horisontal action involve
DESCRIPTION
Horisontal Action Involve. European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Participation at EUSBSR Annual forum in Tallinn, Gdansk and Copenhagen divided into group of actors in %. European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Horisontal Action Involve
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
EU National Regional Local NGO Business Academy JTS Financial Media
Tallinn 2010
Gdansk 2011
Copenhagen 2012
Participation at EUSBSR Annual forum in Tallinn, Gdansk and Copenhagen divided into group of actors in %.
Allocation of funds in % between different group of partners in the Interreg IIIB, Baltic Sea Programme, South Baltic programme, Central Baltic programme and EUSBSR Seed Money Facility.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
23,15
29,16
10,71
14,59
18,15
4,24
8,44
13,115,65
28,96
15,44
18,4
28,13
18,91
6,39
30,13
15,67
0,77
18,44
12,13
8,33
45,12
10,89
5,08
12,39
7,2
33,5
24,3
14,9
7,7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Local Regional Nationell Academy NGO Others
Interreg IIIB
Baltic Sea Programme
South Baltic Sea Programme
Central Baltic Programmet
EUSBSR Seed Money
Allocation of Funds in % between different groups of partners - Interreg IIIB (2000-2006) compared with BSR + South Baltic and Central Baltic programmes (2006-2013).
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
23,15
29,16
10,71
14,59
18,15
4,24
14,17 13,7212,25
33,54
14,2412,09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Local Regional Nationell Academy NGO Others
Interreg IIIB
South + Central Baltic pr. +BSR pr.
Evaluering av den EUSBSR:
• From WWF: ”The BSAP will only be fully implemented when countries realize the potential of cooperation across borders, across sectors, and across levels of government.”
• Most Countries are behind in the implementation.
• Simple, honest and transparent reporting system is urgently needed.
• Countries have not developed
sufficient tools for cooperation.
• From the European Commission: • All participants must recognize
their macro-regional strategies as horizontal responsibility of their governments as a whole;
• Progress should also be seen in terms of networks created, projects successfully pursued, and improvements in integration and coordination.
• If the added value of the strategies is clear, it remains essential to improve implementation methods.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
MLG: first observations.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
National level
Pan-Baltic organizations
Regional-local level
Horizontal actors
EU institutions
Quantitative observations:• Nature of the actors involved in the
implementation activities:
Repartition of leading activities per actors category:
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
Conclusions of the mapping:
• All levels of actors need ”Capacity Building” activities.
• Strong lack of leadership when it comes to reinforce the local actors role in the EUSBSR.
• Horisontal/local actors need a stronger political role in the EUSBSR.
• HA Involve is missing recognition from other EUSBSR actors.
• HA Involve must be more politised.
• HA Involve must identify/support the creation of organisations and structure that can support the role of municipalities.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
Thank you for your attention!
www.balticsea-region-strategy.eu
University, Business sector
NGO:s, Individuals
Nationell nivå
Lokal nivå
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
Regional nivå
EU 2020, EUSBSR
Coaching
EU Commission,
EU Parliament, EU CoR
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
23,15
29,16
10,71
14,59
18,15
4,24
8,44
13,1
15,65
28,96
15,44
18,4
5,81
13,59
18,98
27,14
16,4518,03
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Local Regional Nationel Academy NGO Others
Interreg IIIB
Baltic Sea Programme
Flag ship projects
Funds in % to projects approved in Interreg IIIB (2000-2006), the Baltic Sea Programme (2007-2013) in general compared with flagship projects in the BSR programme (45 projects)