how to write a basic research article to be relevant for the readers of european urology
DESCRIPTION
How to write a basic research article to be relevant for the readers of European Urology. Jean-Nicolas CORNU Associate Editor European Urology. Context. Basic research Leads to new knowledge Provides scientific capital - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
How to write a basic research article to be relevant for the readers of European Urology
Jean-Nicolas CORNUAssociate Editor
European Urology
Context
• Basic research– Leads to new knowledge– Provides scientific capital– Is the fund from which
the practical applications of knowledge must be drawn
National Science Foundation, 1953
Courtesy of the National Cancer Institute (NCI/NIH)
Cancer
Functional
Kidney/stones
Andrology/male
Urogynecology
European Urology contextHigh-impact
Broad readershipMostly focused on clinical issues / patients care
« Relative relevance »
Clinical implications / applicationsTranslational work
Please tell us the whole story…
Reasons for rejection
• Too weak (major issue for basic science) • Too focused (one slice of salami)• Not relevant for all readers (model)• Results consisting in purely technical aspects
Please, understand the concept of primary
rejection…
We DO WANT YOUR BEST WORK IN EUR UROL
How to optimize • TOPIC: is it urology or about urology• RESEARCH QUESTION: relevant for a urologist ?• RATIONALE: make it obvious for a urologist – it requires a
clinical context• METHODS: describe everything – DO USE supplementary
data / supplementary methods• RESULTS: make your work « talk » to a urologist optimize
your displays (spend enough t/e/m) – DO USE supplementary data / supplementary methods
• INTERPRETATION: be accurate – and relevant
Good examples
• Self explanatory title• Could be of interest for urologists
Good examples
Rationale/objectives
…
…
…
General context
Quick summary of known priciples
Rationale for studying mechanisms
Clear statement
Quickly say why does it make sense
MethodsEnough detailed and
referenced to be reproduced
Use of appendix
Methods
• Keep it simple, organized and straight forward• Descriptions should be crisp and accurate (word
count!) – use suppl data• Statistics need to be clearly defined (it‘s your tool
– as well as subjects – will be reviewed !!)• Ethical permission has to be given – references
have to be adequate • If the methods section is unclear, the ms will fail!
Presenting results
Results
Figures
Make it perfect (revision?)
Up to… what you want
• Supplementary content is like « always necessary » in a big basic research
• Always better than publishing– the ideas– then methods– Results in salami– Applications/extensions you have already in the
box
Tell a story !!
Presenting results rules
Short but answering the questionsRefer to pictures and tables - The text is your speech - Science is in the tables and figuresUse sub-sections help to enhance readibilityBe accurate, credible (units!)Do not overinterpret at this stage
Discussion• Not too long• Put you results in perspective• Explian the potential
relevance• Generate (reasonable) new
hypothesis• Do not make pure statements• Do not sell the paper at this
time: Less is more, data are everything
Conclusion• Study needs to be relevant for clinicians ++++• Original / Novel • If the study is not of interest for a broad readership in Eur Urol, it
may be more adequate for submission to a specialized journal (e.g. if you describe a new method or a specific technique): you won‘t lose time
• Critical importance of material & methods• Figures and tables are th most important part of the work and need
your energy• Discussion: put in perspective• Sufficient amount of data / convincing techniques to support the
conclusion : do not over interpret