ies webinar: 5 best practices for utility budgets
TRANSCRIPT
5 Best Practices for Utility Budgets April 9th, 2015
Presenters: Sheila Johnston, Manager, Sustainability & Analytics, Ecova
Accurate Utility Budgets = Fiscally Responsible Spending
“Our budget needs to be what we say it is going to be. Our financial team uses this information for management and planning to develop their annual goals and projections, and it affects our bottom line.”
Environment and Facility Department Director
Mix of complex, custom spreadsheets and ‘best guess’ approach
Lacked critical information
Draining internal resources
‘Crushing’ budget numbers is not a good thing
Risks and challenges
Best practice approach to create and maintain reliable budget
Upcoming webinars
Q&A
Agenda
Complicated Numbers Game
Utility costs are a top operating expense
Internal and external drivers
Accuracy is critical
labo
r
mat
eria
ls
utilit
ies
Avoid Top Down / Macro Approach to Building Your Budget
Pros:
Based on GL, data quickly available
Little time/resource commitment
Add inflationary rate increase
Cons:
Can include GL/vendor billing issues
No ability to track variances with confidence
Will miss regional specific rate impacts
Recommendation Start with site specific baselines
Normalize Data at Site/Service Level
Determine appropriate source of baseline data
Normalize data to fiscal calendar to resolve billing discrepancies – If not Gregorian, is this the “catch up” year (53 weeks)?
Review Baselines Visually
Analyze data for anomalies
Ensure cost and usage are representative
Assess significant usage changes
Model for new locations
Remove locations set to close
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
January February March April May June July August September October November December
Use
Budget
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Winter Weather Continues to Challenge
Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/national/statewidetavgrank/201412-201502
Statewide Temperature Ranks: January – March 2015 Period: 1895 – 2015
Statewide Temperature Ranks: January – March 2014 Period: 1895 – 2014
Include Market Influencers and Regional Intelligence
Natural gas and wholesale electricity prices at their lowest level since 2012
Power sector demand for natural gas set to increase
Regional electric outlook
Ecova Market Intelligence
– Energy Price Hub – Weekly Energy Market
Watch e-newsletter – Quarterly Energy
Outlook webinars
http://www.ecova.com/news-media/energy-price-hub.aspx
The Risk of ‘Going it Alone’
Pros:
Complete control over project
No need to coordinate other’s schedules/agendas
Cons:
May be difficult to create buy in
May miss valuable insight from other departments
Can decrease overall accuracy
Capital Budget
Rebates
Efficiency Projects
Regulated Rate
Options Regional Volatility
Hedged Positions
Price Targets
Operating Budget
Forecast
Energy Procurement
Utility Expense Strategy
Stakeholders • Procurement • Finance • Energy • Real Estate • Facilities
Engineering
Acceptable Risk
Levels
Create Stakeholder Buy-in and Trust
Meet early and often
Accelerated timelines can affect budget accuracy
Discuss processes and assumptions – Comprehensive
– Defendable
– Accountable
Align Budget Risk with Energy Procurement
Understand the energy procurement strategies
What may have they changed?
Ask for an estimate of value at risk for open supply contract positions
Address Variances Proactively
What will stakeholders need to track?
Anticipate commonly asked questions
Think beyond the current budget cycle to position for future stakeholder interactions
Have a process in place for early communication
Risk of Tracking Expenses Based on Bills Paid
Pros:
Quick/Simple methodology, minimal resources
Can align budget to match bill timing
Cons:
Difficult to track variances due to bill timing
Current invoice can reflect the prior month or months usage
Seasonality can affect budget accuracy
Maintain budget accuracy throughout the year
Estimate monthly remaining expenses
Align accrual methodology with budget process
Booking full period removes “bill timing” as cause of variance
Daily cost method
Review for anomalies
Recommended: Book Full Accruals
Adjust Accruals for Seasonality
$0.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$5,000.00
$6,000.00
Cost 2013
Cost 2014
Non Seasonal Accrual
Risk of ‘Reacting’ to Budget
Pros:
Only utilizing resources if questions are asked
“If tracking well, no need to review”
Cons:
No current methodology in place to track variances
No immediate answers ready
Lack clear insight into how budget assumptions are tracking
Lessons Learned: Polar Vortex 2014
Extreme weather conditions drove high volatility
Variances were anticipated, but which factor was driving them?
Understand what’s driving variances
Track Accruals and Variance Monthly
Rates and Usage Relies on accrual approach
consistent with budgeting approach
Cost drivers (usage and/or unit price)
Research large variances
Identify trends
Missed Opportunities with Review at End of Fiscal Period Only
Pros:
Can see the entire year view
Time/resources saved during year
Cons:
May have missed opportunities to adjust problems before they become major issues
Lack of insight to emerging trends that support reforecasting usage
Catch & Resolve Issues Quickly
Identify poor performers through site level analysis
Is there an issue with the budget?
Is there an issue at the location?
Summary
Plan ahead and allow adequate time
Involve stakeholders and document assumptions
Manage the budget throughout the year
Leverage resources Achieve Budget Accuracy and Credibility Good data for use and
spend across portfolio, region and site
Internal resources review and approve
Stakeholder support
Upcoming Webinars
INSIDE ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY
Prioritizing Energy & Water Efficiency Project Rollouts Across a Complex Portfolio – Thursday, April 23rd at 11am PST
Quarterly Energy Market Outlook – Tuesday, June 2nd at 11am PST
Questions, comments, suggestions? [email protected]