 4 stages
Reaction – how do people react, feel, behave in relation to the
process?
Learning – what have people learned from it and what would
they do differently?
Impact – what has been the impact on their lives, behaviour,
relationships,
Results – what change has occurred, is it measurable?
+How would you do this?
Posing the question
E.g How effective has my breastfeeding support group been in
enabling breastfeeding to continue?
Reaction
How did you feel about the breastfeeding support group? What
made you want to continue with it?
What was challenging?
Learning
What have you learned from the group?
What supported your learning?
What would you want to do differently?
+How would you do this?
Posing the question
E.g How effective has my breastfeeding support group been in
enabling breastfeeding to continue?
Impact - What difference has attending the group made to your
experience of breastfeeding?
How has it affected your family’s approach to breastfeeding?
How confident are you about continuing to breastfeed?
Results – what has changed as a a result of the programme?
Before and after measures – breastfeeding rates, confidence,
self-efficacy, attachment,
+How can you contribute?
By being curious about health visiting practice, what makes a difference and why?
Be systematic and methodical!
Through engagement with NHS and public health organisations and identifying areas of local and national concern
By considering how to implement what is already known and identifying gaps in knowledge
Taking part in research events such as master-classes, seminars and conferences –getting ‘out there’
Engaging with families and the public – how can improvement science address their concerns?
Building experience and knowledge through professional development (Masters, PhDs) and working with teams
Disseminating your work in good quality journals, conferences and the e-Community of Practice
Applying for grants that will stimulate and grow new areas
+Disseminate your findings
Write for a journal
or local newsletter
Conference or seminars
Blogs, twitter, facebook – use social media!
Use the e-Community of Practice for Health Visitors
+On-line Community of Practice
The CoP is built around the 6 high impact areas, enabling HVs to build and
share evidence and knowledge in each of the 6 areas within an
on-line community
+One place to build and share
evidence for practice
+Future possibilities
To achieve real quality improvements in health and health care
should promote, build on and invest in evaluation research that
draws on Improvement Science
Working with networks such as the the iHV , CLAHRCs, eCoP
enhances opportunities to work more closely with NHS, public
health and social care partners on a larger scale
We have an opportunity to grow a national and international
reputation if we start to build on current work now