iec meeting iec61400-1, ed. 3 - wakes - wind power · pdf fileiec meeting iec61400-1, ed. 3 -...
TRANSCRIPT
IEC meeting IEC61400-1, ed. 3 -WAKESRisø Wednesday the 13/1-2010
Sten Frandsen + Morten Nielsen
Risø DTU
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Topics re. wake load modelling
•The general idea
•Old and new IEC wake loads
•IEC-old, verification, uncertainties
•More elaborate model? More parameters?
•Simulations, meandering? Averaging time?
•WAsPEng implementation
•Conclusion
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
THE GENERAL IDEA
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
General response-modelling
(*),),(
efUe fwwuu
),(U is the vertical mean shear of the flow
),(Uuu is standard deviation of wind speed fluctuations
),(Uww is the wake-induced mean flow speed deficit
),(Uff is a frequency-scale of turbulence.
Dynamics of the structure:
Flow input to model, through load p:
X
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
How does reality look?The usual picture:
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
flp [
arb
. u
nit
]
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
Wind direction [deg]
flp [
arb
. u
nit
]
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
0.00
0.40
0.80
1.20
1.60
250 270 290 310 330 350
Vindretning [deg]
Tu
rbu
len
s/la
st
Turbulens
Last
Wake loading rather complicated, geometricaland aerodynamically. Nevertheless:
SMW
SMS
Vindeby experiment designedto make plots like this
X=8.5D
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Change input parameter so that output becomes “right”
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
Wind direction
Eq
uiv
. lo
ad
(k
Nm
)
W4-2
E5-2
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
OLD AND NEW IEC WAKELOAD MODELS
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
IEC amendment, “wake changes”:
For fatigue:
For extremes:
The option of just using wake-turbulence has beenremoved
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Resulting differences
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15y
-ln(-
ln(F
(y))
)
F0
Fw
FU
FU,ass
F 0
F w
F U
F U,ass
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 5 10 15 20
Wind speed [m/s]
C_
T
C_T,stall
C_T, pitch
C_T-m1
C_T-m2
CT
CT – stall
CT – pitch
CT – mod1
CT – mod2
U [m/s]
CT - fatigue Extremes
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
IEC-OLD, VERIFICATION+UNCERTAINTIES
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Equivalent load in 1, 2 and multiple wake:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
Wind direction
Eq
uiv
. lo
ad
(k
Nm
)
W4-2
E5-2
Met mast
Wind turbine
Instrumented wt
N
..makes no difference
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Equivalent (wake) load – how does it come out?
X=8.5D
Wind speeds 8-9 m/s, estimated CT=0.88, I0=0.077. Vindeby data.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
230 240 250 260 270 280 290
wind direction [deg]
Eq
uiv
. w
idth
[k
Nm
]
4W_flp_ew
5E_flp_ew
Model
Wind direction [deg]
e [k
Nm
]
e4W-flp
e5E-flp
MET
Wind speeds 13-14 m/s, estimated CT=0.64, I0=0.075. Vindeby data.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
230 240 250 260 270 280 290
Wind direction [m/s]
Eq
uiv
. w
idth
[m
/s]
4W_flp_ew
5E_flp_ew
Model
e [k
Nm
]
e4W-flp
e5E-flp
MET
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
A full scale experiment, 1992Wind farm designed for wake measurements
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
X= 7D X=5D X=9.5D
5D
9.5D7D
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
X=2D X=2.4D
standard deviation of flap-wise bending moment on Nordex turbine, based on 80sec time series. Wind speed 6-9 m/s. From Risø Test station, Vølund (1991).
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
p_w-02
p_w-03
p_w-04
p_w-05
p_w-06
M_w
Mod
standard deviation of power. Wind speed 6-8 m/s. From Middelgrunden 2001
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Middelgrunden (Enevoldsen & Stiesdal 2002)
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Normalisedequivalent loadsfor characteristicloads on a windturbine, multible-wake case; turbine separation 8.5D.
How do different cross-sectional forcesreact to wake conditions?
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
What parameters must be expected to influence fatigue loading?
•Turbulence: u v w
•Vertical mean wind speed shear
•Horizontal mean wind shear
• Flow inclination
• Scales of turbulence
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Wake turbulence as experiencedby downwind turbine
I 0
I add
Wake deficit as experienced by downwind turbine
U
Ub D
D0
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Scale of turbulence in free flow
Measured PFD of length-scale of turbulence. From Petersen et al (1998).
Scales in wakereported to be1-5 timesless thanin free flow
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Wake-scale: Høvsøre Test Site – Risø DTU
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
320 340 360 380 400
Wind direction [deg]
Le
ng
th s
ca
le L
u [m
]
160 m
100 m
60 m
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Is wake-turbulence just…turbulence?
Also analytical considerationsregarding narrow-band randomprocesses lead to a fixed ratio eand y, Crandall and Mark (1963)..
IeeU yuy: fixedFor
Ratio of equivalent load tostandard deviation of wind speedas a function of the wind speedfor.
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Experimental sensitivity factors, Vindeby
Sensitivity coefficient for turbulence, u, as function of wind direction – to the leftfree-flow and to the right full wakecondition.
Sensitivity coefficients for vertical, free-flow shear , and wake deficit, w. Smooth lines are visual fits.
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Model vs. data
Prediction of wake loads Site/wind
turbine
Regu-
lation
Mea-
sure
s
low winds high winds
Alsvik/Danwin stall std 9.5 fits** fits**
Vindeby/Bobus stall e 8.5 fits over-predicts*
Alsvik/Danwin stall std 7.0 over-predicts* over-predicts**
Alsvik/Danwin stall std 5.0 over-predicts* over-predicts**
Kappel/Vestas pitch e 3.7 fits over-predicts
Kegnæs/Bonus stall e 2.5 fits over-predicts
Risø/Nordex stall/pi std 2.0 fits --
Middelg./Bonus stall*
pow 2.4 fits
Oak C./NEGM stall e
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Contemporary uncertainty in predicting fatigue?
•Numerical aeroelastic modelling uncertainty: 20-30%? –according to benchmark
•Uncertainty in modelling external conditions: 10-20%? -present story)
•Material models and testing (SN curves): 10-20-30%?
•Field testing - verification: 10% would be very good
•TOTAL, in terms of standard deviation:
20-30% would probably be very optimistic
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
MORE ELABORATE MODEL? MORE PARAMETERS?
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Alternative possibilities
•Simulations
•Meandering – simulations
•More variables
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Fatigue -close spacing(Middelgrunden)
Model: U=6m/s
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
W ind direction [deg]
Measured
Modelled
Model: U=8m/s
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
W ind direction [deg]Model: U=10m/s
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
W ind direction [deg]
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Ekstremes(Middelgrunden)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360
Wind direction [deg]m
ax-m
in [
arb
. unit]
Modelled
Measured
6m/s <U < 9m/s
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
125 150 175 200 225 250
Wind direction [deg]
Mto
wer
[ar
b.u
nit]
9m/s <U < 12m/s
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
125 150 175 200 225 250
Wind direction [deg]
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
WASP ENGINEERING
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
WASP Engineering script for site assessment
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Windfarm Assessment Tool• IEC 61400-1 site assessment by
• WAsP/WEng results
• Effective Turbulence Intensity(IEC 61400-1, Annex D)
• Complex terrain factors
• Wind-sector management
• Effect on Effective Turbulence Intensity
• Effect on Annual Energy Production
• Grid curtailment effect on AEP
• Support for IEC 61400-12-1 in-situ power performance measurements
• Obstacle Assessment (IEC 61400-12-1, Annex A)
• Terrain Assessment (IEC 61400-12-1, Annex B)
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Conditional wind-direction distribution
1
0
,
,
j j j
N
i i ii
p u A k fp u pp u
p u p u A k f
WAsP sector-wise wind climates
• Frequency f j• Weibull scale parameter A j
• Weibull shape parameter k j
2
eff actual
0
1
( ) | |m
m
I u I u p u d
1
, exp
j
j
k
kj
j j j
j j
k up u A k u A
A Alocal site
but wake model TI depends
on flow at upwind sites
Flow corrections
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Matching IEC and WASP Engineering turbulence
1 1
5 32
1 1
4
1 6
f S f f L u
f L u
21
1 0
1 sinc 2T
T S d
Correction for 10-min sampling
Correction for bias from neutral stability results (under development)
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
IEC 61400-1 (Ed.3) Annex D
Regular array
Windfarm Assessment Tool
Irregular array
Enhanced background turbulence
2 212 wI I I I
1 2
0.36
1 0.2w
T
Id d C 21
sec max sec2
0.36
1 0.2w
T
Id N C
mteetra
Risø DTU, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Model improvements?
•Include explicitly half-wake
•Must work in all wf-configurations• Single-wake, multiple-wakes, right combination of
wakes, right backgeround turbulence etc.
•Models for both fatigue and extreme loading
•Work for all wind turbine components
•Must be verified