iasp news bulletin june/july 2012

6
news bulletin International Association for Suicide Prevention FROM THE PRESIDENT REPORT FROM A NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE COUNTRY REPORT FROM ROMANIA Romania joined the Euro- pean Union in January 2007, a country with an estimated population of 21.5 million. The transition to free market economy was stressful for the Romanian population, confronted more and more with the loss of financial sta- bility. Reporting statistical data on suicide to the WHO, became possible after the political changes in December 1989, which was banned for about 45 years during the communist regime. Romania reported for the WHO Annuals over- all suicide rates per 100,000 people of 12.7 in 1994, 14.64 in 2006, 13.38 in 2007, and 13.5 in 2009. The suicide rate in Romania is lower than the average incidence of suicide in Europe. In 2008, 63,000 people die by suicide within the European Union countries, 2,802 of them being Romanians. In Romania, suicide rates vary significantly from one county to another, ranging from less than 10 to more than 25 suicides/ 100,000 population. Counties with a majority of Hungarian population (such as Harghita, Covasna and Satu Mare) have suicide rates consistently higher than the national average rate, while counties with more than 95% Romanian population have lower suicide rates. Unfortunately, there is no national policy for suicide prevention; there is also no National Institute to coordinate reporting and research into suicide, and there is no National Suicide Prevention Programme. However, mental health prevention programmes with indirect impact on suicide prevention are currently being implemented in Romania. The Law for Mental Health and Protection of Persons with Mental Dis- orders (no. 487/2002) includes provisions for suicide prevention and appropriate institutional structures for primary and secondary prevention of suicidal behaviour. In Romania there are three NGO's involved in the prevention of suicide: “Cry for Help” Foundation from Miercurea Ciuc, the “Anti-Suicide Alliance” from Cluj-Napoca and the Romanian Alliance for Suicide Prevention. Since 2004, these three NGO's coordinated their efforts and organised World Suicide Prevention Day in different Romanian cities, with the aim to implement training for medical specialists and volunteers and to promote public awareness programmes. Prof. Doina Cozman, MD, PhD IASP National Representative for Romania President of Romanian Association for Suicide Prevention www.antisuicid.com e-mail: [email protected] On translating science into practice The World Health Organization states on its website (www.who.int) that “not all suicides can be prevented, but a majority can”, and specifies a number of measures that can be taken at community and national levels to reduce risk. Prominent among these measures is “Reducing access to the means of suicide.” Few suicidologists and specialists in public health suicide prevention would dispute the evidence that means restriction efforts save lives (Mann et al, 2005). Moreover, few would dispute the evidence that, although method substitution does occur, only a relatively small proportion of individuals intend on using one method, but thwarted from access to that method, go on to die by suicide from an alternative method. In the United States, where suicides by firearm predominate, ecolo- gical evidence overwhelmingly supports a preventative approach to remove firearms from easy access, to safely secure firearms, to engage firearm locking mechanisms, etc. (Hemmenway, 2006). Numerous examples, worldwide, have demonstrated the effectiveness of bridge barriers in preventing suicidal jumps from these struc- tures (Beautrais, 2007). IASP, in conjunction with the WHO and with funding from Syngenta, has produced promising results from pilot studies of locked pesticide storage boxes on farms in Sri Lanka (Hawton et al, 2009). Legislation in the UK limiting the number of immediately accessible paracetamol pills has demonstrated reduced deaths from intentional paracetamol poisoning (Hawton et al, 2001); and the coal gas story in the UK (Kreitman, 1976) is infamous in defining that reduced access to highly lethal methods of suicide is effective. Moreover, fencing and other barriers to prevent access to railroad tracks and shut off valves to prevent car exhaust fumes from reaching toxic levels have been proposed, but remain untested. To date, per- haps the only methods used with any frequency in suicide attempts that remain problematic from a means restriction perspective are those of hanging and cutting/piercing, as ligatures and knives are ubiquitous in most all societies. It is my belief that the international suicide prevention community should strongly advocate for the adoption and implementation of means restriction approaches in their communities, states, provinces, and/or countries. With the widespread implementation of these measures and with the passage of sufficient time to engage long-term follow-up evaluation, it is my contention that thousands of lives would be saved. Further, it is my belief that the best of research must translate into policy. This is what happened in the UK with regard to how parace- tamol was restricted in its availability to would-be stock-pilers. But accomplishing policy change or adoption is extraordinarily difficult both at the legislative level and via corporate buy-in. Take, for example, the car exhaust shut-off valve. I don't recall the name of the young man who visited me several years ago to ask for support, but I do recall his argument. He had invented a simple shut-off valve that would effectively prevent toxic levels of carbon monoxide from being emitted by an automobile. He said that the cost, per unit, i.e. per car, to produce and install these devices was only US$ 11.00. That said, he had met total resistance from the US auto manufacturing industry and could not get a response from the U.S. federal regulatory agency that oversaw transportation issues. Some means restriction approaches are, indeed, expensive; hence proposals are understandably resisted by involved industries and/or cash-strapped localities. Other proposals are resisted by groups who simply don't buy into the value of protecting the public health relative to their own values. As but one example, it took three years of advo- cacy to overcome the Art Deco League's opposition to a suicide barrier on Washington, DC's Ellington Bridge, this city's number 1 jumping site (O'Carroll & Silverman, 1994). Their argument was that the proposed fencing would destroy the beauty of this road- bed bridge. One might argue that the evidence in support of means restriction approaches is not all that definitive or that it does not absolutely prove causation hence, alone, would prevent suicides, but little in science meets an absolute test of such criticisms. I, for one, am convinced that the widespread adoption of means restriction approaches will save lives, many, many lives. To make that happen, however, requires us to move out of our offices and learn the necessary skills to be more successful advocates. It might take years (nothing in prevention moves all that quickly), but we must preach less to our own choir and, alternatively, find ways to get our evidence both heard and translated into prevention by the powers that be. Lanny Berman, Ph.D, ABP. References Beautrais, A. (2007). Suicide by jumping: A review of research and prevention strategies, Crisis, 35, 557–562. Hawton, K, Ratnayeke, L, Simkin, S, Harriss, L, & Scott, V. (2009). Evaluation of acceptability and use of lockable storage devices for pesticides in Sri Lanks that might assist in prevention of self-poisoning. BMC Public Health, 9, 69. Hawton, K, Townsend, E., Deeks, J, Appleby, L, & Bennewith, O. (2001). Effects of legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylate on self poi- soning in the United Kingdom: before and after study. British Medical Journal, 322, 1203. Hemmenway, D. (2004). Private guns, public health. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Kreitman N. (1976). The coal gas story. United Kingdom suicide rates, 1960- 71. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 30(2), 86–93. Mann, J J, Apter, A, Bertolote, J, Beautrais, A., Currier, D, Haas, A., et al (2005). Suicide Prevention Strategies: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(16), 2064-2074. O'Carroll, P & Silverman, M M (1994). Community suicide prevention: The effectiveness of bridge barriers. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 24(1), 89-99. In official relations with the World Health Organization President: Dr Lanny Berman 1st Vice President: Professor Marco Sarchiapone 2nd Vice President: Dr Ella Arensman 3rd Vice President: Professor Paul Yip Treasurer: Professor Michael Phillips General Secretary: Dr Tony Davis National Rep: Professor Sunny Collings Organisational Rep: Dr Jerry Reed Doina Cozman J U N E / J U L Y 2 0 1 2

Upload: international-association-for-suicide-prevention-iasp

Post on 27-Mar-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Offers the June / July 2012 News Bulletin of the International Association for Suicide Prevention.

TRANSCRIPT

newsbu l l e t i nI n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u i c i d e P r e v e n t i o n

FROM THE PRESIDENT

REPORT FROM A NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE

COUNTRY REPORTFROM ROMANIARomania joined the Euro-pean Union in January 2007,a country with an estimatedpopulation of 21.5 million.The transition to free marketeconomy was stressful forthe Romanian population,confronted more and morewith the loss of financial sta-bility. Reporting statisticaldata on suicide to the WHO, became possible afterthe political changes in December 1989, which wasbanned for about 45 years during the communistregime. Romania reported for the WHO Annuals over-all suicide rates per 100,000 people of 12.7 in 1994,14.64 in 2006, 13.38 in 2007, and 13.5 in 2009.

The suicide rate in Romania is lower than the averageincidence of suicide in Europe. In 2008, 63,000 peopledie by suicide within the European Union countries,2,802 of them being Romanians. In Romania, suiciderates vary significantly from one county to another,ranging from less than 10 to more than 25 suicides/100,000 population. Counties with a majority ofHungarian population (such as Harghita, Covasnaand Satu Mare) have suicide rates consistently higherthan the national average rate, while counties withmore than 95% Romanian population have lowersuicide rates.

Unfortunately, there is no national policy for suicideprevention; there is also no National Institute tocoordinate reporting and research into suicide, andthere is no National Suicide Prevention Programme.However, mental health prevention programmes withindirect impact on suicide prevention are currentlybeing implemented in Romania. The Law for MentalHealth and Protection of Persons with Mental Dis-orders (no. 487/2002) includes provisions for suicideprevention and appropriate institutional structuresfor primary and secondary prevention of suicidalbehaviour.

In Romania there are three NGO's involved in theprevention of suicide: “Cry for Help” Foundationfrom Miercurea Ciuc, the “Anti-Suicide Alliance”from Cluj-Napoca and the Romanian Alliance forSuicide Prevention. Since 2004, these three NGO'scoordinated their efforts and organised World SuicidePrevention Day in different Romanian cities, withthe aim to implement training for medical specialistsand volunteers and to promote public awarenessprogrammes.

Prof. Doina Cozman, MD, PhDIASP National Representative for RomaniaPresident of Romanian Association for Suicide Prevention www.antisuicid.come-mail: [email protected]

On translating science into practiceThe World Health Organization states on its website (www.who.int)that “not all suicides can be prevented, but a majority can”, andspecifies a number of measures that can be taken at communityand national levels to reduce risk. Prominent among these measuresis “Reducing access to the means of suicide.”

Few suicidologists and specialists in public health suicide preventionwould dispute the evidence that means restriction efforts save lives(Mann et al, 2005). Moreover, few would dispute the evidence that,although method substitution does occur, only a relatively smallproportion of individuals intend on using one method, but thwartedfrom access to that method, go on to die by suicide from an alternativemethod.

In the United States, where suicides by firearm predominate, ecolo-gical evidence overwhelmingly supports a preventative approachto remove firearms from easy access, to safely secure firearms, toengage firearm locking mechanisms, etc. (Hemmenway, 2006).Numerous examples, worldwide, have demonstrated the effectivenessof bridge barriers in preventing suicidal jumps from these struc-tures (Beautrais, 2007). IASP, in conjunction with the WHO and withfunding from Syngenta, has produced promising results from pilotstudies of locked pesticide storage boxes on farms in Sri Lanka(Hawton et al, 2009). Legislation in the UK limiting the number ofimmediately accessible paracetamol pills has demonstrated reduceddeaths from intentional paracetamol poisoning (Hawton et al, 2001);and the coal gas story in the UK (Kreitman, 1976) is infamous indefining that reduced access to highly lethal methods of suicide iseffective.

Moreover, fencing and other barriers to prevent access to railroadtracks and shut off valves to prevent car exhaust fumes from reachingtoxic levels have been proposed, but remain untested. To date, per-haps the only methods used with any frequency in suicide attemptsthat remain problematic from a means restriction perspective arethose of hanging and cutting/piercing, as ligatures and knives areubiquitous in most all societies.

It is my belief that the international suicide prevention communityshould strongly advocate for the adoption and implementationof means restriction approaches in their communities, states,provinces, and/or countries. With the widespread implementationof these measures and with the passage of sufficient time toengage long-term follow-up evaluation, it is my contention thatthousands of lives would be saved.

Further, it is my belief that the best of research must translate intopolicy. This is what happened in the UK with regard to how parace-tamol was restricted in its availability to would-be stock-pilers. Butaccomplishing policy change or adoption is extraordinarily difficultboth at the legislative level and via corporate buy-in.

Take, for example, the car exhaust shut-off valve. I don't recall thename of the young man who visited me several years ago to ask forsupport, but I do recall his argument. He had invented a simpleshut-off valve that would effectively prevent toxic levels of carbonmonoxide from being emitted by an automobile. He said that thecost, per unit, i.e. per car, to produce and install these devices wasonly US$ 11.00. That said, he had met total resistance from the USauto manufacturing industry and could not get a response from theU.S. federal regulatory agency that oversaw transportation issues.

Some means restriction approaches are, indeed, expensive; henceproposals are understandably resisted by involved industries and/orcash-strapped localities. Other proposals are resisted by groups whosimply don't buy into the value of protecting the public health relativeto their own values. As but one example, it took three years of advo-cacy to overcome the Art Deco League's opposition to a suicidebarrier on Washington, DC's Ellington Bridge, this city's number1 jumping site (O'Carroll & Silverman, 1994). Their argument wasthat the proposed fencing would destroy the beauty of this road-bed bridge.

One might argue that the evidence in support of means restrictionapproaches is not all that definitive or that it does not absolutelyprove causation hence, alone, would prevent suicides, but little inscience meets an absolute test of such criticisms. I, for one, amconvinced that the widespread adoption of means restrictionapproaches will save lives, many, many lives. To make that happen,however, requires us to move out of our offices and learn thenecessary skills to be more successful advocates. It might takeyears (nothing in prevention moves all that quickly), but we mustpreach less to our own choir and, alternatively, find ways to get ourevidence both heard and translated into prevention by the powersthat be.

Lanny Berman, Ph.D, ABP.

ReferencesBeautrais, A. (2007). Suicide by jumping: A review of research and preventionstrategies, Crisis, 35, 557–562.

Hawton, K, Ratnayeke, L, Simkin, S, Harriss, L, & Scott, V. (2009). Evaluationof acceptability and use of lockable storage devices for pesticides in Sri Lanksthat might assist in prevention of self-poisoning. BMC Public Health, 9, 69.

Hawton, K, Townsend, E., Deeks, J, Appleby, L, & Bennewith, O. (2001). Effectsof legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylate on self poi-soning in the United Kingdom: before and after study. British Medical Journal,322, 1203.

Hemmenway, D. (2004). Private guns, public health. Ann Arbor, MI: Universityof Michigan Press.

Kreitman N. (1976). The coal gas story. United Kingdom suicide rates, 1960-71. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 30(2), 86–93.

Mann, J J, Apter, A, Bertolote, J, Beautrais, A., Currier, D, Haas, A., et al (2005).Suicide Prevention Strategies: A systematic review. Journal of the AmericanMedical Association, 294(16), 2064-2074.

O'Carroll, P & Silverman, M M (1994). Community suicide prevention: Theeffectiveness of bridge barriers. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 24(1),89-99.

In official relations with

the World Health Organization

President: Dr Lanny Berman1st Vice President: Professor Marco Sarchiapone2nd Vice President: Dr Ella Arensman3rd Vice President: Professor Paul Yip

Treasurer: Professor Michael PhillipsGeneral Secretary: Dr Tony DavisNational Rep: Professor Sunny CollingsOrganisational Rep: Dr Jerry Reed

Doina Cozman

JUNE/JULY 2012

In May of 2012 the Board of the IASP supported the establishment of a Special Interest Group(SIG) on Suicide Bereavement and Postvention. The Board envisage that the establishmentof the SIG will provide a structure for further “expanding and sustaining of the expertise andvaluable work that you have built up under the umbrella of the IASP Task Force on Postventionover many years”.

The establishment of the SIG now empowers us to establish a number of Task Forces (TFs)which shall be time specific and mandated to take on specific pieces of work for the SIG.Such TFs could include

Complicated grief associated with suicide clustering and contagion

Development and publication of SIG newsletter

Ensuring presence of Postvention at all suicide prevention conferences

Provision of bereavement information through IASP website which is culturally sensitiveand available in all official languages of the IASP

These are just a number of suggestions. It will be the SIG membership that shall ultimatelydecide on the TFs required, and the work to be addressed. Each Task Force will have a specificChair appointed by the Chairs of the Special Interest Group and upon the establishment ofa TF, members of the SIG can opt to contribute to the working of the TF.

A proposed TF will ensure that the Postvention stream is visible and central to all conferencesaddressing suicide prevention, and will be chaired by Mr John Peters. The upcoming ESSSB14conference in Tel Aviv shall have a symposium dedicated to Postvention.

An overview of the symposium is below.

Negotiating access to data for a studyof parental suicide bereavement:challenges and opportunities

The development of a parental suicidebereavement training pack for health professionals

The importance of introducing 'lived experience' in postvention education programs

How can we help suicide survivors via the internet? Evidence, major issuesand food for thought

A greater level of exposure for Postvention has already been achieved for the IASP conferencein Oslo in 2013. At this conference 2 plenary presentations relating to postvention will bepresented along with a number of symposia, workshops, poster presentations etc. We willendeavour establishing strong links with other Special Interest Groups, such as Suicide andthe Workplace, Clustering and Contagion in Suicidal Behaviour and Culture and SuicidalBehaviour.

The success of the SIG will be determined by the willingness of people from the Postventionfield to engage actively, offer their time, expertise and support for the greater benefit of thoseliving with the loss of one of their loved one's by suicide.

Karl Andriessen, Co-Chair, [email protected] McCarthy, Co-Chair, [email protected]

45th Annual Conference of the AmericanAssociation of Suicidology (AAS):Collaborations in Suicidology:Bridging the DisciplinesApril 18-21, 2012 Baltimorewww.suicidology.org

IASP SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS

New – IASP Special Interest Group on SuicideBereavement and Postvention established

More than 900 gather for Annual AAS Conference

Lanny Berman and Regina M. Benjamin

The 45th Annual American Association of Suicidology Conference was held in Baltimore,Maryland during the period April 18–21, 2012. Dr. Lanny Berman joined over 900 delegatesin attendance with the aim to advance the conference theme of Collaborations in Suicidology:Bridging the Disciplines.

This year there were 193 presentations accounting for over 238 hours of meaningful contentfor those in attendance. In addition to the many paper and poster sessions, attendees heardseveral engaging keynote presentations to include one from U.S. Surgeon General ReginaM. Benjamin, M.D., M.B.A. (see photo) on the Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention andcurrent efforts to revise the U.S. National Strategy for Suicide Prevention. This year's conferencechair was Stephen O'Connor, Ph.D., who did an outstanding job ensuring an enriching confe-rence experience for all. In addition to great content, there were many organizations representedin the exhibit hall and the International Association for Suicide Prevention was present aswell. Materials promoting World Suicide Prevention Day to be held on September 10, 2012and announcing the XXVII IASP World Congress to be held in Oslo, Norway during the periodSeptember 24–28, 2013 were made available. Additionally, copies of The Journal of CrisisIntervention and Suicide Prevention published under the Auspices of the International Associ-ation for Suicide Prevention (IASP) and plenty of IASP membership application forms weremade available to those visiting our table. The IASP exhibit was staffed by Dr. Dan Reidenberg,U.S. National Representative and Dr. Jerry Reed, IASP Chair of the Council of OrganizationalRepresentatives. Everyone is looking forward to the 46th Annual AAS Conferenceto be held April 24-27, 2013 in Austin, Texas.

Prepared by: Jerry Reed, Ph.D., MSWChair, Council of Organizational Representatives, IASP

newsbu l l e t i nI n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u i c i d e P r e v e n t i o n

KarlAndriessen

SeanMcCarthy

Four years ago, Suicidology lost one of its most brilliant repre-sentatives. A premature, fatal illness took the life of Slovenianpsychiatrist Andrej Marusic (1965-2008). His impressive in-telligence and knowledge, his hunger for learning and achieving,his curiosity of science and life in general, and his tireless ana-lyses of complex issues led to major scientific contributions toSuicidology. This comprised epidemiological and sociologicalresearch as well as genetic studies. His early interest in the gene-tic determinants of suicidal behaviour, involving research inmolecular genetics with innovative techniques, was maintainedthroughout his research career, as he explored the relationshipbetween genes and acquired factors, and the emergence of the"gene-environment" product. Although many of his studiesremained unfinished Andrej left us a precious legacy of researchfindings and theoretical reflections that continue to stimulatediscussion amongst clinicians and researchers in the field ofSuicidology.Andrej had special leadership qualities, highly developed inter-personal skills and an unforgettable communication style, whichbrought energy and enthusiasm to the field of Suicidology.His contribution to Suicidology went beyond his scientific initi-atives through involvement in the development of the EuropeanSymposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour, ESSSB, and the

biannual international meeting "Suicide: Interplay of Genes andEnvironment". We remain indebted to Andrej in many ways.

At the ESSSB 13 Symposium in Rome in September 2010, theAndrej Marusic Award for research was established. During theESSSB 14 Symposium in Tel Aviv, 3-6th September 2012, prizeswill also be awarded to the best scientific contributions to theSymposium in the field of biology of suicide, suicide preventionand treatment of suicidal behaviour, by young researchers.

Applicants should be under 40 years old, or have less then 5years of experience in the field of Suicidology. They should sub-mit a summary of their scientific proposal/contribution throughthe symposium website. Criteria that will be taken into accountin evaluating the applications include: innovative nature of theresearch, relevance and clarity of aims and objectives, quality ofthe methodological approach and feasibility of the implementationof the research findings in terms of available expertise, planningand resources.

Applicants should submit by e-mail to the Organising Committee,lead by Professor Marco Sarchiapone:[email protected], a letter of application stating theirname, title, affiliation and focus of research. A CV of no morethan 4 pages and a 1500 word summary of their scientific pro-posal/contribution and its importance is required. Candidateswho are shortlisted for the prizes will be invited to present aresearch paper at the Award Symposium of ESSSB 14.

The deadline for applications is July 30th 2012. The AndrejMarusic Prize 2012 has been announced on the websites of theInternational Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP), the 14thEuropean Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour(ESSSB14), the Institute Andrej Marusic (IAM), and was circulatedamong IASP members in June.

For further information, seewww.iasp.info, www.esssb14.org

ESSSB14 2012“LUNCH WITH EXPERTS”During the 14th European Symposium on Suicide andSuicidal Behaviour, collaborative ESSSB14 and IASP“Lunch with Experts” sessions will be organised.Theaim of these sessions is to facilitate the transferenceof specialist knowledge and expertise to conferenceparticipants in an informal way.

Renowned experts in suicide research and preventionwill be available over a 60 minute lunch session todiscuss their work in research, treatment and preventionwith researchers and others who are interested in pick-ing their brains in an informal setting. Experts whohave agreed to participate are: Diego De Leo, MadelynGould, Lars Mehlum, Rory O'Connor, Airi Varnik andGil Zalsman.

The “Lunch with Experts” sessions will take placeduring the ESSSB14 Conference on Wednesday 5thand Thursday 6th September, between 13.30–14.30,and will be facilitated by Ella Arensman.

September 10th, 2012 marks the 10th anniversary of theWorld Suicide Prevention Day: ten years of research, tenyears of prevention, ten years of education and dissemi-nation of information.

The efforts of this decade are founded on research evi-dencethat we can prevent suicide. Indeed, the most im-portant aimof this initiative, organized by the International Associationfor Suicide Prevention (IASP) in collaboration with the WorldHealth Organisation (WHO), is raising awareness among thescientific community and the general population that suicideis preventable. Hence we must reduce the stigma and silencethat still surrounds it.

The theme of World Suicide Prevention Day this year is"Suicide Prevention across the Globe: StrengtheningProtective Factors and Instilling Hope".

Public health awareness and education campaigns haveoften focused on the role of risk factors in the developmentof suicidal behaviour. In order to increase effectiveness inpreventing suicide we propose to direct our efforts not onlytowards reducing risk factors but also toward strengtheningprotective factors, with the aim of preventing vulnerabilityto suicide and strengthening people's resilience.

We anticipate over 50 countries will participate this year. 14countries have already announced a wide range of activities,such as an essay competition and awareness walk in Sabah,Malaysia, a rally in Nepal, a march through cities in NewZealand, a classical concert in Zürich, Switzerland and apublic education program in the Municipal Auditorium Santiagodo Cacém, Portugal. This year IASP will launch World SuicidePrevention Day in 10 locations across the globe, includingEurope, Asia, Australia, Canada, North and South America.

Join us on this important day in the year!

World SuicidePrevention Day 2012is coming closer.....

The International Association for Suicide Prevention,the Institute Andrej Marusic (IAM) and the 14th EuropeanSymposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour (ESSSB14)are introducing the Andrej Marusic Prizes (AMP)

newsbu l l e t i nI n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u i c i d e P r e v e n t i o n

Andrej Marusic

Lars MehlumMadelyn GouldDiego De Leo

Gil ZalsmanAiri VarnikRory O’Connor

The World Suicide Prevention Day Toolkit can be accessed through: http://iasp.info/wspd/pdf/2012_wspd_toolkit.pdf

Professor Sunny Collings, New Zealand

Sunny Collings has been a member of IASP since2003 and has been the National Representative for New Zealand since 2009. She is also a member of the IASP Task Force Suicide and the Media. Hercommitment to suicide prevention research andpractice is long standing. Sunny Collings has hadmany opportunities to contribute through her clinicalwork as a Consultant Psychiatrist in a public mentalhealth service for people with severe personality

disorders, and as an academic at the University of Otago Medical Schoolin New Zealand. Her research, practice and advocacy has focused on thesocial and health services aspects of suicide, suicidal behaviors and theirprevention. Sunny Collings is currently Dean & Head of Campus at theUniversity of Otago, Wellington (School of Medicine & Health Sciences).She is still research active and leads a multilevel suicide prevention study,supervises two PhD students, one an Emergency Department nurseinvestigating the risk of people who present with mixed pictures of physicalhealth problems and self-harm, and the other looking at opportunities forhealth services to contribute to risk reduction among at risk Pacific Islandpeople in New Zealand.

Sunny Collings can be contacted at: [email protected]

Time is running! The 14th European Symposium of Suicide and SuicidalBehavior will be held from 3rd–6th September in Tel Aviv. Under the motto“Integration of different perspectives”, the ESSSB14 conference pro-gramme includes the most important aspects of suicidal behavior as wellas the latest achievements in this field. Professionals in the field will enjoya high-level scientific programme covering the latest perspectives anddevelopments in the different components of suicidology.

A very rich scientific programme will engage us during these 4 days, ina continuous and mutual exchange of ideas that will undoubtedly enrichand integrate our knowledge and collaboration in suicide research andprevention. Both ESSSB14 and IASP are involved in organising differentactivities such as the many Symposia, the 'Lunch with Experts sessions',and the Andrej Marusic Award.

Professor Maurizio Pompili, Italy

Maurizio Pompili, M.D, Ph.D. is currently Professor of Suicidology and part of the Facultyof Medicine and Psychology of Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, where he received hisM.D. degree, where he trained in Psychiatry (both summa cum laude) and where he has doctoral degree in Experimental and Clinical Neurosciences. He is the Director of theSuicide Prevention Center at Sant'Andrea Hospital in Rome. He is also part of the Commu-nity at McLean Hospital - Harvard Medical School, USA. He is the recipient of the AmericanAssociation of Suicidology's 2008 Shneidman Award for “Outstanding early career contributionto suicidology”.

Maurizio Pompili is part of IASP Task Force for Emergency Medicine and Suicidal Behavior and he has beenItalian representative for IASP for several years. He is also member of the International Academy for SuicideResearch and the American Association of Suicidology. Professor Pompili has provided validation studies ofthe Beck Hopelessness Scale, Reason for Living Inventory, TEMPS-A for the Italian population researching theinterplay of factors that may precipitate suicide both in clinical and non-clinical samples.

Maurizio Pompili has published about 300 papers on suicide including original research articles, book chaptersand editorials. He co-edited ten international books on suicide (including the latest Evidence-based practice insuicidology with Hogrefe & Huber and Suicide in the words of suicidologists with Nova). Maurizio Pompili isparticularly active in collaborations the Italian Ministry of Health and Italian Health Institute for suicide prevention.He is the principal investigator for Italy for the START study directed by Prof. Diego De Leo. He recently launchedthe Race for Live, a sporting event to support suicide prevention in the community.

Maurizio Pompili can be contacted at: [email protected]

This unique suicide prevention conference promises to be a dynamic and educational event in the equally excitingsurrounds of Tel Aviv-Jaffa with its distinctive cosmopolitan and energetic atmosphere.

For the first time ever, Israeli and Palestinian clinicians will join hands to challenge the phenomena of suicidalbehavior under the umbrella of the European symposium. Palestinian colleagues have agreed to participate inboth organizing and scientific local committees and to contribute from their knowledge and experience. The con-gress will take place in Tel Aviv-Jaffa, a symbol of integration for both Israelis and Arabs living together in peacefor decades.

We are proud to inform you that we received more than 400 submissions of scientific contributions that willbe presented in 22 plenary and keynote sessions, 65 parallel sessions and more than 150 scientific posters.For more details please, see the Symposium website: www.esssb14.org, e-mail: [email protected]

We look forward to welcoming you to the beautiful city of Tel Aviv-Jaffa! Don't forget to register!!!

Prof. Gil Zalsman Prof. Alan ApterCo-President Co-President

newsbu l l e t i nI n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u i c i d e P r e v e n t i o n

Sunny Collings

New elected chair and deputy chair of the council of nationalrepresentativesThe Executive Committee on behalf of the IASP members, would like to congratulate Sunny Collings, who has been elected Chair ofthe Council of National Representatives and Maurizio Pompili, who has been elected Deputy Chair. The Executive Committee welcomeboth Sunny and Maurizio to their respective roles and look forward to collaborating with them. For those not familiar with Sunny andMaurizio we have printed their profiles below:

Preview of ESSSB14 2012

Dear Colleagues,

Gil Zalsman Alan Apter

MaurizioPompili

The Conference theme: SuicidePrevention in the Asia Pacific:Barriers, Boundaries and Beyond aims at strengthening networks ofacademic and practitioners in workingtowards a common goal within adiverse environment. The Conferencewill address the requirement to focuson putting research into practice,

and implement innovative suicide prevention activitieswithin well defined strategies that call on the participationof Governments, institutions, clinicians and NGOs. Theconference will be organised by SNEHA and IASP andaims to provide participants an insight into various aspectsof suicide research and suicide prevention.

Key topics that will be covered during the conferenceinclude suicide and cultural factors, neurobiological,psychiatric and psychosocial factors associated withsuicidal behavior, evidence based and best practices insuicide prevention, postvention, encouraging responsiblereporting of suicide, and challenges associated with socialmedia and suicide prevention.

Chennai is known as the gateway to South India. Despitebeing an important city for manufacturing, health care

and IT, Chennai managed to retain a charm of its own.Tt is a sprawling, busy and yet a conservation city withdeep traditions and culture. Throughout the conference,delegates will be provided with a variety of social andcultural experiences. A range of pre and post conferencetours will be made available.

Professor Lakshmi VijayakumarOrganising Secretary, SNEHA

Congress Secretariat:5th IASP Asia Pacif ic Regional ConferenceMarundeshwara Enterprises A2,Shanthi Apartments18, T.T.K. 1st Cross StreetAlwarpet Chennai 600 018, India

Phone: +91 (0)44-2435 3079 / 7194 2432 8152Tel/Fax: +91(0)44-2432 0605Email: [email protected]

Important dates:July 31st 2012: Deadline for Submission ofAbstracts and Early Bird Registration

September 30th 2012: Announcement ofProgramme

September 2012: Programme announced

November 29th - December 2nd 2012:5th IASP Asia-Pacific Conference, Chennai, India.

The congress will be organized by the National Centrefor Suicide Research and Prevention at the University ofOslo in collaboration with IASP, supported by the Nor-wegian Directorate of Health and sponsored by the WorldHealth Organization (WHO). We aim to provide you asdelegates with a rich scientific programme highlightingthe latest developments in suicidological research andprevention. Innovation is a key word to us as organizersof this major event. The enormity of the problem of suicidalbehaviour world wide calls for creative and courageousefforts to bring new ideas and new knowledge into practicalwork in effective approaches of treatment and intervention.We will provide delegates with ample opportunities toshare their own experiences and take part in formal andinformal discussions over a wide range of topics.

A rich social and cultural programme and an opportunityto experience the flavour of Oslo and Norway with its manytouristic attractions will hopefully make your conferenceexperience complete.

Set aside the dates in your calendar now and joinus for the XXVII World Congress of the IASP inOslo in September 2013!

Lars Mehlum M.D. Ph.D.

Congress PresidentProfessor of Psychiatry and SuicidologyNational Centre for Suicide Research and PreventionInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

Congress secretariat:E-mail: [email protected]

Phone: +47 22 56 19 30

www.iasp2013.org

Important dates:September 30th 2012:Second Announcement and Call for Papers

March 31st 2013:

Deadline for Submission of Abstracts

September 24th 2013: Congress Opening

newsbu l l e t i nI n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u i c i d e P r e v e n t i o n

IASP 5TH ASIA PACIFIC REGIONAL CONFERENCEProfessor Lakshmi Vijayakumar welcomes you to Chennai, India to attend IASP's 5th Asia Pacific Regional Conference to be held inChennai, 29 November–2nd December 2012.

LakshmiVijayakumar

THE 27TH IASP WORLD CONGRESS IN OSLO

Lars Mehlum

Dear Colleagues,

We are delighted to invite you toattend the XXVII World Congress ofthe International Association forSuicide Prevention which will takeplace in Oslo, Norway between the24th and 28th of September 2013.

newsbu l l e t i nI n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u i c i d e P r e v e n t i o n

International Associationfor Suicide Prevention (IASP)The International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) is a world-wide non-governmentalorganization dedicated to the prevention of suicide. In official relations with the World HealthOrganization, IASP's members come from over 50 countries across the world.

IASP connects people working in Suicide Prevention andResearch across the world! Become an IASP member today!

Your benefits:• Free access to Crisis - The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention

- 6 issues per year• Reduced registration fee for IASP conferences• Free membership of IASP Task Forces and Special Interest Groups

Why wait any longer? Become part of IASP now!

Individuals

Zone 1: US $170 (3 years $460)

Zone 2: US $140 (3 years $380)

Zone 3: US $120 (3 years $310)

Zone 4: US $95 (3 years $260)

Organization(Less than $1 million pa budget)

Zone 1: US $200 (3 years $550)

Zone 2: US $150 (3 years $400)

Zone 3: US $130 (3 years $340)

Zone 4: US $100 (3 years $270)

Organization(More than $1 million pa budget)

Zone 1: US $220 (3 years $600)

Zone 2: US $170 (3 years $460)

Zone 3: US $150 (3 years $390)

Zone 4: US $120 (3 years $300)

National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Sognsvannsveien 21, building 12; N0372 Oslo, NorwayTel: +47 22 92 37 15 / Fax: +47 22 92 39 58 / Email: [email protected] / Web: www.iasp.info

MEMBERSHIP DUES (Opportunity to pay for 3 year membership at a reduced fee)Membership dues according to the zones used by the World Bank.

Students,Volunteersand AssociateMembersUS $90 (3 years $240)