hobbs: better ignorant than misled: including uncertainty in forecasts supporting management and...

26
Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions Better ignorant than misled: Including uncertainty in forecasts supporting management and policy N. Thompson Hobbs Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University Uncertainty Analysis: A Critical Step in Ecological Synthesis Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, 8/5/2013 1 / 26

Upload: questrcn

Post on 20-Aug-2015

228 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Better ignorant than misled: Includinguncertainty in forecasts supporting management

and policy

N. Thompson Hobbs

Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Department of Ecosystem Science andSustainability, and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology,

Colorado State University

Uncertainty Analysis: A Critical Step in Ecological SynthesisAnnual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, 8/5/2013

1 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Honest synthesis

Published

research

Monitoring

Experiments Physical

laws

Theory

Management and Policy

Process

studies

2 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

The problem of management:

What actions will allow us to meetgoals for the future?

3 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Synthesis with deterministic models

4 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Orrin H. Pilkey and Linda Pilkey-Jarvis 2007

5 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

A broadly applicable approach to ecological modeling insupport of management

[E,θprocess,θdata |data] ∝

[data|θdata ,Et ] [Et |θprocess ,Et−1] [θprocess ,θdata ,E0]

data

EtEt�1

✓data✓process

Process

Parameters

6 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Posterior predictive distributions[E ′|data] =∫

θθθ

∫E [E ′|E ,θdata ,θprocess ] [E ,θdata ,θprocess |data]dEdθdataθprocess

Time

Stat

e of

Pop

ulat

ion

(E o

r E’

)St

ate

of E

colo

gica

l Sys

tem

(E o

r E')

7 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Posterior predictive distribution of future states, E ′

Future state of system, E'

Prob

abilit

y de

nsity

Time

Stat

e of

Pop

ulat

ion

(E o

r E’

)St

ate

of E

colo

gica

l Sys

tem

(E o

r E')

8 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

How to evaluate actions?

Objective: reduce state below a target

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Objective

9 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Objective: maintain state within acceptable range

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Range

10 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Objective: increase state above a target

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Objective

11 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Action: do nothing

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Objective

12 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Action: implement managment

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Objective

Management

13 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Net effect of management

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Objective

14 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Net effect of management

Future state of system, E'

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Objective

15 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Example: Managing brucellosis in Yellowstone Bison

16 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Goal: Reduce probability of infectionby half in five years.

Action: Annually vaccinate 200sero-positive females.

17 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Bayesian matrix model with multiple sources of data

Serology Ysero[t]

Mark recaptureyϕ[t]

Removalsyr[t]

Censusyn.obs[t]yn.sd[t]

Aerial classificationsyratio.calf[t]

yσ[t]

A[t]n[t�1] � r[t]

n[t]asd, bsd

psight

Ground classificationsyp.µ[t]yp.σ[t]

�p

Removal age, sexyr.age[t]

Removal serologyyr.sero[t]

rcomp[t]

rsero[t]

�, fc, fn, fp, , s, v

rinfect[t]

18 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Effect of vaccination: Treat 200 sero-positive / year

0 1 2 3 4 5

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

Years into the future

Pro

babi

lity

of tr

ansm

issi

on

Do nothingVaccinate

19 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Effect of vaccination

0 1 2 3 4 5

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

Years into the future

Pro

babi

lity

of tr

ansm

issi

on

20 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Effect of vaccination

Objective: reduce transmission probability by half

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

02

46

810

Five years in the future

Probablity of tranmission

Density

Do nothingVaccinate

21 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Comparison of alternatives

Management action Probability of meeting goal

Do nothing .05

Vaccinate 200 sero-positives .33

Cull 200 sero-positives .29

Cull 200 females .15

Boundary hunting .03

22 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Multiple objectives, multiple actions

Objectives

I Reduce P(infection) byhalf

I Sero prevalence < 40%

I Population size between3000 - 3500

I Appropriate demographiccomposition

Actions

I Vaccination

I Remove sero-positives

I Remove sero-negatives

I Boundary hunting (or removal)

23 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Closing

I Value

I Provides honest forecasts relevant to actions and goals.I Informs the conversation

I Limitations

I Demonic intrusions aren’t included.I Forecasting horizons are short.

24 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

Develop Bayesian model(s) of system

Forecast system behavior under different policy

options

Implement policy (or better, policies)

Observe system behavior

Update model(s)

Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan, New York.

25 / 26

institution-logo

Motivation Bayes Evaluating actions Example Conclusions

May 21-30, 2013 Google “NREL Bayes”

Building capacity in Bayesian modeling

for practicing ecologists

Award DEB 000347455

A workshop for faculty and agency researchers. $1000 stipend. See www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/bayesworkshop/

26 / 26