greenhouse gas emission targets for limiting global...
TRANSCRIPT
Greenhouse gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2CMalte Meinshausen (Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research)
Overview
• Nature study
“Greenhouse Gas targets
for staying below 2C”.Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N.,
Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K.,
Knutti, R., Frame, D. J. & Allen, M.
• Implications for
emitting CO2 from
fossil fuels.
• Implications for the Copenhagen
agreement, peaking by 2015.
Introduction
• More than 100 countries call for limiting warming to maximally 2C or lower. (Most of them, i.e. Small Island States and LDCs: 1.5C target)
• How much emission reductions necessary for staying below 2C warming?
• Reflecting current scientific uncertainties across carbon cycle and climate response, as well as radiative forcing.
Cumulative emissions
• Cumulative emissions up to the point of maximal
temperatures are key.
• If you increase your emissions afterwards again, then of
course you can further increase global temperature
levels.
• In the lower mitigation scenarios, temperatures do peak
in the early part of the second half of the 21st century.
• Thus, the cumulative emissions in the first half of the
21st century is a necessary, not a sufficient condition for
staying below 2C.
What is left for 2000 to 2050?
1000 GtCO2 = 1 Trillion tonnes CO2 = 0.27 TtC
Pro
ve
n r
eco
ve
rab
le fo
ssil
fue
l re
se
rve
estim
ate
s:
E=
R x
V x
C =
Rese
rve
x N
et ca
lorific V
alu
e x
Carb
on
co
nte
nt
Fro
m W
orld E
ne
rgy C
ou
ncil,
Su
rve
y o
f E
ne
rgy R
eso
urc
es 2
00
7
BP
Sta
tistica
l R
evie
w o
f W
orld E
ne
rgy 2
00
7
Ge
rma
n F
ed
era
l In
st.
Fo
r G
eo
scie
nce
s a
nd
Natu
ral R
eso
urc
es 2
00
6
IPC
C 2
00
6 D
efa
ult n
et ca
lorific v
alu
es, ca
rbo
n c
on
ten
t e
mis
sio
n fa
cto
rs
Key findings: 1 Trillion tonnes CO2
• If probability of exceeding 2C shall be limited to
25%: 1 Trillion Tonnes of CO2 (=0.27 TtC)
between 2000 and 2050.
• A third of that budget we used already in past
nine years.
• If we continue to emit fossil fuels at current
rates, by 2030 we will have run out of this
budget.
What does the Trillion tonnes CO2 budget mean?
• From a purely physical point of view, it does not matter
when emissions occur.
• We cannot afford to emit the CO2 from proven
recoverable reserves (in fact, only 1/4. Resources being even far larger)
• The budget for 2C is very tight, but manageable (Lower
mitigation scenarios do indicate the technological challenges and moderate economic costs –
See e.g. IPCC RCP3-PD vetting process).
• The carbon budget is the yardstick against which to
measure the appropriateness of 2020 and 2050 targets.
What does it not mean?
• … that we can delay action as long as there is
some of the carbon budget left.
• … that we should bet on future technological
advancements (CCS, free-air capture etc.)
• … that “when”-flexibility would allow us to defer
the global peak.
We had flexibility to choose from multiple pathways
tens years ago, not any more. (See WRE, Nature 1996 and
subsequent discussion).
Q: When would global emissions need
to peak?
Kyoto-2GHGs: 1750 GtCO2eq
Total CO2: ~1250 GtCO2
nearly 40% risk of exceeding 2C
Conclusion
• We exhausted the options for
multiple pathways: global emissions
have to peak by 2015, before 2020.
Other studies, a tool & Further Reading
“2C Check” tool and more background information and data
available on www.primap.org Nature 2C paper
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B.,
Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J. & Allen, M. Greenhouse gas
emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, doi:
10.1038/nature08017 (2009).
Allen et al. 2009 Cumulative CO2 emissions determine peak
warming; 1TtC over anthropocene will induce 2C as best
estimate.
Allen, M. R., Frame, D. J., Frieler, K., Hare, W., Huntingford, C.,
Jones, C., Knutti, R., Lowe, J., Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen,
N. & Raper, S. The exit strategy: Emission targets must be
placed in the context of a cumulative carbon budget if we are to
avoid dangerous climate change. Nature Reports Climate
Change, doi:10.1038/climate.2009.38 (2009).
Matthews, D. et al. (2009) Nature.
See more comments, essays and News & Views pieces in 30th April
issue of Nature www.primap.org.