8/13/2019 Group 1 Topic 10

1/2

COMM2384 CLIENT MANAGEMENT

GROUP PRESENTATION: Criteria and Feedback sheet

This report is worth 20% of your overall assessment - Peer (5%) Lecturer (15%)

s3408753 Le

Chau

Phuong Lien

s3410147 Nguyen Minh Dang

GROUP TOPIC Effective Communication

(Optional) Name of Peer assessor: ____________________________________________

Criterion ND

(0-1.5)

MD

(1.5-2.5)

MR

(3-4)

EX

(4.5-5)

Presentation Delivery AudioQuality of deliveryuse of voice and clarity, body

language

3

Connection with the participantseye contact, interactivity 2.5 Theatre Engaging, exciting and motivating 1.5 Time Management completed presentation within the agreed

time limit

3

Use of visual aidsvideo/ slides/ handouts/ other 2.5Content

Set up/Opening Was the purpose and structure of the presentation clearly

communicated?

1

Topic coverage

Did the presentation address all key elements of the topic? 1.5Dealing with Questions

Did the facilitating group address questions raised by audience? 2Wider Research

Was the audience provided with further resources (other than thestarter resources posted on Blackboard), open questions and

ideas for future study?

2

Summary

Did the presentation have a clearly defined, climatic andconclusive closing?

3.5

Mark: 21.5/50

Level of attainment:ND = Not Demonstrated, you have not demonstrated an understanding of the criterion and its expectationsMD= Marginally Demonstrated, you have shown limited aspects of the criterion requirementsMR= Met requirements appropriately, you have competently met the requirements for the criterionEX= Exceptional, your work demonstrates outstanding qualities for the criterion

*HD= 41+, DI= 36-40, CR= 31-35, PA= 25-30, NN is 24 and below

Comments:

8/13/2019 Group 1 Topic 10

2/2

I like your intro, you got audience attention. That pitch is as important as proposal. Its relevant to your audience.

I think when you suggest follow instruction it deals with making sure you do what the client want regarding the brief.That you follow the brief and provide solutions to their issues.

You do a good example of explaining each of the general tips of pitching.

Is the other general tips, more general that pitching? Maybe that should go first, then pitching as its more specific.

I think you spend a bit too much time on explaining each general tip.

The Steve Jobs case study could have been really good, if you introduced the tips of what he did first, then had theaudience try to identify them in the video. Would be more engaging as well as you show you can make theconnections. The other problem with this example is that it doesnt show all of the things you said he did.

You next video elevator pitch is hard to follow, the handout did not connect with it or you just have bad organizationof content in presentation. The tips are too general to understand, need to first show the video and ask us what weliked and disliked then relate them to the tips after. Might have been easier for audience.

I like how you conclude with the 3 things audience should try to do. But better to intro at the beginning of presentationand show examples throughout the presentation.

Elevator pitch part was hard to follow, very poorly presented.

You have too many tips and examples of presentations, you should focus on 1 and do it well.A lot of the tips you suggested you did not do in your own presentation, use of jargon for example, no well prepared isanother.