historians fallacies by david hackett fischer. causes of fallacies “any procedure is permissible...
TRANSCRIPT
Historians Fallacies
By David Hackett Fischer
Causes of Fallacies
“Any procedure is permissible as long as its practitioner publishes an essay from time to time, and is not convicted of a felony”
“Every man does that which is right in his own eyes”
“Errors of the sort that I was looking for were most easily found in the work of the best and brightest historians who are writing today.
Lack of method and logical thinking
Broad Categories
Inquiry
Question Framing
Factual Verification
Significance
Explanation
Generalization
Narration
Causation
Motivation
Composition
False Analogy
Argument
Semantical Distortion
Substantive Distraction
Test Question 1: What is a Practical Objective
Know everything about everything
Know something about everything
Know everything about something
Know something about something
Question Framing
The first step of any research
Key: Operational, open ended (not wide-open), flexible, analytical, precise, tested
The fallacy of many questionsHave you stopped beating your wife?
Why was American slavery the most awful the world has ever known?
The fallacy of false dichotomous questionsWhat is History – Fact or Fancy
What is your expected grade- A+ or E?
The fallacy of metaphysical questionsWas the War inevitable
The fallacy of fictional questionsFogel: How economy might have functioned if railroads had not existed
Factual Verification
The fallacy of pseudo proof“Levy on the ‘Estates Real and Personal’ of Bostonians amount to 13 shillings and six pence in the pound or 67 percent”
Pound of property at market value or from an assessed valuation of estates?
Apple has shown a growth of 6%
The fallacy of irrelevant proofWas Senator X a thief?
Senator Y was a bigger thief. Senator X was kind of poor. Senator X’ mom said that her son was not a thief. Everyone in the senate was a thief.
The fallacy of the circular proofDo gentlemen prefer blondes?
Smith, Jones and James prefer blondes
Therefore gentlemen prefer blondes
But how did we assume that Smith, Jones and James are gentlemen
Rules of ThumbCreate a relation between the proposition to be proved and the material which is offered as a proof
Present the ‘best’ evidence, closest to the event. Good is not enough
Affirmative evidence
Context of evidence is important: A won the war of 1500 should say which 1500? Moslem 1500? Or 1500 AD?
Factual Significance
The fallacy of holistA historian should select significant details from the whole thing.
A historian who swears to tell nothing but the whole truth would thereby take a vow of eternal silence
The furtive fallacyThings are never what they seem to be
The pragmatic fallacyIn a quest to make their work useful, historians select useful facts – immediately and directly useful facts – in the service of a social cause
Eric Williams attempted to give ‘National History’ to the people of Trinidad and Tobago
The quantitative fallacyThe facts that count best count most
Story of drunkard search his house keys under street light
Explanation
GeneralizationStatistical Errors, Sampling Errors
NarrationErrors in time and temporal integrity
Temporal integrity: Past and future state in addition to present Salaries of employees should never decrease
Once a student drops out of a Harvard Program, she should not be readmitted to Law program
CausationIf event B happened after event A, then B was because of A.
MotivationTrying to find flat answers to complex motivational problems
American Mind – Converting millions of Americans to one individual
CompositionElevating property of a member of group to the property of the group itself
Racial profiling
False AnalogyA resembles B in possession of X. A has Y so B must have Y.
This is just like a cold war
Argument
Semantical DistortionSave Soap and Waste Paper
Richly carved Chippendale furniture was produced by colonial craftsmen with curved legs and claw feet
Substantive DistortionOperate by shifting attention from a reasoned argument to other things which are irrelevant
Like David Donald talking about problem of encouraging ‘young scholars’.
Was Iraq War Illegal?
Is it war or act of aggression or intervention
Is it simply a question of legal and illegal?
Context of legality Is the context sufficient to prove legality? What about US/UK intervention in Kosovo?
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=11953&#.UVjhjKKyBbw
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/09/kofi-annans-iraq-blunder
Drawbacks
Conceptual poverty
Stupidity of the authors
Negro historian
Bridenbaugh’s method adds something to the weight of the book but nothing to its value
..hordes of hairy graduate students who are crying up this error
BACKUP
Writing Assignment
Syllogistic
Epistemologists
Cognoscenti
Procrustean