human rights in education
DESCRIPTION
NERA 2011 Congress ‘Rights and Education’ Human Rights in Education: Which Rights For Whom and To What End? Marie-Bénédicte Dembour University of Sussex 10 March 2011. Human rights in education. Sounds good But what does it mean?. Some ECHR case law. The Belgian Linguistic Case - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NERA 2011 Congress ‘Rights and Education’Human Rights in Education: Which Rights For Whom and To What End?
Marie-Bénédicte Dembour
University of Sussex10 March 2011
Human rights in education
• Sounds good
• But what does it mean?
Some ECHR case law
• The Belgian Linguistic Case• Kjeldsen and Others v. Denmark• Campbell and Cosans v UK• Maybe: Leyla Sahin v. Turkey• Maybe: DH and Others v. Czech Republic• NOT: Osman v UK• NOT: T. v. United Kingdom• NOT: Muskhadzhiyeva v Belgium
Some personal experiences
• Luqma from Nigeria
• Statute V and ‘Sussex Six’
• Statute XXI
• http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/sos21/
Some personal and general questions
• What to put in the curriculum?
• What are human rights?
NATURAL SCHOOL
NATURAL SCHOOL
• HR conceived as• Consist in• Are for
• Embodied in law? • HR law since 1948• Are based on • Are realizable?• Are universal?
a givenentitlementsevery single human
being
Yesis a progressNature/God/ReasonYes, definitelyYes, definitely
PROTEST SCHOOL
Protest School
• HR conceived as• Consist in• Are for
• Embodied in law? • HR law since 1948• Are based on • Are realizable?• Are universal?
fought forClaims/aspirationsfirst and foremost
those who suffer
beware of betrayal miragesocial strugglesno, perpetual strugglelike suffering is
DELIBERATIVE SCHOOL
Deliberative School
• HR conceived as• Consist in• Are for
• Embodied in law? • HR law since 1948• Are based on • Are realizable?• Are universal?
agreed uponprinciplesrunning the polity
fairlyexist only through lawprogressconsensusthrough good processpotentially
DISCOURSE SCHOOL
Discourse School
• HR conceived as• Consist in• Are for
• Embodied in law? • HR law since 1948• Are based on • Are realizable?• Are universal?
talked about/consumed
whatever
should be, but are not, for those who suffer
say so, but …
not progress
language
no, they are a failure
no, that’s a pretence
Alternative reading of the model
• Time 1: belief in universal norms
Time 2: outrage at oppression
Time 3: agreement on express norms
Time 4: disappointment at their limitations
• These moments do not happen chronologically but ‘together’
Which rights?
• Take your pick
For whom?
Not clear!
To what end?
• That is the BIG question, and this is why law cannot replace politics
Back to my personal experience
• Luqma
• ‘Sussex Six’
• http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/sos21/
‘Academic freedom is a fundamental right, and contributes to the health of the community’
And now to your understanding of human rights
Thank you!