ieee 802.11e qos on wlans speaker : min-hua yang advisor : ho-ting wu date: 10/25/05
Post on 20-Dec-2015
227 views
TRANSCRIPT
Overview 802.11 background information
DCFPCFQos limitations of 802.11
802.11e (QoS support)EDCAHCCA
Simulation result
IEEE 802.11 background information
WLAN( Wireless Local Area Network )A LAN to which mobile users (clients) can con
nect and communicate by means of high-frequency radio waves rather than wires.
WLAN Standard IEEE 802.11 (IEEE) HiperLAN (European Telecommunications Standards
Institute, ETSI)
IEEE 802.11 Topology
Basic Service set networks (BSS) Independent BSS networks Infrastructure BSS Extended Service Set (ESS) networks
The Basic Service Set (BSS) The BSS consists of a group of any number of stations. The basic building block of IEEE 802.11 LAN
Independent BSS (IBSS) network
stations communicate directly
no connection to a wired network
Ad hoc network
Infrastructure BSS (BSS)
Include an access point (AP) The AP may have connecti
on to an wired network All stations communicate w
ith the AP
Communication between stations must go through AP consume twice the bandwi
dth
The Extended Service Set(ESS)
Distribution system (DS) provides logical services necessary to handle address-to-destination mapping and seamless integration of multiple BSSs
An AP is a STA that provides access to the DS
AccessPoint
WirelessClient
WirelessClient
WirelessClient
Basic Service Set (BSS)
WirelessClient
AccessPoint
Distribution System
Basic Service Set (BSS)Access
Point
WirelessClient
WirelessClient
WirelessClient
Basic Service Set (BSS)
WirelessClient
AccessPoint
Distribution System
Basic Service Set (BSS)
Terminology- Interframe Space
Time interval between frames.SIFS – Short Interframe Space PIFS – PCF Interframe SpaceDIFS – DCF Interframe Space DIFS > PIFS > SIFS
Fixed for each PHY Provide priority levels
IEEE 802.11
Two coordination functions are defined the mandatory Distributed Coordination Funct
ion ( DCF) based on CSMA/CA optional Point Coordination Function (PCF) ba
sed on poll-and-response mechanism. Most of today’s 802.11 devices operate in
the DCF mode only.
Distributed Coordination Function ( DCF)
Possible in both Infrastructure and Ad hoc mode
Known as Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA)
Used During Contention period (CP) DCF can support best-effort services , not
any QoS guarantees.
Basic Access Mechanism-CSMA/CA
Sense the medium before transmitting. If the medium is not busy, the transmission may
proceed. If the medium is busy, invoke backoff procedure. Transmit after the backoff procedure If the transmission is not successful, invoke back
off procedure.
Virtual Carrier Sense Mechanism
Network Allocation Vector (NAV) Set NAV based on duration information (a
vailable in MAC header, RTS, CTS) NAV counts down to zero at a uniform rate. IF NAV=0, medium is idle; otherwise, it is
busy.
IEEE 802.11 DCF (cont.)
BackoffTime = Random() × aSlotTime where Random( ) = [0, CW]
CWmin≤ CW ≤CWmax.
aSlotTime fixed for each PHY CWnew= (CWold+ 1) ×PF –1 (where PF=2) PF : Persistence Factor
Other Collision Avoidance Mechanism – RTS/CTS Hidden Terminal Problem:
Hidden Terminal are STAs that the receiver can hear but that cannot be detected by other senders.
In order to solve the problem,a optional RTS/CTS is introduced.
The source sends a short RTS frame before each data transmission,and the receiver replies with a CTS frame if it is ready to receive.
Point Coordination Function (PCF) [Optional in Standard] Used during Contention-Free Period (CFP) A single AP controls access to the medium, and
a Point Coordinator (PC) Agent resides in the AP.
AP polls each station for data, and after a given time interval moves to the next station.
No stations are allowed to transmit unless it is polled.
AP could have a priority scheme for stations. PCF is useful for time-sensitive applications.
IEEE Legacy 802.11 MAC SuperFrame consists of Contention Period (C
P) and Contention Free Period (CFP). PCF used during CFP and DCF used during C
P.
QoS Limitations of 802.11
DCF (Distributed Coordination Function) Only support best-effort services No guarantee in bandwidth, packet delay and jitter Throughput degradation in the heavy load
PCF (Point Coordination Function) Inefficient central polling scheme Unpredictable beacon frame delay due to incompatible
cooperation between CP and CFP modes Transmission time of the polled stations is difficult to control
IEEE 802.11e – Overview
New terminology QAP – QoS Access Point QSTA – QoS Station HC – Hybrid Coordinator
In order to support QoS in 802.11 WLAN , 802.11e has defined a new mechanism , namely, Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF).
HCF is implemented by all QAPs and QSTAs HCF has two access mechanisms
Contention based Enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA)
Controlled channel access HCF Controlled Channel Access (HCCA)
IEEE 802.11e Overview - Enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA)
EDCA defines four Access Categories (AC) Background Best Effort Voice Video
EDCA supports 8 User Priority (UP) values Priority values (0 to 7) identical to the IEEE 802.1D priorities
Rules One UP belongs to one AC Each AC may contains more than one UP Traffic of higher UP will be transmitted first in one AC
Basic concepts – Transmission opportunity (TXOP)
Time interval permitted for a particular STA to transmit packets.
During the TXOP, there can be a series of frames transmitted by an STA separated by SIFS.
TXOP types EDCA TXOP initiation
Obtained by winning a successful EDCF contention
Polled TXOP (HCCA TXOP) Obtained by receiving a QoS CF-poll frame from the QAP
802.11e EDCF – Access Category
EDCF defines access category (AC) mechanism to support the priority mechanism at the non-AP QSTAs.
Each QSTA has four ACs. An AC is an enhanced variant of the DCF which contend
s for transmission opportunity (TXOP) using the set of parameters such as CWmin[AC], CWmax[AC], AIFS[AC], etc.
Each AC queue works as an independent DCF STA and uses its backoff parameter.
In EDCA, the size of Contention-Window (CW) and Inter-frame space (IFS) is dependent on AC
EDCA – Accessing the medium
EDCA use different IFSs SIFS – ACKs, between multiple frames with the cont
inuation EDCA TXOP DIFS / AIFS – Used by DCF and EDCA for different
access categories
EDCF - Arbitration Interframe Space (AIFS)
QSTA use AIFS to defer the contention window or transmission for each AC
AIFS[AC] = AIFSN[AC]x aSlotTime+ aSIFTimeAIFSN for each AC is broadcast via beacon fr
ame containing ‘EDCA Parameter Set’element
DIFS = 2 x aSlotTime+ aSIFTime
EDCA details
Each AC has own Interframe space – AIFS Backoff Counter (BO) CWmin, CWmax, CW TXOP limit QSTA listens beacon frames t
o receive this information Each QSTA implements own q
ueues for each AC traffic From the queues the frame wit
h the highest priority is sent if internal collision happens
802.11e HCCA Overview - Hybrid Coordination Function(HCF)
Designed to increase efficiency by reducing the contention on the medium
Uses ”polling” Like PCF Thus, HCCA can send ”polling” both under CFP and
CP PCF – Only polling in CP
Specifically assigned transmit times for every frame
Enables QoS guarantees
802.11e HCCA (cont.)
Has higher priority than EDCA .Under HCCA, HC(Hybrid Coordinator) has full controll over the wireless medium
If HC needs it, it could take over the controll of the medium by sending a QoS CF-Poll
802.11e HCCA (cont.)
Differences between hybrid coordinator (HC) and point coordinator (PC):HC can poll QSTAs in both CP and CFPHC grants a polled TXOP to one QSTA, which
restricts the duration of the QSTA’s access to the medium.
Improve Efficiency – 802.11e
Block Acknowledgment Send multiple MSDUs without a bunch of ACKs Group ACK
Direct Link Protocol (LDP) No support for DLP in legacy MAC – Needs to talk through the
AP Less use of the channel The STAs is enable to talk directly to each other Sounds easy, lots of things to think about:
Power saving Security
Throughput and delay performance for EDCF
Throughput(K
B/
s)
EDCF maintains the throughput of high-priority audio and video flows by punishing the background traffic.
Comparison of total throughput between EDCF and DCF
The total throughput of EDCF is lower than that of DCF when the traffic load is larger than 48%:EDCF reduces the throughput of low-priority flows considerable and therefore results in decreasing the total throughput.
Mean delay of audio,CBR video versus channel load for EDCF and HCF
The result show that the HCF controlled channel access mechanism can guarantee the minimum delay requierment(50ms) for the admitted flows in different load rate
EDCF works very well under low load conditions but suffers from delay degradation in high-load condition
Reference
Qiang Ni, Lamia Romdhani, and Thierry Turletti. "A Survey of QoS Enhancements for IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN". Wiley Journal of Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing (JWCMC), John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2004; Volume 4, Issue 5: 547-566.
“Analysis of IEEE 802.11e for QoS support in wireless LANs”Mangold, S.; Sunghyun Choi; Hiertz, G.R.; Klein, O.; Walke, B.;Wireless Communications, IEEE Volume 10, Issue 6, Dec. 2003 Page(s):40 - 50
Yu-Sun Liu Ph. D. WLAN上課講義 Google.com