health and the internet: still web 1.0
DESCRIPTION
PRESENTATION TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0 5-6 SEPTEMBER 2007 NATIONAL SCIENCE LEARNING CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF YORKTRANSCRIPT
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva
Lecturer Information and Communication ScienceOpen University of Catalonia
http://www.uoc.edu
TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.05-6 SEPTEMBER 2007
NATIONAL SCIENCE LEARNING CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF YORK
• 2 / 33
• Introduction
• Methodology
• Results
• Discussion
• Conclusions
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 3 / 33
Introduction
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 4 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Research Programme
Project Internet Catalonia directed by Prof. Castells and Prof. Tubella and supported by Catalonia Government.
http://www.uoc.edu/in3/pic/cat/index.html
Internet and the Catalan Public Health System. Technological Modernisation, Organizational Change and Service Delivery in the Catalan Public Health System directed by Prof. Castells and supported by Catalonia Government
http://www.uoc.edu/in3/pic/cat/salut.html
Health and Technology - IN3 Research Programme
• 5 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Wikipedia definition Web 2.0
Informationalims: theoretical blueprint by Prof. Castells
Interactive communication – W.W.W browser and editor
Flexibility, that allows the distribution of processing power in various contexts and applications
The three major, distinctive features of the technologies that are at the heart of the system are:
1. Their self-expanding processing and communicating capacity in terms of volume, complexity, and speed.2. Their recombining ability on the basis of digitization and recurrent communication.3. Their distributing flexibility through interactive, digitized networking.
• 6 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
But…due to the dynamic of these technologies, those actors are in front of another challenge
related to Web 2.0.
Health field is also involved by the informationalim paradigm.
• 7 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Purpose
The aim of this paper is to analyze the Internet use made by physicians, nurses, pharmacists, patient support groups and Internet users.
In this analysis, we put specially emphasis on two objectives.
• To identify the possible interactive communication processes allowed by the applications available on the Net.
• To study in depth the social consequences of the change on the information and communication dimension caused by the Internet.
• 8 / 33
Methodology
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 9 / 33
Web Content Analysis
Online surveys
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 10 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Web content analysis
In order to approach the analysis of webs of health in Catalonia we have to delimit the object of study of our investigation, in two scopes:
• The thematic approach: "health"
• The geographic approach "Catalonia"
1240 web resourcesOctober 2005 – January 2006
Online survey to webmaster – March 2006388 emails – 112 answer (28,86%)
• 11 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Web content analysis
Criteria
Content
Interaction
Quality
Communication
Services
Content
Interaction
Web resource
• 12 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Web content analysisContent
Health content YES / NO
Postal Address YES / NO
Telephone number YES / NO
Advertising YES / NO
Interaction
Communication
email YES / NO
Email list YES / NO
Electronic forums YES / NO
Chat YES / NO
Online surveys YES / NO
Services
Electronic Commerce YES / NO
Electronic formulary YES / NO
Login - password YES / NO
Other YES / NO
• 13 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Web content analysisQuality
Contents
Author YES / NO
Professional profile YES / NO
Date YES / NO
Communication and services
Privacy – Legal advices YES / NO
Web resources
Web Map YES / NO
Languages YES / NO
Search YES / NO
FAQ: Frequent Asked Question YES / NO
Help YES / NO
Technological Standards YES / NO
Accreditation YES / NO
Aim of the web YES / NO
Agents
Personal Web
Patient Support Groups
Healthcare providers
Professional Associations
Public Administration
Healthcare professionals
Research Centres
Other providers
Teaching Centres
NGO
Media
• 14 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Healthcare actors
This type of surveys offers an alternative to the postal, telephone or face to face surveys as long as technical and methodological considerations are taking into account
The main obstacles of this type of surveys are associate to the representation of the sample and the suitable rates of answer
• 15 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Rates
Healthcare Actors Date Population Rate Questions - Variables
Patient Support Groups
October 2005 215 Groups 52 (24,18%) 32 questions
237 variables
Webmaster March 2006 388 contact email
112 (28,86%) 3 questions
34 variables
Physicians June 2006 16531 Barcelona (COMB)
2199 (13,3%) 272 variables
38 questions
Internet users June 2006 435 48 questions
279 variables
Nurses October 2006 13583 Barcelona (COIB)
1170 (8,61%) 42 questions
278 variables
Pharmacist November 2006
7.648 Barcelona (COFB)
898 (11,74%) 30 questions
234 variables
• 16 / 33
Results
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 17 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Web content analysisContent
Telephone number 72.6 %
Postal Address 70.6 %
Health content 55.9 %
Advertising 13.7 %
Interaction
Communication
email 78.9 %
Electronic forums 9.2 %
Email list 8.8 %
Online surveys 6.4 %
Chat 2.3 %
Services
Electronic formulary 14.6 %
Login - password 10.1 %
Electronic Commerce 4.1 %
Physicians appointments 4.8 %
Other 4.8%
Library services 3.5%
Healthcare services 1.4%
Online learning 0.4%
Payments 0,5%
• 18 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Web content analysisQuality
Contents
Author 66,3%
Professional profile 60,6%
Date 50,2%
Communication and services
Privacy – Legal advices 20,8%
Web resources
More than one language 37,6%
Aim of the web 35,9%
Search 16,9%
Web Map 12,6%
Accreditation 11,5%
Help 4,9%
FAQ: Frequent Asked Question 4,3%
Technological Standards 1,2%
Agents
Professional Associations 25%
Healthcare professionals 22.2 %
Patient Support Groups 17.1 %
Healthcare providers 12.8 %
Personal Web 5.9 %
Public Administration 5 %
Teaching Centres 4 %
NGO 2.4 %
Research Centres 2.3 %
Other providers 2.3 %
Media 1 %
• 19 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Webmasters
What are the main objectives of your website?
To offer contact data details 81,3%
To offer health information 75,9%
To obtain non economic benefits (prestige, recognition…)
64,3%
To offer a new communication channel
63,4%
To offer face to face services 63,4%
To offer online services 33,9%
To obtain economic benefits 18,8%
What are the main barriers to the development of your website?:
Lack of time 70,5%
Lack of money 47,3%
Human resources 38,4%
Enough knowledge about Internet applications
34,8%
Technological infrastructure 31,8%
Private sponsorship 28,6%
Support from your own organization
21,4%
Enough knowledge about the Internet potential
21,4%
Lack of ideas about what I can do on the Internet.
14,3%
Lack of interest 2,7%
• 20 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Internet users
Internet Health information seek frequency %
Daily 7,5
Weekly 17,6
Monthly 45,0
Never or almost never 30,1
Total 100,0
Have you sought Patient Support Groups information on the Internet
%
YES 47,6
NO 50,8
As a result of your Internet search do you… %
keep searching for more advice or information on the health question
43,9%
calm down with the medical advice received 34,5%
look for a health professional 27,4%
try to diagnose a health problem 12,2%
worry about the medical advice received 11%
Try to treat a health problem 10,8%
Look for the support of no health professional 5,7%
Other 4,1%
Have you talked with your physician about the health information you found on the Internet?
%
YES 18,8%
NO 81,2%
Do you have the email of your physician? %
YES 11,1
NO 88,9
Which of the following health services will you never use?
%
Online appointments with your physician 2.9
Online consultation with your physician 8.9
Online prescription 5,6
Online monitoring 15.2
• 21 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Patient support groups
Do you have Internet connection? %
YES 92,3%
NO 7,7%
Do you have a website? %
YES 76,9%
NO 23,1%
Do you have any electronic newsletter? %
YES 30,8%
NO 69,2%
Do you have any electronic forum? %
YES, it is just for our patient support group 7,7%
YES, it is opened for anyone 17,3%
NO 75%
Do you have the email of the group members %
YES, we ask them for the email 40,4%
YES, they give it although we do not ask for it 34,6%
NO 25%
• 22 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Physicians
Do you use the Internet for professional purpose? %
YES 93,3%
NO 6,7%
Do you recommend to your patients the consult of health information on the Internet?
%
Frequently 7,7%
Sometimes 38,1%
Never 543%
Do you have… %
A personal website 19,1%
A collective website 49,1%
A blog 5,1%
What are the main reasons? %
Share information with people 15,4%
Share information with my friends and families 12,5%
Spread my own scientific work 11,1%
Discussion about clinical issues related with my medical speciality
6,8%
Share information with my patients 5,5%
Spread no scientific work 2,7%
Do you use the email to contact or communicate… %
With other healthcare professionals 89,1%
With your patients 21,9%
When you have doubts on treatments or diagnoses, do you use any electronic discussion list or look for information on the Internet?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 45,5%
Rarely - Never 54,5%
Do you participate in Internet sites explaining or clarifying doubts?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 9%
Rarely - Never 91%
Do you participate in Internet sites as an advisor of patients?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 2,5%
Rarely - Never 97,5%
• 23 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Nurses
Do you use the Internet for professional purpose? %
YES 74,3%
NO 25,7%
Do you recommend to your patients the consult of health information on the Internet?
%
Frequently 7%
Sometimes 36,8%
Never 52,2%
Do you have… %
A collective website 40,7%
A personal website 30,9%
A blog 9%
What are the main reasons? %
Share information with my friends and families 21.4%
Share information with people 10.7%
Spread my own scientific work 9.3%
Discussion about clinical issues related with my speciality
7.6%
Spread no scientific work 6.2%
Share information with my patients 2.9%
Do you use the email to contact or communicate… %
With other healthcare professionals 74%
With your patients 7,7%
When you have doubts on treatments or diagnoses, do you use any electronic discussion list or look for information on the Internet?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 57,6%
Rarely - Never 42,4%
Do you participate in Internet sites explaining or clarifying doubts?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 10,9%
Rarely - Never 89,1%
Do you participate in Internet sites as an advisor of patients?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 2,5%
Rarely - Never 97,5%
• 24 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Online surveys – Pharmacist
Do you use the Internet for professional purpose? %
YES 92,9%
NO 7,1%
Do you recommend to your patients the consult of health information on the Internet?
%
Frequently 8,4%
Sometimes 40,2%
Never 51,2%
Do you have… %
A collective website 47.5%
A personal website 20.5%
A blog 15,5%
What are the main reasons? %
Share information with people 46.7%
Share information with my friends and families 38.0%
Share information with my clients 18.8%
Spread my own scientific work 9.2%
Spread no scientific work 8.7%
Discussion about clinical issues related with my speciality
7.4%
Do you use the email to contact or communicate… %
With other healthcare professionals 73%
With your clients 38%
When you have doubts on treatments or diagnoses, do you use any electronic discussion list or look for information on the Internet?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 33%
Rarely - Never 67%
Do you participate in Internet sites explaining or clarifying doubts?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 26,6%
Rarely - Never 73,4%
Do you participate in Internet sites as an advisor of patients?
%
Very Frequently - Frequently 36%
Rarely - Never 64%
• 25 / 33
Discussion
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 26 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Discussion - Web content analysis
The presence in the Internet of the Catalan health care system is led by the professionals who offer mainly different information and contents on health and few applications related to communication processes and/or services.
Quality is still a challenge
The Network is constituted mainly as a space of contents with little presence of applications of communication and services, therefore with a little degree of interaction.
The little presence of the healthcare providers and of the Government (in comparison with the rest of identified agents) added to the little number of applications of communication and services available do not allow the attention or the management of the users demand
• 27 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Discussion - Internet users
Internet users are characterized by: the high proportion of women, a high education level, facility of access to Internet from its own home, and a high frequency of use. These users of Internet integrate the use of different sources of information in their activities related to the health. But physicians are the key source.
Women have a more active role than the men with all the sources, including Internet
The problem of the use of the Internet for the people with more age and the consequences that the use of the consulted information can have on the health, since a smaller level of education could suppose an irregular use of the information.
The frequency of use of the Internet for questions related to the health is far away from of the levels that would allow us to call to "the cibercondriacs".
The interest of the individuals by the associations of patients like a source of information remind us the importance of the no expert knowledge, since the utility and the confidence in this source is very high.
The main consequence of the use of Internet for questions related to the health is the increase of information available. Just a minority percentage of individuals makes decisions relative to the diagnosis or the treatment of the health problem. These data support the hypothesis of the conscience of the individuals when they manage the inherent tension to the use of Internet. emphasize the need of physicians as an expert.
• 28 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Discussion - Patient support groups
Internet is used by these organizations like a space of contents that allows then to spread information relative to the organization and the health thematic.
The electronic mail is used like unidirectional communication channel producing a little interaction.
There are just a very few applications related to interactive processes of communication and a lack of professional working online
• 29 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
Discussion - Health care professionals
Professionals are connected to Internet and make an intensive use of the Net, mainly for questions related to the search and consultation of information.
The use of Internet as communication media with other professionals of the sector are extended between all the professionals, but the levels of use of Internet or the electronic mail to communicate or interact with its patients or users is scarce.
The increase of the information flows available in Internet has not come accompanied by an increase of the communication flows.
However, we have to emphasize a tendency that indicates that those professionals who develop their professional practice in competitive markets make more intensive use of the Internet and the electronic mail to interact with their patients or users.
Most of the professionals positively values the relevance of the contents available in the Internet and they do not consider that the patient search of information is negative neither for the professional - patient relationship or for the management the patients make of their disease.
However just a minority percentage of professionals recommend to their patients the consultation of health information on the Internet or talk about the Internet. Probably because on the lack of time during their face to face meetings
Nevertheless, the behavior of the phamacists shows us a new case where the factors related to the market oriented context are the key. These professionals do not have time barriers and are more accessible that the rest of professionals, given the physical distribution of the pharmacies by the territory.
• 30 / 33
Conclusions
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
• 31 / 33
The Internet as a content platformNot as an interaction space
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
The Internet reproduces the social
organization of the healthcare system
• 32 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0
http://wisdom.blogs.com/health/2007/06/why_web_20_matt.html
Thank you for your attention
Francisco Lupiáñ[email protected]
http://www.ictconsequences.netLecturer Information and Communication Science
Open University of Cataloniahttp://www.uoc.edu
• 33 / 33
Health and the Internet: still Web 1.0 - TOWARDS A SOCIAL SCIENCE OF WEB 2.0