how to write a scientific paper worth reading

39
Who Cares About Style? Simplicity and clarity are the features of good scientific writing. The meaning must be readily understood. Clear thought can be expressed clearly. In other words, most writers are failing to communicate — the object of writing in the first place.

Upload: michaeleditscom

Post on 08-Jun-2015

106 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Yes, the topic may be (and probably is) complex. But that doesn't mean the writing can't be clear, simple, easy to understand, and impossible to misunderstand. And concise. Watson and Crick won a Nobel prize for DNA. Their report was under 900 words. How long is yours?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Who Cares About Style?

•Simplicity and clarity are the features of good scientific writing.

•The meaning must be readily understood.

•Clear thought can be expressed clearly.

•In other words, most writers are failing to communicate — the object of writing in the first place.

Page 2: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

Page 3: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

It is direct. “We wish to suggest…” not In this communication is made a suggestion….

Page 4: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

It comes straight to the point. They could have started with a general statement about DNA: Deoxyribose nucleic acid is a nucleotide that has been isolated from many species. We wish to suggest…. To write this would have reduced the impact.

Page 5: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

They make two simple statements in two short sentences. They could have linked the sentences: We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of DNA that has novel features that are of considerable biological interest. This version is more clumsy and also ambiguous: it is not clear now whether it is the suggested structure, or the salt of DNA itself, that has the novel features.

Page 6: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

They are not afraid of using the same word, structure, twice. Many writers would have started the second sentence with a pronoun, such as It…, or used a synonym, such as This configuration…; neither device would have been as effective as repeating structure.

Page 7: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

Every word is necessary: “We wish to suggest a structure for the salt…” not We propose a possible structural hypothesis concerning the salt…. They even avoid molecular structure, there being no other type of structure to which they could be referring. And, while most writers would probably write We would like to… they use the elegant “We wish to…”.

Page 8: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Watson and Crick show how it’s done

We wish to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest.

Why is this a good example?

Every word is the correct word, particularly novel (of new kind or nature, strange, hitherto unknown.) They write “features which are of considerable biological interest” not features associated with considerable biological interest.

Page 9: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

Studies indicate that 25 (OH) vitamin D is most likely transferred by a passive or facilitative process transplacentally.

Page 10: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

Studies indicate that 25 (OH) vitamin D is most likely transferred by a passive or facilitative process transplacentally.

Studies indicate that 25 (OH) vitamin D is most likely transferred passively or actively across the placenta.

Page 11: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

Thus, it would seem reasonable that shortening of 10 cm at skeletal maturity or predicted shortening of this amount when the child reaches adulthood would be sufficient to consider Syme amputation.

Page 12: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

Thus, it would seem reasonable that shortening of 10 cm at skeletal maturity or predicted shortening of this amount when the child reaches adulthood would be sufficient to consider Syme amputation.

A Syme amputation should be considered for a shortening or predicted shortening of 10 cm at skeletal maturity.

Page 13: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

If the organism demonstrates to be a staph on the gram stain, one may consider drilling the femoral neck for prophylactic decompression as this may be secondary to a metaphyseal osteomyelitis.

Page 14: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

If the organism demonstrates to be a staph on the gram stain, one may consider drilling the femoral neck for prophylactic decompression as this may be secondary to a metaphyseal osteomyelitis.

If the gram stain shows staphylococci, consider drilling the femoral neck to drain the metaphyseal abscess.

Page 15: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

A 3-year-old female presented with pain and swelling of the right elbow and was noted to have decreased use of the arm.

Page 16: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

A 3-year-old female presented with pain and swelling of the right elbow and was noted to have decreased use of the arm.

A 3-year-old girl had pain and swelling of her right elbow and decreased use of her arm.

Page 17: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

It has been suggested that the utilization of surgical intervention be deferred until attenuation of the infectious symptomatology.

Page 18: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

It has been suggested that the utilization of surgical intervention be deferred until attenuation of the infectious symptomatology.

Jones recommends that surgery be delayed if the patient has an infection.

Page 19: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

It is common for the need to voluntarily evacuate the pouch to occur on one occasion nightly; more frequent defecation interfering with the patient’s sleep has not been encountered in our continent patients.

Page 20: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

It is common for the need to voluntarily evacuate the pouch to occur on one occasion nightly; more frequent defecation interfering with the patient’s sleep has not been encountered in our continent patients.

Patients who are continent need only empty their stomach pouches once each night.

Page 21: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

The study confirmed the hypothesis that clinical instructors of undergraduate medical students would choose instructional techniques limiting active student involvement in patient care activities when faced with problematical situations.

Page 22: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

The study confirmed the hypothesis that clinical instructors of undergraduate medical students would choose instructional techniques limiting active student involvement in patient care activities when faced with problematical situations.

.....wait for it.....

Page 23: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

The study confirmed the hypothesis that clinical instructors of undergraduate medical students would choose instructional techniques limiting active student involvement in patient care activities when faced with problematical situations.

Medical teachers of undergraduates tend not to let students look after difficult patients.

Page 24: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

As he is examining each word and checking its meaning, the author can also delete redundant words such as “in colour,” “in size,” “in number” from such descriptions as “red in colour,” “small in size,” “few in number,” and pompous expressions such as “adult human organism,” which the reader has to waste time and concentration on translating for himself.

Page 25: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

Passive (weak): An appendectomy was performed.Active (better): We performed the appendectomy.

Passive (weak): The thigh is then abducted and the “clunk” of the

femoral head reduction is felt.Active (better): Abduct the thigh to feel for the “clunk” of the

femoral head reduction.

Passive (weak): It is thought that this technique might carry a high

risk of infection.Active (better): We found this technique carries a high risk of

infection.or: Preliminary results indicate this

technique maycarry a high risk of infection.

Page 26: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Writers Show How It’s Not Done

The passive voice is appropriate and useful when you need to emphasize the action or object of action rather than the doer.

An example of acceptable use of the passive voice:

The patient has been shot in the abdomen. (Who did the

shooting is not relevant to the medical information.)

An 18-gauge needle is inserted through the skin wound and

advanced through the renal parenchyma. (Theemphasis is on method.)

Page 27: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

• Spend some time thinking before you start writing your rough draft.

Page 28: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

• Spend some time thinking before you start writing your rough draft.

• Compile a list of your ideas as you are thinking.

Page 29: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

• Spend some time thinking before you start writing your rough draft.

• Compile a list of your ideas as you are thinking.

• Place the list in some order that makes sense to you.

Page 30: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

• Spend some time thinking before you start writing your rough draft.

• Compile a list of your ideas as you are thinking.

• Place the list in some order that makes sense to you.

• Write the rough draft.

Page 31: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

• Spend some time thinking before you start writing your rough draft.

• Compile a list of your ideas as you are thinking.

• Place the list in some order that makes sense to you.

• Write the rough draft.

• Write a final draft that shows some changes from the initial draft.

Page 32: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

• Spend some time thinking before you start writing your rough draft.

• Compile a list of your ideas as you are thinking.

• Place the list in some order that makes sense to you.

• Write the rough draft.

• Write a final draft that shows some changes from the initial draft.

• Read what you write aloud to yourself and you will hear mistakes and find a way to correct them.

Page 33: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Article Format1) Title

Excess words: Report on the Destruction of Renal Calculi by Use of Ultrasound

Page 34: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Article Format1) Title

Excess words: Report on the Destruction of Renal Calculi by Use of Ultrasound

Better: Ultrasonic Destruction of Kidney Stones

Page 35: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Article Format

1) Title

Excess words: Prior Study to Access the Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease in a Group of High School Football Coaches

Page 36: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Article Format

1) Title

Excess words: Prior Study to Access the Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease in a Group of High School Football Coaches

Better: Coronary Artery Disease in High School Football Coaches

Page 37: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Article Format

2) Introduction3) Materials and Methods4) Results5) Discussion6) Summary and Conclusion7) Abstract8) Appendix9) References10) The Cover Letter

Page 38: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Be Your Own Editor

I now believe that much of what I do can be done by the author, either by himself or in collaboration with an interested colleague. If the colleague will ask the author to explain exactly in his own words what he means by each sentence, and even each word, the article will become steadily shorter and clearer as unnecessary words are crossed out and simple words and constructions replace complicated ones.

Articles that have had this time-consuming treatment, sometimes more than once, are much easier for an editor to accept and for a language supervisor to make sound English without changing the meaning.

I try to make it clear that my changes are only suggestions, not Holy Writ, and I make them in pencil so that they can be rubbed out if the author disagrees with them. At the same time I do not hesitate to comment on the length, the layout, or the logic. I am also convinced that articles by English and American authors would invariably benefit from scrutiny by colleagues. Not only articles but many expensive medical books are far too long and turgid to read because they get no such treatment from their authors or publishers.

I appreciate that many articles submitted in English have been written in another language and then translated. The “colleague treatment” can be applied to the draft in the original language and, if possible, to the English translation also.

Page 39: How to Write a Scientific Paper Worth Reading

Question and Answer

Session