high ph winemaking · • native or “feral” fermentation can be a real thing, it just requires...
TRANSCRIPT
High pH Winemaking
Practical TastingTimothy Donahue M.S. Director of Winemaking WWCC
The TeamMarcus Rafanelli, Instructor of Applied WinemakingTim Donahue, Director of WinemakingJoel Perez, Director of ViticultureSabrina Lueck, Instructor of EnologyDanielle Swan-Froese, Program Coordinator
ETS Laboratories St Helena, CA
“This is where a quote can go or a simple
powerful statement or sentence.”—Attribution If Needed
“Everything I am about to tell you is a terrible
idea.”—Tim Donahue
Tempranillo x 2• High pH due do MLF
• Vintage differences
• Do you need MLF?
Syrah x 2• Got Rocks?
• Buffer capacity
• Feral fermentation
• Sulfide evolution
Today’s goals: Taste 4 different wines
Disclaimer
• I am not here to defend a PhD dissertation• These wines were not made in duplicate/triplicate• The trials we are showing today come from student produced wines
that reflect current industry practices • These wines were made in production level volumes and are
representative of the value of internal, practical, applicable research for wineries
• From a scientific perspective, all of this is a bad idea. • Sorry, no refunds
2015 & 2017 Walla Walla ValleyTempranillo
High pH wines from MLF shift
Wines 3 & 4: Tempranillo
Myles Anderson Vineyard (Estate)
Soil Deep wind blown loess on basalt
Trellis VSP
Irrigation Drip
Elevation 426 m ASL
Viticulturist Jeffrey Popick/Joel Perez
Harvest Date October 2, 2015 September 28, 2017
Tempranillo – comparative harvest data
Analysis 2015 2017 Unit
brix 25.1 25 degrees
glucose + fructose 260 265 g/L
pH 3.66 3.61
titratable acidity 5 5.2 g/L
Basic Harvest Data
• On the surface we have very similar basic harvest data.• Do we need more info?
Tempranillo – comparative harvest data
Analysis 2015 2017
L-malic acid 3.04 4.26g/L
tartaric acid 3.8 2g/L
potassium 2130 2420mg/L
yeast assimilable nitrogen 216 117mg/L (as N)
Now for a quick history lesson - 2015
3.043.17
2.972.77
0.86
0
October 2nd October 13th October 16th October 20th October 24th November 9th
Malic AcidMalic Acid
And what do you suppose happened to the pH?
3.663.88 3.98
4.224.44 4.54
October 2nd October 13th October 16th October 20th October 24th November 9th
pH
What do you do about it?
• Pick earlier?
• Tempranillo is tricky in WA. Basic fruit maturity (pH TA Brix) is well ahead of phenolic ripeness.
• Add acid?
• Again, tricky, choice of flavor VS chemistry. Could you add enough acid?
• We tried.
Other options
• Ion exchange?
• Electro-dialysis?
• Do you really have to take a red wine through MLF?
• No
• But
• You must maintain some free SO2 during ageing to inhibit MLF
• You must sterile filter before bottling!
• Monitor microbe populations
• Keep cellar cool
2015• Destemmed to 1.75T SS bin
• QA-23 yeast
• 2X daily punch downs
• Pressed at dryness
• Full MLF
• Aged in 100% new 400L AO
2017• Destemmed to 1.75T SS Bin
• QA-23 yeast
• 2X daily punch downs
• Pressed at dryness
• NO MLF
• Aged in 100% new 400L AO
Production
What’s in your wine? Wine
Scorpion "Yeast and Bacteria Panel" 12/21/2015 8/22/2016 2/13/2017
15 MATO Oenococcus oeni 1700000 156000 144000cells/mL
15 MATOSaccharomyces cerevisiae 81200 22000 11500cells/mL
15 MATO Acetic acid bacteria 2100 21600 22800cells/mL
15 MATO Pediococcus species 1800 1900 1900cells/mL
15 MATOLactobacillus plantarum/casei/mali <10 <10 <10 cells/mL
15 MATO Lactobacillus kunkeei <10 <10 <10 cells/mL
15 MATOZygosaccharomyces
bailii <10 <10 <10 cells/mL
15 MATO
L. brevis/hilgardii/fermentum <10 <10 <10 cells/mL
15 MATOBrettanomyces bruxellensis <10 <10 <10 cells/mL
Wine Data
2015 2017
pH 4.41 3.99
titratable acidity 4.7 6.2volatile acidity(acetic) 0.69 0.17
ethanol at 20C 14.81 14.23
Wine Data
2015 2017
pH 4.41 3.99
free sulfur dioxide 38 35molecular sulfur dioxide <0.10 <0.10
total sulfur dioxide 75 67
L-malic acid 0 2.98
Tempranillo take away
• High pH winemaking is very risky
• If you are going to make wine at these pH levels, SO2 is basically ineffective as an anti-microbial. However; it still has anti-oxidant properties.
• Forget about molecular SO2 (Not that it matters, you have to be insane to do this)
• Are the risks worth the rewards? You decide!
Walla Walla Valley Syrah Buffer capacity, sulfide evolution, stem inclusion
Wines 3 & 4: Syrah
Cockburn Ranch Vineyard Stoney Vine VineyardSoil Deep wind blown loess on basalt Basalt cobbles,
thin windblown loessClone Clone 7 Clone 10Irrigation Dry grown IrrigatedElevation 426 m ASL 228 m ASLViticulturist Cecil Zerba Chris BanekHarvest Date September 12, 2016 October 3, 2016
Harvest data
Cockburn Ranch Vineyard Stoney Vine Vineyard
brix 24.1° 24.7°glucose + fructose 254 g/L 256 g/L
titratable acidity 5.7 g/L 5.8 g/L
pH 3.68 3.87
Harvest Data: Takeaway
• We have VERY similar basic harvest data.
• What else can we look at?
Acids
1.96
1.21
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (g
/L)
L-malic acid
4
5.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (g
/L)
tartaric acid
The acid pH disconnect
5.7
6.8
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Tart
aric
aci
d eq
uiva
lent
s (g/
L)
total acidity
3.683.87
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
pH
Potassium & pH
1870
2300
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (m
g/L)
potassium
34.1
40.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Cockburn Ranch Stoney VineBu
ffer c
apac
ity (m
M/p
H)
buffer capacity
Acids: Takeaway
• Long extended hang time allowed by the soil/climate increased potassium and subsequently buffer capacity.
• The Stoney Vine is going to have a pretty high pH once it turns into wine.
• Adding acid isn’t going to help here.
Wine Production Comparison
Cockburn Ranch Stoney VineProcessing 40% foot stomp
40% stem inclusion50% foot stomp
70% stem inclusionBlend 91% Syrah, 9% Viognier 100% SyrahYeast Lalvin Rhône 4600® Feral fermentation from PDC
Cap Management Punch down Submerged cap
Maceration Length 10 days on skins/stems 10 days on skins/stems
Nutrition Nutrient additions No nutrient additionsOxygen Additions Macro and meso oxygenation Minimal oxygen additions
Wine Data
Cockburn Ranch Vineyard Stoney Vine Vineyardethanol at 20°C 14.2% 14.41%free sulfur dioxide 31 mg/L 29 mg/LpH 3.86 4.11titratable acidity 5.8 g/L 5.1 g/Lvolatile acidity (acetic) 0.67 g/L 0.47 g/L
Wine Chemistry Takeaway
• Why on earth would you do this?• Well…..
• Stems certainly don’t help lower pH• Lots of potassium in stems
• Good or bad? • Depends on your goals and ability to accept risk.
• So what about that aroma? Deeper?… you betcha!
0.00E+00
1.00E+07
2.00E+07
3.00E+07
4.00E+07
5.00E+07
6.00E+07
7.00E+07
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Cell
Coun
t (ce
lls/m
L)Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in uninoculated Carménère
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9
No commercial yeast were harmed during the production of the SVSY
Figure 1. Yeast population profile
Nitrogen's role in fermentation
• Yeast growth (biomass)
• Metabolic functions
• Alcoholic fermentation regulation
• Aroma/flavor compound formation
• (Esters, alcohols, acids, carbonyls, etc)
• Sulfur metabolism regulation
• (Sulfides Mercaptans Thiols)
Nitrogen: Syrah
134
211
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (m
g/L)
Yeast Assimilable Nitrogen (YAN)
How much nitrogen between the two?
354
211
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
16 COSY 16 SVSY
Total Yeast Assimilable Nitrogen (Natural + Added)
211 mg/L “au-naturel”
134 mg/L “natural”
220 mg/L “added”
Sulfates, sulfites and sulfides – oh my!
• Sulfides are created through yeast metabolism• S-containing amino acids (sulfate fertilizers)• Nutrient restriction• Elemental sulfur remaining from organic sprays
• Stylistically, some wines aromatic can be built off of various sulfide/reduction compounds.• Burgundian: Pinot Noir – dimethyl sulfide• South African: Pinotage – diethyl sulfide + mercaptins• New Zealand: Sauvignon Blanc – s-cysteine based volatile thiols
Reduced Sulfur Compounds
Compound Aroma
Hydrogen sulfide Rotten eggs, fecal
Ethyl mercaptan Onion, rubber, natural gas
Methyl mercaptan Cooked cabbage, rotten eggs
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS)Truffle, cooked asparagus, cooked corn, cabbage, molasses, quince, canned vegetable
Diethyl sulfide Garlic, onion, strong garlic
Dimethyl disulfide Cooked vegetable, strong onion, cabbage
Diethyl disulfide Strong onion, burnt rubber
(Aroma descriptors from UC Davis)
Sulfide Evolution: How To AVOID
• To DECREASE sulfides
• Use limited amounts of elemental S in vineyard
• Limit use of “sulfate” based fertilizers
• Use foliar urea sprays to increase nitrogen in fruit
• Supplement fermentations with nitrogen during fermentation
• Use oxygen during fermentation
• Rack off of yeast lees
Sulfide Evolution: How To ENHANCE
• Keys to maximizing sulfides• Use organic sulfur in the vineyard• Burn sulfur wicks in barrels (and leave a little behind)• Limit yeast nutrition• Extended yeast lees contact • Large format barrels, large format tank ageing• Minimal (if any) racking• Limit oxygen
Sulfide Evolution: November 9, 2016
1.1
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (n
g/L)
dimethyl sulfide
Sulfide Evolution: February 14, 2017
2.2
11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (n
g/L)
dimethyl sulfide
Sulfide Evolution: April 13, 2017
3.8
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (n
g/L)
dimethyl sulfide
Sulfide Evolution: December 1, 2017
3.9
26
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cockburn Ranch Stoney Vine
Conc
entr
atio
n (n
g/L)
dimethyl sulfide
Syrah: Takeaway
• You shouldn’t do this. Really.• Extended hang times increase potassium accumulation & buffer
capacity. • Stems contain significant amounts of potassium, and even when
harvested early, can increase pH and reduce TA.• Earthy, truffle, molasses and even meaty aromatics can be driven
by technique as well as vineyard practices • Native or “Feral” fermentation can be a real thing, it just requires
tinfoil hats and cheap vodka.
At the end of the day…..
• Making wine is great
• Working within the Walla Walla wine community is amazing
• Stewarding people on their life journey is fantastic
• Having the privilege to do both is both awesome and humbling.
Special Thanks
ETS LaboratoriesFor supporting WWCC and for performing all of the analysis.
Dusted ValleyFor the opportunity to work with some awesome Stoney Vine fruit.
Walla Walla Valley Wine CommunityFor being visionary by creating the Institute for EV as well as the incredible support and camaraderie!