hall v berry petroleum company pro hac vice letter
DESCRIPTION
Pro hac vice letter.TRANSCRIPT
Sam Glasscock IVICE CHANCELLOR
Peter Andrews, EsquireFaruqi & Faruqi20 Montchanin Road, Suite 145Wilmington, DE 19807
EFiled: May 23 2013 11:16Transaction ID 52434393
Case No. 8476-VCG
COURT OF CHANCERY
OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE
May 23,2013
CHANCERY COURTHOUSE34 The Circle
GEORGETOWN. DELAWARE 19947AND
NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE500 NORTH KINGSTREET. SUITE 11400WILMINGTON. DELAWARE 19950-3734
RE: David S. Hall v. Berry Petroleum Co., et al.C.A. No. 8476-VCG
Dear Mr. Andrews:
I have your Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Juan E. Monteverde in this matter. Ihave reviewed Mr. Monteverde's Certification of Counsel For Consideration of Admittance Pro
Hac Vice. It has come to the Court's attention that Mr. Monteverde is a defendant in litigationthe allegations of which may have a bearing on this Motion; however, Mr. Monteverde has madeno disclosure in his Certification concerning this litigation.l Before further consideration ofthisMotion, I ask that Mr. Monteverde amend his Certificaiton to explain (1) why this litigation wasnot disclosed; and (2) whether, in his opinion, it has any bearing on this Motion for AdmissionPro Hac Vice.
Sincerely,
/s/ Sam Glasscock III
Vice Chancellor
cc: Register in Chancery
1See.Manning v. Vellardita, 2012 WL 1072233 (Del. Ch., March 28,2012) (addressing duty of candor inCertification for consideration of motion to appear pro hac vice).
David S. Hall v. Berry Petroleum Company, et al., C.A. No. 8476-VCG, letter (Del. Ch. May 23, 2013)
www.chancerydaily.com