governor’s local control funding formula
DESCRIPTION
Governor’s Local Control Funding Formula. Administrative Council March 11, 2013. LCFF Principles. Equity Simplicity Needs-based Local Control Accountability. LCFF Components Base Grants and Augmentations. LCFF Components Supplemental Grant. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Governor’s Local Control Funding Formula
Administrative Council
March 11, 2013
LCFF Principles
• Equity• Simplicity• Needs-based• Local Control• Accountability
LCFF ComponentsBase Grants and Augmentations
Grade Span Per ADA Grant Augmentation
K-3 $6,342 $6,342*.1123=$712
4-6 $6,437
7-8 $6,628
9-12 $7,680 $7,680*.028 = $215
LCFF ComponentsSupplemental Grant
Grade SpanBase Grant
Per Unduplicated ADA
TOTAL per Unduplicated
ADA
K-3 = $6,342 $2,219 $8,561
4-6 = $6,437 $2,253 $8,690
7-8 = $6,628 $2,320 $8,948
9-12 = $7,680 $2,688 $10,368*Determined as 35% of each grade span Base Grant
LCFF ComponentsConcentration Factor
• Determined by the concentration of disadvantaged students by grade span above 50%.
• Additional 35% of the grade span Base Grant
Grade SpanBase Grant
Supplemental Grant/ADA
Concentration Factor
TOTAL per Eligible
Disadvantaged Student
K-3 = $6,342 $2,219 $2,219 $10,780
4-6 = $6,437 $2,253 $2,253 $10,943
7-8 = $6,628 $2,320 $2,320 $11,268
9-12 = $7,680 $2,688 $2,688 $13,056
6
Source: Legislative Analyst’s Office
LCFF Add Ons
• 2012-13 Home-to-School Transportation• 2012-13 Targeted Instructional Improvement
Grant
LCFF Entitlement/ADAwithout HTS/TIIG
per ADA fundingwithin Riverside County…
2013-14: $7,774 - $10,143
2019-20: $8,787 - $11,465
LCFF Entitlement/ADAwithout HTS/TIIG
K-3 4-6 7-8 9-12
2013-14 Ave./ ADA
2019-20 Ave/ADA w COLA
Alvord 9,627 9,065 9,280 10,704 9,763 11,164
Banning 9,689 9,246 9,993 10,767 9,942 11,369
Beaumont 8,711 8,261 8,499 9,938 8,915 10,194
Corona-Norco 8,094 7,448 7,644 8,952 8,161 9,333
Desert Center 9,115 8,915 7,208 7,895 8,740 9,995
Desert Sands 9,329 8,616 8,604 9,970 9,260 10,589
Hemet 9,826 9,096 9,315 10,695 9,870 11,286
Jurupa 9,726 9,073 8,391 10,782 9,652 11,038
Lake Elsinore 8,903 8,159 8,365 9,500 8,844 10,114
Moreno Valley 9,501 8,873 8,921 10,626 9,618 10,999
Murrieta Valley 7,910 7,241 7,399 8,677 7,950 9,091
Nuview 9,646 8,988 9,123 9,693 9,387 10,734
Palm Springs 9,742 9,307 9,576 10,982 10,002 11,438
Perris Elementary 10,233 9,695 9,928 7,895 10,014 11,452
Perris Union High 7,054 9,409 9,602 10,046 9,972 11,404
Riverside 9,024 8,366 8,435 9,564 8,965 10,251
San Jacinto 9,433 8,860 8,938 10,106 9,442 10,798
Temecula Valley 7,689 7,018 7,155 8,389 7,684 8,787
Val Verde 9,876 9,326 9,480 11,007 10,026 11,465
Comparing the LCFF…
• The 2012-13 national expenditure per student is estimated to be $11,467*.
• Under the LCFF by 2019-2020, in Riverside County expenditure per pupil will be between…
$8,787 - $11,465
...below/on par with the today’s national average.
* Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Let’s examine the policy…
The Base Grants
LCFF Ave/ADA Grant 2007-2008 Ave/ADA Funding(including categoricals)
Difference/ADA
$6,772 $7,220 ($448)
ADEQUACY is critical.
• The LCFF restores LEAs to 2007-08 base funding levels, but…• Does not restore 20% cut to categorical funding, and...• Even if it did, we should ask: Is this ADEQUATE to fund core
educational programs in 2019-2020?
per ADA fundingwithin Riverside County…
2019-20: $8,787 - $11,465
Variance: $2,678/student
The Concentration Factor
What explains the funding variance?
In part, the Concentration Factor…
Riverside County % Disadvantage and Concentration Factor
% Growth/ADA % DisadvantageEligible for
CF?
LCFF Entitlemen
t
Beaumont 48% 64% Y $10,194
Corona-Norco 37% 43% N $9,333
Riverside 47% 64% Y $10,251
Temecula Valley 30% 24% N $8,787
Val Verde 66% 87% Y $11,465
Should the Concentration Factor be calculated on a districtwide basis or on a schoolsite basis?
CNUSD is ineligible for the Concentration Factor but at least six school sites have concentrations of disadvantaged students near or in excess of 80%.
Calculated as 35% of base grant, but what if the Base Grant is ADEQUATE for a rigorous core program?
Should the Supplemental Grant be provided as a fixed-dollar amount that reflects the actual cost of supplemental support and programs for disadvantaged students?
The Supplemental Grant
K-3 Base Grant
Per Unduplicated
ADA
TOTAL per Unduplicated
ADA
LCFF $6,342 $2,219 $8,561AQEQUATE $10,500 $3,675 $14,175
LCFF preserves two historic and most inequitable categorical programs: Home-To-School Transportation and TIIG.
Let’s look at TIIG for example…
The LCFF Add-Ons
District TIIG (Per ADA)
Richgrove Elementary 3,399
Sausalito Elementary 3,055
Allensworth Elementary 1,054
San Jose Unified 982
Los Angeles Unified 811
San Francisco Unified 776
Redwood City Elementary 585
San Diego City Unified 584
Berkeley Unified 482
Oak Run Elementary 425
Top 10 TIIG Districts Top 10 RC Districts
District TIIG (Per ADA)
Riverside Unified 63
Moreno Valley 62
Alvord 53
Jurupa 38
Nuview 33
San Jacinto 29
Corona-Norco 29
Desert Sands 26
Romoland 22
Perris Union High 21
Policy deficiencies in the LCFFare curable.
• Concentration Factor: Eliminate, reduce, or scale the concentration factor and increase the base grant or apply by school site
• Supplemental Grants can be calculated as a fixed dollar based on empirical evidence of need
• Antiquated HTS/TIIG formulas can be modernized to reflect current conditions and need
The LCFF does not account for educational adequacy. In the absence of an adequacy discussion, California’s public education system will persistently lag behind the nation.
Questions/Discussion…
Local Control and Accountability Plans
(LCAP)
LCAP Components
Goals, Actions, Strategies, and Costs to achieve all of the following:
• Implement content standards• Increase, and reduce gaps in, the API for each school, pupil
subgroup• Improve student achievement• Increase high school graduation rates• Increase successful completion of:
• A-G courses• AP courses• CTE programs
• Identify and address needs of “disadvantaged students” • Remedy Williams deficiencies (textbooks, facilities, qualified
teachers)• Provide meaningful opportunities for parent involvement
LCAP Components
Additionally, COEs must express goals and strategies to:
• Address countywide needs• Conduct effective oversight• Support operations, educational technology and
professional development• Provide guidance on curriculum and instructional
practices• Coordinate instruction for expelled students
LCAP Requirements• Conform to SBE-adopted template• Annual adoption by July 1• Consult with teachers, principals, administrators, parents and
students• Public notice requirement• At least one public hearing to solicit public input must be held
prior to budget adoption and not on the same day that the LCAP is adopted by the governing board.
• The LCAP must be adopted on the same day that the budget is being considered.
• Within 5 days of adoption, LEA must submit to LCAP to county superintendent on the same day budget is submitted
• County superintendent is required to review LCAP and can disapprove budget if the LCAP does not align with budget
LCAP Requirements
Additionally, COEs required to submit LCAP to:
• State Superintendent for review• County Board of Supervisors• County Auditor
What are the implications of the LCAP?
Questions?