ieee switchgear committee meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 ieee switchgear committee...

39

Upload: others

Post on 27-Mar-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 1

Page 2: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 2

IEEE Switchgear Committee

Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel

Pittsburgh, PA November 11th, 1999

Page 3: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 3

Condition Monitoring and POW Control of Power

Delivery Apparatus

Partners in:

Cost Reduction

Life Extension Power Quality

Page 4: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 4

OVERVIEW • Installed Base and Segmentation • ROI Methodologies • Case Studies • Financial Improvements • New Designs and Standards

Page 5: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 5

Condition Monitoring Installed Base

20000

1000 1000500 500

50

XFOs

XFOs + LTC CBs Other

apparatusBatteries Relays

Page 6: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 6

Circuit Breaker Condition Monitoring

Installed Base 900

100

New

Retrofit

Page 7: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 7

Circuit Breaker POW Control Installed Base

Retrofit25%

New75%

300

900

Page 8: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 8

Condition Monitoring Segmentation

Single function59%

Multi function closed

29%

Open architecture12%

Diagnostic Expert Systems

0%

Page 9: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 9

Circuit Breaker POW Control Segmentation

Cap Bank40%

Reactor20%

Lines2%

XFOs38%

Page 10: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 10

ROI Methodologies

Page 11: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 11

ROI Methodologies

Predicted Savings Predicted ROI = Budgeted Investments

Page 12: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 12

ROI Methodologies

Predicted Savings = Maintenance + Repair + Replacement (w/o CM) - Maintenance + Repair + Replacement (with CM) MRR (w/o CM) = [Budgeted Maintenance + Historical (R+R)] x Years

Page 13: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 13

ROI Methodologies

BI = CMS cost + Engineering + Site costs + Response costs

Page 14: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 14

ROI Methodologies

Budgeted Investment ($)

Predicted Payback = Years Predicted Savings ($ / year)

Page 15: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 15

ROI Methodologies

Budgeted Investment ($)

CM Efficacy Requirement = % Predicted MRR (w/o CM)

Page 16: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 16

ROI Methodologies Breaker Retrofit

BENEFITS ABPB¬

COSTS Perbreaker

Persubstation

Per group

Reduction routine inspections costs Monitoring system hardware and softwareReduction overhaul costs (postponed andoptimized)

Breaker specific engineering

Reduction in failure costs Components + cabling installation Benefit Index = Remote communication link installationEffectiveness Index = Sensor + controller sub-system commissioning PAFS - Sensor + controller sub-system maintenanceReduction in data analysis costs Substation staff trainingReduction in spare parts cost Substation spare partsIncrease of revenues Central controller hardware and softwareReduction in capital and/or expense costs ofequipment

Central controller installation

Reduction in training costs Central controller software configuration andcommissioning

Reduction in insurance premiums Breaker group generic engineeringReduction in environmental protection andclean-up costs

Breaker group expert system software

Reduction in designed redundancy costs TrainingSpare parts

TOTAL BENEFITS COST SUBTOTALS

¬ Annualized Benefit Per Breaker - Projected Annual equipment Failure expenditure Saving

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Here is a sample worksheet used but please don't try to read it here, it's in the paper.
Page 17: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 17

ROI Methodologies

• Cu = Unscheduled renewal • Cs = Scheduled renewal • X = Cu / Cs • T = Period of optimal renewal • Cd = Diagnostics • R(t)= Reliability of equipment • Rd = Reliability of detection

© Andtek, Inc.

Page 18: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 18

ROI Methodologies

Cd ∫ R(t) dt 0 < [R(T)(1-X) + X] -1 T

Cs ∫ R(t) dt 0

© Andtek, Inc

Page 19: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 19

ROI Methodologies

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Cd/Cs

Cu/Cs

Rd=1

Rd=0.9

© Andtek, Inc.

Page 20: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 20

ROI Methodologies POW Control

• Case by case

• New vs retrofit

• POW vs Conventional

• Measurable + Qualitative

Page 21: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 21

ROI Methodologies Conventional designs

• Purchase + installation +

commissionning

• Routine testing

• Preventive maintenance

• Failure triggered replacement costs

Page 22: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 22

ROI Methodologies

POW Control System

COSTS

– EPIC

– Characteristics

– Other devices

BENEFITS – Savings

– Security

– Power Quality

– Life extension

Page 23: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 23

Load current No damage

Fault current Catastrophic

Savings $ 400,000

Monitoring Case Study#1

Page 24: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 24

Monitoring Case Study#2

Locked piston Explosion

Collateral damage CT

Savings $630,000

Page 25: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 25

Monitoring Case Study#3

Pressure drop signature Stuck moving contact Fault current Catastrophic Savings $175,000

Page 26: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 26

POW Case Study#1 • CEZ • GSU transformers • End of life condition • Historical severe inrush conditions • Controlled opening to condition

remanent flux • Controlled closing to limit inrush below

30% of rated current • Deferred purchase > 5 mio $

Page 27: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 27

POW Case Study#2

• 25 kV distribution daily Cap bank switching

• O/V trips subway DC supply

• Some passenger cars in tunnels

• Public opinion of Transit Authority and Utility suffers

Page 28: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 28

TRENDS

Installed costs

Performance & benefits

21st Century Smart Substation

Page 29: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 29

Installed Cost Reductions

Cabling

CM + POW

2.4GHz Comms

Inter-operability

Page 30: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 30

Diagnostic Expert System DATA INFORMATION KNOWLEDGE ACTION

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Models of circuit breaker operational behaviour , including aging and failure mode profiles, have been developped and validated over the years. The progression from primary data to operational actions has historically depended on discrete snapshots in time of the breaker aging process. The time appropriate and correct processing of the primary data isnot always economically feasible. The transformation into information, knowledge and action programs is further hampered by the loss of expertise through attrition.
Page 31: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 31

Diagnostics Expert System • Customized software shell to ensure

optimal performance and flexibility • Device specific rules • Combinatorial algorithms • User “tool box” • Simulation and field tested • Import / Exportability with other

platforms

Page 32: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 32

Diagnostics Expert System

Page 33: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 33

IEC Interference Immunity

• Electrostatic discharge (ESD) IEC1000-4-2 • Electromagnetic compatibility IEC1000-4-3 • Damped oscillating magnetic fields IEC1000-4-10 • High power, damped oscillations IEC1000-4-12 • Rapid transients (EFT) IEC1000-4-4 • High frequency current, modulated amplitude

IEC1000-4-6 • Line conducted transients IEC1000-4-16 • Magnetic fields with energy frequencies

IEC1000-4-8, IEC SC 77A

Page 34: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 34

IEC Emitted Interference

• Main ac current : • Harmonic oscillation currents and

voltage oscillations IEC1000-3-2, IEC1000-3-3

Page 35: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 35

IEC Climatic Requirements

• Cold temperature IEC 68-2-1 • Dry heat IEC 68-2-2 • Damp heat IEC 68-2-3 • Temperature cycling IEC 68-2-14

Page 36: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 36

IEC Mechanical requirements • IEC 68-2-6 • IEC 68-2-27 • IEC 68-2-29 • IEC 68-2-59 • IEC 536 • IEC 529 IP 54 • IEC 707 DC Supply Voltages IEC 694

Page 37: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 37

IEC

• IEC 77/215 EMC Immunity for power stations

and substation environments

• IEC 61850-1 Communication Networks and

Systems in Substations

Page 38: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 38

CIGRE • WG 13.07 : Controlled Switching

– Tutorial ( 1996) – Application Guide (1998) – Studies, Specifications and Tests

(1999) • WG 13.09 : Condition Monitoring

– Application Guide (2000) • WG 13.10 : Asset Management

Page 39: IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting · 2013. 11. 19. · 22/09/2013 2 IEEE Switchgear Committee Meeting Condition Monitoring Panel Pittsburgh, PA . November 11th, 1999

22/09/2013 39

THANKS YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

3605 Isabelle Brossard, QC Canada, J4Y 2R2 Tel: 1.450.444.3001 Fax: 1.450.444.3009 Email : [email protected] Web : www.snemo.com