how do we get better

2
www.bicalliance.com February 2011 63 A s in business or sports, improving turnaround performance involves using metrics and keeping score. In busi- ness, we keep score by measuring dollars of profit as a percent of revenue earned. The metrics that drive the profits may be inventory turns, asset utilization, lead con- version, cash flow and etc. Better metrics translate into more profit. In baseball for offense, on base per- centage, RBI’s, number of walks, hitting percentage and other factors may apply. Better metrics in team offense translate into better scores, and, hopefully, more wins. Turnarounds are no different. If we want to get better, we must keep score. What measures should we keep that become the telltale yardstick of our perfor- mance? The answer is twofold. On the one hand, we have measures we should keep on each event — performance measure of a single turnaround project. The purpose is to benchmark against baseline measures, such as cost, schedule, safety performance, discovery work and etc. On the other hand, we have measures we keep to benchmark ourselves against our peers. The purpose, in this case, is to make sure we are not one of the weak sisters in the bottom quartile because when hard times come the weak sisters are squeezed the most. The key is to focus on the drivers of the goals. The great law of nature is the law of cause and effect, “As ye sow, so shall ye reap.” No one expects to put apples and dough in an oven and pull out a pumpkin pie. In that vein, tracking cost is a means not an end. We cannot expect that tracking the cost will control the cost. Measuring cost may tell us what we want to know yet still not tell us what we need to know to fix the cost overrun. As author Steven Covey would urge, “Check and make sure we have our ladder on the right wall before we expend the effort to get to the top.” We should always question the function of each metric. Is it linking to the key indica- tors? In other words, is the performance (the effect) the metric denotes a related one (the root cause) of the key performance indica- tors? If the metrics don’t align with the per- formance expected, then they cannot possibly tell us anything we really need to know. We often begin collecting data even though the reason we started using the met- ric has been long ago satisfied. As an orga- nization we keep collecting and reporting them when they have outlived their useful- ness. We should constantly challenge stan- dard conventions by asking: Why do we measure this? Why do we measure it this way? What does this measurement mean? Why is this measurement important? Are these measures root causes of and aligned with the performance we expect? OK, so now we know how to keep score. But do we get better? Our scorecards should be balanced between financial measures, operations measures, HS&E measures, reli- ability measures and more. I advocate keep- ing two scorecards — an event scorecard and an organization scorecard. Each turnaround will have its own chal- lenges. Goals unique to that event should be reflected on the event scorecard along with the perennial measures. The organi- zation scorecard is a collection of histori- cal measures benchmarked for improving internal performance and of measures of peer groups benchmarked for improving performance versus our peers. To get better, we target a benchmark or benchmarks that need improvement. Then quantify the amount of improvement wanted or expected, in measurable terms, to realize the goals (shorter duration, lower spend, fewer environmental excursions, fewer accidents and etc.). Next, determine the turnaround systems that control the root cause or drive that measure then optimize the processes, procedures or standards until the inputs and outputs of the system pro- duce the desired result. This sounds simple, but it is not neces- sarily easy. It requires us to take a different perspective … thinking outside of the box. Remember the phrase, “If you keep doing what you’ve always done, the same way you’ve always done it, you’ll keep getting what you’ve always got.” Or, in the case of turnarounds, you could ask the same thing the Capital One TV ads ask, “What’s in your wallet?” For more information, contact David Frinsco at (281) 461-9340, e-mail [email protected] or visit www.tamanagement.com. How do we get better? By: MICHAEL D. JEANSONNE, CEO The Turnaround Management Company/TTMC Personnel TURNAROUND MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE UPDATE

Upload: hanafi-soeseno

Post on 06-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How Do We Get Better

8/3/2019 How Do We Get Better

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-do-we-get-better 1/1

www. bicalliance .com February 2011 63

A s in business or sports, improvingturnaround performance involves

using metrics and keeping score. In busi-ness, we keep score by measuring dollarsof profit as a percent of revenue earned.The metrics that drive the profits may beinventory turns, asset utilization, lead con-version, cash flow and etc. Better metricstranslate into more profit.

In baseball for offense, on base per-centage, RBI’s, number of walks, hitting

percentage and other factors may apply.Better metrics in team offense translate intobetter scores, and, hopefully, more wins.Turnarounds are no different. If we want toget better, we must keep score.

What measures should we keep thatbecome the telltale yardstick of our perfor-mance? The answer is twofold. On the onehand, we have measures we should keepon each event — performance measure of a single turnaround project. The purposeis to benchmark against baseline measures,such as cost, schedule, safety performance,discovery work and etc.

On the other hand, we have measureswe keep to benchmark ourselves against our

peers. The purpose, in this case, is to makesure we are not one of the weak sisters inthe bottom quartile because when hardtimes come the weak sisters are squeezedthe most.

The key is to focus on the drivers of thegoals. The great law of nature is the lawof cause and effect, “As ye sow, so shallye reap.” No one expects to put apples anddough in an oven and pull out a pumpkinpie. In that vein, tracking cost is a means

not an end. We cannot expect that trackingthe cost will control the cost. Measuringcost may tell us what we want to know yetstill not tell us what we need to know to fixthe cost overrun. As author Steven Coveywould urge, “Check and make sure wehave our ladder on the right wall before weexpend the effort to get to the top.”

We should always question the functionof each metric. Is it linking to the key indica-tors? In other words, is the performance (theeffect) the metric denotes a related one (theroot cause) of the key performance indica-tors? If the metrics don’t align with the per-formance expected, then they cannot possiblytell us anything we really need to know.

We often begin collecting data eventhough the reason we started using the met-ric has been long ago satisfied. As an orga-nization we keep collecting and reportingthem when they have outlived their useful-ness. We should constantly challenge stan-dard conventions by asking: Why do wemeasure this? Why do we measure it thisway? What does this measurement mean?Why is this measurement important? Arethese measures root causes of and aligned

with the performance we expect?OK, so now we know how to keep score.But do we get better? Our scorecards shouldbe balanced between financial measures,operations measures, HS&E measures, reli-ability measures and more. I advocate keep-ing two scorecards — an event scorecard andan organization scorecard.

Each turnaround will have its own chal-lenges. Goals unique to that event shouldbe reflected on the event scorecard alongwith the perennial measures. The organi-zation scorecard is a collection of histori-cal measures benchmarked for improvinginternal performance and of measures of peer groups benchmarked for improving

performance versus our peers.To get better, we target a benchmark

or benchmarks that need improvement.Then quantify the amount of improvementwanted or expected, in measurable terms,to realize the goals (shorter duration, lowerspend, fewer environmental excursions,fewer accidents and etc.). Next, determinethe turnaround systems that control the rootcause or drive that measure then optimizethe processes, procedures or standards until

the inputs and outputs of the system pro-duce the desired result.This sounds simple, but it is not neces-

sarily easy. It requires us to take a differentperspective … thinking outside of the box.Remember the phrase, “If you keep doingwhat you’ve always done, the same wayyou’ve always done it, you’ll keep gettingwhat you’ve always got.” Or, in the case of turnarounds, you could ask the same thingthe Capital One TV ads ask, “What’s inyour wallet?”

For more information, contactDavid Frinsco at (281) 461-9340,e-mail [email protected] orvisit www.tamanagement.com. •

How do we get better?

By: MICHAEL D. JEANSONNE, CEOThe Turnaround Management Company/TTMC Personnel

TURNAROUND MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE UPDATE