gossip : a vertex detector combining a thin gas layer as signal generator with a cmos readout pixel...
TRANSCRIPT
GOSSIP: a vertex detector combining athin gas layer as signal generator with aCMOS readout pixel array
Gas On Slimmed SIlicon Pixels
Time Projection Chamber (TPC): 2D/3D Drift ChamberThe Ultimate Wire (drift) Chamber
E-field(and B-field)
Wire Plane+Readout Pads
track ofchargedparticle
Wire plane
Pad plane
Let us eliminate wires: wireless wire chambers
1996: F. Sauli: Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM)
1995 Giomataris & Charpak: MicroMegas
Ideally: a preamp/shaper/discriminator channel below each hole….
The MediPix2 pixel CMOS chip
256 x 256 pixelspixel: 55 x 55 μm2
per pixel: - preamp- shaper- 2 discr.- Thresh. DAQ- 14 bit counter
- enable counting- stop counting- readout image frame- reset
We apply the ‘naked’ MediPix2 chipwithout X-ray convertor!
MediPix2 pixel sensorBrass spacer blockPrinted circuit boardAluminum base plate
Micromegas: - 350 V
Cathode (drift) plane: - 700 V
Baseplate
Drift space: 15 mm(gas filled)
Very strong E-field above (CMOS) MediPix!
Cubic drift volume:14 x 14 x 14 mm3
cosmic muon
We always knew, but never saw: the conversion of 55Fe quanta in Ar gas
No source, 1sNo source, 1s5555Fe, 1sFe, 1s
5555Fe, 10sFe, 10s
Friday 13 (!) Feb 2004: signals from a 55Fe source (220 e- per photon); 300 m x 500 m clouds as expected
14 mm
The Medipix CMOS chip facesan electric field of 350 V/50 μm
= 7 kV/mm !!
Eff = e-Thr/G
Thr: threshold setting (#e-)G: Gas amplification
Single electron efficiency
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Threshold setting (number of electrons)
Eff
icie
ncy
(-)
G=500
G=1000
g=2000
g=4000
g=8000
Expon. (G=500)
Expon. (G=1000)
Expon. (g=2000)
Expon. (g=4000)
Expon. (g=8000)
single-electron avalanche distribution
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
electrons in avalanche
Pro
b(n
)
G=500
G=1000
G=2000
G=4000
G=8000
Expon. (G=500)
Expon. (G=1000)
Expon. (G=2000)
Expon. (G=4000)
Expon. (G=8000)Prob(n) = 1/G . e-n/G
• no attachment• homogeneous field in avalanche gap• low gas gain• simple exponential grown of avalanche
No Curran or Polyadistributions but simply:
Single electron efficiency
New trial: NIKHEF, March 30 – April 2, 2004Essential: try to see single electrons from cosmic muons (MIPs)
Pixel preamp threshold: 3000 e- (due to analog-digital X-talk)Required gain: 5000 – 10.000
New MedipixNew Micromegas
Gas: He/Isobutane 80/20 !Gain up to 30 k!He/CF4 80/20
…… It Works!
He/Isobutane80/20Modified MediPix
Sensitive area:14 x 14 x 15 mm3
Drift direction:Verticalmax = 15 mm
He/Isobutane80/20Modified MediPix
Sensitive area:14 x 14 x 15 mm3
Drift direction:Verticalmax = 15 mm
He/Isobutane80/20Modified MediPix
δ-ray?
Sensitive area:14 x 14 x 15 mm3
Drift direction:Verticalmax = 15 mm
MediPix modified by MESA+, Univ. of Twente, The Netherlands
Pixel Pitch: 55 x 55 μm2
Bump Bond pad: 25 μm octagonal75 % surface: passivation Si3N4
New Pixel Pad: 45 x 45 μm2
Insulating surface was 75 %Reduced to 20 %
Non Modified Modified
Vernier, Moire, Nonius effect
Pitch MediPix: 55 μmPitch Micromegas: 60 μm
Periodic variation in gain per 12 pixels
Focussing on (small) anode padContinues anode plane is NOT requiredReduction of source capacity!
Non-modified MediPixModified MediPix has much less Moire effect
No charge spread over2 or 4 pixels
Modified
Non Modified
InGrid: perfect alignment of pixels and grid holes!Small pad: small capacitance!
De-focussing
focusing
focusing
De-focussing
INtegrate Micromegas GRID and pixel sensor
‘Micromegas’
By ‘wafer post processing’at MESA+, Univ. of Twente
InGrid
Integrate GEM/Micromegas and pixel sensor: InGrid
‘GEM’ ‘Micromegas’
By ‘wafer post processing’
-For KABES II, there are two options. The TPC with transverse drift option would need strips rather than pixels.But it could be interesting to have an InGrid-like integrated mesh.The thin Si or CMOS+gas option would need a very high rate capability. -CAST (CERN Axion Solar Telescope) seems to be a more straightforward application.It simply requires a possibility of triggering a common stop.This is why Esther Ferrer-Ribas, from CAST, will join us. - The polarimetry application (challenging Belazzini) is very interestingfor people from the Astrophysics division. The requirement is very similar to CAST's. - The MicroTPC might have applications in nuclear physics or in Babar, for instance. - There are other applications (X-ray beam monitor for SOLEIL) which I can talk about tomorrow. - The protection issue is essential in all Micromegas applications.
! With 1 mm layer of (Ar/Isobutane) gas we have a fast TPC!
• thick enough for 99 % MIP detection efficiency• thin enough for max. drift time < 25 ns (LHC bunchX)
Replace {Si sensor + amplifier} by gas layer:
tracker for intense radiation environment
After all: until 1990 most vertex detectors were gas detectors!Si solved granularity problems associated with wires.
CMOS pixel array
MIP
Micromegas (InGrid)
GOSSIP: Gas On Slimmed SIlicon Pixels
Drift gap: 1 mmMax drift time: 16 ns
MIP
CMOS pixel chip
Cathode foil
Essentials of GOSSIP:
• Generate charge signal in gas instead of Si (e-/ions versus e-/holes)• Amplify # electrons in gas (electron avalanche versus FET preamps)
Then:• No radiation damage in depletion layer or pixel preamp FETs• No power dissipation of preamps, required for Si charge signals• No detector bias current
1 mm gas layer + 20 μm gain gap + CMOS (almost digital!) chipAfter all: it is a TPC with 1 mm drift length (parallax error!)
Max. drift length: 1 mmMax. drift time: 16 nsResolution: 0.1 mm 1.6 ns
AgeingEfficiencyPosition resolutionRate effectsRadiation hardnessHV breakdownsPower dissipationMaterial budget
AgeingRemember the MSGCs……
Little ageing:
• the ratio (anode surface)/(gas volume) is very high w.r.t. wire chambers
• little gas gain: 5 k for GOSSIP, 20 – 200 k for wire chambers
• homogeneous drift field + homogeneous multiplication field versus 1/R field of wire. Absence of high E-field close to a wire: no high electron energy; little production of chemical radicals
Confirmed by measurements (Alfonsi, Colas)
But: critical issue: ageing studies can not be much accelerated!
Efficiency
Determined by gas layer thickness and gas mixture:
Number of clusters per mm: 3 (Ar) – 10 (Isobutane)Number of electrons per cluster: 3 (Ar) - 15 (Isobutane)Probability to have min. 1 cluster in 1 mm Ar: 0.95
With nice gas: eff ~ 0.99 in 1 mm thick layer should be possible
But…….
• Parallax error due to 1 mm thick layer, with 3rd coordinate 0.1 mm:• TPC/ max drift time 16 ns; σ = 0.1 mm; σ = 1.6 ns: feasible!• Lorentz angle
• We want fast drifting ions (rate effect)• little UV photon induced avalanches: good quenching gas
Position resolutionTransversal coordinates limited by:• Diffusion: single electron diffusion 0 – 40/70 µm
weighed fit: ava 20/30 µm10 e- per track: σ = 8/10 µm
• pixel dimensions: 20 x 20 – 50 x 50 μm2 Note: we MUST have sq. pixels: no strips (pad capacity/noise)Good resolution in non-bending plane!Pixel number has NO cost consequence (m2 Si counts)Pixel number has some effect on CMOS power dissipation
• δ-rays: can be recognised & eliminated
3rd (drift) coordinatelimited by:• Pulse height fluctuation• gas gain (5 k), pad capacity, # e- per cluster With Time Over Threshold: σ = 1 ns ~~ 0.1 mm
0
Q
20 ns
Rate effects
time
0
Q
20 ns
• ~10 e- per track (average)• gas gain 5 k• most ions are discharged at grid after traveling time of 20 ns• a few percent enter the drift space:
SLHC @ 2 cm from beam pipe:10 tracks cm-2 25 ns-1
400 MHz cm-2!
Some ions crossing drift space: takes 20 – 200 μs!•ion space charge has NO effect on gas gain• ion charge may influence drift field, but this does little harm• ion charge may influence drift direction: change in lorentz angle ~0.1 rad• B-field should help
Data rate
Hit Pixel (single electron) data: 8 bit column ID8 bit row ID4 bit timing leading edge4 bit timing trailing edge
total 24 bits/hit pixel
100 e-/ 25 ns cm2 380 Gb/s per chip (2 x 2 cm2)
Cluster finding: reduction factor 10: 40 Gb/s
Horisberger:
Data rate, DAQ, data transmission is a limiting factor for SLHC
Required: rad hard optical links with 1 mm3 light emittors per chip!
Radiation hardness
• Gas is refreshed: no damage• CMOS 130 nm technology: ? TID
? NIEL? SEU: design/test
• need only modest pixel input stage• How is 40 Gb/s hit pixel data transferred?
need rad hard optical link per chip!
HV breakdowns: InGrid issue
4) Protection Network
1) High-resistive layer
2) High-resistive layer
3) ‘massive’ pads
Power dissipation
For GOSSIP CMOS Pixel chip:
Per pixel: - input stage (1.8 μA/pixel)- monostable disc/gate
Futher: data transfer logic
guess: 0.1 W/cm2
Gas Cooling feasible!
Detector Material budget
‘Slimmed’ Si CMOS chip: 20 μm SiPixel resistive layer 1 μm SU8 eq.Anode pads 1 μm AlGrid 1 μm AlGrid resistive layer 5 μm SU8 eq.Cathode 1 μm Al
Gas instead of SiPro:- no radiation damage in sensor- modest pixel input circuitry- no bias current, no dark current (in absence of HV breakdowns..!)- requires (almost) only digital CMOS readout chip- low detector material budget
Typical: Si foil. New mechanical concepts: self-supporting pressurised co-centric balloons
- low power dissipation- (12”) CMOS wafer Wafer Post Processing dicing 12” pcs
- no bump bonding- ‘simple’ assembly
- operates at room temperature- less sensitive for X-ray background- 3D track info per layer
Con:- Gas chamber ageing: not known at this stage- Needs gas flow (but can be used for cooling….)
How to proceed?
- InGrid 1 available for tests in October:- rate effects (all except change in drift direction)- ageing (start of test)
Proof-of-principle of signal generator: Xmas 2004!
- InGrid 2: HV breakdowns, beamtests with MediPix (TimePix1 in 2005)
- TimePix2: CMOS chip for Multi Project Wafer test chip
GOSSIPO !
Dummy wafer
Essential Ingredients of GOSSIP CMOS chip
RATE
Assume application in Super LHC:
- Bunch crossing 25 ns- 10 tracks per (25 ns cm2) - 10 e- per track (average: Landau fluct.)
So: 4 MHz/mm2 tracks!, 40 MHz/mm2 single electrons!
Charge signal on pixel input pad
Q
10 - 20 ns
- Signal shape is well defined and uniform- No bias current, no dark current- Signal is subject to exponential distribution- may be large, but limited by
- chamber ageing- space charge (rate) effects
single-electron avalanche distribution
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
electrons in avalanche
Pro
b(n
)
G=500
G=1000
G=2000
G=4000
G=8000
Expon. (G=500)
Expon. (G=1000)
Expon. (G=2000)
Expon. (G=4000)
Expon. (G=8000)
Input Pad capacity
preamp stage, noise, power
- Input pads may be small: focusingToo small pads: chamber ageing
- capacity to neighbors & metal layers- capacity due to gas gain grid- Pixel size: 50 x 50 - 20 x 20 μm2
4 fF seems feasible
Time resolution
preamp-disc speed, noise, power
- Measurement 3rd coordinate: σdrift time: 25/16 = 1.5 ns- Time over threshold: slewing correction- drift time related to BX
Record: leading edge - BXtrailing edge - BXBX ID
Data Readout
ALL data: 80 MB s-1 mm-2 ( 15 GB/s per chip)Maybe possible in 10 years from now:
- optical fibre per chip- Vertex can be used as trigger
For SLHC:Use BX ID info (typical Vertex policy)
- tell BX ID to all (Rows/Columns/Pixels)- get data from (Row/Column/Pixel)
Gossipo
MultiProjectWafer submit in 130 nm CMOS technology
Test of essential GOSSIP ingredients:
- Low power, low input capacity preamp/shaper/discriminator- 1.5 ns TDC (per discriminator output)- Data transfer
Maybe not all of this in a first submitMaybe with less ambitious specifications
Amplifier-shaper-discriminator
- How to apply a test pulse?- using gas gain grid (all channels fire)- capacitive coupling test pulse strip- reality: with a gas gain grid(!)
- What to do with the output?- (bonded) contact: digital feedback?!- TDC + DAQ?
TDC
- 1.5 ns clock: derived on-board from 40 MHz BX clock?- 640 MHz clock distribution (per pixel?!)- DLL?
(My) goal of this meeting:
- Are there any showstoppers in this stage?- can we define a Gossipo concept (block diagram)?- Can we estimate the amount of work?