great idea forum, september 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/davis_chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 reduction...

9
1 GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013

Upload: others

Post on 06-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

1 GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013

Page 2: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Introduction

Page 3: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Introduction

©parkpolicy.com

Eight rungs on the ladder of citizen participation (Arnstein, 1969)

Page 4: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Overview • The project objective is to evaluate visualization as a tool to assists in

participatory decision-making processes for transportation projects.

• Holistic community involvement for project development is needed and mandated.

• Visualizations are effective and democratic means to convey design ideas to public, empowering the whole process.

• Case study developed in the community in Mayaguez, PR.

Criteria identification

Criteria prioritization

Visualizations design and evaluation

Literature review Survey, AHP Questionnaire

Geographical location of the case study area

Page 5: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Early involvement

•Solicitation of community values and needs

•Design criteria prioritization

Context-Sensitive designs

•Conjoint features based on preferences

• Five 3-D fly-though animations

Validation of preferences

• Visual preference surveys

•Feedback from community members

Criteria identification

Criteria prioritization

Visualizations design and evaluation

Literature review Survey, AHP Questionnaire

Overview

Page 6: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Design Criteria

Fuel cost

17%

Traffic

congestion

17%

Availability of

public

transportation

10% Personal

Security

10%

Pavement

quality

7%

Safety

6%

Not having

bikelanes

6%

Vehicle

acquisition

cost

5%

Pollution

caused by

vehicles

5%

Lack of facilities

for people with

disabilities

4%

Loss of natural

areas by the

construction of

highway

3%

Noise from

traffic

4%

Parking

3% Vehicle

operating cost

3%

Figure: Main issues affecting the quality of life Community of “Dulces Labios” (n=114)

Criteria Eigenvalue

Generation of employment and economic activity in the

community 0.19

Reduction of air and water pollution 0.13

Safety Improvements of transportation infrastructure and

operations 0.12

Infrastructure for bicycle pedestrian movement 0.1

Including greenery and landscaping 0.08

Ecologically friendly Infrastructure. (Recycled materials,

Solar energy, etc.) 0.08

Preservation of cultural, historic and archeological elements 0.07

Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06

Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06

Reduction of travel time 0.05

Rapid construction of the infrastructure 0.05

Table: Hierarchy of selected evaluation criteria based on eigenvalues

Page 7: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Visualizations • Humans are inherently visuals

• Visualizations are tools used to convey effectively complex characteristics of objects at appropriate and understandable scales

Eleven Criteria

Project alt. 01

Project alt. 02

Project alt. 03

Project alt. 04

Figures: Visualization of alternative s “Do-nothing”, and Alt “E”, PR 102 “Litoral”, Mayaguez, community of “Dulces Labios”.

Page 8: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

Validation of preferences

Alt-EAlt-DAlt-CAlt-BAlt-A

5th

4th

3rd

2nd

1st

Ra

nk

ing

DULCES LABIOS - Boxplot of Alt-A, Alt-B, Alt-C, Alt-D, Alt-E

N= 28

Alt-EAlt-DAlt-CAlt-BAlt-A

5th

4th

3rd

2nd

1st

Ran

kin

g

Grad/Others/SCamp Boxplot of Alt-A, Alt-B, Alt-C, Alt-D, Alt-E

Figures: Preferred alternatives. Community of “Dulces Labios” and “Others” group

Page 9: GREAT IDEA Forum, September 17, 2013 1greatidea.uprm.edu/Davis_Chacon_2013_09_17.pdf0.07 Reduction of vehicle operation cost 0.06 Self – Sustainable financial system 0.06 Reduction

[email protected]

Sustainable Development and Transportation Decision Making:

Embedding community preferences in Visualizations