i. the detailed r&r plan for people from whom the land is...
TRANSCRIPT
i. The detailed R&R plan for people from whom the land is acquired and the details of local
people deriving their livelihood from the lease area
The proposed mining lease area of 377.68 ha consists of 347.983 ha of Patta Land and
29.692 ha of Government Land and the Patta Land constitutes 92 % of the total proposed
mining lease area. The total land owners involved are 332. The R & R Plan for the land
owners is enclosed herewith as Appendix 1a.
The proposed mining area is having lots of outcrop of Limestone. The photographs
showing the outcrop of limestone are given in Appendix 1b. These clearly confirms that no
activity is being carried out at present by any of the land owners in the proposed mine
lease area.
ii. The CGWA approval for intersecting the ground water table and drawl of 120 kld of
water to be used for carrying out mining operations need to be submitted.
Application for ground water drawl for the Plant and the Mine has been submitted to
Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Hyderabad on 20th Jan 2104. A copy of the same
is enclosed as Appendix 2a
Queries raised by the CGWB vide letter F.No 1/CGWA/Perm/SR/2013‐14/274 dated
14th Feb 2014 have been clarified through our letter Chettinad Cement/ Dachepalli/
CGWB‐Hyd /2014 dated 15th Apr 2014. A copy of the same is enclosed as Appendix 2b
Queries raised by the CGWB vide letter F.No 1/CGWA/Perm/SR/2013‐14/774 dated 6th
May 2014 have been clarified through our letter Chettinad Cement/ Dachepalli/
CGWB‐Hyd / 2014 dated 27th Jun 2014. A copy of the same is enclosed as Appendix 2c
The proposal recommended by the CGWB, Hyderabad to the Central Ground Water
Authority,(CGWA), New Delhi is under process
Appendix 1a
Rehabilitation & Resettlement Plan for Land Owners
The proposed mining lease area of 377.68 ha consists of 347.983 ha of Patta Land and 29.692 ha of
Government Land and the Patta Land constitutes 92 % of the total proposed mining lease area.The
total land owners involved are 332 (Pedagarlapadu Village :197 & in Kesanupalli Village: 135). The
details of extent of land given by each land owner , Government Guideline Rate & Government
Guideline Value and the CCCL Value pertaining to both Pedagarlapadu Village & Kesanupalli Village
have been included as as a part of this document . In the proposed mining lease area there are no
structures and no habitation. Hence, Resettlement Plan has not been envisaged.
Rehabilitation Plan
Though full compensation for the land has been paid to land givers as per mutual‐ agreement, the
following measures have also been proposed to be taken up to help the land givers to lead a
sustained livlihood.
1. Employment
Project Stage
The plan includes foreseeing involvement in construction activities during the project stage,
whether skilled or unskilled through the contractor executing the project. If they are skilled
persons like electricians, plumbers, carpenters, drivers etc., they will be engaged to meet the
project work related requirements. If required, temporary housing facilities will be extended to
them. In addition to the above health care facilities will also be provided to them.
Operation Stage
Preference will be given to land‐giver/his or her legal heir, if the qualification/experience /skill
matches with requirement for a particular opening in the Plant/Mine.
Similarly , the services of the land givers will be utlilised by the company ,depending upon the
need of the company and capabilities of the land‐givers.
2. Training
Training is a very useful tool,which will be used extensively to develop a specific skill or help
persons to enhance their skills. Various training programmes will be conducted for the land‐givers ,
which will help them to have a sustained livilihood.
Training Programmes will be planned covering the following.
S.No Focus Area Specific Aspect
1. Land Related Minor Irrigation
Commercial Agriculture Techniques
Medicinal Plantation & Floriculture
Establishment of Nursaries
2. Live‐stock Related Dairy
Fisheries
3. Service Related Cooking
Para‐health care
Para ‐ teaching
Security
4. Handicrafts Related Readymade garments & Fancy items
Stritching/Tailoring
Embroidery
Soft‐Toys
3. Assistance for livelihood
Chettinad Cement will
Help to form Self Help Groups to ensure sustained generation of income to the land givers
Coordinate with National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development (NABARD), Small
Industries Development Bank of India and other financial institutions to finance the
economic ventures around the project area
Assist in creating self‐employment opportunities
Chettinad Cement hereby confirms that the R & R policy of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh will be
followed in the true spirit.
Cost provision for R & R Cost
S.No Cost – Head Amount (Rs in Crores)
1. Cost of Land 10.9
2. Cost of Shifting Structures NIL
3. Cost of Resettlement ( No habitation within the
proposed mine lease area)
NIL
4. Assistance & Other Implementation Cost As per
R & R policy of Government
of Andhra Pradesh
LAND DETAILS ( PROPOSED MINE LEASE AREA)PEDAGARLAPADU VILLAGE - DACHEPALLI MANDAL- GUNTUR DISTRICT,A.P
S.No Land OwnerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value( in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value(in Rs lakhs)
1 ADDANKI JOHN SAIDULU 1.440 0.69 0.99 0.99
2 ADDANKI PRAKASHA RAO 1.860 2.00 3.72 3.72
3 AKKEM ANKARAO 0.280 0.66 0.18 0.18
4 AKKEM KOTAMMA 0.590 0.65 0.38 0.38
5 AKKEM LAKSMAMMA 1.950 0.62 1.21 1.21
6 AKKEM SAMBAIAH 0.235 0.63 0.15 0.15
7 AKKEM SANKAR RAO 0.280 0.66 0.18 0.18
8 AKKEM SIVA 0.230 0.63 0.14 0.14
9 AKKEM VENKATESWARLU 1.360 0.65 0.88 0.88
10 ATMAKURI SUBRAMANYAM 5.510 0.61 3.36 3.36
11 BARREDDY JAGGAMMA 2.750 0.65 1.79 1.79
12 BATHULA THIRUPATHAMMA 1.900 0.62 1.18 1.18
13 BUDATI RAJAMANI 3.000 2.00 6.00 6.00
14 BUSI KOTESWRARAO 1.220 0.70 0.85 0.85
15 BUSI NAGA BHUSANAM 0.360 0.65 0.23 0.23
16 BUSI PURNA CHANDRARAO 1.900 0.65 1.24 1.24
17 CHIDELLA KANAKAIAH 1.000 0.62 0.62 0.62
18 CHINTHA NAGARATNAMMA 1.900 0.62 1.18 1.18
19 CHINTHAREDDY MANGIREDDY 8.940 0.76 6.79 6.79
20 CHOKKA CHINA NARAYANA 1.950 0.65 1.27 1.27
21 DIBBAMADUGU KRISHNAMURTHY 1.000 0.70 0.70 0.70
22 DIBBAMADUGU RAJU 8.000 1.26 10.06 10.06
23 ENDURI SRINIVASA RAO 0.780 2.00 1.56 1.56
24 GARIKAPATI KOTAMMA 3.000 0.65 1.95 1.95
25 GATTAM HANUMANTHARAO 4.200 2.00 8.40 8.40
26 GOGIREDDY VENKATA RAVAMMA 3.040 0.65 1.98 1.98
27 GOPISETTI NAGESWARAO 1.500 0.65 0.98 0.98
28 GOVINDU NAGESWARAO 1.000 0.62 0.62 0.62
29 GOVINDU BRAHMAM 1.000 0.62 0.62 0.62
30 GOVINDU SAMBAIAH 5.990 0.61 3.65 3.65
31 GUNDA SAIDA RAO 6.410 0.77 4.95 4.95
32 GURRAM VENKATESWAREDDY 12.510 0.74 9.27 9.27
33 ILLURI VENKAT REDDY 7.910 2.00 15.82 15.82
34 IMMADISETTI CHENNAIAH 0.790 0.99 0.78 0.78
35 IMMADISETTI CHINA BRAHMAIAH 0.940 0.65 0.61 0.61
36 IMMADISETTI GURAVAIAH 0.560 0.62 0.35 0.35
37 IMMADISETTI KOTAIAH 0.790 0.99 0.78 0.78
S.No Land OwnerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value( in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value(in Rs lakhs)
38 IMMADISETTI PEDA BRAHMAIAH 0.940 0.65 0.61 0.61
39 IMMADISETTI PERAIAH 1.500 0.65 0.98 0.98
40 IMMIDISETTI LAKSMAMMA 5.820 0.61 3.55 3.55
41 JADDA YESUDASU 0.800 2.00 1.60 1.60
42 JANGILI APPA RAO 1.500 0.61 0.92 0.92
43 JANGILI GOPALA RAO 1.700 0.61 1.04 1.04
44 JANGILI VENKATESWARLU 1.500 0.61 0.92 0.92
45 KAMIREDDY NARSIREDDY 6.460 0.61 3.94 3.94
46 KAMIREDDY VENKAT REDDY 4.005 0.77 3.08 3.08
47 KAMIREDDY YALAMANDAREDDY 8.940 0.77 6.89 6.89
48 KARPURAPU CHINA NARASIMHAM 1.190 0.62 0.74 0.74
49 KARPURAPU CHINA VENKATESWRLU 2.860 0.65 1.86 1.86
50 KARPURAPU KOTESWARA RAO 0.750 0.65 0.49 0.49
51 KARPURAPU MUSALI KOTAIAH 10.620 0.65 6.90 6.90
52 KARPURAPU NAGESWARA RAO 1.825 2.00 3.65 3.65
53 KARPURAPU PEDA VENKATESWARLU 2.440 1.48 3.61 3.61
54 KARPURAPU RAMANJANEYULU 1.015 0.64 0.65 0.65
55 KARPURAPU SANJEEVARAO 0.230 0.66 0.15 0.15
56 KARPURAPU VENKATESWARLU 0.290 0.65 0.19 0.19
57 KARPURAPU YELAMANDA 7.380 1.74 12.84 12.84
58 KARREDLA VENKATESWARLU 8.700 0.65 5.66 5.66
59 KATIKALA GURAVAIAH 1.500 2.00 3.00 3.00
60 KATIKALA GURUVULU 8.040 0.63 5.03 5.03
61 KATIKALA SUBBAIAH 2.180 0.61 1.33 1.33
62 KATIKAM BRAMAIAH 6.220 2.00 12.44 12.44
63 KICHAMSETTI CHINA ANKAIAH 1.000 2.00 2.00 2.00
64 KOLA KOTAIAH 2.990 0.95 2.84 2.84
65 KORE RAMARAO 3.260 0.65 2.12 2.12
66 KOTHAPALLI KRUPADANAM 0.740 2.00 1.48 1.48
67 KOTHAPALLI LACHAIAH 0.800 2.00 1.60 1.60
68 KOTTA LACHAIAH 0.850 2.00 1.70 1.70
69 LAYYAGARI PEDA NARASAIAH 0.720 0.65 0.47 0.47
70 LINGIREDDY CHINA VENKATA REDDY 5.460 2.00 10.92 10.92
71 LINGIREDDY PITCHIREDDY 9.720 1.54 14.94 14.94
72 LINGIREDDY SESHIREDDY 3.640 0.62 2.26 2.26
73 LINGIREDDY VENKAT REDDY 4.610 0.62 2.86 2.86
74 M.LAKSHMAIAH 1.410 2.00 2.82 2.82
75 MAMILLA KOTESWARARAO 2.200 0.65 1.43 1.43
76 MANDA ABRAHAM 0.800 2.00 1.60 1.60
77 MANDA PULLAYYA 1.000 2.00 2.00 2.00
78 MARASU KOTESWARAO 1.910 0.61 1.17 1.17
S.No Land OwnerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value( in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value(in Rs lakhs)
79 MARASU PULLA RAO 5.790 0.66 3.83 3.83
80 MARIKANTI CHINA JASHUVA 1.990 2.00 3.98 3.98
81 MARIKANTI KOTAMMA 2.260 2.00 4.52 4.52
82 MARIKANTI PEDA JASHUVA 3.550 2.00 7.10 7.10
83 MIRYALA PAPARAO 2.650 0.65 1.72 1.72
84 MOTHULA SESHIREDDY 5.020 2.00 10.04 10.04
85 MOTHULA SOW REDDY 2.020 0.65 1.31 1.31
86 MOTHULA VENKATAREDDY 5.570 2.00 11.14 11.14
87 NAGARJUNAKONDA GOVINDAMMA 7.630 2.00 15.26 15.26
88 PAHINITHI SANTHAMMA 4.220 2.00 8.44 8.44
89 PALLE AMARLINGAREDDY 8.380 2.00 16.76 16.76
90 PALLE ANKAMMA 1.480 0.65 0.96 0.96
91 PALLE SANJEEV REDDY 5.910 0.65 3.84 3.84
92 PALLE SATYANARAYAN REDDY 4.080 0.65 2.65 2.65
93 PALLE VENKATREDDY 1.480 0.65 0.96 0.96
94 PEERLA ALLI SAHEB 2.990 0.65 1.94 1.94
95 PEERLA HASSAN 3.030 0.65 1.97 1.97
96 PEERLA PULLU SAHEB 1.640 1.00 1.65 1.65
97 PERAM BENJIMAN 3.500 2.00 7.00 7.00
98 PERAM CHANDRASEKHAR RAO 4.000 2.00 8.00 8.00
99 PERAM CHINA SANTHAIAH 2.930 2.00 5.86 5.86
100 PERAM PRABHUDASU 3.430 2.00 6.86 6.86
101 PERAM VEDAMANI 7.600 1.36 10.34 10.34
102 PINNAM CHINA VENKATESWARLU 1.500 2.00 3.00 3.00
103 PINNAM KASAIAH 1.690 0.62 1.05 1.05
104 PINNAM LAKSHMI 1.600 0.65 1.04 1.04
105 PINNAM PURNAIAH 2.560 0.63 1.61 1.61
106 PINNAM RANGA RAO 3.000 0.65 1.95 1.95
107 PINNAM ROSAIAH 2.870 2.00 5.74 5.74
108 PINNAM SANKAR RAO 1.470 2.00 2.94 2.94
109 PINNAM SIVAMMA 1.270 0.65 0.83 0.83
110 PINNAM VENKAMMA 1.710 0.65 1.11 1.11
111 PINNAM VENKATA RAMANA 1.470 0.65 0.96 0.96
112 PINNAM VENKATESWARLU 4.040 0.86 3.46 3.46
113 PINNAM VENKATRAMAIAH 1.620 0.63 1.02 1.02
114 PUARAMSETTI VENKATRAO 6.300 0.80 5.04 5.04
115 PULIBANDLA DIBBAIAH 1.780 0.65 1.15 1.15
116 PULIBANDLA SATYANARAYANA 4.760 2.00 9.52 9.52
117 PULIBANDLA VENKATESARLU 3.800 0.65 2.47 2.47
118 PURAM KRISHNA SANKARAM 1.560 0.62 0.97 0.97
119 PURAM SAIDULU 2.270 0.62 1.41 1.41
S.No Land OwnerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value( in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value(in Rs lakhs)
120 PURAM VENKATA KOTESWARAO 1.650 0.70 1.16 1.16
121 PURAMSETTI ANJANEYULU 6.400 2.00 12.80 12.80
122 PURAMSETTI ANKULU 0.600 2.00 1.20 1.20
123 PURAMSETTI APPAIAH 1.240 0.61 0.76 0.76
124 PURAMSETTI BHU LAKSHMI 5.855 0.63 3.72 3.72
125 PURAMSETTI CHINA SUBBAIAH 2.900 0.61 1.77 1.77
126 PURAMSETTI GOVINDAIAH 4.300 0.62 2.66 2.66
127 PURAMSETTI KRISHNA 2.515 0.65 1.64 1.64
128 PURAMSETTI PEDA APPAIAH 6.870 0.65 4.46 4.46
129 PURAMSETTI PEDA CHALAMAIAH 0.830 0.65 0.54 0.54
130 PURAMSETTI SARVAIAH 4.200 0.65 2.74 2.74
131 PURAMSETTI VENKAIAH 1.250 0.61 0.77 0.77
132 PURAMSETTI YEDUKONDALU 3.120 2.00 6.24 6.24
133 RAJANALA ANKAIAH 3.070 0.65 1.99 1.99
134 RAJANALA SRINIVASARAO 1.900 0.70 1.33 1.33
135 RAJANALA VENKATRAVAMMA 2.000 0.65 1.30 1.30
136 RAJAVARAPU NAGAIAH 6.330 1.35 8.57 8.57
137 RAJAVARAPU PICHAMMA 3.540 0.65 2.30 2.30
138 REMIDICHARLA LALU SAHEB 2.605 2.00 5.21 5.21
139 SHAIK BUDESAHEB 1.430 0.97 1.39 1.39
140 SHAIK GULLAPALLI JOHNY BASHA 3.580 0.65 2.32 2.32
141 SHAIK GULPALLI CHINA SAIDA 4.120 1.08 4.44 4.44
142 SHAIK IMAMBEE 4.900 1.41 6.89 6.89
143 SHAIK KHASIMBEE 0.550 0.63 0.34 0.34
144 SHAIK MAHABOOB 1.310 2.00 2.62 2.62
145 SHAIK MEERA SAHEB 1.100 0.62 0.68 0.68
146 SHAIK NAGULMEERA 2.160 0.62 1.33 1.33
147 SHAIK REMIDICHARLA LALUSAHEB 4.340 0.62 2.69 2.69
148 SHAIK SILARBI 1.770 0.75 1.33 1.33
149 SHAIKPEERLA PULLU SAHEB 3.220 0.65 2.09 2.09
150 SOMALA BHIKSHALA REDDY 4.040 0.65 2.63 2.63
151 SOMALA PULLA REDDY 2.250 0.65 1.46 1.46
152 SONTIREDDY GOPIREDDY 6.090 0.77 4.69 4.69
153 SRIPATHI RAMA KOTAIAH 1.940 0.65 1.27 1.27
154 SRIRAMDASU ANNAPURNAMMA 7.630 2.00 15.26 15.26
155 SUNKARA ANKARAO 1.450 2.00 2.90 2.90
156 SYED JOHN SAHEB 2.840 0.65 1.84 1.84
157 SYED NAGUL MEERA 2.360 0.65 1.53 1.53
158 SYED PAKEER SAHEB 6.600 0.62 4.09 4.09
159 THIRUMALASETTI HUSSAIN 5.000 2.00 10.00 10.00
160 THIRUMALSETTI NAGA BHUSANAM 0.860 0.70 0.60 0.60
S.No Land OwnerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value( in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value(in Rs lakhs)
161 THIRUMALSETTI PEDA
VENKATESWARLU
0.230 0.66 0.15 0.15
162 THOTA APPAIAH 0.300 0.65 0.20 0.20
163 THOTA HANUMANTHA RAO 0.100 2.00 0.20 0.20
164 THOTA KOTAIAH 4.010 0.61 2.44 2.44
165 THOTA LAKSMAIAH 0.660 0.65 0.43 0.43
166 THOTA NAGESWARRAO 1.560 0.65 1.01 1.01
167 THOTA RAMA BRAHMAM 5.940 0.65 3.86 3.86
168 THOTA SATYANARAYANA 3.155 2.00 6.31 6.31
169 THOTA SESHAIAH 1.560 2.00 3.12 3.12
170 THOTA SRINIVASA RAO 0.990 0.65 0.64 0.64
171 THOTA VARDHANAMMA 0.300 0.61 0.18 0.18
172 THOTA VEERANJANEYULU 1.450 2.00 2.90 2.90
173 THOTA VENKATA GURAVAIAH 5.450 0.62 3.37 3.37
174 THOTA YEDUKONDALU 3.860 2.00 7.72 7.72
175 THUMMEPALLI CHINA ANKARAO 0.500 0.62 0.31 0.31
176 THUMMEPALLI PEDA ANKARAO 2.500 0.62 1.55 1.55
177 THUMMEPALLI RAMANJANEYULU 7.240 0.62 4.48 4.48
178 THUMMEPALLI SATYANARAYANA 1.000 0.65 0.65 0.65
179 THUMMEPALLI SRIRAM MURTHY 1.000 0.62 0.62 0.62
180 VARIKALLU SIVAIAH 7.260 0.65 4.72 4.72
181 VENNAPUSALA KESAVA REDDY 10.280 2.00 20.56 20.56
182 VENUGOPALASWAMY 11.610 2.00 23.22 23.22
183 VUSTELA ANJIREDDY 4.230 0.78 3.29 3.29
184 VUSTHELA BASIVI REDDY 3.530 0.65 2.29 2.29
185 VUSTHELA SAIDAREDDY 2.370 2.00 4.74 4.74
186 VUSTHELA SAMBIREDDY 2.370 2.00 4.74 4.74
187 YARAGANI BHIKSHAM 1.150 0.67 0.77 0.77
188 YEDLAPALLI SAMBAIAH 0.960 0.65 0.62 0.62
189 YEDLAPALLI CHINA VENKAIAH 4.260 0.65 2.77 2.77
190 YEDLAPALLI LAKSMAMMA 3.000 0.65 1.95 1.95
191 YEDLAPALLI NAGESWARA RAO 0.960 0.65 0.62 0.62
192 YEDLAPALLI PEDA MALLAIAH 1.470 2.00 2.94 2.94
193 YEDLAPALLI RANGAYYA 1.470 2.00 2.94 2.94
194 YEDLAPALLI SANKARA RAO 1.580 0.65 1.02 1.02
195 YEDLAPALLI VENKATA SIVAIAH 1.130 0.65 0.73 0.73
196 YEDLAPALLI YEDUKONDALU 2.000 0.65 1.30 1.30
S.No Land OwnerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value( in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value(in Rs lakhs)
197 YEDLPALLI SRINIVASARAO 2.370 0.65 1.54 1.54
Total Patta Land 598.53 665.55 665.55
Total Govt Land 50.56 0.00
Total Land in Pedagarlapadu Village 649.09 665.55
LAND DETAILS ( PROPOSED MINE LEASE AREA)KESANUPALLI VILLAGE - DACHEPALLI MANDAL- GUNTUR DISTRICT,A.P
S.No Land ownerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value(in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value( in RsLakhs)
1 BANDI KASAIAH 0.640 0.656 0.42 0.42
2 BOPPURI RAMULAMMA 1.120 0.651 0.73 0.73
3 CHIDELLA RAMARAO 0.580 0.802 0.47 0.47
4 DEVARASETTI BRAHMANANDAM 1.670 2.000 3.34 3.34
5
DEVARASETTI KASI BRAMMANANDA
RAO 1.055 2.000 2.11 2.11
6 DEVARASETTI KOTAIAH 1.060 2.000 2.12 2.12
7 DEVARASETTI KOTESWARARAO 1.250 0.550 0.69 0.69
8 DEVARASETTI KRISNA MURTHY 1.250 0.550 0.69 0.69
9 DEVARASETTI SUBBARAO 1.740 0.833 1.45 1.45
10 DEVARASETTI V APPARAO 3.940 2.000 7.88 7.88
11 DEVARASETTI V MALLIKARJUNA RAO 2.020 2.000 4.04 4.04
12 DRONADULA MALLAIAH 1.040 2.000 2.08 2.08
13 DRONADULA VENKATESWARLU 2.000 2.000 4.00 4.00
14 DRONADULA VISWANADHAM 2.200 2.000 4.40 4.40
15 GALAM NARENDRA 1.800 2.000 3.60 3.60
16 GALAM VEERANJANEYULU 3.930 2.000 7.86 7.86
17 GALI PITCHIREDDY 2.240 0.600 1.34 1.34
18 GALI RAMI REDDY 2.000 0.600 1.20 1.20
19 GONUGUNTLA KASAIAH 1.850 0.651 1.20 1.20
20 GUDURI RAMA KOTESWARRAO 1.800 2.000 3.60 3.60
21 GUNDA CHANDRASEKHAR RAO 2.020 2.000 4.04 4.04
22 GUNDA SAIDA RAO 1.850 1.000 1.85 1.85
23 GURRAPUSALA PERAYYA 1.830 2.000 3.66 3.66
24 JAKKA LAKSHMI NARAYANA 0.300 2.000 0.60 0.60
25 JAKKA VENKATESWARLU 0.300 2.000 0.60 0.60
26 JANGILI NARAYANA 1.150 2.000 2.30 2.30
27 JANGILI RAMA SAIDAIAH 1.340 2.000 2.68 2.68
28 JANGILI RAMA SAIDAMMA 5.005 2.000 10.01 10.01
29 JANGILI SAIDAYYA 2.360 2.000 4.72 4.72
30 JANGILI VENKAT NARAYANA 0.700 2.000 1.40 1.40
31 JANGILI VENKAT RAO 1.300 2.000 2.60 2.60
32 JANGILI VENKATA RAMAIAH 0.938 2.000 1.88 1.88
33 JANGILI VENKATESWARLU 4.060 2.000 8.12 8.12
34 JANGILI VENKAYAMMA 0.670 2.000 1.34 1.34
35 JUNNU SUDARSHANARAO 2.000 2.000 4.00 4.00
36 KANKUMARI SAIDAYYA 1.720 2.000 3.44 3.44
S.No Land ownerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value(in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value( in RsLakhs)
37 KANTHAVARAPU VENKATESWARLU 1.000 0.650 0.65 0.65
38 KATAM RAM SIVA REDDY 1.580 2.000 3.16 3.16
39 KATTEYBOINA ADEMMA 2.530 2.000 5.06 5.06
40 KAYYAKULA NAGARAJU 7.380 2.000 14.76 14.76
41 KICHAMSETTI KUMARI 2.680 0.600 1.61 1.61
42 KICHAMSETTI LAXMIKUMARI 1.000 0.540 0.54 0.54
43 KICHAMSETTI MALLIAIAH 1.810 0.900 1.63 1.63
44 KICHAMSETTI NARASIMHULU 1.670 2.000 3.34 3.34
45 KICHAMSETTI PADMAVATHI 2.140 0.651 1.39 1.39
46 KICHAMSETTI PEDA ANKAIAH 1.965 1.000 1.97 1.97
47 KICHAMSETTI RAMAIAH 4.510 1.676 7.56 7.56
48 KICHAMSETTI RAMULU 2.200 2.000 4.40 4.40
49 KICHAMSETTI VENKAIAH 1.400 2.000 2.80 2.80
50 KICHAMSETTI VENKATESWARLU 1.800 0.650 1.17 1.17
51 KILARI KRISHNA 1.000 2.000 2.00 2.00
52 KOTHA CHINA DEENAIAH 2.480 0.600 1.49 1.49
53 KOTHA CHINA KOTESWARARAO 2.480 0.600 1.49 1.49
54 KOTHAPALLI PAKEERAIAH 0.060 2.000 0.12 0.12
55 KOTHAPALLI VENKATESWARLU 3.850 1.455 5.60 5.60
56 KOTTE BHADRADRI NAIDU 0.100 0.603 0.06 0.06
57 KOTTE NARASAMMA 0.455 0.901 0.41 0.41
58 KOTTE NARASAYYA 1.610 2.000 3.22 3.22
59 KUNTA ANKARAO 1.750 0.600 1.05 1.05
60 KUNTA RANGARAO 0.950 2.000 1.90 1.90
61 MALLELA RAM SAIDAIAH 1.100 2.000 2.20 2.20
62 MAMIDI BRAHMANAIDU 1.735 0.600 1.04 1.04
63 MAMIDI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO 1.200 1.179 1.41 1.41
64 MAMIDI LAKSHMI 0.730 2.000 1.46 1.46
65 MAMIDI NAGESWAR RAO 2.570 2.000 5.14 5.14
66 MAMILLA SRINIVASARAO 3.250 2.000 6.50 6.50
67 MANDA CHINA PULLIAH 2.095 0.600 1.26 1.26
68 MANDA YELAMANDA 2.095 0.600 1.26 1.26
69 MEDATHI SUBBARAO 0.280 2.000 0.56 0.56
70 MEDATHI VENKATESWARLU 0.670 2.000 1.34 1.34
71 MOGILI ANKAMMA 1.190 2.000 2.38 2.38
72 MOGILI VENKATA NAGESWAR RAO 1.830 2.000 3.66 3.66
73 NELLURI PAKEERAMMA 0.370 0.567 0.21 0.21
74 NUKANA HANUMANTHA RAO 1.660 0.650 1.08 1.08
75 NUKANA NAGESWRARAO 1.660 0.650 1.08 1.08
76 PALLI SATYANARAYANA 1.180 0.797 0.94 0.94
77 PASAM GURAVAIAH 4.020 2.000 8.04 8.04
S.No Land ownerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value(in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value( in RsLakhs)
78 PASAM SRINIVASA RAO 7.965 1.927 15.35 15.35
79 PASAM VEERAIAH 2.000 2.000 4.00 4.00
80 PASUPULETI BRAHAMAIAH 1.340 2.000 2.68 2.68
81 PASUPULETI LAKSMAMMA 0.240 0.540 0.13 0.13
82 PASUPULETI RAMA KRISHNA 1.870 2.000 3.74 3.74
83 PASUPULETI RAMA SAIDULU 0.750 0.653 0.49 0.49
84 PINNABOINA PEDA ADEYYA 1.130 2.000 2.26 2.26
85 PINNABOINA SESHAIAH 1.500 2.000 3.00 3.00
86 POLISETTI ANJANEYULU 2.840 2.000 5.68 5.68
87 POLISETTI DHANALAKSHMI 4.170 2.000 8.34 8.34
88 POLISETTI SRINIVASA RAO 1.200 2.000 2.40 2.40
89 POLISETTI VENKATESWARLU 1.160 2.000 2.32 2.32
90 POTTA SIRI VENKAIAH 1.010 2.000 2.02 2.02
91 PRAGADA PEDA ANKAMMA 1.670 2.000 3.34 3.34
92 PRAGADALA VENKATESWARLU 1.340 2.000 2.68 2.68
93 RACHAKONDA SAIDAYYA 0.485 2.000 0.97 0.97
94 RAJAVARAPU BHIKSHALU 2.425 2.000 4.85 4.85
95 REGALLA PEDA GOPAYYA 1.000 2.000 2.00 2.00
96 REGALLA SAIDULU 0.020 2.000 0.04 0.04
97 REGALLA SUBBAYYA 2.480 2.000 4.96 4.96
98 REGALLA VENKATA GOPINATH 1.320 2.000 2.64 2.64
99 SANAM NARASIMHA 1.800 2.000 3.60 3.60
100 SANAM VENKATESWARLU 3.610 1.197 4.32 4.32
101 SANAM VENKATRAMAIAH 2.030 1.367 2.77 2.77
102 SANAM VENKATRAVAMMA 2.480 0.651 1.61 1.61
103 SANKURATRI PERAMMA 0.405 2.000 0.81 0.81
104 SHAIK LALBEE 2.250 0.651 1.46 1.46
105 SIRAMSETTI KOTESWARRAO 7.330 2.000 14.66 14.66
106 SIRAMSETTI SUBBARAO 0.860 2.000 1.72 1.72
107 SIRAMSETTI SRINIVASA RAO 1.260 2.000 2.52 2.52
108 SIRAMSETTI VENKATESWARLU 2.030 1.103 2.24 2.24
109 SIVANGULU RAMA SUBBULU 2.280 0.651 1.48 1.48
110 SOMU ANKA RAO 1.730 0.601 1.04 1.04
111 TAMATAM ANANTHA RAMAIAH 1.540 2.000 3.08 3.08
112 TAMATAM CHALAMAIAH 1.930 0.953 1.84 1.84
113 TAMATAM RAMA RAO 1.620 0.651 1.05 1.05
114 TAMTAM AMARA LAKSHMAYYA 3.130 2.000 6.26 6.26
115 TAMTAM APPAMMA 2.000 2.000 4.00 4.00
116 TAMTAM LACHAYYA 2.940 2.000 5.88 5.88
117 TAMTAM NAGA LAKSHMAIAH 2.060 2.000 4.12 4.12
118 TAMTAM NAGESWARARAO 5.280 2.000 10.56 10.56
S.No Land ownerLand Extent
( in Acres)
GovernmentGuideline
Rate/Acre(in Rs lakhs)
GovernmentGuideline
Value(in Rs lakhs)
CCCL Value( in RsLakhs)
119 TAMTAM RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY 0.875 2.000 1.75 1.75
120 TAMTAM RAMA SAIDULU 0.933 0.602 0.56 0.56
121 TAMTAM RAMA SUBBAIAH 1.000 2.000 2.00 2.00
122 TAMTAM RAMAKRISHNA 0.540 2.000 1.08 1.08
123 TAMTAM RAMANJANEYULU 4.240 2.000 8.48 8.48
124 TAMTAM RAMASAIDAYYA 2.000 2.000 4.00 4.00
125 TAMTAM ROSAIAH 1.560 0.600 0.94 0.94
126 TAMTAM SAMABHASIVA RAO 4.600 2.000 9.20 9.20
127 TAMTAM SRINIVASARAO 5.020 1.564 7.85 7.85
128 TAMTAM VEERAYYA 0.940 2.000 1.88 1.88
129 TAMTAM VENKATA NARASIMHAM 1.780 2.000 3.56 3.56
130 TAMTAM VENKATESWARLU 3.180 2.003 6.37 6.37
131 VATTEPU BALLAIAH 1.000 0.540 0.54 0.54
132 VATTEPU VENKAIAH 2.240 0.540 1.21 1.21
133 VATTEPU YESAIAH 1.000 0.540 0.54 0.54
134 VECHA PEDA SRIRAMULU 2.370 2.000 4.74 4.74
135 YALAMALA NARASIMHA RAO 2.470 2.000 4.94 4.94
Total Patta Land 260.99 421.95 421.95
Total Govt Land 22.78 0.00
Total Land in Kesanupalli Village 283.77 421.95
Photographs showing the outcrops of limestone
Annexure – 1 c
Annexure 1
Ground Water Level & Intersection of Ground Water TableRegional
The ground water levels have been observed in the study area during the study period of
November 2013. Ground water level has been observed in 11 wells spreading the 5 km radius
from the site boundary. During the ground water measurement, the locations of the wells
were captured using GARMIN Global Positioning System (GPS). Using the GPS data, the
location were marked on map.The minimum and maximum ground water level in the study
area during the study period is 4 and 17m respectively. The ground water level during the
study period in the project site is 8m. Based on the ground water level data, ground water
level zones and ground water table (Ground water table = Mean Sea Level – water level below
ground level) have been developed and presented below. From the ground water level zone
map it is clear that deepest water level zone of > 17 m is observed in the eastern side of the
study area and it is also noticed that relatively shallow water level zones occupied southern
side of the study area. The project site falls in 4-8 m ground water level zones during the study
period. The ground water table contour map depicts that steep hydraulic gradient is in the
southern part of the study area. Gentle hydraulic gradient is observed in the project site area. It
is observed that the movement of ground water is from the southern side. There is a ground
water trough (convergent flow of ground water) observed in the western side of the study are.
The above may is due the heavy pumping in the western part of the study area. Near the
project site the ground water movement is towards south.
Ground Water Intersection &
Estimation of Ground Water Inflow and Radius of Influence
In general the digging of any mine below the water table will create lowering of water table in
the surrounding area due to the development of cone of depression. The radius of influence
depends on the depth of the water table and the quantum of dewatering of the mines.
In order to calculate the radius of influence, capture zone delineation method, which is the
best suitable method for the heterogeneous aquifer as defined in the formula given by Hudak
has been adopted.
In Hudak method the pumping rate from the mine pit, the saturated thickness of the aquifer,
the duration of pumping, the effective porosity of the lithological unit and the radius of
equivalent to the radius of the mine pit are considered in deciding the distance and the
influence zone of mine pit dewatering.
The volume of aquifer Vc that contributes water to the mine over a period of time ‘t’ is
Vc = Q(t)/ne …………………………………………………………..1
Where Q is the discharge rate from the mine, and ne is the effective porosity of the aquifer.
The area Ac around the excavated mine that contributes water to the mine is given by
Av = Vc/b ……………………………………………………………..2
Where b is the saturated thickness of the aquifer.
Combining the equations 1 and 2
Ac = Q (t) / [ne / b]
Thus the rate of capture zone around the mine can be estimated as:
R = [Ac/] +rc
Substituting the parameters in the formula given by Hudak the following radius of influence
has been arrived.
CCCL Proposed to go to a depth of 46 m for lime stone mining with 5 benches. In first year
CCCL proposed to excavate to a depth of 10.0 (1m top soil + 9m 1st Bench) and the remaining
depth excavation planned from 2 to 5 years.
The inflow and radius of influence calculations for each bench is given below:
Bench 1
Mine Dimensions in Sq.m
Area in Sq.m 97270
rc - the radius or equivalent radius of the mine pit in meters 176
VC = (Q x t) / ne
Q - Rate of pumping from the mine in m3/day 90
t - time of continuous pumping in days 330
ne - the effective fractured or secondary porosity 0.65
Ac - Area of zone influence in the aquifer in sq meters
AC= Vc / b
b - saturated thickness of aquifer around the mine 2 (Depth of mine 1+9 m.Ground water level at 8m)
R - Radius of influence in m
R =(ÖAc/¶)+rc
R - Radius of influence in m 297
Bench – 2
Mine Dimensions in Sq.m at 10.7 m
Area in Sq.m 147000
rc - the radius or equivalent radius of the mine pit in meters 216
VC = (Q x t) / ne
Q - Rate of pumping from the mine in m3/day 140
t - time of continuous pumping in days 330
ne - the effective fractured or secondary porosity 0.11
Ac - Area of zone influence in the aquifer in sq meters
AC= Vc / b
b - saturated thickness of aquifer around the mine 11
R - Radius of influence in m
R =(ÖAc/¶)+rc
R - Radius of influence in m 333
Bench – 3
Mine Dimensions in Sq.m at 28.7 m
Area in Sq.m 244125
rc - the radius or equivalent radius of the mine pit in meters 279
VC = (Q x t) / ne
Q - Rate of pumping from the mine in m3/day 340
t - time of continuous pumping in days 330
ne - the effective fractured or secondary porosity 0.05
Ac - Area of zone influence in the aquifer in sq meters
AC= Vc / b
b - saturated thickness of aquifer around the mine 20
R - Radius of influence in m
R =(ÖAc/¶)+rc
R - Radius of influence in m 475
Bench – 4
Mine Dimensions in Sq.m at 28.7 m
Area in Sq.m 340625
rc - the radius or equivalent radius of the mine pit in meters 329
VC = (Q x t) / ne
Q - Rate of pumping from the mine in m3/day 620
t - time of continuous pumping in days 330
ne - the effective fractured or secondary porosity 0.04
Ac - Area of zone influence in the aquifer in sq meters
AC= Vc / b
b - saturated thickness of aquifer around the mine 29
R - Radius of influence in m
R =(ÖAc/¶)+rc
R - Radius of influence in m 584
The radius of influence of the above mine pit of Chettinad Cement is as follows:
S.No Bench Number and Total DepthRadius of
Influence In mInflow in to
mines in cum
1 Bench-1- 10 m (1 m BCS + 9m Bench(seepage at 8th m)
297 90
2 Bench-2 – 9m (2+9.0 = 11 m) 333 140
3 Bench-3 – 9m (11+9 = 20 m) 475 340
4 Bench-4 9m (9.0+20 = 29 m) 584 620
5 Bench-5 9m (9.0+29 = 38m) 646 980
Bench – 5
Mine Dimensions in Sq.m at 28.7 m
Area in Sq.m 265200
rc - the radius or equivalent radius of the mine pit in meters 290
VC = (Q x t) / ne
Q - Rate of pumping from the mine in m3/day 980
t - time of continuous pumping in days 330
ne - the effective fractured or secondary porosity 0.02
Ac - Area of zone influence in the aquifer in sq meters
AC= Vc / b
b - saturated thickness of aquifer around the mine 38
R - Radius of influence in m
R =(ÖAc/¶)+rc
R - Radius of influence in m 646
The ground water level in the proposed mine area is 8.0 m. Hence the dewatering is required
below 8.0 m ie. from bench 1 at a depth of 8 m onwards. The average thickness of Black
Cotton Soil is 1m. With 5 benches of Limestone Mining having a bench height of 9m, the total
depth of Limestone Mining will be 1m + 45 m i.e., 46m and the water is to be dewatered is for
a depth of 46m – 8m i.e., 38m. ( as the depth of ground water is 8m).
The cone of depression created due to the mining activity is within the limits of the area owned
by Chettinad Cements ltd and there will not be any adverse impact on the adjacent lands.
Radius of Influence 646 m
Annexure 3
Transmissivity & Storativity
The generalized aquifer parameters of geological formations of
Guntur district have been estimated by the state government department is given below:
Formation Transmissivity (T) m2/dayAlluvium 100-400
Sedimentary 20-150
Hard rock 5 to 60
Resistivity
The total water requirement of the Project is 2659 KLD and the ground water requirement is
2000 KLD. The balance 659 KLD can be met out from the recycled water. To meet out the
above requirement it is proposed to explore the possibility of availability ground water sources
within the project site. In order to know Hydro geological conditions and to study the fracture
pattern, Geophysical survey (VES) was carried out inside the premises in selected locations.
The purpose of electrical surveys is to determine the subsurface resistivity distribution by
making measurements on the ground surface. From these measurements, the true resistivity of
the subsurface can be estimated. The ground resistivity is related to various geological
parameters such as the mineral and fluid content, porosity and degree of water saturation in
the rock.
Electrical resistivity surveys have been used for many decades in hydro geological, mining and
geo technical investigations. More recently, it has been used for environmental surveys.
Injecting current into the ground through two current electrodes and measuring the resulting
voltage difference at two potential electrodes normally record the resistivity measurements.
From the current (I) and voltage (V) values, an apparent resistivity (pa) value is calculated. pa
= k V / I where k is the geometric factor which depends on the arrangement of the four
electrodes.
Resistivity meters normally give a resistance value, R = V/I, so in practice the apparent
resistivity value is calculated by pa = k R. The calculated resistivity value is not the true
resistivity of the subsurface, but an “apparent” value, which is the resistivity of a homogeneous
ground, which will give the same resistance value for the same electrode arrangement.
Based on the Geology and Hydrology, Resistivity Survey using schlumberger method of
configuration was carried out in order to identify the Hydro geological conditions and the
fracture pattern. The data obtained from the resistivity survey were analyzed.
In the site 10 locations have been identified for conducting resistivity survey based on the site
condition and hydrogeological conditions. The resistivity survey has been conducted to a
depth of 160 m bgl to know the subsurface lithology and the existence of fracture pattern
which serves as ground water source.
GROUND WATER EXPLORATION REPORT
SL.NO. DESCRIPTION DETAILS
01 AREA OF INVESTIGATION. Hard Rock
02 TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA Plain topography.
03 GEOLOGY The site under lain by Limestone TheBlack Cotton Soil extends from 0 to 3 mbelow which the Limestone encounters
04 GENERALHYDROGEOLOGICALCONDITIONS.
Ground water occurs in water tablecondition. The ground water occurrenceand movement is controlled by fracture andfissures. The ground water rechargedepends mainly on precipitation andirrigated fields by canals.
05 HYDRO GEOELECTRICALINVESTIGATION.
RESISTIVITY METER USED IGIS –DDR3
ELECTRODE CONFIGURATION
ADOPTED.
Schlumberger.
VES CONDUCTED. VES conducted @ 10 locations- AB/ 2 –160m m
SOFT WARES USED FORINTERPRETATION &ANALYSIS OF VES DATA.
W-Geosoft – Winsev-6.1 software
The resistivity survey data has been interpreted using W-Geosoft – Winsev-6.1 software.
After care full interpretation of the resistivity results, it is ascertained that the fracture system
exists within the plant and mines area. The plant and mines area are more favorable for
development of bore well in the fracture system and the open wells near the nallah. Bore
wells to a depth of 120 m and open well to a depth 25 is required to tap the water table and
fractured aquifers.
The depth, estimated yield from the proposed abstraction structures are as follows.
Sl.No LocationNo
Latitude Longitude Depth
in m
ExpectedYield
in LPM
1 OW1 79° 44' 23.646" 16° 32' 44.963" 25 500
2 OW2 79° 44' 14.044" 16° 32' 24.975" 25 500
3 OW3 79° 44' 23.058" 16° 32' 13.805" 25 500
4 OW4 79° 44' 29.917" 16° 31' 51.857" 25 500
5 BW1 79° 44' 48.337" 16° 32' 43.787" 120 225
6 BW2 79° 45' 3.034" 16° 32' 40.847" 120 225
7 BW3 79° 45' 38.699" 16° 32' 40.064" 120 225
8 BW4 79° 45' 12.44" 16° 32' 23.015" 120 225
9 BW5 79° 45' 52.417" 16° 32' 35.752" 120 225
10 BW6 79° 45' 41.051" 16° 32' 23.015" 120 225
The distance between the bore wells will be around 150 m. The ground water can be extracted
from 4 open wells and 6 bore wells without disturbing the aquifer system as the distance
between the bore well will be sufficiently spaced.
.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 AB/2 [m] 1
10
100
1000
10000
[ohm·m]
Electrical sounding Schlumberger - Dachapalli CCCL Mines and Plant area - VES1.WS3
Model Resistivity Thickness Depth
[ohm·m] [m] [m] 1500 1
90 30 1 240 29 31 380 30 60 322 35 90 600 125
.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 AB/2 [m] 1
10
100
1000
10000
[ohm·m]
Electrical sounding Schlumberger - Dachapalli CCCL Mines and Plant area - VES2.WS3
Model Resistivity Thickness Depth
[ohm·m] [m] [m] 1300 1
95 30 1 250 32 31 300 38 63 240 35 101 600 136
Pumping Test
Pumping test is the most accurate reliable and commonly used method to evaluate the
hydraulic parameters of an aquifer, efficiency of a well / bore well, safer operational rates of
pumping and selection of suitable pump.. The main objective of pumping test is to determine
the aquifer parameters such as Transmissivity (T), Storage co-efficient (S) Hydraulic
Conductivity (K), well performance and safe yield for execution of water supply.
The pumping test conducted in the same hydrogeological environment has been collected
from the government department. The results are as follows:
Bore Well in m 100
Static Water level in m 10
Pump capacity 5 HP
Discharge in lpm 120 lpm
Time in min. 320 minutes Stability
not attained
Drawdown in m 6 m
Specific Capacity lpm per m draw down 20
Transmissivity of the fractured aquifer m2/day 60
Rate of recovery In 300 minutes static
water level was
attained
Discharge Capacity
The Quantity of water requirement is 2659 KLD. Out of this total water requirement, 659 KLD
for Greenbelt, Dust Suppression and process can be met out from the recycled water and 2000
KLD will be the fresh water requirement.
S.No LocationNo
Latitude Longitude ExpectedYield
in LPM
Hours ofPumping
Total YieldFrom theBore well
m3/day
1 OW1 79° 44' 23.646" 16° 32' 44.963" 500 10 300
2 OW2 79° 44' 14.044" 16° 32' 24.975" 500 10 300
3 OW3 79° 44' 23.058" 16° 32' 13.805" 500 10 300
4 OW4 79° 44' 29.917" 16° 31' 51.857" 500 10 300
5 BW1 79° 44' 48.337" 16° 32' 43.787" 225 10 135
6 BW2 79° 45' 3.034" 16° 32' 40.847" 225 10 135
7 BW3 79° 45' 38.699" 16° 32' 40.064" 225 10 135
8 BW4 79° 45' 12.44" 16° 32' 23.015" 225 10 135
9 BW5 79° 45' 52.417" 16° 32' 35.752" 225 10 135
10 BW6 79° 45' 41.051" 16° 32' 23.015" 225 10 135
Total 2010
Total Ground water requirement for the Project - 2000 KLD
Total expected yield from the bore wells - 2010 KLD
It is clear the total requirement of the plant and mines can be met out from the
ground water sources. Proper rainwater harvesting will be taken up in the plant
and mines area to make the ground water sources sustainable.
Annexure 4
Comprehensive Strategy to harvest and Utilise Rain Water & Storm Water
There is lot of surface and subsurface recharging measures available depending upon the site
conditions. The specific recharge measures are to be selected depending on the soil
characteristics, lithology and nature of the aquifer material, pre and post monsoon ground
water level and so on. The ground water level in the project in the project site is 8 m , which
clearly indicates that the ground water level in the study area is moderately deep. As the
ground water level is moderately deep, proposal for roof top collection, Storage cum
percolation pond have been contemplated. In addition the above recharge trench with bore
well has also been suggested inside the pond.
Predicted Total Post Project Runoff per annum : 1693229 m3
Roof Water Harvesting
o Proposed Capacity of the Sumps 10 Nos (15mX15mX3m) * : 6750 m3
o Estimated collection of rainwater through Roof Top collection per annum(1) : 74100 m3
‘ * ’ Based on contour and availability of space
Storm Water Harvesting
o Proposed Capacity of storm water harvesting ponds # : 31500 m3
[6 Nos (70 m x 30 m x2.5 m)]o Estimated collection of storm water per annum : 338338 m3
o Estimated Evaporation Losses per annum : 92515 m3
o Estimated ground water charging per annum (2) : 172076 m3
o Net availability of water per annum for use (3) : 73747 m3
‘ # ’ Based on contour and availability of space
Total requirement of water for Plant & Mine including domesticrequirement per annum : 670850 m3
Total estimated harvested water per annum (1+2+3) : 319922 m3
Percentage water harvested over utilized water : 48%
However, this rainwater harvesting (48%) will further be increased by using the mined
out pits for coollection of rainwater. In stages , the mined out pits will be converted into
rain water harvesting ponds.
Annexure 5
Waste Water Generation - Treatment - Reuse/Recycle
I. WASTE WATER
S.No Particulars
WasteWater
Generation(KLD)
ProposedTreatment
Proposes Usage(Reuse/Recycle)
A .Sewage Generation1. From Cement Plant 100 Will be treated in
Sewage TreatmentPlant ( SchematicDiagram provided)
Will be used forGreenbeltDevelopment
2. From Power Plant 253. From Township 125
4. From Mines 8 Will be treated inseptic tank followedby dispersion trench
Sub Total 250 +8B. Trade Effluent Generation
1. From Cement Planta. Cooling Waterb. Waste Heat
Recovery Boiler
205
Will be treated inEffluent TreatmentPlant ( SchematicDiagram provided)
Will be used forGreenbeltDevelopment, DustSuppression, AshConditioning andService Purposes
2. From Power Planta. Cooling Tower
Blow Downb. Boiler Blow Downc. DM / RO Rejects
40
40265
3. Central Workshop 194. Service Water 20
Sub Total 409Total 659 +8
100 % of effluents generated will be treated and reused within the premises,
thus ensuring ZERO DISCHARGE and a reduction of 659 m3 of water per day
due to usage of treated waste water for various purposes.
II. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
Bar ScreenSanitation
Grit Chamber Aeration Tank
Nutrition
Alum
ClarifierClari
FlocculatorSand Filter
Treated Water(Gardening)
Sludge Sludge
Sludge Drying beds (for use as manure)
III. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT
Oil Separator
Cooling Tower Blow Down
N
SEASONAL NALL
A
PROPOSED PLANT BOUNDARY
PROPOSED COLONY
ANKALAMMA TEMPLE
Transformer
32
4
5
67
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
1617
18
1920
2122
24
25
26
27
2829
34
3536
3738
3940
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
5051
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
6061
62
63
64
65
66
67 68
69
70
71
72
73
7475
767778
80
81
82A
89
90
91
929394
95
96
97
98
99
105
106
108
109
110
111
112
113114
115
122
123
124
125126
127
128
129 130
131
132
133
134
135136
137139
140
141
143
144145
146
147148
149
150
151
152 153 154
155 156
Idgah
100
101
102103
GCP-1
GCP-2
GCP-3
20A
39-A104
119
117
118
89-A
89-B
138
142
25-A
-A31
39-B42-A
46-A
58-A
64-A64-B
64-C
1
Takkellapadu Temple
149-A
149-B
120
121
65-A
65-B65-C
65-D 65-E
65-G
74E
84
85
87
88
86
83
58-B
65-F
116
APPLIED MINING LEASE BOUNDARY
CHETTINAD CEMENT CORPORATION LTD.DACHEPALLI PROJECT
VIL
LAG
E B
OUND
ARYVILLAGE BOUNDARY
VILLAGE BOUNDARY
VIL
LAG
E B
OU
NDAR
Y
VILL
AGE
BOU
NDAR
Y
VILL
AGE
BOUN
DARY
Annexure 3
Top Map ( 10 km Radius)
Annexure 4Land Use (10km Radius)
Annexure 5Satellite Image( 10km Radius)
Annexure 7
Krishna River Distance
Annexure 8
Jungle Streams within the Project Site
A seasonal nallah flowing south to north passes through Pedagarlapadu
block dividing it into two portions
Further, in the southern extremity of Pedagarlapadu block two more
seasonal nallahs, one flowing from southwest and the other flowing from
southeast join the nallah flowing south to north direction
This nallah flowing from south to north further joins with the main nallah
flowing in between Pedagarlapadu block in south and Kesanupalli block in
the north, thus dividing the ML area into two blocks. This main nallah also
forms the village boundaries of Pedagarlapadu and Kesanupalli and
ultimately flows towards northwest joining with Naguleru vagu streamlet
located about 0.5 km northwest of ML
Annexure 9
Villages ( 10 km Radius)
S.No Village Name
1. Gogulapadu2. Pallegunta3. Cherlagudi Padu4. Gamalapadu5. Madinapadu6. Mutyalampadu7. Dachepalle8. Nadikudi9. Alugumallipadu10. Kesanapalle11. Pedagarlapadu12. Peda Kodamagundla13. China Kodamagundla14. Chinagarlapadu15. Chintapalle16. Thummalacheruvu17. Kamepalle18. Peda Agraharam
19. Karalapadu
20. China Agraharam
21. Chennayapalem
22. Pinnelli
Annexure 10Ground Water Flow
`` 300
WATER BALANCE
Process
270 20
570
55 5
Cooling
Cement Plant
WHRB Blow Down
20 20 19
270 40 Blow Down 409
Central Workshop
(Cement + Mines)
Waste Water
Cooling Effluent Treatment Plant270 40 Blow Down 409
910
55 265
640 320 20
Intake
DM/RO Plant Boiler Make Up
Cooling Effluent Treatment Plant
Captive Power Plant
Blow Down 40
265
30
100 100
Intake
(2000)DM/RO Reject
Service Purpose
Mine Dust Suppression, GB
130
120 100
Dust Suppression /
Ash Conditioning
Cement Plant
Mine Dust Suppression, GB
310 30 25
150 125
Cement Plant
Domestic Captive Power PlantSewage Treatment Plant
(STP)
Colony150 125
250 249
10 8
Mine
Septic Tank with Dispersion
Trench
Colony
90 499Green Belt
Annexure 12
Ground Water Quality
Sl.No Location Latitude Longitude Total
Dissolved
Solids
mg/L
1 Peda Kadamagundla 79° 42' 41.79" 16° 29' 41.152" 1411
2 Palliguntla 79° 41' 28.974" 16° 33' 36.073" 1050
3 Gogulapadu 79° 42' 21.757" 16° 31' 50.407" 980
4 Nadikudi 79° 43' 13.938" 16° 35' 25.852" 1110
5 Gamalapadu 79° 44' 1.573" 16° 36' 5.976" 1140
6 Chinna Garlapadu 79° 45' 59.969" 16° 29' 32.64" 960
7 Pachavaram 79° 43' 14.531" 16° 32' 13.137" 1240
8 Pedda Ganlapadu 79° 44' 56.917" 16° 31' 35.78" 1532
9 Alugumallpadu 79° 43' 59.399" 16° 34' 14.3" 1360
10 Tummalacheruvu 79° 47' 53.028" 16° 31' 39.338" 1240
11 Virapuram 79° 47' 30.298" 16° 33' 35.56" 1685
F. No. J-1101114211201f {A ll (t)Government of lndia
Mlnistry of Environment and Forests(1.A. Division)
Paryavaran BhawanCGO Conrplex, Lodhi Road
New Delhi- 110 003E-mail: gkk3'[email protected]
Tefefax: 011:2436 4592Dated: 12th November, 2013
tlo, /! Mls Chettinad Cement Corporaiion Limited-
603, 6th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall Building,Anna Salai,Chennai - 600 006
Email: [email protected] / [email protected]; Fax: tC44- 4298 8661
Subject: Proposed 3.5 MTPA Cement Plant & 100 MW Captive Power plant (2x50 MW ofFBC power plant and 8MW of WHRB) at Peddagariapadu \/illage, DachepalliMandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Chettinad Gelnent Corporationlimited- regarding extension of validity of TORs
Ref.: (i) Ministry's ToR letter of even no. dated 13.1A.2011(ii) Your letter No. Ghettinad CemenUDachepalli Plant - NerdToR Extnl2013dated 26.4.2013
Sir,
Kindly refer your letter cited above, wherein you have requested for extension of thevalidity of the Terms of Reference (ToR) letter of even no. dated 13.10.2011 by a period ofone year.
2. The above proposal was placed before the Reconstituted Expert AppraisalCommittee (lndustry) in its 10th meeting held during 29-31't July, 2013. lt was noted thatfollowing are the reasons for seeking extension of validity of ToR:
. Awaiting issuance of Mines ToR to carry out EIA Study for both Plant & Minessimultaneously so that common EIA can be prepared to go for a common PublicConsultation (as the proposal is a Green Field Project of lntegrated Cement Plantincluding Captive Power Plant, Waste Heat Recovery Boiler & Captive LimestoneMine)
After detailed deliberations, the committee recommended for the extension of validity of TORfor a period of one year with effect from 12.1O.2013.
3. The Ministry accepts the recommendation of the REAC (lndustry) and extends thevalidity of the aforesaid ToR letter for a period of one year with effect from 12.10.2013.
4. The company shall comply with all the conditions stipulated in the ToR letter of evenno. dated 1 3.10.201 1 .
This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.
etL
N*,i'r\''\\ \ ,
(Dr.K.K.Garg)Director(S)cfiJill ll A 0 mlffi t[ n
p il' t T 0'
Cherr:ral -600 006'
1. Theand FBlock
-z-
Principal Chief Conseruator of Forests (Central), Ministry of EnvironmentRegional Office - Southern Zone, Kendriya Sadan, 4th Floor, E&F Wing, ll
, Ban$lore-560034
, Andhr:a Fradesh Pdlution Control Board,Estate, Sanath lllagar, Hyderabad-sO0O1 8.
Paryavaran Bhawan, A-3,
,/(Dr.K.K.Garg)
Director(S)
Location of the industry
Type of the project
1 M/s Panchali Beverage
25.06.2014 3486 dt. 03.07.2014
PO & Village Kalugaon,
Block Amguri, Dist Sivasagar,
Assam
Packaged Drinking Water
Under process
2 Tirupati Beverage 13.06.2014 3570 dt. 08.07.2014
Village Nutunnagar, Co-operative, Block Mohanpur, Distric West Tripura,
Packaged drinking water
Under process
3 M/s Joymati Babhareje Enterprises
10.07.2014 3718 dt. 15.07.2014
Village Jobe, Block Rani, District Kamrup (M), Assam
packaged drinking water
Under process
4 M/s Techno Steel and Craft Industries
10.07.2014 3717 dt. 15.07.2014
Villages Painikhaiti, Khankar, Block Chandrapur, District Kamrup (M), Assam
packaged drinking water
Under process
1 M/s Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd.
18.06.2014 3431 dt. 01.07.2014
Village Bhikki Bilaspur, Block Kookda, Tehsil Sadar, District Muzaffarnagar, UP
Distillery Under process
2 M/s Shri Durga Beverages Pvt. Ltd.
20.06.2014 3489 dt. 03.07.2014
Town Jhansi Nagar Badagaon, Baragaon Tehsil Jhansi, Distt. Jhansi, U.P.
Packaged Drinking Water Unit
Under process
Northern Region, Lucknow
North Eastern Region, Guwahati
Statement Indicating Position of Pending cases received for Permission/NOC by CGWA during the month of July,2014
Sl.No. Name of the Individual/Industr
y
Individual/ Industry
Letter No. and date
CGWA Dy. No. & Date
Brief Subject Remarks
10 M/s Peerless Hotels Ltd.
23.07.2014 3976 dt. 31.07.2014
Plot no. 305/414 & 308/409, Mouza
Sipasarubali, Block Puri
Sadar, District Puri, Odisha
Safe Under process
11 M/s Balasore Alloys Ltd.,
23.07.2014 3974 dt. 31.07.2014
Village Kaliapani, Block & Tehsil Sukinda, District Jajpur, Orissa
Chromite Mines
Under process
1 M/s Chettinad Cement
11.07.2014 3750 dt. 17.07.2014
Village Pedagarlapad
u & Kasanupalli
Block Dachepalli
Taluka Dachepalli
Distt. Guntur Andhra Pradesh
Integrated Cement
Plant and Captive
Power Plant
Under process
2 M/s Cairn India Ltd.
09.07.2014 3746 dt. 17.07.2014
Village Surasaniyanna
m, Taluka Uppalaguptam
, Dist East Godhavari, AP
Onshore oil and gas terminal
Under process
Southern Region, Hyderabad
WELFARE MEASURES PLAN - INFRASTRUCTURE
Welfare MeasureVillage Name
First Year Second Year Third Year Fourth Year Fifth Year
Total (Rs)Quantum Amount (Rs)
Quantum Amount (Rs)
Quantum Amount (Rs)
Quantum Amount (Rs)
Quantum Amount (Rs)
Toilet
Peddagarlapadu 10 2.00 10 2.00 10 2.00 10 2.00 10 2.00 10.00
Kesanupalli 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5.00Takkellapadu 3 0.60 3 0.60 3 0.60 3 0.60 3 0.60 3.00Kachavaram 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.4 2 0.40 2 0.40 2.00Shankarapuram 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2.00Budawada 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2.00
Repairing of Roads
Peddagarlapadu 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 25.00Kesanupalli 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 12.50Takkellapadu 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 7.50Kachavaram 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Shankarapuram 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Budawada 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00
Supply of Drinking water (Bore Well,Pump,
Pipeline, Overhead Tank)
Peddagarlapadu 15.00 15.00 15.00 45.00Kesanupalli 10.00 10.00 20.00Takkellapadu 5.00 5.00 5.00 15.00Kachavaram 5.00 5.00 10.00Shankarapuram 5.00 5.00 10.00Budawada 5.00 5.00 5.00 15.00
Any specific and UrgentRequirement as
requested by Panchayat Head
Peddagarlapadu 10.00 14.00 10.00 14.00 10.00 58.00Kesanupalli 5.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 27.00Takkellapadu 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 20.00Kachavaram 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 16.00Shankarapuram 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 15.00Budawada 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 15.00
Total (Rs) 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
WELFARE MEASURES PLAN-EDUCATION
Welfare MeasureVillage Name First Year Second Year Third Year Fourth Year Fifth Year
Total (Rs)Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs)
Scholarship
Peddagarlapadu 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 12.50Kesanupalli 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 7.50Takkellapadu 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Kachavaram 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.75Shankarapuram 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.75Budawada 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.75
Distribution of Books, Notes, Dress etc.,
Peddagarlapadu 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Kesanupalli 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Takkellapadu 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.50Kachavaram 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75Shankarapuram 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75Budawada 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75
Supply of Chairs/Desks/
School Repair Works
Peddagarlapadu 2.00 2.00 2.00 6.00Kesanupalli 1.50 1.50 3.00Takkellapadu 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00Kachavaram 0.50 0.50 1.00Shankarapuram 0.50 0.50 1.00Budawada 0.50 0.50 1.00
Coaching Classes
Peddagarlapadu 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Kesanupalli 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Takkellapadu 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 2.00Kachavaram 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.00Shankarapuram 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.00Budawada 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.00
Total (Rs) 15 15 15 15 15
WELFARE MEASURES PLAN-EDUCATION
Welfare MeasureVillage Name First Year Second Year Third Year Fourth Year Fifth Year
Total (Rs)Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs) Amount (Rs)
Medical Camps
Peddagarlapadu 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 10.00Kesanupalli 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Takkellapadu 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.75Kachavaram 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Shankarapuram 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Budawada 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50
Medicines
Peddagarlapadu 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 12.50Kesanupalli 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 6.25Takkellapadu 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00Kachavaram 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Shankarapuram 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Budawada 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50
Health Awareness Programme
Peddagarlapadu 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 7.50Kesanupalli 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.75Takkellapadu 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50Kachavaram 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.25Shankarapuram 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.25Budawada 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.25
Total (Rs) 15 15 15 15 15
1
Annexure ‐ 4
Occupational Health Monitoring and Implementation Plan
Methodology Proposed
a) Identification and evaluation of the environmental factors which may affect the
workers' health and safety
b) Assessment of conditions of occupational hygiene and factors in the work places which
may give rise to risks for the health and safety of workers
c) Assessment of personal protective equipment
d) Assessment where appropriate exposure of workers to hazardous conditions by valid
and generally accepted monitoring methods
e) Assessment of control systems designed to eliminate or reduce exposure
Thus the above methodlogy of assessment of working environment will include examination of
the factors in the work place which may affect the workers' health and the environmental
conditions based on which guidance and advice on measures to improve the working
environment and the health and safety of workers will be developed.
Occupational Health Monitoring
This will include
a) Monitoring of worker’s exposure to health hazards like exposure to dust, noxious gases,
etc.
b) Monitoring of sanitary installations and other facilities for the workers, such as drinking
water, canteens and living accommodation, provided by the employer
c) Examining possible impact on the worker’s health of the use of technologies like
equipment used in mining & transport
d) Participating in and advising on the selection of the equipment necessary for the
personal protection of the workers against occupational hazards
e) Participating in the analysis of occupational accidents and occupational diseases and in
2
accident prevention programmes.
Surveillance Monitoring
a) Health assessment of workers before their assignment to specific tasks which may
involve a danger to their health
b) Health assessment at periodic intervals during employment which involves exposure to
a particular hazard to health
c) Health assessment on resumption of work after a prolonged absence for health reasons
for the purpose of determining its possible occupational causes, recommending
appropriate action to protect the workers and determining the worker's suitability for
the job and needs for reassignment and rehabilitation
d) Health assessment on and after the termination of assignments involving hazards which
might cause or contribute to future health impairment, if applicable
e) Any examinations and investigations which may be necessary to detect exposure levels
and early biological effects and responses,if applicable
Information, Education & Training
a) Training and regular retraining of first‐aid personnel for providing first‐aid and
emergency treatment in cases of accident or indisposition of workers at the workplace
b) Progressive and continuous training of all workers to enhance their knowledge on
occupational health and safety
c) Advising on occupational health and hygiene and ergonomics to all employees including
contract workmen
d) Carrying out immunisations,if applicable , in respect of biological hazards in the working
environment
e) Conducting occupational health related campaigns
f) Conducting awareness programme on through competitions, exhibitions on
occupational health and safety
g) Display of notices, posters, wall ‐paintings on occupational health and safety realted
information
3
Budget for Implementation of Occupational Health Plan
S.No. Activity Budget
(Rs. In Lakhs)
1. Surveillance monitoring on the occupational health & safety Rs. 5.0 lakhs
2. Construction of Occupational Health Center, appointing qualified doctor and
staff nurse,medicines and equipment, Ambulance etc., at mine/plant site
Rs 75 lakhs
3. Curative medical care for workers Rs 5.00 lakhs
4. Training and regular retraining of first‐aid personnel Rs.0.25 lakhs
5. Progressive and continuous training of all workers to enhance their
knowledge on occupational health and safety
Rs. 1.0 lakhs
6. Provision for personal protective equipment Rs. 10.00 lakhs
7. Health assessment of workers at periodic intervals during employment. The
tests conducted will be general health checkup, spirometry, audiometry and
vision test in addition to X‐ray and ECG examination
Rs. 5.0 Lakhs
8. Treatment of occupational diseases : Rs. 5.0 lakhs
Capital Cost ‐ Rs 45.00 lakhs
Recurring Expenditure ‐ Rs 61.25 lakhs
Total cost on implementation of Occupational Health Plan = Rs. 106.25 lakhs