icici spss output

Upload: desiree-horne

Post on 03-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    1/13

    V8A ICICI

    Frequencies

    Statistics

    preservices

    N Valid 75

    Missing 0

    Mean 1.4267

    preservices

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid stronglysatisfied 49 65.3 65.3 65.3

    satisfied 20 26.7 26.7 92.0

    neutral 6 8.0 8.0 100.0

    Total 75 100.0 100.0

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    2/13

    T-TEST

    /TESTVAL=1.43

    /MISSING=ANALYSIS

    /VARIABLES=v8a

    /CRITERIA=CI(.95).

    T-Test

    One-Sample Statistics

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

    preservices 75 1.4267 .64038 .07395

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    3/13

    One-Sample Test

    Test Value = 1.43

    t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference

    95% Confidence Interval of the

    DifferenceLower Upper

    preservices -.045 74 .964 -.00333 -.1507 .1440

    V8C ICICI

    Frequencies

    Statistics

    interestrate

    N Valid 75

    Missing 0

    Mean 2.5333

    interestrate

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid stronglysatisfied 6 8.0 8.0 8.0

    satisfied 32 42.7 42.7 50.7

    neutral 31 41.3 41.3 92.0

    dissatisfied 3 4.0 4.0 96.0

    stronglydissatisfied 3 4.0 4.0 100.0

    Total 75 100.0 100.0

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    4/13

    T-TEST

    /TESTVAL=2.5

    /MISSING=ANALYSIS

    /VARIABLES=v8c

    /CRITERIA=CI(.95).

    T-Test

    One-Sample Statistics

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

    interestrate 75 2.5333 .85950 .09925

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    5/13

    One-Sample Test

    Test Value = 2.5

    t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference

    95% Confidence Interval of the

    DifferenceLower Upper

    interestrate .336 74 .738 .03333 -.1644 .2311

    V8E ICICI

    Frequencies

    Statistics

    processingtime

    N Valid 75

    Missing 0

    Mean 3.0933

    processingtime

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid stronglysatisfied 1 1.3 1.3 1.3satisfied 19 25.3 25.3 26.7

    neutral 30 40.0 40.0 66.7

    dissatisfied 22 29.3 29.3 96.0

    stronglydissatisfied 3 4.0 4.0 100.0

    Total 75 100.0 100.0

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    6/13

    T-Test

    One-Sample Statistics

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

    interestrate 75 2.5333 .85950 .09925

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    7/13

    One-Sample Test

    Test Value = 3.0

    t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference

    95% Confidence Interval of the

    Difference

    Lower Upper

    interestrate -4.702 74 .000 -.46667 -.6644 -.2689

    V8F ICICI

    Frequencies

    Statistics

    repaymentcharge

    N Valid 75

    Missing 0

    Mean 3.4400

    repaymentcharge

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid stronglysatisfied 1 1.3 1.3 1.3

    satisfied 11 14.7 14.7 16.0

    neutral 26 34.7 34.7 50.7

    dissatisfied 28 37.3 37.3 88.0

    stronglydissatisfied 9 12.0 12.0 100.0

    Total 75 100.0 100.0

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    8/13

    T-TEST

    /TESTVAL=3.4

    /MISSING=ANALYSIS

    /VARIABLES=v8f

    /CRITERIA=CI(.95).

    T-Test

    One-Sample Statistics

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

    repaymentcharge 75 3.4400 .93346 .10779

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    9/13

    One-Sample Test

    Test Value = 3.4

    t df Sig. (2-tailed)Mean

    Difference

    95% Confidence Interval of the

    DifferenceLower Upper

    repaymentcharge .371 74 .712 .04000 -.1748 .2548

    CHI-SQURE

    V4 & V6

    CROSSTABS

    /TABLES=v4 BY v6/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

    /STATISTICS=CHISQ

    /CELLS=COUNT

    /COUNT ROUND CELL

    /BARCHART.

    Crosstabs

    Case Processing Summary

    Cases

    Valid Missing Total

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    10/13

    Case Processing Summary

    Cases

    Valid Missing Total

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    typeofservices *

    incomeeligibility

    75 100.0% 0 .0% 75 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig. (2-

    sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 27.373a

    8 .001

    Likelihood Ratio 19.614 8 .012

    Linear-by-Linear Association 2.886 1 .089

    N of Valid Cases 75

    a. 12 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

    expected count is .07.

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    11/13

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    12/13

    V11 &v12

    CROSSTABS

    /TABLES=v11 BY v12

    /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

    /STATISTICS=CHISQ

    /CELLS=COUNT

    /COUNT ROUND CELL

    /BARCHART.

    Crosstabs

    Case Processing Summary

    Cases

    Valid Missing Total

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    attentiononyou *

    staffbehaviour

    75 100.0% 0 .0% 75 100.0%

    attentiononyou * staffbehaviour Crosstabulation

    Count

    staffbehaviour

    Totalyes no

    attentiononyou yes 21 13 34

    no 14 27 41

    Total 35 40 75

  • 7/29/2019 Icici Spss Output

    13/13

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig. (2-

    sided)

    Exact Sig. (2-

    sided)

    Exact Sig. (1-

    sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 5.696a

    1 .017

    Continuity Correctionb

    4.641 1 .031Likelihood Ratio 5.760 1 .016

    Fisher's Exact Test .021 .015

    Linear-by-Linear Association 5.620 1 .018

    N of Valid Cases 75

    a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.87.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table