id name: nnne,2004-06-06,bu,001,bs-4c,e1 yelo mag cyan...

1
C M Y K ID NAME: NNNE,2004-06-06,BU,001,Bs-4C,E1 YELO MAG CYAN BLK 3 7 15 25 50 75 85 93 97 By TIMOTHY L. O’BRIEN W HEN a United States Army sergeant broke through a false wall in a small building in Baghdad on a Friday afternoon a little over a year ago, he discovered more than three dozen sealed boxes containing about $160 million in neatly bundled $100 bills. Later that day, soldiers found more cash in other hideaways near the Tigris River, in an exclusive neigh- borhood that elite members of Saddam Hussein’s gov- ernment once called home. By the end of the evening, they had amassed 164 metal boxes, all riveted shut, that held about $650 million in shrink-wrapped greenbacks. The cash was so heavy, and so valuable, that the Army needed a C-130 Hercules cargo plane to airlift it to a se- cure location. Just two days later, on Sunday, April 20, 2003, Thomas C. Baxter, head of the legal unit of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, read a brief news account of the discovery. Most of the money that turned up in Baghdad was new, bore sequential serial numbers and was stored with documents indicating that it had once been held in Iraq’s central bank. One fact particularly bothered Mr. Baxter: the money had markings from three Fed banks, including his own in New York. Iraq, of course, had been subject to more than a decade of trade sanctions by the United States and the United Nations, so large piles of dollars, especially new bills, were not supposed to have found their way to Baghdad. “How could that happen?” Mr. Baxter thought to himself, as he recalled later in Senate testimony. “Not only with U.S. sanctions, but with U.N. sanctions. How could that happen?” Mr. Baxter and the New York Fed, along with the Treasury Department and the Customs Service, imme- diately began an investigation into Baghdad’s currency stockpile. The continuing inquiry offers a rudimentary road map of illicit dealings — including lucrative oil smuggling — in Iraq and neighboring countries during the Hussein years, the federal authorities say. The investigation led quickly to the vaults of four Polaris Continued on Page 7 How Regulators Traced a Hoard Of U.S. Cash Lockboxes, Iraqi Loot And a Trail To the Fed Maj. Rodney King with some of the millions in cash that American troops found dur- ing raids in Iraq in April 2003. By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN S ITTING on the witness stand in a tiny courtroom in northern Connecticut last week, Theodore J. Forstmann looked every bit the Wall Street Mas- ter of the Universe that he is. He just didn’t sound like one. “What is a junk bond?” a lawyer inquired. “You’re really asking the wrong person,” Mr. Forstmann replied. Indeed, the usually loquacious Mr. Forstmann, who made billions of dollars for investors by betting on buyouts like Gulfstream Aerospace, Dr Pepper and General Instrument in the 1980’s and 90’s, appeared vis- ibly frustrated and at times incapable of answering the most basic questions about his business. “Frankly, this is kind of over my head,” he told the courtroom at one point, when asked a question related to the structure of one of his deals. “I cannot answer that to your satisfaction,” he re- sponded to another question, wearing a pained look on his face. “Can I get some water?” Mr. Forstmann was in court to explain his biggest flop: how he managed to lose $2 billion of his investors’ money gambling on two upstart telecommunications companies, XO Communications and McLeodUSA, just before the entire industry collapsed in 2001. In an unprecedented case that, if successful, could potentially cripple Mr. Forstmann’s business and ex- pose legions of other private equity firms to debilitating lawsuits from their own investors, Connecticut’s attor- ney general and state treasurer have sued him and his firm, Forstmann Little & Company, contending that they invested improperly and lost $125 million of the state’s pension fund money. The state has accused the firm of a bait-and-switch scheme: luring the state’s pensions to invest with the fund on the promise of a conservative investment strat- egy and then pursuing highly speculative deals. “This case is not about simply a failed investment,” Gerald J. Fields, the lead lawyer for Connecticut, said in State Superior Court in Rockville, Conn., a hamlet about 130 miles northeast of Manhattan, during his opening statement, accusing Forstmann Little of breach of con- tract and fiduciary duty. “The firm invested in two high- risk ventures that Connecticut had not bargained for.” Forstmann Little’s lawyer, Fred Bartlit, who repre- sented the Bush campaign in the 2000 Florida recount, said the case was without merit. Mr. Bartlit, a com- manding figure with a booming voice, argued in the court that the deals were explicitly permitted under the agreement signed by Connecticut. He said the state was now simply engaged in Monday-morning quarterback- ing, trying “to rewrite the contract in court.” Indeed, he pointed out that Connecticut never com- plained about the investments in question — which were all disclosed to the state before they were made and ini- tially rose in value — until they began to lose money. He Defending a Colossal Flop, in His Own Way Bloomberg News Theodore J. Forstmann, right, with his lawyer, Fred Bartlit, is being sued over failed investments. Continued on Page 8 OPENERS Luring the modern condom buyer. The Goods, by Brendan I. Koerner. 2 NEWS AND ANALYSIS Murdoch has his own succession issues. By Geraldine Fabrikant and Laura M. Holson. 3 Searching for the secret of Google’s success? Digital Domain, by Randall Stross. 3 Money for nothing: Why Viacom’s board paid Mel. The Agenda, by Patrick McGeehan. 4 SUNDAY MONEY Do-it- yourself home sales often mean doing a lot. By Lynnley Browning. 5 One less worry for investors. Strategies, by Mark Hulbert. 5 OFFICE SPACE Why some bosses wouldn’t dream of outsourcing. Armchair M.B.A., by William J. Holstein. 9 INSIDE C OMPUTER ASSOCIATES, embroiled in one of the nation’s longest-running accounting fraud investigations, announced on Friday that Sanjay Kumar, its chief software architect and former chief executive, was finally making his exit. In a blinding glimpse of the obvious, Mr. Kumar, who clung to the company even as investi- gators from the Justice Department and the Secu- rities and Exchange Commission inched closer, said: “It has become increasingly clear to me in the past few days that my continued role at C.A. is not helping the company’s efforts to move for- ward.” Is the company really trying to move forward? Mr. Kumar’s defenestration is only the last in a line of disappointingly incremental moves by Computer Associates International to clean house. The com- pany does not seem to un- derstand that such big problems — a recent $2.2 billion restatement of sales booked during 1999 and 2000 and a federal in- vestigation that has pro- duced four guilty pleas among former managers, including a chief financial officer — require decisive and comprehensive action. Lewis S. Ranieri, a Computer Associates di- rector since 2001 and for- mer Wall Streeter, is run- ning the company now. It is something of a mystery why Mr. Ranieri, known as an aggressive trader in his years at Salomon Broth- ers, has not acted more boldly to set the company on a fresh course. An especially odd move was the company’s lu- dicrously lowball, $10 million offer to the United States government to make the twin investigations go away. The offer, described as “initial,” was dis- closed in a company filing last month. The $10 million offer matches what Computer Associates paid two years ago to Sam Wyly, a dissi- dent shareholder, to get him to pipe down. Mr. Wyly, a Texas investor, accepted the money and dropped a challenge he had made to elect five new members to the Computer Associates board. Maybe the company figured that what worked with Mr. Wyly could work with Uncle Sam. But of- fering the same amount to the government investi- gating allegations of accounting fraud seems wildly inappropriate, to put it mildly. An even larger question is this: What’s up with the notion of offering $10 million of shareholders’ GRETCHEN MORGENSON The Scandal That Refuses To Go Away Associated Press Lewis S. Ranieri Continued on Page 8 Sunday, June 6, 2004 NNE

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ID NAME: NNNE,2004-06-06,BU,001,Bs-4C,E1 YELO MAG CYAN …timothylobrien.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Iraq.pdf · Iraqi Loot And a Trail To the Fed Maj. Rodney King with some of

C M Y KID NAME: NNNE,2004-06-06,BU,001,Bs-4C,E1 YELO MAG CYAN BLK 3 7 15 25 50 75 85 93 97

By TIMOTHY L. O’BRIEN

WHEN a United States Army sergeant brokethrough a false wall in a small building inBaghdad on a Friday afternoon a little over a

year ago, he discovered more than three dozen sealedboxes containing about $160 million in neatly bundled$100 bills.

Later that day, soldiers found more cash in otherhideaways near the Tigris River, in an exclusive neigh-borhood that elite members of Saddam Hussein’s gov-ernment once called home. By the end of the evening,they had amassed 164 metal boxes, all riveted shut, thatheld about $650 million in shrink-wrapped greenbacks.

The cash was so heavy, and so valuable, that the Armyneeded a C-130 Hercules cargo plane to airlift it to a se-cure location.

Just two days later, on Sunday, April 20, 2003,Thomas C. Baxter, head of the legal unit of the FederalReserve Bank of New York, read a brief news accountof the discovery. Most of the money that turned up inBaghdad was new, bore sequential serial numbers andwas stored with documents indicating that it had oncebeen held in Iraq’s central bank. One fact particularlybothered Mr. Baxter: the money had markings fromthree Fed banks, including his own in New York.

Iraq, of course, had been subject to more than adecade of trade sanctions by the United States and theUnited Nations, so large piles of dollars, especially new

bills, were not supposed to have found their way toBaghdad.

“How could that happen?” Mr. Baxter thought tohimself, as he recalled later in Senate testimony. “Notonly with U.S. sanctions, but with U.N. sanctions. Howcould that happen?”

Mr. Baxter and the New York Fed, along with theTreasury Department and the Customs Service, imme-diately began an investigation into Baghdad’s currencystockpile. The continuing inquiry offers a rudimentaryroad map of illicit dealings — including lucrative oilsmuggling — in Iraq and neighboring countries duringthe Hussein years, the federal authorities say.

The investigation led quickly to the vaults of four

Polaris

Continued on Page 7

How Regulators

Traced a Hoard

Of U.S. Cash

Lockboxes,Iraqi LootAnd a TrailTo the Fed

Maj. Rodney Kingwith some of themillions in cashthat American

troops found dur-ing raids in Iraq in

April 2003.

By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

SITTING on the witness stand in a tiny courtroom innorthern Connecticut last week, Theodore J.Forstmann looked every bit the Wall Street Mas-

ter of the Universe that he is. He just didn’t sound likeone.

“What is a junk bond?” a lawyer inquired.“You’re really asking the wrong person,” Mr.

Forstmann replied.Indeed, the usually loquacious Mr. Forstmann, who

made billions of dollars for investors by betting onbuyouts like Gulfstream Aerospace, Dr Pepper andGeneral Instrument in the 1980’s and 90’s, appeared vis-ibly frustrated and at times incapable of answering themost basic questions about his business.

“Frankly, this is kind of over my head,” he told thecourtroom at one point, when asked a question related tothe structure of one of his deals.

“I cannot answer that to your satisfaction,” he re-sponded to another question, wearing a pained look onhis face. “Can I get some water?”

Mr. Forstmann was in court to explain his biggestflop: how he managed to lose $2 billion of his investors’money gambling on two upstart telecommunicationscompanies, XO Communications and McLeodUSA, justbefore the entire industry collapsed in 2001.

In an unprecedented case that, if successful, couldpotentially cripple Mr. Forstmann’s business and ex-

pose legions of other private equity firms to debilitatinglawsuits from their own investors, Connecticut’s attor-ney general and state treasurer have sued him and hisfirm, Forstmann Little & Company, contending thatthey invested improperly and lost $125 million of thestate’s pension fund money.

The state has accused the firm of a bait-and-switchscheme: luring the state’s pensions to invest with thefund on the promise of a conservative investment strat-egy and then pursuing highly speculative deals.

“This case is not about simply a failed investment,”Gerald J. Fields, the lead lawyer for Connecticut, said inState Superior Court in Rockville, Conn., a hamlet about130 miles northeast of Manhattan, during his openingstatement, accusing Forstmann Little of breach of con-tract and fiduciary duty. “The firm invested in two high-risk ventures that Connecticut had not bargained for.”

Forstmann Little’s lawyer, Fred Bartlit, who repre-sented the Bush campaign in the 2000 Florida recount,said the case was without merit. Mr. Bartlit, a com-manding figure with a booming voice, argued in thecourt that the deals were explicitly permitted under theagreement signed by Connecticut. He said the state wasnow simply engaged in Monday-morning quarterback-ing, trying “to rewrite the contract in court.”

Indeed, he pointed out that Connecticut never com-plained about the investments in question — which wereall disclosed to the state before they were made and ini-tially rose in value — until they began to lose money. He

Defending a Colossal Flop, in His Own Way

Bloomberg News

Theodore J. Forstmann, right, with his lawyer, FredBartlit, is being sued over failed investments. Continued on Page 8

OPENERS

Luring the modern condom

buyer. The Goods, by Brendan I.

Koerner. 2

NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Murdoch has his own succession

issues. By Geraldine Fabrikant

and Laura M. Holson. 3

Searching for

the secret of

Google’s success?

Digital Domain,

by Randall

Stross. 3

Money for nothing: Why Viacom’s

board paid Mel. The Agenda, by

Patrick McGeehan. 4

SUNDAY MONEY

Do-it-

yourself

home sales

often mean

doing a lot.

By Lynnley Browning. 5

One less worry for investors.

Strategies, by Mark Hulbert. 5

OFFICE SPACE

Why some bosses wouldn’t dream

of outsourcing. Armchair M.B.A.,

by William J. Holstein. 9

INSIDE

COMPUTER ASSOCIATES, embroiled in oneof the nation’s longest-running accountingfraud investigations, announced on Friday

that Sanjay Kumar, its chief software architect andformer chief executive, was finally making his exit.

In a blinding glimpse of the obvious, Mr.Kumar, who clung to the company even as investi-gators from the Justice Department and the Secu-rities and Exchange Commission inched closer,said: “It has become increasingly clear to me inthe past few days that my continued role at C.A. isnot helping the company’s efforts to move for-ward.”

Is the company really trying to move forward?Mr. Kumar’s defenestration is only the last in a lineof disappointingly incremental moves by ComputerAssociates International to clean house. The com-

pany does not seem to un-derstand that such bigproblems — a recent $2.2billion restatement ofsales booked during 1999and 2000 and a federal in-vestigation that has pro-duced four guilty pleasamong former managers,including a chief financialofficer — require decisiveand comprehensive action.

Lewis S. Ranieri, aComputer Associates di-rector since 2001 and for-mer Wall Streeter, is run-ning the company now. Itis something of a mysterywhy Mr. Ranieri, known asan aggressive trader in hisyears at Salomon Broth-ers, has not acted more

boldly to set the company on a fresh course. An especially odd move was the company’s lu-

dicrously lowball, $10 million offer to the UnitedStates government to make the twin investigationsgo away. The offer, described as “initial,” was dis-closed in a company filing last month.

The $10 million offer matches what ComputerAssociates paid two years ago to Sam Wyly, a dissi-dent shareholder, to get him to pipe down. Mr.Wyly, a Texas investor, accepted the money anddropped a challenge he had made to elect five newmembers to the Computer Associates board.

Maybe the company figured that what workedwith Mr. Wyly could work with Uncle Sam. But of-fering the same amount to the government investi-gating allegations of accounting fraud seems wildlyinappropriate, to put it mildly.

An even larger question is this: What’s up withthe notion of offering $10 million of shareholders’

GRETCHEN MORGENSON

The ScandalThat RefusesTo Go Away

Associated Press

Lewis S. Ranieri

Continued on Page 8

Sunday, June 6, 2004

NNE