governments and authorities in exile

Upload: abel-djassi-amado

Post on 06-Jul-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    1/29

     

    Governments and Authorities in Exile

    Author(s): F. E. OppenheimerSource: The American Journal of International Law , Vol. 36, No. 4 (Oct., 1942), pp. 568-595

    Published by: American Society of International Law

    Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2192751Accessed: 03-05-2016 17:14 UTC

     

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

    http://about.jstor.org/terms

     

    JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted

    digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about

    JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    American Society of International Law  is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extendaccess to The American Journal of International Law 

    This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTCAll use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    2/29

     GOVERNMENTS AND AUTHORITIES IN EXILE

    BY F. E. OPPENHEIMER

     Member of the Inner Temple, London

     The governments-in-exile present new problems created by the special cir-

     cumstances of this war. During World War I, belligerent occupation played

     an important role. Disregarding smaller incidents, the following occupa-

     tions may be mentioned: that of Belgium and parts'of France by German

     troops; parts of White Russia by Austro-Hungarian troops; of Serbia and

     Macedonia by German, Austro-Hungarian and Bulgarian troops; of Ru-

     mania by German, Austro-Hungarian and Bulgarian troops; of parts of Italy

     by Austro-Hungarian and German troops; of parts of Austria by Russian

     troops; of parts of Alsace-Lorraine by French troops; and of Palestine by

     British troops. As a result of the invasion of its territories the Belgian

     Government exercised its functions in Sainte-Adresse, France, and the

     Serbian Government in Corfu, Greece, but it is not known that the activity

     of these sovereignties-in-exile has raised any significant legal problems.1

     Since 1940 an increasing number of governments have been forced to flee

     their homelands in the face of hostile armed forces and have been invited by

     the British Government to establish themselves in the United Kingdom.

     We have now a Miniature Europe in London.2 There are at present

     eight foreign governments in England: Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Greece,

     Luxembourg,3 The Netherlands, Norway, Poland and Yugoslavia.

     STRUCTURE AND RECOGNITION OF GOVERNMENTS-IN-EXILE

     The chief executive of these governments is a Queen in the case of The

     Netherlands, a King in the case of Greece, Norway, and Yugoslavia, a Grand

     Duchess in the case of Luxembourg, and a President in the case of Czecho-

     slovakia and Poland. Belgium marks an exception; constitutionally it is a

     monarchy, but King Leopold surrendered on May 28, 1940, to the Germans

     and is now a prisoner living under German belligerent occupation.

     * The term exiled or refugee government-although well-known today-is not very

     appropriate since it does not express clearly that such government is the only de jure sov-

     ereign power of the country, the territory of which is under belligerent occupation, but no

     better term has yet been coined. Authority is used in the English war legislation as re-

     ferring to the Free French.

     1 See Le refuge du Gouvernement National a I' tranger, by Andree Jumeau, Aix-en-Provence,

     France (1941), dealing with the events of the last war, reviewed in this JOURNAL, Vol. 36

     (1942), p. 346.

     2 This expression was used by the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs in the House

     of Commons (369 Parliamentary Debates, 1940-41, p. 329).

     3 The Government of Luxembourg is partly in Montreal (Canada) and partly in London

     (England), but both the Grand Duchess and the Prime Minister are in Canada.

     568

    This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTCAll use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    3/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    4/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    5/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    6/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    7/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    8/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    9/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    10/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    11/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    12/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    13/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    14/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    15/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    16/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    17/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    18/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    19/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    20/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    21/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    22/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    23/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    24/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    25/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    26/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    27/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    28/29This content downloaded from 134.140.211.153 on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:14:57 UTC

    All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

  • 8/17/2019 Governments and Authorities in Exile

    29/29

     GOVERNMENTS AND AUTHORITIES IN EXLE 9

    example of such cooperation of several independent states functioning in the

     same territory. The agreement signed at London on March 27, 1941, be-

     tween Great Britain and this country for the use and operation of bases in

     Newfoundland, Bermuda, Bahamas, Jamaica, St. Lucia, Trinidad and Brit-

     ish Guiana, is another illustration. It may also be mentioned that the

     Icelandic Government entrusted the protection of its country to the United

     States on the condition that, among other undertakings, the United States

     promise to recognize the absolute independence and sovereignty of Iceland

     and not to interfere with the Government now or hereafter.'40

     Certainly a co6peration of this kind requires good will on both sides by the

     territorial sovereign and by the invitee or licensee government. The

     rigidity of the notion of sovereignty proved to be an obstacle to a healthy

     development of international law and order in the past. It is to be hoped

     that when the last gun is fired the lesson of a Miniature Europe in London

     will not be forgotten.

     140 This JOURNAL, Supplement, Vol. 35 (1941), p. 194; Dept. of State Bull., July 12, 1941,

     pp. 15, 409.