icts for open contracting in fragile states-march19

11

Click here to load reader

Upload: open-contracting

Post on 27-Jun-2015

183 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

ICT for Open Contracting in Fragile States

Claire Schouten OpenGovHub

March 19th, 2013

Page 2: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

Fragile States – Not clear (35 to 47 countries), but limited ability to govern their

territory, failure to build mutually constructive and reinforcing relations with society

– 70% of fragile states have experienced conflict since 1989 – Home to 14% of world pop, 33% of poorest -> 50% by 2015 – 38% of total ODA flows (USD 50 billion)

ICT and ICT4D – Use of info tech, communication device or application

applied for socio-economic development, human rights Open Contracting – Global movement for increased disclosure and

participation in public contracting

Concepts

Page 3: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

Accountability Chain

The affected communities must be reintegrated in the accountability chain

• Tax Payers

Semi-contractual

• Donor

Contract • Implementer • NGO /

Company

Non contract

• Beneficiaries

State in Reconstruction

X % of aid

Y%

Audit and financial accountability A2I? Engagement? M&E? Feedback & Response?

Actual accountability chain

Page 4: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

Context and technology

• Population et literacy rates

• Democratization – EIU Index – authoritarian & hybrid, TL - flawed

• Access to information - Angola, Ethiopia, Guinea Conakry, Liberia, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan

• Independence of the media – not free to partly free

• Infrastructure – mobiles: 65% penetration; 69% of mobiles in Africa will have internet access by 2014

Page 5: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

OpenSpending

Page 6: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19
Page 7: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19
Page 8: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

Community Engagement and Monitoring

Afghanistan

EITI, OBI, FOI, OC

Integrity Watch

Afghanistan

- Health centers

- Schools - Roads

- Electricity - Police station

Dem Rep of Congo

EITI, OBI

FOCHI

- Water projects - Health centers - Roads - Land

- Electricity

Liberia

EITI, OBI, FOI, OC

Poverty Reduction Strategy Tracking Network

Infrastructure and basic services of the PRS

Nepal

FOI, OBI, Open Nepal

CAHURAST

- Education services - Health

- Irrigation - Roads

Palestine

Social Audits in Schools

Teacher Creativity

Centre

- Roads - Schools

- Water and waste

- Library - Parks - Food security

Timor Leste

EITI, OBI, Budget and E-

Portal, FOI

Luta Hamutuk

- Roads - Electricity - Veteran housing - Health centers

- Schools

Page 10: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

Questions for the use of ICT • Do we understand the context? • Do we have a good diagnostic of the problem? • Does the tool reinforce a particular strategy? • What is the comparative advantage of the tool? • Who are the providers and users? • Is the information credible, timely and useful with

respect to the objectives? • Are we enabling collaborative processes? • Are we closing the loop? • Is it sustainable?

Page 11: ICTs for Open Contracting in Fragile States-March19

Thank you!

Claire Schouten

[email protected]

www.integrityaction.org