hl-lhc: scope, structure and management
DESCRIPTION
HL-LHC: scope, structure and management. HL-LHC internal kick-off day 15 April 2011. Content. Scope Structure Management Situation of CERN budget Situation of HiLumi FP7 DS. How the luminosity might evolve optimistic to 2012, then prudent: nominal. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
HL-LHC: scope, structure and management
HL-LHC internal kick-off day15 April 2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 2
Content
• Scope• Structure• Management• Situation of CERN budget• Situation of HiLumi FP7 DS
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 3
How the luminosity might evolve optimistic to 2012, then prudent: nominal
15-04-2011
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1000.00
0.0E+00
2.0E+33
4.0E+33
6.0E+33
8.0E+33
1.0E+34
1.2E+3420
10
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Inte
grat
ed lu
min
osity
[fb-1
]
Peak
Lum
inos
ity [c
m-2
s-1]
Peak lumi Int. lumi
Shut
dow
n
Shut
dow
n
Data from M. LamontGraph E. TodescoNOT yet validated in LMC
Based on 15 months LS1 now under change
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 415-04-2011
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.020
10
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Hal
ving
tim
e (y
ears
)
Inte
grat
ed Lu
min
osity
[fb-1
]
Int. lumi Halving time
Shut
dow
n
Shut
dow
n
Data from M. LamontGraph E. TodescoNOT yet validated in LMC
How the luminosity might evolve optimistic to 2012, then nominal -cont
220 inv fb by end of 2020
Based on 15 months LS1 now under change
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 5
Lumi evolution: more otpimistic(ultimate=2xnominal) is reached
15-04-2011
If LHC performs « nominal »: the upgrade is required by the saturationIf LHC performs better, saturation is 2 years later, but radiation limits may come in earlier
In such case we may reach 320 inv. fb for end of 2020.
Data from M. LamontGraph E. TodescoNOT yet validated in LMC
Based on 15 months LS1 now under change
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 6
The goal
The main objective of HL-LHC is to implement a hardware configuration and a set of beam parameters that will allow the LHC to reach the following targets:•A peak luminosity of 5×1034 cm-2s-1 with levelling, allowing:•An integrated luminosity of 250 fb-1 per year, enabling the goal of 3000 fb-1 twelve years after the upgrade. This luminosity is more than ten times the luminosity reach of the first 10 years of the LHC lifetime.
0.E+00
2.E+34
4.E+34
6.E+34
8.E+34
1.E+35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Lum
inos
ity
(cm
-2s-1
)
time (hours)
Nominal
1035 - no levelling
Levelling at 5 10
35
34
0.E+00
2.E+34
4.E+34
6.E+34
8.E+34
1.E+35
0 5 10 15 20 25
Lum
inos
ity
(cm
-2 s
-1)
time (hours)
1035 - no level Level at 5 1035 34
Average no level
Average level
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 7
Goal – cont.
• Levelled lumi of LLp =51034 s-1 cm-2 (not Hz cm-2)• Annual integrated luminosty: IL =250 fb-1
– More than 1 fb-1 a day
• Which is more important? I guess IL . We take Lp as guideline, not a barrier, however it is understood that this is the nominal limit.
• These goals are already questioning parameter space of Linear Collider: we need to be correct, optimist but not overoptimist
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 8
• We need to have potential for Lp =10-151034 (before levelling)– Today the preferred baseline is to reach 5 1034 and then « crabbing ». But
may be we put crab at max immediately and then use another parameters.– We cannot rely only on one scheme: we need to have scheme with very
low and not small , we need to explore very high beam curent and moderate beam current, and having more than on leveling methods.
– Many actions will be needed in addition to the most visible being discussed today to reach integrated :
• Turn around time: will allow « releasing » beam current (protection)• Stops, Shutdowns, etc…
– Advanced robotics and monitoring? – Remove on surface of sensible equipments.
• To be worked out with experiments• The upgrade is « ultimate consolidation », too. I see these actions as a
« continuum » with some spike activities , the biggest being
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 9
Structure• By deliverable
– Study and R&D (big part in FP7 HiLumi Design Study and Eucard(2))– Construction
• tooling&infrastructure, if needed, • components , • Assembly• Test (on surface)
– Installation, commissioning• This way external contribution are easy to evidence and to account• Also is easy to do a cost-to-completion and decision making by line management• My view is to agree at Management level the cost (M+P) and time profile, then transfer resources
(with clear control) to Department/Groups. It is their job to efficiently manage it and our job to check, to see sufferance or excess and propose transfers/integrations. Contingency at CERN level (or Project with full transparency toward management, but see US project: in this way contingency is always used)
• The cost-structure should be based on CORE-cost. This will easy in-kind contribution and make them visible.
• Next slides: quick overview, details and substructure to be discussed with various leaders of projects and systems.
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 10
HL-LHC composition
WP1 Project Management and Technical Coordination
WP2 Accelerator Physics and Performance
WP3 Magnet Design
WP5 IR Collimation
WP6 Cold Powering
WP4 Crab Cavities
HiLumi LHC
WP7 Machine Protection
WP8 Collider-Experiment Interface
WP9 Cryogenics
WP10 Energy Deposition and shielding
WP11 11 tesla dipole two-in-one
WP12 Integration & (de)installation
Non-HiLumi LHC
HL-LHC Design Study
CollimationProject
Matching section and correctors
Beam Diagnostics
High Field Magnets R&D
HE-LHC Studies Hardware Commissioning
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 11
HL-LHC management
CERN Council
CERN DG
Collaboration Board Scientific Advisory Board
Project Coordinator
Steering Committee
WP1 WP11
Project Office EC DG Research
WP6 to to WP7
Key:
Strategic decisions
Specific to HiLumi LHC
HiLumi LHC
management structure
extended to whole
HL-LHC Design Study
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 12
R&D Design PrototypeConstruction CERN Budget Code name Bud.Code#Installtion-Commission.
1HL-LHC Proj. Mngt. and Techn.Coordin.
1.1 ManagementForm and coordinate various bodies: CB, SC,SAC,...Maintain DB of collaboration members Reporting to EU-FP7, to Collaborations and to CERN managementAnnual meetings, etc.Master PlanningBudget
1.2 Parameters and Lay-outCommittee (PLC) activitiesData Base of the the various possible HL-LHC lay-outLiaison with LHC operation and MDs
1.3 QA PlanNaming ConventionTechnical QA planRules for in-kind contributionProcedures and Reviews
1.4 SafetyRadiological impactImplementation of ALARA proceduresDefintion of equivalence among different standardsGeneral riskEnvironmental impact
1.5Liaison with Detector Uprade and LIU
Link to Detector Upgrade and LHCCLink to LIU
1.6Dissemination and Industry outreach
Publication policy and publication DBLink to TIARA, CERN-ITLO and other kTT programsScientific dissemination and communication to general public
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 13
2Accelerator Physics and Performance
2.1Coordination and Communication
2.2 Optics and Lay-out2.2.1 New IR4 Optics for CC
2.2.2Chromatic aberration corrections (of insertions)
2.2.3 General Optics and Lattice (various lay-out)2.2.4 ATS studies
2.3 Particle simulation2.3.1 Monte Carlo tracking2.3.2 Simulation tools2.3.3 Correction circuits 2.3.4 Optimize Tune working pointfor HL2.3.5 Radiation and heat depostion
2.4 Intensity limitations2.4.1 Impedence studies2.4.2 Corrector circuit settings2.4.3 IBS estimate2.4.4 e-coulds effects
2.5 Beam-beam effects2.5.1 Orbit variation2.5.2 LR b-b correction by wires2.5.3 CC b-b compensation
2.6Beam parameter and Lumi optimization
2.6.1Lumi reduction by geometric factor and levelling means
2.6.2 Optimization of Lumi via beam paramerters2.6.3 Optimization of beam parameters
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 14
3 Magnets for IRs
3.1Coordination and Communication
3.2 Ending Phase 1 LIT project3.2.1 MQXC Short model 2(3) 2m models Short quadrupoles 99605
SLHC-PP WP6 (CERN) 97109SLHC-PP WP6 (EU) 97184
2 short cold mass wiht 2 models Pre-series quadrupoles 99606cryostat for short cold mass Cryostats and support 99608
3.2.2 Nested correctors2 single and 1 nested assembly Correctors NIT 99610
3.2.3 Magnet Testing LIT Magnet Testing 996113.2.4 Magnetic measurements LIT NIT: Magnetic Measurements 99625
3.3 General Design3.3.1 Nb3Sn MQX for inner triplet3.3.2 SeparationDipoles D1-D23.3.3 Cooling studies for IR3.3.4 Special Magnet studies
Large Aperture Outer Triplet Q4-Q6Analysis of Nb-Ti Phase 1 resultsIR3-IR7 magnet lifetimeDipole first and Two-in-One MQX
3.4 R&D and Prototyping Models and demonstrator3.5 Construction
SuperconductorComponentsToolingMagnet assemblyCryostatsCold TestsMagnetic MeasurementsMagnet ProtectionIntegration in the tunnelInstallationAlignment
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 15
4 Crab Cavities (CC)
4.1Coordination and communications
4.2 Support studies4.3 Compact CC (CCC)
4.3.1 CCC Design4.3.2 CCC Validation Prototyping 4.3.3 CCC construction4.3.4 CCC Cryopmodule components4.3.5 CCC Cryomodule assembly
4.4 Elliptical CC (ECC)4.4.1 ECC Design
4.4.2 ECC Validation Prototyping These lines go on only if CCC fails
4.4.3 ECC construction4.4.4 ECC Cryopmodule components4.4.5 ECC Cryomodule assembly
4.5 Test on beam4.5.1 Test prototype in SPS4.5.2 Test prototype in IP4
4.6 RF Power System4.7 Low level RF (LLRF)4.8 Integration in the tunnel4.9 Installation
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 16
5Collimation project
5.1
Coordination, communication and technical management
Budget & ScheduleQA Safety
5.2 Studies LHC studies and beam lossesEnergy deposition in/around collimatorsRadiation impactSPS and HiRadMat beam tests
5.2Collimation upgrade in the LLSS
DesignConstructionInstallation
5.3Collimation upgrade in DS by warm collimators
General Design & StudiesCryo by-pass
DesignComponentsAssemblyTestsMagnet removal and re-installationModification of LHC layout: cryogenicsModification of LHC layout: vacuumInstallation
5.4Collimation upgrade in DS by cold collimators
5.5 Collimation for IR upgradeSimulation of Beam losses in IRSimulation of Energy deposition in IRDesign of Collimation in the IRCollimators constructionIntegration Installation15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 17
6 Cold Powering
6.1Coordination and Communication
6.2Sc Link R&D Horizontal prototype
Development and conctruction 20 m link (ending Phase 1) Cold Powering NIT 99614Test link Magnet Testing NIT 99611
6.3 General DesignLHC Cryogenics: cooling and operationElectrical Transfer and cryostatsEnergy depostion and material studies
6.4 Vertical link for HL IPsR&D and prototypes 60 m longCivil EngineeringConstruction linkConstruction FeedboxesTestIntegration Installation
6.5 Power Converters
7Machine Protection
8
Collider-Experiment Interface
8.1 New beam pipes8.1.1 Studies8.1.2 New beam pipe ATLAS8.1.3 New beam pipe CMS8.1.4 New beam pipe Alice8.1.5 New beam pipe LHCb ?
8.2 Studies of background8.3 TAS & absorbers design
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 18
9 Cryogenics
9.1Cryogenics for test CC in SPS
9.2Cryoplant for upgrade Point 4
9.3 Cryoplants for HL IP1-IP5
10Energy Deposition & Absorber
10.1 ED by Collision DebrisMagnet coil (triplets, D1, D2, MS, DS ?)Cryoequipment s (Magnets, cryostats)Dose for life-time, fluence spectrum Conceptual Design of TAS-TAN-absorbersThermomechanical stress in peak conditionR2E shieldingSc linkModel-Run for activation (with/for SC, see WP 1.4)
10.2 ED by primary beam lossesShower induced on Magnet coil (triplet, D1)background on experimentinfluence of abosrber on Change of beam losses due higher current or different beam parameters
10.3ED by Beam-residual gas interaction
Activation R2EQuench
10.4 Constuction of absorbers
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 19
1111 T dipole Two-in-One for DS
11.1 Short model magnets11.2 Construction
SuperConductorComponentsToolingConstructionCryostatsCold TestsMagnetic MeasurementsMagnet protectionPower converterIntegration tunnel with collimationInstallation
12
Matching Sections and Correctors (Ma.Se.Co.)
12.1 Lay-out studies & design12.1.1 Magnet design & prototypes12.1.2 hardware commis.600A12.1.3 MQT new powering
12.2 Magnets ConstructionMQY wideMCBYMatc.Section ModificationNew MQs P6-P7Power TestMagnetic MeasurementsMagnet ProtectionIntegrationInstallation
12.3 Cryogenics modifications12.4 Vacuum modification15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 20
13Integration and (de-)installation
14Hardware commissioning
15 Beam Diagnostics
15.1Studies New diagnostics for HiLumi
15.2 LRBB compensating wirestudiesprototypesTest in LHC ConstructionsIntegration Installation
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 21
16High Field Magnet R&D
HFM: design, analysis and test HFM: design, analysis and test 99150HFM: insulation and impregnation
HFM: insulation and impregnation 99151
HFM: constructions HFM: constructions 99152FP7 HFM Fresca2 (CERN) FP7 HFM Fresca2 (CERN) 99353FP7 HFM Fresca2 (EU) FP7 HFM Fresca2 (EU) 99354HFM Power Tests HFM Power Tests 99344HFM MM magnetic measurements
HFM MM magnetic measurements 99345
Eucard HFM HTS Links (CERN) Eucard HFM HTS Links (CERN) 99153Eucard HFM HTS Links (EU) Eucard HFM HTS Links (EU) 99161
17 HE-LHC StudiesGeneral accelerator concepts & integrationOptics and lay-outImpedance and collective effectsMagnets
Magnet designSuperconductorsMagnets short models
CryogenicsVacuum SR topicsInjection and dumpCollimationMachine protectionRF
15-04-2011
Long term R&D aimed at SC R&D and validation via FRESCA2 (13 T 100 mm)
Preparation of EU Sc cable, tooling technologies (help from US-LRP)
Lucio Rossi @sLHC2011 22
HiLumi FP7 Design Study
Saclay - 8 Feb 2011
WP1 Project Management and Technical Coordination
WP2 Accelerator Physics and Performance
WP3 Magnet Design
WP5 IR Collimation
WP6 Cold Powering
WP4 Crab Cavities
HiLumi LHC
WP7 Machine Protection
WP8 Collider-Experiment Interface
WP9 Cryogenics
WP10 Energy Deposition and shielding
WP11 11 tesla dipole two-in-one
WP12 Integration & (de)installation
Non-HiLumi LHC
HL-LHC Design Study
End of year
Lucio Rossi @sLHC2011 23
Large participationapplication 25 Nov 2010
Saclay - 8 Feb 2011
Participant no.
Participant organisation name Short name
Country
1 (Coord-inator)
European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN IEIO1
2 Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux énergies alternatives
CEA France
3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS France
4 Stiftung Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY Germany
5 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare INFN Italy
6 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics BINP Russia
7 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas CSIC Spain
8 École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL Switzerland
9 Royal Holloway, University of London RHUL UK
10 University of Southampton SOTON UK
11 Science & Technology Facilities Council STFC UK
12 University of Lancaster ULANC UK
13 University of Liverpool UNILIV UK
14 University of Manchester UNIMAN UK
15 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK Japan
16 Brookhaven National Laboratory BNL USA
17 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab)
FNAL USA
18 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL USA
19 Old Dominion University ODU USA
20 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory SLAC USA
1 International European Interest Organisation
Lucio Rossi @sLHC2011 24
HiLumi is the focal point of 20 years of converging International collaboration
• The collaboration wiht US on LHC upgrafe started during the cosntruction of LHC
• EU programs have been instruemntal in federatin all EU efforts
• With Hi-Lumi the coordination makes a step further: from coordinated R&D to a common project
• CERN is not anymore the unique owner, rather is the motor and cathalizer of a wider effort.
• Manged like a large detector collaboration (with CERN in special position as operator of LHC)
Saclay - 8 Feb 2011
Lucio Rossi @sLHC2011 25
Budget FP7 HiLumi
Saclay - 8 Feb 2011
Waiving effect
CERN waives all technical works: LHC is core program.Only kept the CERN cost for managem.
50%85% of CERN gen. mngt
Only EU research area
N.1/67Score 15/15
4.9 M€
Lucio Rossi @sLHC2011 26
Budget cont.
Saclay - 8 Feb 2011
Design in FP7 HiLumi
Extra effort for Design
R&D and proto
Industrialization & Construction TOT Industry
W1-WP6 27 10 50 200 287 160WP7-12 0 15 30 100 145 80Other 0 5 10 50 65 40TOT 27 30 90 350 497 280
Personnel for HiLumi by WP1. Manag and Tech. Coord. (6%)2. Acc. Physics and beam3. Magnets for IR4. Crab Cavities5. Collimators6. Sc links
Estimated cost for the the whole HL-LHC over 10 years in M€
Precise cost evaluation by end 2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 27
In-Kind contributions: targets
• Profiting of LARP– 200 M$ from USA (US accounting)
• 5 G¥ (50 MCHF) from Japan• Others?
– Member states? Difficult or impossible? • CH and FR are theobvious candidates• Othr MSs (or Labs) with specific interest or exchange of
help we give them
– Non MSs: we need to think wide…
15-04-2011
L.Rossi @ HL kick off internal day 28
conclusions
15-04-2011
A luminous future in front of us!!!
(Lucio: from Lucius = lux)