hb 1815 teacher training southwest region update
DESCRIPTION
An update for Oklahoma's 1997 -2002 HB 1815 Teacher Training InitaitiveTRANSCRIPT
Telecommunications Telecommunications and Distance Learningand Distance LearningTechnology TrainingTechnology Training
Rose BonjourTelecommunications Coordinator
ODVTE
2
House Bill 1815House Bill 1815
3
TopicsTopics
Background
Goals and Status
Southwest Region
Challenges
Future Directions
4
BackgroundBackground
Telephone Bill
Representative Larry Adair, D-Stilwell Senator Ben Robinson, D-Muskogee
Signed June 13, 1997
Telecommunications Telecommunications Technology Training FundTechnology Training Fund
¢
Service providers contribute annually
75 per retail local exchange access line
6
PurposePurpose
“...to provide statewide teacher training in the most effective use of telecommunications and distance learning technology for the enhancement of education throughout the state.”
“...to provide statewide teacher training in the most effective use of telecommunications and distance learning technology for the enhancement of education throughout the state.”
7
StructureStructure
Six consortia
Full-time coordinators
Training Levels
Master Trainers (MT)
Lead Technology Teachers (LTT)
8
GoalGoal
“...to develop a Lead Technology
Teacher in every wing of every
educational institution in the
state of Oklahoma.”
9
ChallengeChallenge
Teachers in Oklahoma
648
51,140
Public Institutions
10
ChallengeChallenge
1,817 K-12 school sites
32 Higher Ed institutions
54 Vo-tech campuses
1,903 Total sites
11
Southwest ChallengeSouthwest Challenge
6,039 K-12
294 Higher Education
181 Vo-tech
9 Skills Centers/DOC
6,523 Total Teachers/Instructors
Coordinator
Six RegionsSix Regions
SouthwestSouthwest
14
Specific GoalSpecific Goal
FY 1999 Goal:
2,236 teachers
FY 1999 Actual:2,032 teachers
91%91%of Goalof Goal
15
Currently Currently 374 Master Trainers
2,204 Lead Technology Teachers
84% K-12
10% Higher Ed6% Vo-Tech
16
More SpecificallyMore Specifically
200 Sessions
73 Locations
56% of all public institutions
74 Counties represented
1 in 20 Educators certified
Training Site
Six RegionsSix Regions
18
Southwest FiguresSouthwest Figures
74 Master Trainers
301 Lead Technology Teachers
375 Total Trained
5.7 Percent Trained
1 in 20 Educators certified
CompetenciesCompetencies
Level One
Level Two
Level Three
20
RequirementsRequirements
Level One competencies
Administrative support
Commitment
Time!
21
Level 2 ContentLevel 2 Content
Multimedia and presentations
IETV and video conferencing
Internet and web development
Legal issues
Instructional integration
22
Level 3 ContentLevel 3 Content
True technology integration
Teacher-centered instruction
Learner-centered instruction
Peer mentoring/coaching
23
AccomplishmentsAccomplishments
Curriculum
College credit
Partnerships
Presentations at local, regional, and state conferences
24
FY 2000 GoalsFY 2000 Goals
Level 2 Level 3
Training Sessions 159 50
MTs 70 350
LTTs 1,800 487
25
Southwest GoalsSouthwest Goals
Level 2 Level 3
Training Sessions 20 5
MTs 0 75
LTTs 200 50
26
FundingFunding
$7,000,000 over 5 years
~ $1.4 million per year
Based on teacher counts
27
Southwest FundingSouthwest Funding
FY00 $192,016
Carryover ~ $180,000
Total ~ $370,000
28
Allowable Expenses Allowable Expenses
Coordinator < $85,000salary/benefits, office, travel
TrainingMT sal/ben, travel, materials, kits, refreshments, substitutes, “stipends” for 1 LTT / school
Repositorymaterials/supplies
29
ChallengesChallenges
Marketing
Training Facilities
Training Equipment
Scheduling
30
Future DirectionsFuture Directions
Level 3 training
LTT stipends
Substitute pay
Follow-up sessions
Marketing
31
HB 1815 SummaryHB 1815 Summary
Background
Goals and Status
Southwest Region
Challenges
Future Directions
32
ImpactImpact
33
Task Force SummaryTask Force Summary
“…this program has been very successful and cost effective.”
Coberly, William A., Educational Benefits of HB1815: Preliminary Findings, August 1999.
34
Task Force SummaryTask Force Summary “The vision of the legislature, “The vision of the legislature,
the administration by the Oklahoma Vo-Tech System,
“The vision of the legislature,
the administration by the Oklahoma Vo-Tech System, and most importantly,
“The vision of the legislature,
the administration by the Oklahoma Vo-Tech System, and most importantly, the enthusiastic response of Oklahoma’s teachers should be commended.”
William A. Coberly, Ph.D.
QuestionsQuestions
36