gravity surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

74
1 Gravity Surveying

Upload: others

Post on 02-Feb-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

1

Gravity Surveying

Page 2: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

2

Introduction

Gravity surveying…

Investigation on the basis of relative variations in the

Earth’s gravitational field caused by difference of density

between subsurface rocks

Page 3: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Applications

• Exploration of fossil fuels (oil, gas, coal)

• Exploration of mineral deposits

• Exploration of groundwater resources

• Engineering/construction site investigation

• Cavity detection

• Regional and global tectonics

• Shape of the Earth, isostasy

3

Page 4: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

5

1. Density of rocks

Page 5: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

6

Rock density

Rock density depends mainly on…

• Mineral composition

• Porosity (compaction, cementation)

Lab or field determination of density is

useful for anomaly interpretation and

data reduction

Page 6: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

7

2. Equations in gravity surveying

Page 7: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

r G m1 m2 rr

r

8

First Newton´s Law

Newton´s Law of Gravitation

2F = -

(x2 - x1)2

+(y2 - y1)2

+(z2 - z1)2r =

M3kg-1s-2G = 6.67×10-11

Gravitational constant

Page 8: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

r r rr = gN

R

9

Second Newton´s Law

F = m a a = -G M r r

2

kgM = 5.977×1024

R = 6371 km

mass of a homogeneous Earth

mean radius of Earth

g N 9.81 m s2

gN: gravitational acceleration or „gravity“

for a spherical, non-rotating, homogeneous Earth, gN iseverywhere the same

Page 9: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

10

Units of gravity

• 1 gal = 10-2

m/s2

• 1 m gal = 10-3

gal = 10-5

m/s2

• 1 µ gal = 10-6

gal = 10-8

m/s2

(precision of a gravimeter for

geotechnical surveys)

• Gravity Unit: 10 gu = 1 mgal

• Mean gravity around the Earth: 9.81 m/s2

or 981000 mgal

Page 10: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

11

Keep in mind…

…that in exploration geophysics,

we are working with values about…

0.01-0.001 m gal 10-8

- 10-9

gN !!!

Page 11: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

r U r U r U r

r r dr

12

Gravitational potential field

The gravitational potential field is conservative (i.e. the work to move a mass

in this field is independent of the way)

The first derivative of U in a direction gives the component of gravity in that

direction

U = g = with U = i + j + kx y z

rF

m2

G m1

R

R R

U = g . r dr = -G m1 r 2

=∞ ∞

Page 12: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

13

Measurement component

The measured perturbations in gravity effectively correspond to the vertical

component of the attraction of the causative body

we can show that is usually

insignifiant since gz << g

Therefore…

g gz

Page 13: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

gr =

cos =r r

14

Grav. anomaly: point mass

from Newton's Law

Gm Gm (z -z)2 3

Gm

r 2

g = gz =

Page 14: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

17

3. Gravity of the Earth

Page 15: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

18

Shape of the Earth: spheroid

Spherical Earth with R = 6371 km is an approximation!

Rotation creates an ellipsoid or a spheroid

1

298.247=

Re - Rp

Re

Deviation from a spherical model:

Re - R = 7.2 km

R -Rp =14.3 km

Page 16: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

19

Page 17: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

20

The Earth´s ellipsoidal shape, rotation, irregular surface relief and internal massdistribution cause gravity to vary over it´s surface

Page 18: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

- Rcos

21

From the equator to the pole: gn increases, gc decreases

Total amplitude in the value of g: 5.2 gal

)22R

g = gn + gC = G (M

Page 19: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

22

Reference spheroid

• The reference spheroid is an oblate ellipsoid that

approximates the mean sea-level surface (geoid) with the

land above removed

• The reference spheroid is defined in the Gravity Formula

1967 and is the model used in gravimetry

• Because of lateral density variations, the geoid and

reference spheroid do not coincide

Page 20: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

23

Shape of the Earth: geoid

• It is the sea level surface (equipotential surface U = constant)

• The geoid is everywhere perpendicular to the plumb line

Page 21: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

24

Page 22: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

25

Page 23: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

26

Spheroid versus geoid

Geoid and spheroid usually do not coincide (India -105m, New Guinea +73 m)

Page 24: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

27

4. Measurement of gravity and interpretation

Page 25: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

28

Measurement of gravity

• Large pendulums

• Falling body techniques

• Gravimeters

Use spring techniques

Precision: 0.01 to 0.001 mgal

Relative measurements are usedsince absolute gravity

determination is complex and

long!

1

2g t 2z =

gLT = 2π

For a precision of 1 mgal

Distance for measurement 1 to 2 m

z known at 0.5 µm

t known at 10-8 s

Absolute measurements Relative measurements

Page 26: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

29

Scintrex CG-5

LaCoste-Romberg mod. G

Source: P. Radogna, University of Lausanne

Gravimeters

Page 27: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

g = x

g = x with T = 2πT k

30

k

m

4π2 m2

For one period

k is the elastic spring constant

Problem: low sensitivity since the

spring serves to both support the

mass and to measure the data. So this

technique is no longer used…

Stable gravimeters

Hook´s Law

Page 28: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

LaCoste-Romberg gravimeter

This meter consists of a hinged beam,

carrying a mass, supported by a spring

attached immediately above the hinge.

A „zero-lenght“ spring can be used, where the

tension in the spring is proportional to the

actual lenght of the spring.

More precise than stable gravimeters (betterthan 0.01 mgal)

Less sensitive to horizontal vibrations

Requires a constant temperature environment

31

Page 29: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

CG-5 Autograv

CG-5 electronic gravimeter:

CG-5 gravimeter uses a mass supported bya spring. The position of the mass is kept

fixed using two capacitors. The dV used to

keep the mass fixed is proportional to the

gravity.

••

Self levellingRapid measurement rate (6 meas/sec)

Filtering

Data storage

32

Page 30: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

33

Gravity surveying

Page 31: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Factors that influence gravity

The magnitude of gravity depends on 5 factors:

• Latitude

• Elevation

• Topography of the surrounding terrains

• Earth tides

• Density variations in the subsurface:

this is the factor of interest in gravity exploration, but it is

much smaller than latitude or elevation effects!

34

Page 32: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

35

Gravity surveying

Good location is requiredUncertainties in elevations of gravity stations account for the greatest

errors in reduced gravity values (precision required about 1 cm) (use

dGPS)

Frequently read gravity at a base station (looping) needed

Page 33: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

37

Observed data corrections

gobs can be computed for the stations using g only after thefollowing corrections:

• Drift correction

• Tidal correction

• Distance ground/gravimeter („free air correction“ see below)

Page 34: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

38

Drift correction on observed data

Gradual linear change in reading with time, due to imperfect

elasticity of the spring (creep in the spring)

Page 35: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

39

Tidal correction on observed data

Effect of the Moon: about 0.1 mgal

Effect of the Sun: about 0.05 mgal

Page 36: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

40

After drift and tidal corrections, gobs can be computed using g, thecalibration factor of the gravimeter and the value of gravity at the base

Page 37: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

41

Gravity reduction: Bouguer anomaly

BA = gobs - gmodel

gmodel = g - FAC + BC -TC

gmodel

g

FAC

BC

TC

model for an on-land gravity survey

gravity at latitude (latitude correction)

free air correction

Bouguer correction

terrain correction

Page 38: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

g = g equator (1+1 sin2 +2 sin

4

42

)

Latitude correction

• 1 and 2 are constants dependent on the shape and speedof rotation of the Earth

• The values of 1 , 2 and gequator are definded in the GravityFormula 1967 (reference spheroid)

Page 39: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

43

Free air correction

The FAC accounts for variation in the distance of the

observation point from the centre of the Earth.

This equation must also be used to account for the distance

ground/gravimeter.

Page 40: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

44

Free air correction

FAC = 0.3086 h (h in meters)

GM

R 2g =

Page 41: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

45

Bouguer correction

• The BC accounts for the gravitational effect of the rocks

present between the observation point and the datum

• Typical reduction density for the crust is =2.67 g/cm3

BC = 2πG h

Page 42: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

46

Terrain correction

The TC accounts for the effect of topography.

The terrains in green and blue are taken into account in the TC

correction in the same manner.

Page 43: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

47

Page 44: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

48

Page 45: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

49

Residual gravity anomaly

The regional field can be

estimated by hand or

using more elaborated

methods (e.g. upward

continuation methods)

Page 46: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

50

Bouguer anomaly

Page 47: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

51

Interpretation: the inverse problem

Two ways of solving

the inverse problem:

• „Direct“ interpretation

• „Indirect“ interpretation

and automatic inversion

Warning: „direct“ interpretation has nothing to do with

„direct“ (forward) problem!

Page 48: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

52

Direct interpretation

Assomption: a 3D anomaly is

caused by a point mass (a 2D

anomaly is caused by a line

mass) at depth =z

x1/2 gives z

z

mass m

surface

Page 49: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

53

Direct interpretation

Page 50: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

54

Indirect interpretation

1. Construction of a reasonable model

2. Computation of its gravity anomaly

3. Comparison of computed with observed anomaly

4. Alteration of the model to improve correspondence of

5. observed and calculated anomalies and return to step (2)

Page 51: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

55

Page 52: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

56

Non-unicity of the solution

Page 53: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

57

Automatic inversion

Automatic computer inversion with a priori information for

more complex models (3D) using non-linear optimization

algorithms. Minimize a cost (error) function F

with n the number of data

Automatic inversion is used when the model is complex (3D)

Page 54: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

58

Automatic inversion

Page 55: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

59

Mining geophysics

Page 56: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

60

5. Microgravity: a case history

Page 57: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

• length:6 km

• difference in altitude: 323 m

• geology: alpine molassic bedrock (tertiary sandstone) and

an overlaying quaternary glacial fill

• depth of bedrock: varying from 1.5 m to 25 m

• The choice of the corridor had to consider the depth of the

61

bedrock Source: P. Radogna et al.

A SUBWAY PROJECT IN LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, AS AN

URBAN MICROGRAVIMETRY TEST SITEP. Radogna, R. Olivier, P. Logean and P. Chasseriau

Institute of Geophysics, University of Lausanne

Page 58: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Zone II

Scintrex CG5

200 gravity stations 62Source: P. Radogna et al.

Page 59: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Geological section,

approximately A´´-A´-A

63Source: P. Radogna et al.

Page 60: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

64

Source: P. Radogna et al.

Page 61: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Profile A´´-A´-A

Source: P. Radogna et al.

65

Page 62: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

66

Building and basement gravity effect

Page 63: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

DEM for topographical corrections

BASEMENT FROM:

•Cadastral plan

•Building typology

•GIS

Source: P. Radogna et al.

67

Page 64: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Bouguer Anomaly

Source: P. Radogna et al.

68

Page 65: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Regional Anomaly

Source: P. Radogna et al.

69

Page 66: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Residual Anomaly

Source: P. Radogna et al.

70

Page 67: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Result…

Source: P. Radogna et al.

71

Page 68: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Painting of the valley and the bridge before 1874

and actual picture of the same zone

Complex building corrections

Source: P. Radogna et al.

72

Page 69: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Rectangular prisms are used for modeling the bridge’s pillars

Source: P. Radogna et al.

73

Page 70: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Gravity effect of the bridge

•Formulation of rectangular

prism (Nagy, 1966)

•Pillar’s density is fixed

to 2.00 g/cm3

Source: P. Radogna et al.

74

Page 71: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

Standard corrections gravity anomaly withouttopographical corrections.

Reduction density : 2.40 g/cm3

Source: P. Radogna et al.

75

Page 72: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

76

6. Conclusions

Page 73: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

77

Advantages

• The only geophysical method that describes directly the

density of the subsurface materials

• No artificial source required

• Useful in urban environment!

Page 74: Gravity Surveying - fac.ksu.edu.sa

78

Drawbacks

Expensive

Complex acquisition process

Complex data processing

Limited resolution

Very sensitive to non-unicity in the modeling solutions