identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds in maize based on...
TRANSCRIPT
Identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds in maize based on oil content V. Mirdita, W. Schipprack, and A.E. Melchinger Abstract In vivo haploid induction has become a routine tool for rapid line development in maize. However, distinguishing haploid (H) from diploid crossing (C) seeds is problematic for many germplasm due to poor expression or suppression of the currently used R1-nj embryo marker. A new approach for sorting H and C seeds based on their oil content (OC) was examined. Ten source germplasm, including single crosses, synthetics and landraces, were pollinated by high-oil (HO) inducer UH600 with OC=10.8%. The average difference (1.79%) between the mean OC of C and H seeds was more than twice the standard deviation (SD) within each fraction. Thus, sorting H and C seeds based on OC smaller or greater than an a priori chosen threshold t was generally more reliable than based on the R1-nj embryo marker. Another ten source germplasm were pollinated with normal-oil inducer UH400 with OC=3.0%. Since the difference (0.65%) between OC of C and H seeds was approximately of the same magnitude as the SD, both fractions overlapped too much for reliable sorting. The discrimination of H and C seeds based on their OC looks very promising, even for heterogeneous source materials such as landraces, provided a HO inducer and a stringent threshold t are used. In combination with high-throughput platforms for automated sorting of single seeds for OC, this opens new avenues for extending the application and increasing the efficiency of the double haploid technology in maize.
Identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds in maize based on oil
content
V. Mirdita, W. Schipprack, and A.E. Melchinger Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics
University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
e-mail: [email protected] Phone: 49 711 - 459 - 22334
2 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Outline
● Introduction
● State-of-the-art of DH production
● Current status of marker systems
● New identification system based on oil content
● New inducers for haploid seed identification
● Summary and conclusions
3 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
● Acceleration of line development ● Early evaluation of potential hybrid cultivars ● Maximum additive variance from the beginning ● No masking effects due to residual
heterozygosity ● Reduced costs of maintainance breeding ● Good per se performance of lines ● Early protection of outstanding lines by PVP ● Simplified logistics
Main advantages of DH technique
4 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
State-of-the-art of DH production
F1 seeds
haploids
1 2
3
4
4
inducer
source germplasm
DH line 1
DH line 2
5 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Requirements of an effective marker system
easy, cheap and early detection
reliable, unambiguous unbiased selection
small FDR and FNR
independent of environment
stable expression in different genetic
background
high throughput, automatable
6 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Marker currently used: R1-nj
x
outcross or selfing
H (aploid) seed
C (rossing) seed
Embryo: purple Colorless
embryo
Aleurone: purple
Aleurone: purple
7 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Pros (+): Easy Cons (-): Labor-intensive Cheap No automation Early detection Error-prone
Marker currently used: R1-nj
8 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Limitations of 1-nj system
has purple aleurone color
harbors dominant anthocyanin inhibitor genes suppressing R1-nj expression
Accuracy and speed of H seed identification depends on trained staff
Haploid seeds identification is hampered if source population:
no clear marker = ?
9 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
FDR = FP
FP TP +
Misclassification in selecting H/C seeds
FN
FNR = FN TP +
Type I error = FDR
Type II error = FNR
C H
True positive
TP
False negative
FN
True negative
TN
False positive
FP
H
Test result of
True
con
ditio
n
C
10 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
C H
H
Test result of
C
TP
FN
TN
FP “Gol
d“ s
tand
ard
FDR
FNR
True H 128 = 8.90 %
True C 1310 = 91.10 %
Ligueless
Numerical example for marker
C
11 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
red root coloration
GMO traits e.g.GFP
quality traits
oil content
oil composition
protein
Alternative marker systems
12 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
x
H seed colorless
root purple
root C seed
Principle of haploid identification based on red root colour
13 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Bruker mq 20 the minispec Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Analyzer
Principle of haploid identification based on oil content
Mixture of H and C seeds
H-seeds (lower oil content)
C-seeds (higher oil content)
Choice of threshhold for oil
content
Oil measurement of single seeds
14 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Suggestion of Rotarenco et al. (2007)
Would a HO inducer solve the problem?
Freq
uenc
y (%
)
Discriminate H and C seeds based on OC
Oil content (%)
15 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Foundations of HO-inducer system
Melchinger et al. 2013 Oil content (%)
µC seeds HO-Inducer
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1
µH seeds
Den
sity
10.8
C seed
H seed HIR = +
16 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
“Gol
d“ s
tand
ard
Example: HO- inducer system
FDR = 11
11 76 + = 12.6%
8 FNR =
8 76 + = 9.52%
Threshold t = 4.40% OC CH
TP FN
TN FP
H
Test result
C
True H
True C C
17 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Distribution of OC in H/C seeds
= 12.6%
= 9.52 %
t
Oil content (%)
Freq
uenc
y
8 FNR =
8 76 +
Example: 919 seeds from cross (S072 x P213) x UH601
FDR = 11
11 76 +
18 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Foundation of HO-inducer system
Important factors FDR FNR
Hapl. induction rate (HIR) ∆OC = µC - µH σC, σH Threshold t
↓
↓
↓
↓ ↓
↓
↑
↑ ↓
↑
↑
↑
19 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
HIR: well-known property of HO-Inducer (I) little variation among source germplasm (SG) ∆OC: µC - µH µC = (µI - µSG) and µH = µSG
and if SD = P1 x P2 then µSG = (µP1 + µP2)
µC - µH = (µI - µSG)
σC, σH: use prior information from other similar germplasm
Choose t based on theory and desired FDR and FNR
assuming additive inheritance of OC
21
21
21
Foundation of HO-inducer system
20 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Choice of t in HO-system
Software available for CDF player: www.wolfram.com/cdf-player
21 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
“Proof of concept“ - Results 37,454 seeds from 10 source germplasm x UH600 Classification based on R1-nj Classification based on OC
Melchinger et al. 2014, in press.
“Gold standard“:
visual scoring of
plants in field
false “positives“
22 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
OC R1-nj Misclassification of seeds:
vs
60
40
0
20
80
100 FDR (%) FNR (%)
23 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Identification of H seeds based on OC
C seeds H seeds
NO Inducer UH400
Oil content (%)
HO Inducer UH600
24 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
“Proof of concept“ successfully completed
2 HO-inducers available: UH600, UH601
UHOH develops further HO-inducers
UHOH has high-throughput system for H
seed identification based on OC
Summary and conclusions
25 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
HO inducer lines
Haploid induction rate (HIR): 10.2 ± 1.3% 6.6 ± 2.7%
Oil content: 10.8 ± 0.7% 11.7 ± 0.4%
Marker system: OC of seeds: + + R1-nj marker: + + B1 marker: + Pollen production: + +
UH601 UH600
UH600 UH601
26 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
References
https://plant-breeding.uni-hohenheim.de
Melchinger et al. 2013, Sc. Rep. 3
Melchinger et al. 2014, Crop Sci. in press
Rotarenco et al. 2007, MNL 81:11
27 50th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School © VM 03.03.2014
Acknowledgements
Project members:
A. E. Melchinger V. Mirdita
Technical team: F. Mauch R. Volkhausen
T. Schmid N. Friedl
Internal funds from University of Hohenheim
F. Mauch
Financial support: