graduate education in meat science

9
266 GRADUATE EDUCATION IN MEAT SCIENCE* R. L. HENRICKSON OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Higher education for the undergraduates may be considered as the quantitative phase of acquiring knowledge, years the student is prepring for life and his work in society by formulating a broad base of cultural and technical knowledge. the other hand, those who continue education toward either or both the Master of Science or Doctor of Philosophy degrees must be considered in the qualitative phase of education. knowledge must be gained in sufficient detail, in a given area, to be able to dispense technical information or conduct basic research, The state of knowledge i n all areas is sufficient to encourage the need for quality education. According t o Chancellor Allan Carter, New York University, "We have created a graduate education and research establishment in American universities that is about 30 to 50% larger than shall effectively be used in the 1970's and early 1980'9, the United States. graduated with the Ph,D. and unless the machinery slows down, 60,000 will be turned out annually by 1980. During the first four On Specific scientific In 1957, about 9000 Ph.D.'s in all fields were granted in In the spring of 1971, more than 30,000 people A recent survey by the American Society of Animal Science indi- cated that the Master of Science degree in Meat Science is now g i v e n at 40 universities while the Ph.D. is awarded at 20 or more univer- sities. These figures will be low since many universities award the degree in Food Science. The question immediately comes t o mind is: how many Meat Science Ph.D.'s are now available, and what are the replacement needs? Jihphasis on quality education comes at a time when the colleges and universities are having great fiscal problems, Federal and state support for higher education seems to be less evident. This situation has led to an unprecedented flood of appeals from the academic community. A few examples will illustrate the point. James M. Hester, President of New York University and head of a White House task force on higher education, stated, that virtually every public and private institution in the country is facing severe financial pressures, A. R. Chamberlain, President of Colorado State University, sees financing as the most serious problem higher education will face in the 1970's. * Presented at the 24th Annual Eiecipracal Meat Conference of the Amerlcan Meat Science Assoclation, 1971 ,

Upload: others

Post on 10-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

266

GRADUATE EDUCATION IN MEAT SCIENCE*

R . L . HENRICKSON OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Higher education f o r t h e undergraduates may be considered as t h e q u a n t i t a t i v e phase of acqu i r ing knowledge, years t h e s tuden t is p r e p r i n g f o r l i f e and h i s work i n s o c i e t y by formulating a broad base of c u l t u r a l and t e c h n i c a l knowledge. t h e o t h e r hand, t hose who cont inue education toward e i t h e r or both t h e Master of Science o r Doctor of Philosophy degrees must be considered i n t h e q u a l i t a t i v e phase of education. knowledge m u s t be gained i n s u f f i c i e n t d e t a i l , i n a given area, t o be able t o dispense t e c h n i c a l information o r conduct bas i c r e s e a r c h , The state of knowledge i n a l l areas is s u f f i c i e n t t o encourage t h e need f o r q u a l i t y education. According t o Chancellor Allan Car t e r , New York University, "We have created a graduate education and r e s e a r c h establishment i n American u n i v e r s i t i e s t h a t i s about 30 t o 50% larger than shall e f f e c t i v e l y be used i n t h e 1970's and early 1980'9, t h e United S ta t e s . graduated with t h e Ph,D. and un le s s t h e machinery slows down, 60,000 w i l l be turned out annual ly by 1980.

During t h e first f o u r

On

Spec i f i c s c i e n t i f i c

In 1957, about 9000 Ph.D.'s i n a l l f ields were granted i n I n t h e spring of 1971, more than 30,000 people

A r e c e n t survey by t h e American Society of Animal Science i n d i - ca t ed t h a t t h e Master of Science degree i n Meat Science is now given at 40 u n i v e r s i t i e s while t h e Ph.D. is awarded at 20 or more univer- s i t i e s . These figures w i l l be low s i n c e many u n i v e r s i t i e s award t h e degree i n Food Science. The ques t ion immediately comes t o mind is: how many Meat Science Ph.D.'s are now a v a i l a b l e , and what a re t h e replacement needs?

Jihphasis on q u a l i t y education comes at a time when t h e c o l l e g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s are having great fiscal problems, Federal and s t a t e support f o r higher education seems t o be l ess evident. This s i t u a t i o n has led t o an unprecedented f l o o d of appeals from t h e academic community. A few examples w i l l i l lustrate t h e point .

James M. Hester, President o f New York Universi ty and head o f a White House t a s k f o r c e on higher education, stated, t h a t v i r t u a l l y every pub l i c and p r i v a t e i n s t i t u t i o n i n t h e country is f a c i n g s e v e r e f i n a n c i a l pressures,

A . R . Chamberlain, President of Colorado S t a t e Universi ty , sees f inanc ing as t h e most s e r i o u s problem higher education w i l l face i n t h e 1970's.

* Presented a t t h e 24th Annual Eiecipracal Meat Conference o f t h e Amerlcan Meat Science Assoclation, 1971 ,

267

The Lieutenant Governor o f I l l l n o i s predicted t h a t one-thi.rd of t h e Nation’s W i v s t e c o l l e c s s may ga o u t of ex i s t ance by t h e end of +.he decade, unless state Sovernment T o v i d e f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e ,

A point of i n t e r e s t t h i s morning is t h a t a t moat u n i v e r c i t l e s one may have a choice t o e i t h e r abandon g u a l i t y education o r aha.ndon certain areas of a c t i v i t y . Perhaps one must t ake inventory now i n o rde r t o be prepared t o scale down a c t i v i t i e s when it b, ec om es necessary. Recent a c t i o n s a t t h e f e d e r a l l e v e l nake t h i s Doint more dramatic, For example, t h e number of f e d e r a l l y supported first- year graduate f e l lowsh ip w i l l be n e a r l y 62% lower i n 1971-72 than ir. 1967-68. The National Science Foundation h a s announced t h a t i t w i l l not cont inue t o make g r a n t s f o r campus coFputer operat ions and f e d e r a l funds f o r r e sea rch has decl ined 11% between 1967-1970.

With t h e s e brief points of i n t roduc t ion , I w i l l r a i s e f i v e ques t ions f o r discussion!

1, What is t h e bas i c purpose o f a graduate a s s i s t a n t ?

2. What should be t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e s tudent and adv i so r?

3. Idhat t ype of s tuden t should be encouraged t o pursue graduate work?

4, Is a research p ro jec t necessary?

5. ‘hat c r i t e r i a s should be used by a f a c u l t y committee t o i d e n t i f y competency and completion of t h e graduate educat ional ob jec t iv es ?

1, What i s t h e bas i c purpose of a graduate a s s i s t a n t ?

The major j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r a s s i s t a n t s h i p s awarded a department by e i t h e r t h e graduate c o l l e r e of t h e A q i c u l t u r a l Experiment S t a t i o n , is t o expedi te t h e authorized r e sea rch and teaching, and t h e department. become an e f f e c t i v e extender of knowledge, and assist him i n s e l l i n g a worthy i d e a f o r r e sea rch funds, hours o f a graduate a s s i s t a n t should be used i n supuort of productive and authorized planned r e sea rch . As a r e s u l t o f t h i s teacher-pupi l a s s o c i a t i o n , competent replacements f o r un ive rc i ty 2nd i n d u s t r y personnel are developed, F1nm.: ia l z i d to a T a d u a t e assistant seems t o be one way I n whi-h to r)roDerqtP a n 2rea nf er?iic3?? 3 n .

They are paid for performing a s e r v i c e t o t h e adv i so r The t each ing experience w i l l h e l p him t o

The r e m a i n i w work

268

2. What should be t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e s tuden t and adv i so r?

The Graduate College gene ra l ly has a proud list of names But t h e co l l ege has given c o n s t i t u t i n g t h e graduate f a c u l t y .

l i t t l e concern t o t h e c r i t e r i a making one a member. one capable of being a graduate s tuden t adv i so r? c a t i o n must be possessed? t o have a graduate a s s i s t a n t ?

What makes What q u a l i f i -

Should a new f a c u l t y member be permit ted

Perhaps a f a c u l t y member should earn t h e r i g h t t o t r a i n a graduate s tuden t . M.S. degree s tuden t , w h i l e o t h e r s have s u f f i c i e n t t a l e n t , experience, motivation, and equipment t o adv i se t h e F'h.D, have t h e abi l i t ies and f i n a n c i a l a id t o supe rv i se a pos t -doc to ra l f e l low, demonstrate some q u a l i f i c a t i o n s and perhaps earn t h e p r iv i l edge of adv i s ing a graduate s t u d e n t , having adequate knowledge i n t h e f i e ld , a n active r e sea rch i n t e r e s t , and above a l l t h e d e s i r e t o assist t h e candidate t o l e a r n ,

Some f a c u l t y members are equipped t o handle only t h e

S t i l l o t h e r s may

A po in t f o r d i scuss ion is t h a t a f a c u l t y member m u s t

Such q u a l i f i c a t i o n s may inc lude

The s tuden t is l i k e l y t o be a n extension of h i s a d v i s o r , t h e adv i so r m u s t h e l p t h e p u p i l form s tudy habits, c r i t i c a l l y analyze, and i n t e r p r e t information. He must be t augh t how t o develop an idea , organize t h e f a c t s , s e l l t h e idea, and be able t o manage people. By t h e t ime a candidate is ready t o graduate with t h e Ph,D. he should have some idea o f what it is l i k e i n a real l i f e s i t u a t i o n ,

Therefore,

I n t h e f i n a l a n a l y s i s , the r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e adv i so r and graduate a s s i s t a n t should be one o f cooperat ive team e f f o r t where mutual r e spec t ex is t s .

2. What type s tuden t should be encouraged t o pursue advanced work?

One should make t h e assumption t h a t good grades are necessary f o r acceptance i n t o t h e Graduate College, equivalent t o a "B" average i n d i c a t e s t h a t a s tudent has formu- l a t e d a n educat ional foundation on which t o b u i l d , It a l s o suggests t h a t a s tudent has formulated c e r t a i n s t u d y h a b i t s and h a s t h e c a p a b i l i t y of c a r r y i n g out a l e v e l of work. It seems t o me t h a t t h e most important trait. of a graduate s tuden t is d e s i r e , have an i n t e r e s t i n t h e assigned work and have an i n t e r n a l motivation t o achieve, Along with t h e s e c r i t e r i a , t h e s tuden t must have t h e desire and a b i l i t y t o r ead and communicate with o t h e r s , When t h e s e a b i l i t i e s a re combined with t h e w i l l t o work you have located a Ph.D, candidate .

An academic r eco rd

H e must want t o acqu i r e knowledge, The s tuden t must

269

!:, Is a research p ro jec t gecessary?

I favor a reseavqh y o j e c + at, a l l d c m e e l e v e l c . fqr a student t o b w m ? a fact m t h e r e r . Vnless h e :i+w experjence i n o r q a n i z f n g f a c t s , he is of l i t t l e value t o + h ~ i n d w t r y . Pur l i b r a r i e s are f u l l of facts , TQ be nf valup., one must put; t h e f a c t s t o work in a form u5:sful t o someone.

I+ is ear7

4 student w i l l l e a r n Fom a research e f f o r t t h a t no t a l l pobl-erns a r e r e a d i l y solved. Most l i k e l y , some phases of t h e e x F r i m e n t s w i l l need t o be r epea ted , A pro jec t he lps t h e a.dvisor teach t h e s tuden t confidence, organize facts, analyze information and provide a l o g i c a l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n f o r o t h e r s , Consequently, a r e sea rch p ro jec t is a u s e f u l teaching t o o l .

5 . What cr i ter ia should be used by a f a c u l t y committee t o i d e n t i f y competency and completion of t h e graduate educat ional o b j e c t i v e s ?

Many young people have gained t h e Ph.D. with l i t t l e more r equ i r ed of them than t o defend t h e i r r e sea rch e f f o r t and possess good grades, a b i l i t y t o do r e sea rch , but very l i t t l e e l se , t h a t much more i s expected and des i r ed by s o c i e t y . about t o receive t h e Ph,D. should have gained f u l l confidence i n himself , He must have developed physical , mental, and s o c i a l s t a b i l i t y . o t h e r s i n both t h e v e r b a l and w r i t t e n form at both t h e s c i e n t i f i c and extension l e v e l s , A Ph.D. candidate is expected t o be i n q u i s i t i v e , alert t o a new idea, and t o be able t o develop t h e problem i n t o a r e sea rch proposal. The t h e s i s w i l l be evidence of h i s a b i l i t y t o conduct i n depth r e sea rch , as we l l as, h i s a b i l i t y t o u t i l i z e s u f f i c i e n t experimental u n i t s f o r t h e information t o be v a l i d , i n d u s t r y o r a n academic department, h e m u s t possess t h e a b i l i t y t o create a p leasan t environment i n which t o work with o t h e r s and manage people.

In most cases t h e s tuden t has demonstrat,ed t h e It seems t o me

A candidate

He should possess t h e a b i l i t y t o communicate t o

However, before t h e candidate can be of real va lue t o

3. F. PLDWTONI de a r e not going t o a t t e m p t any s o r t of summary, I t h i n k w h a t we can a l l p r o f i t from now is t o open t h i s up f o r your discussion, g ive you an opportuni ty t o s c r u t i n i z e our speake r s t h i s morning. w e have two microphones for your use. with t h e first quest ion.

So i f they w i l l j o i n us up here a t t h e f r o n t t a b l e I th ink So l e t ' s open up r i g h t away

May we please have i t ?

uOB KAUFTFIAN, WISCONSIN: When a graduate s tuden t begins h i s prograi , how should he be indoc t r ina t ed? This is a m u l t i p l e choice quest ion. Do you t e l l him what he 's going t o do based on t h e e x i s t i n g g r a n t you have o r do you t r y t o motivate him i n t o a c e r t a i n area t h a t would h e l p make up h i s mind? t h e s i x ?

Do you g i v e him t h e choice of h i s i n t e r e s t s ?

What do you do about t h i s and I'm ask ing t h i s of anyone o f

270

R . F. PLIMPI'ONi Who would l i k e t o respond? Dr . Pope?

I,. s . POPE: No, l e t Dr. Bray.

R . W . BRAY: I thought I answered t h a t , Bob. I t h i n k , i f possible , we want t o g e t away from t h e idea o f present ing a graduate s tudent with a w e l l de f ined problem that comes wi th c o n t r a c t s o r s p e c i f i c funding i f at a l l poss ib l e , because I don't t h i n k t h i s provides much s t i m u l a t i o n f o r a s t u d e n t , Some of them w i l l come with ideas ready t o go and then t h a t ' s no problem, because he knows t h e i n t e r e s t area and knows t h e kind o f problem he wants t o g e t i n t o , I 've had t h e kind of experience where t h e graduate s tuden t accepted a n a s s i s t a n t s h i p and he expresses p a r t i c u l a r i n t e r e s t i n an a r e a , This is great, because he's w e l l on t h e way t o developing a re sea rch program w i t h a l i t t l e guidance, t ake t h e o t h e r choice you gave me, can e l i m i n a t e c o n t r a c t s , Then t h e o t h e r one--you w i l l have t o go with him and t h a t is you have t o motivate him. motivate him, maybe you shouldn ' t have taken him i n t h e f i rs t place,

On t h e o t h e r hand, I w i l l If you don't have t h a t kind you

But i f you have t o

L. S. POPE: I would l i k e t o add a l i t t l e b i t t o that, I t h i n k we have t o decide whether h e ' s a Master's candidate or a Ph.D. cand ida te , If he 's a Iriaster's cand ida te , many t imes he comes, not with an idea, and you are b e t t e r o f f t o g i v e him a n a l t e r n a t i v e of cho ices , You may suggest t h a t he re are f o u r o r f i v e p r o j e c t s t h a t you t h i n k he might work on and then l e t him make a cho ice , He has been a b l e t o formulate i d e a s and he's a b l e then t o develop one of h i s own.

R . F. PLDlPTON: We have a ques t ion over on t h i s s ide ,

DON KROPF, KANSAS STATE: This is f o r d i l l Pope and maybe dob dray, t o o . 'kat adv i se do you have on s e l l i n g our Administrators on using graduate s t u d e n t s i n a teaching f u n c t i o n ? are hung up on t h e idea that Ph.D.'s are t h e ones that should do t h e teaching and f u r t h e r , what guarantees do you want from u s as staff members who would be involved i n t h i s t each ing?

Some Administrators

L . S. POPE: Let me just s a y a few words about it and leave i t I t h i n k t h e r e is a growing change i n feelings o f t o Bob t o answer.

Administrators toward t h e t each ing func t ion . I t h i n k we see t h e s e enrollment f i g u r e s and look at t h e incomes of some of t h e c o l l e g e s of a g r i c u l t u r e and w e look at t h e o p p o r t u n i t i e s and I don ' t t h i n k i t 's as hard t o s e l l , Don, as it w a s a few yea r s b c k . I t h i n k t h e y ' l l provide more and more oppor tun i t i e s . So I ' m banking on Administrators taking a new look a t t h e t each ing a spec t w i t h i n t h e whole a g r i c u l t u r e f i e l d . same way o r no t .

sob, I don't know whether you f e e l t h a t

R . W . d3AY: I don't t h ink , i n t h e view of t h e sho r t age of time, I have t o agree with d i l l Pope.

271

R . F. PLIMPTON: Let 's have t h e next ques t ion i f w e may please.

AUTTIS PIULLIIK3, LJNI'JiiRSITY OF IDAHO: I do not d i sag ree with the philosophy expressed by t h e speakers , but I th ink more r e a l i s t i c a l l y , graduate s t u d e n t s g r a v i t a t e toward an i n s t i t u t i o n based upon r e sea rch programs at t h e s e i n s t i t u t i o n s . Therefore, t h e graduate s tuden t has some idea of s p e c i a l i z a t i o n before he a c t u a l l y chooses a school. So I wonder i f w e shouldn ' t be a l i t t l e more realistic and develop this concept i n our graduate program r e a l i z i n g that we a l l cannot be a l l th ings t o t h e s e s t u d e n t s , think t h i s philosophy has been exposed somewhat here t h i s morning, but I f ee l t h i s is a c t u a l l y i n p r a c t i c e w h a t has occurred and I concur with t h i s philosophy, I t h i n k it m u s t be that some schools w i l l develop a s p e c i a l i t y area and c e r t a i n s t u d e n t s w i l l g r a v i t a t e toward t h a t school because of t h i s ,

I

i?. F. PLIMPTOIJ: Anyone care t o comment on those remarks? Could we have ano the r ques t ion?

Z'J'JHTIS ;YIILTON, W-III33SII'Y OF TKiNESSEd: I would l i k e t o ask one of t h e Administrators o r anyone on t h e panel--how do we c u t down t h e number of Ph.I), a p p l i c a n t s today and more s p e c i f i c a l l y , is grade-point a good c r i t e r i a t o use i n t h i s r eques t ?

R . F. PLIMPI'ON: Let's d i r e c t t h i s ques t ion t o A l l S t r i n g e r . tie responded r a t h e r v i o l e n t l y ,

'd. C . STRINGliFi: I don't remember my responding t o t h a t , hut I don't t h i n k , C u r t i s , t h a t you need t o t r y t o discourage anybody from a Ph.D. program, I ' m not as pess imis t i c as some of t h e people might have been about j ob p o s i t i o n s because I t h i n k w e are see ing , as I made t h e statement e a r l i e r , many oppor tun i t i e s w e never thought of before i n t h e t o t a l meat o r t o t a l food indus t ry f o r people with meats t r a i n i n g , Mow t h e second t h i n g about grade-points, I t h i n k t h a t a Ph.D. candidate , o r a person you're consider ing f o r a Ph.D., should have a "3'' average e s t a b l i s h e d , I don't f e e l q u i t e that s t r o n g l y f o r a Plaster's s t u d e n t , I th ink t h a t a person who has during h i s 3.ast two yea r s e s t a b l i s h e d a "3" avera5,e is b e t t e r than worrying about h i s first two y e a r s ,

L . S . POPd:: Could I say a word along t h i s l i n e about t h e s e x o f e s s i o n a l programs? i-iow do you eva lua te a s tudent on a p ro fes s iona l program? What does grade-point mean, f o r example? goes a boy's d r i v e , l o g i c , a b i l i t y and oackground mean more t h a n Trade-points? So we're f ac ing some rea l kno t ty ques t ions regarding p ro fes s iona l programs. dow do you evaluate them t o start with and how do you eva lua te them when you g e t throqyh? I r e a l l y don't know the a n s w e r t o i t ,

3 . F. PLIjViViPTON: de have a ques t ion over on t h i s s i d e ,

272

TOM BLUME3, NORTH CAROLINA STATE: I would l i k e t o a s k anybody i n t h e panel how he f e e l s about p u t t i n g a time l i m i t on a n M.S. program o r Ph.D, program? Now at our place t h e r e is a l i t t l e b i t of pressure put on u s i n o rde r t o f i n i s h up t h e s e programs. You know, occas iona l ly a s tuden t w i l l f i n d a home, and I can see where w e don't want t o do t h i s ; but t o put a limit o f two yea r s on t h e M.S. and three yea r s on t h e Ph.D. has been t h e consensus o f opinion and I wonder how t h e panel would f e e l about t h i s .

R . F. PLIMPTON: L e t ' s d i rect t h a t ques t ion t o one o f ou r r ecen t graduates, Would you respond t o t h a t Dr. Herring?

H . K . HERFtING: I don't be l i eve you can put a time l i m i t on anyone, Some of us can g e t through i n t h a t l eng th of time and some of us r e q u b e longe r , problem, depends on whether it is t h e Master of Science, Master of Agricul ture o r Doctor of f i i l o s o p h y degree and depends on h i s concept of what he wants. I don't t h ink you should put a time limit unless it should be seven o r e i g h t yea r s ,

It p a r t l y depends on t h e complexity of t he

R . F. PLIMPTONt D r . Bidner, do you have any comments t o add t o t h a t ,

T . D . BIDNERI I ag ree with w h a t ' s been said. I t h i n k i t a l s o depends on t h e background, l i k e e s p e c i a l l y i n a Master's program, It would depend on t h e background of t h e s t u d e n t , w h a t he has t o make up, l e t ' s say, before he g e t s i n t o h i s g r a d u t e cour ses ,

W. C , STRINGER: Tom, I would ag ree with you. I t h i n k t h e r e should be t ime l i m i t s because not only do t h e s t u d e n t s f i n d a home, but t h e professors f i n d a good s l a v e and they don ' t l i k e t o t u r n them l o o s e , Professors do not f i n i s h up t h e i r p a r t of t h e man's work, They don ' t read t h e t h e s i s , They don ' t g e t hls paper published, They don ' t do many t h i n g s . I t h i n k , t h e p ro fes so r ' s o b l i g a t i o n I s t o t h e s tudent j u s t as much as t h e s t u d e n t ' s o b l i g a t i o n is t o g e t through. Now I'm not sure I agree with two and three years , but I t h i n k some time l i m i t should be se t ,

R . F. PLIMPTON: But perhaps, B i l l , t h e y don ' t g e t s t a r t e d soon enough, May we have another ques t ion . I be l i eve up he re , Oh yes , Tom, go r i g h t ahead.

H. K. HERRING: W h a t kind o f t ime l i m i t would you l i k e t o put on them then?

'rl. C . STRINGER: I th ink two yea r s is c e r t a i n l y reasonable on a Master's, but I thought perhaps f o u r on t h e ou t s ide f o r a Ph,D.

R . F. PLIMPTON: So far t h i s morning w e have shotgunned graduate education and reasonable time limits. May w e have ano the r ques t ion?

J O H N SECRET, ARMY-NATICK LAaORATOXES: I would l i k e t o present t h i s ques t ion t o Dr, Herring. frame of f o u r o r f i v e yea r s i n c o l l e g e is ha rd ly adequate t o t r a i n a man p ro fes s iona l ly i n h i s f i e ld of endeavor, not t o say anything about t h e economics and t h e business admin i s t r a t ion and t h e business management and t h i s type of t h i n g , acqu i r ing a newly graduated s c i e n t i s t ? Would you r a t h e r have him completely educated and p r o f i c i e n t i n h i s f i e l d of endeavor with t h e th ink ing that i n d u s t r y would provide t h e management t r a i n i n g , t h e economic t r a i n i n g i n accordance wi th w h a t t h a t p a r t i c u l a r i ndus t ry would l i k e t o u t i l i z e i n t h i s man? I have a two-fold ques t ion he re , What has i n d u s t r y thought about a program of cooperat ion with u n i v e r s i t i e s i n which a man i n h i s t r a i n i n g , p a r t i c u l a r l y maybe a Master's program, would work part-time i n indus t ry and come back f o r h i s education and then work a g a i n l i k e a co-op program which many u n i v e r s i t i e s today have taken on?

I t h i n k we a l l r e a l i z e that t h e time

What is i n d u s t r y ' s thinking i n

H . K, HERRINGS To your first ques t ion , he should have, as I eluded t o i n my t a l k , a basic understanding of fundamental problems- a basic working knowledge and be able t o t h i n k on h i s feet--having concepts and being a b l e t o s o l v e problems, Now t h i s e n t a i l s q u i t e a l o t of t h ings . I ' m i n Armour Foods Research, so we don't have a t r a i n i n g program as such r i g h t on t h e job. Ye go r i g h t i n t o our d i r e c t job. However, i n o t h e r i n d u s t r i e s and i n o t h e r parts of h o u r Company t h e r e a r e t r a i n i n g programs, Now t h i s is good f o r t h i s w r t i c u l a r area, Now i n response t o your second ques t ion , I would l i k e t o see more ind iv idua l s t a k e s a b b a t i c a l leave and g e t a n understanding and a f e e l i n g f o r i n d u s t r i a l problems, What I 've seen i n the past is that an i n d i v i d u a l s t r o n g i n biochemistry w i l l go t o ano the r school s t r o n g i n biochemistry o r i f he 's s t r o n g i n physiology he w i l l go t o ano the r school s t r o n g i n physiology, Why shouldn't he go, i f h e ' s a m e a t s c i e n t i s t , t o a n i n d u s t r i a l r e sea rch l a b and l e a r n some of t h e p r a c t i c a l problems w e are faced with. Now t h e r e have been some i n d u s t r i a l g r a n t s by Armour t o two i n d i v i d u a l s i n t h e past year and ano the r s h o r t l y . Perhaps t h e year is t o o long. Perhaps three months would be long enough. Have 1 answered your ques t ion? A t t h e same time perhaps w e i n d u s t r i a l i s t s should consider a leave, i f our companies w i l l l e t us.

This i s he lp fu l .

L , S . POPE! I t h i n k w e w i l l have our day, f e l lows , when indus t ry w i l l j o i n with t h e u n i v e r s i t y i n doing some o f t h e s e jobs. For example, one of t h e aspects of the f e e d l o t program has been t o employ people from i n d u s t r y t o come i n on a s h o r t term basis and he lp t e a c h some of t h e s e courses because t h e f e e d l o t technology is highly s p e c i a l i z e d , I t h i n k t h i s i n t e r n s h i p program is d i r e c t l y aimed a t t h e s i t u a t i o n involved,

d . F. PLIMPI'ON: I want t o j u s t add a thought here . It always has been a hope o f mine that somehow, someday, w e can get a better interchange between i n d u s t r y and u n i v e r s i t i e s and with exchange of

personnel w e can figure out a way that we can have industry-research people come on our staff f o r a y e a r or/and a t t h e same time one of our people j o i n a n industry-research group and maybe there are o t h e r areas as well where t h i s can be done, I t h i n k w e could do much t o keep academic staffs r e l e v a n t and i n tune wi th w h a t ' s going on i n t h e r e a l world and at t h e same time make r e s e a r c h e r s i n i n d u s t r y aware of some of t h e problems that are faced i n t h e academic s i t u a t i o n , d i scuss ion o f f at t h i s particular p o i n t , g r a i n ; perhaps you don ' t agree w i t h everything t h a t ' s been said t h i s morning, but on th ink ing about it we have accomplished our j o b s o we'l l t u r n t h i s back t o Dr. Hedrick.

I m u s t p l ay t h e part of t h e v i l l i a n and ca l l t h i s It goes a g a i n s t our

H , B . HEDRICK; Thank you, Rodney and members of your committee and t h e speakers for a n e x c e l l e n t program. announcements p r i o r t o t h e break by J i m Kemp,

We have a f e w

H . 3. HEDRICK: The Fklucation Committee w a s going t o u t i l i z e

We've asked Herb Ockenan of Ohio Stat'e a l l t h e time s o they l e f t o f f t h i s o t h e r t o p i c , of t h e Uplate Committee. University t o share with u s h i s r e c e n t experience, e n t i t l e d Meat Science I n t e r n a t i o n a l , Herb.

The t o p i c is that

H i s t o p i c is

R # # # #