hfa ii-i with guided progression analysis (gpa) sample cases
TRANSCRIPT
HFA II-i with Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) Sample cases
// CONFIDENCE MADE BY CARL ZEISS
Part I GPA Summary Report 3
Part II Understanding GPA Reports 4
Part III GPA Sample Cases
Case 1 Slow progression 6
Case 2 Resetting the baseline 7
Case 3 Excluding a non-representative exam 8
Case 4 Life expectancy considerations 9
Case 5 Cataract patient 10
Case 6 Insufficient exams 11
Table of Contents
3
Part I. GPA Summary Report
The diagnosis and management of glaucoma critically relies on assessment of visual field status and progression. Now you
can estimate the stage of visual field loss and its rate of progression, and assess your patient’s risk of future vision loss –
all at a glance. The Humphrey® Field Analyzer II-i (HFA™ II-i) with Guided Progression Analysis™ (GPA™) software delivers
current exam results, trends the overall visual field history and projects future vision loss all on a single page. The GPA
Summary Report presentation format is designed to simplify and streamline clinical interpretation.
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
Baseline Exams Establish initial visual field status.
VFI Value A summary measurement of the patient’s visual field status, expressed as a percent of a normal age-adjusted visual field.
2
1
VFI Rate of Progression Analysis Trend analysis of the patient’s overall visual field history.
VFI Plot Regression analysis of VFI values and 3 to 5 year projection.
VFI Bar A graphical depiction of the patient’s remaining useful vision at the current VFI value along with a 3 to 5 year projection of the VFI regression line if the current trend continues.
5
4
3
Current Visual Field Summary Complete report of current visual field including VFI, MD, PSD, the Progression Analysis Plot and the GPA alert.
GPA Alert A message that indicates whether statistically significant deterioration was noted in consecutive tests.
7
6
4
Pioneered by Boel Bengtsson, PhD1
as a more intuitive assessment of
visual function, VFI is optimized for
progression analysis. VFI is center-
weighted to correlate with ganglion
cell density and visual function. It is less
affected by cataract and other media
changes compared with earlier indices.
On the GPA Summary Report, VFI is
used to quantify rate of progression,
where it is plotted relative to patient
age to calculate the rate of functional
loss. This brochure provides an overview
of the GPA software for the HFA II-i and
some real life case examples showing
how VFI is used in GPA.
The GPA Summary Report is a powerful
one-page report that provides an
overview of the patient’s entire visual
field history. The report can be divided
into three sections: the Baseline exams
at the top, the visual field history and
trend in the middle, and the current
exam at the bottom. Elements of each
section are described below.
GPA Baseline Exams
At the top of the report are the two
Baseline Exams. Graytone and Pattern
Deviation Plots are shown for both GPA
Part II. Understanding the GPA Summary Report
1 Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008 Feb; 145(2): 343-53.
Baselines, along with key indices such
as VFI, MD, and PSD. By default, the
oldest two exams of the same type are
automatically selected as Baseline. Then
the initial selection of a SITA Standard
or a SITA Fast Exam determines which
exams will be included as follow-up
exams. It is critical that you ensure
that tests included in the Baseline are
representative of the patient’s actual
Baseline status. SITA Standard and SITA
Fast Exams cannot be combined in
the GPA analysis. Also, GPA supports
Central 30-2 and 24-2 tests in the same
analysis, but when combined, GPA will
analyze all tests as if they were 24-2
tests. GPA does not support FastPac
tests or Central 10-2 tests for either
Baseline or Follow-up.
VFI Plot
In the center of the report, the VFI
Plot graphs the VFI values of all exams
included in the GPA analysis as a
function of the patient’s age. The VFI
Plot also provides a linear regression
analysis of the VFI over time when
appropriate. A minimum of 5 exams
over 3 years or more must be included
in GPA for the linear regression results
to be presented.
Note: The regression line slope may be positive due to statistical uncertainty or the Learning Effect.
VFI Plot VFI Bar
GPA uses the Visual Field Index™ (VFI™), a
summary measurement of a patient’s visual field
status expressed as a percent of a normal age-
adjusted visual field.
5Deviation from Baseline Plot
Three Possible GPA Alerts:1. "Likely Progression"2. "Possible Progression"3. "No Progression Detected"
Progression Analysis Plot
VFI Bar
To the right of the VFI Plot is the VFI
Bar that indicates the patient’s current
VFI value. In addition, when the results
of the regression analysis are displayed,
the VFI Bar will also graphically indicate
the 3 to 5 year projection of the linear
regression line, shown as a broken line.
The length of projection is equal to the
number of years of GPA data that is
available, up to a maximum projection
time of 5 years.
Deviation from Baseline Plot
The deviation from Baseline Plot
compares the pattern deviation of
the most recent Follow-up test to
the average of the pattern deviation
values of the two Baseline tests, and
indicates changes at each tested point,
in dB notation.
Progression Analysis
Probability Plot
The Progression Analysis Probability Plot
gives the statistical significance of the
dB changes shown in the deviation from
Baseline Plot. It compares the changes
between the Baseline and Follow-up
exams to the inter-test variability typical
of stable glaucoma patients2 and then
shows a plot of point locations, which
have changed significantly.
Points that have changed by more
than the expected variability are
identified with a simple and intuitive
set of symbols:
A single, solid dot indicates a
point not changing by a significant
amount.
A small open triangle identifies
a degree of deterioration expected
less than 5% of the time at that
location in stable glaucoma
patients (p < 0.05).
A half-filled triangle indicates
significant deterioration at that
point in two consecutive tests.
A solid triangle indicates
significant deterioration at that
point in three consecutive tests.
An X signifies that the data at that
point was out of range for analysis.
For data that is out of range, GPA
cannot determine whether or not the
encountered deviation at that point
is significant. This occurs mainly with
field defects that were already quite
deep at Baseline.
GPA Alert
The GPA Alert is a message in plain
language terms that indicates whether
the GPA progression criteria were met.
The GPA Alert assists you in recognizing
deterioration in consecutive tests. In
cases where three or more points show
deterioration in at least two consecutive
tests, the progression analysis indicates
“Possible Progression.” In cases where
three or more points show deterioration
in at least three consecutive tests,
the progression analysis indicates
“Likely Progression.” When neither of
the foregoing conditions applies, a
message of “No Progression Detected”
is displayed.
2 Arnalich-Montiel F, Casas-Llera P, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G. Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009 Mar; 247(3): 391-7. Epub 2008 Nov. 4.
6
Part III. Sample Case 1 Slow progression
Slow progression may not necessarily be vision threatening
This is an example of a patient with slowly progressing visual field loss. The event analysis (GPA Alert)
indicates “Likely Progression”. However, the VFI slope is nearly flat and the confidence intervals are narrow.
This patient’s visual field loss is measurably progressing (based on the change probability map) but only very
slowly, and the patient may not be at significant risk of visual impairment during his lifetime.
3
2
1
1 2
3
Patient is 74 years old.
VFI slope is nearly flat and the
confidence intervals are narrow.
Event analysis (GPA Alert)
indicates “Likely Progression”.
7
Updating baseline after significant treatment change
The first four exams showed fast progressing visual field loss, followed by a change in treatment.
Post-treatment exams are severely depressed, and it is not clear whether the patient’s visual field stabilized
after the fourth exam.
Part III. Sample Case 2 Resetting the baseline
By re-establishing baseline after a
significant therapeutic change, it
is easier to see that the patient’s
visual field has somewhat stabilized.
The GPA analysis now displays a
shallower VFI progression line,
along with the label “Slope not
significant”. While this patient’s
vision is already so damaged that
further increases in therapy may
still be needed, this analysis gives a
more complete picture for assessing
risks vs. possible benefits.
First four exams showed fast
glaucoma progression,followed
by change in treatment.
Has the patient’s visual field
stabilized after the fourth exam?
Severely depressed visual field
on latest exam.
1
2
3
Before: with default baseline selections
1
2
3
After: with adjusted baselines
8
Excluding non-representative exams
Notice that the third exam on this report has a markedly worse VFI. In this case the patient probably was just
having a bad day, because the next visit shows a much improved field, more like the first and second exams.
In a case like this, it is important to deselect that particular exam and not use it in the GPA.
Part III. Sample Case 3 Excluding a non-representative exam
Before: with poor exam included
The third exam on this
report has a markedly
worse VFI.
1
2 Notice that the VFI regression
line in the “After” example with
the poor exam deselected is a
much more typical looking
regression line than in the
“Before” example.
2
1After: with poor exam excluded
9
Part III. Sample Case 4 Life expectancy considerations
Life expectancy can be an important consideration
A progression rate that might be acceptable at age 90 may not be acceptable at age 65.
3 Event analysis (GPA Alert)
indicates “Likely Progression”.
1
2
Age at most recent exam is 65.
VFI progression is
-3.0 ± 0.9% per year.
1
2
3
10
VFI reduces the effect of cataract 3,4
This is an example of an eye with concomitant glaucoma and cataract where the MD values reflect
much more loss than the VFI. The time of cataract surgery is marked by the red arrow in both graphs.
Part III. Sample Case 5 Cataract patient
3 Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol, 2008 Feb; 145(2): 343-53.
4 Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Qiu K, Liu S, Li H, Xu G, Fan N, Pang CP, Tse KK, Lam DS. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010 Jan; 51(1): 217-22. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Old GPA
MD follow-up (dB/year)
VFI follow-up from same patient
Cataract Surgery
Cataract Surgery
New GPA1 After surgery, MD levels
approach those seen in
the baseline exams.
2 Here is the same series
of fields with Guided
Progression Analysis.
As opposed to MD,
VFI is hardly influenced
by cataract and the
corrected rate of
progression is almost
zero. This patient has
stable glaucoma and it is
much easier to see this
with the VFI plot.
1
2
11
Part III. Sample Case 6 Insufficient exams
A patient with only one exam
When there are insufficient exams to perform a GPA analysis, the default report is the Single Field
Analysis (SFA) Report. Single Field Analysis remains the standard until follow-up is established.
VFI is calculated along with MD
and PSD for each reliable exam.
1 1
Your local contact:
ArgentinaCarl Zeiss Argentina S.A.Calle Nahuel Huapi 4015 / 25C1430 BCO Buenos AiresArgentinaPhone: +54 11 45 45 66 [email protected]
AustraliaCarl Zeiss Pty. Ltd.Unit 13, 2 Eden Park DriveNorth Ryde, New South Wales 2113AustraliaPhone: +61 2 9020 [email protected]
AustriaCarl Zeiss GmbHLaxenburger Str. 21100 ViennaAustriaPhone: +43 1 79 51 [email protected]
BelgiumCarl Zeiss NV-SAIkaroslaan 491930 ZaventemBelgiumPhone: + 32 2 719 39 [email protected]
BrazilCarl Zeiss do Brasil Ltda.Av. Naçoes Unidas, 21711CEP04795-100 São PauloBrazilPhone: +55 11 5693 [email protected]
CanadaCarl Zeiss Canada Ltd.45 Valleybrook DriveToronto, ON M3B 2S6CanadaPhone: +1 800 387 [email protected]
ChinaCarl Zeiss Shanghai Co. Ltd.1/f., Ke Yuan Building11 Ri Yin Nan RoadWaigaoqiao Free Trade Zone2005 Yang Gao Bei RoadShanghai 200131ChinaPhone: +86 21 5048 17 [email protected]
Czech RepublicCarl Zeiss spol. s.r.o.Radlická 14/3201150 00 Prague 5Czech RepublicPhone: +420 233 101 [email protected]
FranceCarl Zeiss Meditec France SAS60, route de Sartrouville78230 Le PecqFrancePhone: +33 1 34 80 21 [email protected]
GermanyCarl Zeiss Meditec VG mbHCarl-Zeiss-Strasse 2273446 OberkochenGermanyPhone: +49 7364 20 [email protected] Ophthalmology:Phone: +49 800 470 50 [email protected]
Hong KongCarl Zeiss Far East Co. Ltd.Units 11-12. 25/FTower 2, Ever Gain PlazaNo. 88 Container Port RoadKwai ChungHong KongPhone: +852 2332 [email protected]
IndiaCarl Zeiss India Pvt. Ltd.22. Kensington RoadUlsoorBangalore 560 008IndiaPhone: +91 80 2557 88 [email protected]
ItalyCarl Zeiss S.p.A.Viale delle Industrie 2020020 Arese (Milan)ItalyPhone: +39 02 93773 [email protected]
JapanCarl Zeiss Meditec Japan Co. Ltd.Shinjuku KuTokyo 160-000322 Honchio-ChoJapanOphthalmic instruments:Phone: +81 3 33 55 [email protected] instruments:Phone: +81 3 33 55 [email protected]
MalaysiaCarl Zeiss Sdn Bhd.Lot2, Jalan 243/51 A46100 Petaling JayaSelangor Darul EhsanMalaysiaPhone: +60 3 7877 50 [email protected]
MexicoCarl Zeiss de México S.A. de C.V.Avenida Miguel Angel de Quevedo 49604010 Mexico CityMexicoPhone: +52 55 59 99 [email protected]
NetherlandsCarl Zeiss B.V.Trapezium 300Postbus 3103364 DL SliedrechtNetherlandsPhone: +31 184 43 34 [email protected]
New ZealandCarl Zeiss (N.Z.) Ltd.15B Paramount DriveP.O. Box 121 - 1001Henderson, Auckland 0650New ZealandPhone: +64 9 838 [email protected]
PolandCarl Zeiss sp. Z o.o.ul. Lopuszanska 3202-220 WarsawPolandPhone: +48 22 858 [email protected]
SingaporeCarl Zeiss Ptd. Ltd.50 Kaki Bukit PlaceSingapore 415926SingaporePhone: +65 6741 [email protected]
South AfricaCarl Zeiss (Pty.) Ltd.363 Oak AvenueFerndaleRandburg 2194South AfricaPhone: +27 11 886 [email protected]
South KoreaCarl Zeiss Co. Ltd.Seoul 121-828Mapo-gu141-1, Sangsu-dong2F, BR Elitel Bldg.South KoreaPhone: +82 2 3140 [email protected]
SpainCarl Zeiss Meditec Iberia S.A.Ronda de Poniente, 15Tres Cantos28760 MadridSpainPhone: +34 91 203 37 [email protected]
SwedenCarl Zeiss ABTegeluddsvaegen 7610254 StockholmSwedenPhone: +46 84 59 25 [email protected]
SwitzerlandCarl Zeiss AGFeldbachstrasse 818714 FeldbachSwitzerlandPhone: +41 55 254 [email protected]
ThailandCarl Zeiss ThailandFloor 8, Thosapol Land Building 2230 Ratchadapisek RoadHuaykwang, Bangkok 10310ThailandPhone: +66 2 2 74 06 [email protected]
United KingdomCarl Zeiss Ltd.15-20 Woodfield RoadWelwyn Garden CityHertfordshire, AL7 1JQUnited KingdomPhone: +44 1707 [email protected]
United States of AmericaCarl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.5160 Hacienda DriveDublin, CA 94568USAPhone: +1 925 557 [email protected]
Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.5160 Hacienda DriveDublin, CA 94568USAwww.meditec.zeiss.com/hfa
Carl Zeiss Meditec AGGoeschwitzer Str. 51-5207745 JenaGermany www.meditec.zeiss.com/hfa
SAP
00
00
00
-19
76
-23
8 H
FA.4
00
2
The
cont
ents
of t
he b
roch
ure
may
diff
er fr
om th
e cu
rrent
sta
tus
of a
ppro
val o
f the
pro
duct
in y
our c
ount
ry. P
leas
e co
ntac
t our
regi
onal
repr
esen
tativ
e fo
r mor
e in
form
atio
n. S
ubje
ct to
cha
nge
in d
esig
n an
d sc
ope
of d
eliv
ery
and
as a
resu
lt of
ong
oing
tech
nica
l dev
elop
men
t. Hu
mph
rey,
HFA,
Gui
ded
Prog
ress
ion
Anal
ysis,
GPA
, Visu
al F
ield
Inde
x an
d VF
I are
eith
er tr
adem
arks
or
regi
ster
ed tr
adem
arks
of C
arl Z
eiss
Med
itec,
Inc.
in th
e Un
ited
Stat
es a
nd/o
r oth
er c
ount
ries.
© 2
011
by C
arl Z
eiss
Med
itec,
Inc.
All
copy
right
s re
serv
ed. P
rinte
d in
USA
. 101
1
0297