going green – jigsaw approach
DESCRIPTION
Going Green – Jigsaw Approach. Each Analysis Team will present a summary of the feedback on their topic from the pilot, with recommendations. Individually, we will consider the information just presented and brainstorm ways to Go Green. Going Green – Jigsaw Approach. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Going Green – Jigsaw Approach
1. Each Analysis Team will present a summary of the feedback on their topic from the pilot, with recommendations.
2. Individually, we will consider the information just presented and brainstorm ways to Go Green.
Going Green – Jigsaw Approach
3. After the last presentation and reflection, we will take a break and then use the NCDPI Retreat Planning Doc (http://bit.ly/NCDPIRetreat) for Going Green.
4. As we work, please join a planning group and start prioritizing for Year 1.
FUTURE PLANNING
ASW Pilot Analysis
Submitter #11 and #12 Evaluator #13 and #14
1) Anonymous NC teacher2) State committee
3) Self4-5) Principal or Central Office
Others: retired teachers, 10+ years exp. or various years of exp. on cmte., district teams with mix of content teachers or teams from similar-sized districts, 3 ratings per submission with evaluators receiving ratings on how well they do as evaluators
1) State committee2) Anonymous NC teacher
3) Self4) Central Office5) Principal-no 1st choice votes
Others: peer in same school as 2nd evaluator
Who would be best to evaluate submissions?
Evaluator/State Committee Qualifications
Evaluator/State Committee Qualifications
1. Leadership Experience2. Teaching Experience3. Graduate degree in content area4. Mentor training or experience5. College degree in licensure area6. Specialized certification or training7. Recognized contributor to the field
Others: graduate degree in education, student teacher supervisor, methods instructor, educator knowledgeable in NCES, master teacher, professional recommendation
Peer Review
Recommendations
Year 1
• State Committees• Application/selection
process• Training with Certificate
Year 2
• State Committees• 1 Anonymous Peer
Reviewer
Year 3
• 2 Anonymous Peer Reviewers
• State Committees when reviews do not match
Creating a Submission Sharing a Submission
Selecting a single Clarifying Objective (CO)
Selecting student work that demonstrates growth
Clarifying how the CO is connected to the student work sample
Writing about your teaching context and other details of submission with clarity (i.e. use of NCES)
Preparing submissions for uploading
Professional Development Topics
Extension of NCEES Training?
Others . . .
Understanding the category ratings
Content-specific examples of each category rating
How to upload samples
How to pick a representative sample
How to select student work samples for pre/post or two points in time
Professional Development Topics
Dissemination of PD
Blended (70-85%) Online PD materials
with face-to-face training
Train-the-Trainer to bring back locally
Face-to-face regionally (62-82%)
Access materials posted online (52-63%)
Webinars/online only (33-59%)
Others: Online quarterly
updates County-wide f2f Mentoring with local
trainer/facilitator Differentiated based
on years of classroom experience
Options so teachers could choose what works best for them individually
Submitters Evaluators
Overwhelming majority: 82%Peer with similar content experience
Almost 40%1) Coordinator/Central Office2) Regional PD Consultant
25%: Principal
< 15%: Peer with different content experience or AP
< 5%: No one
Majority: 52-63%1) Coordinator/Central Office2) Peer with similar content
experience3) Regional PD Consultant
< 15%: AP or Principal
< 10% Peer with different content
experience No one
Who would you consult with locally?
Going Green – Jigsaw Approach
Individually, consider the feedback and recommendations just presented and brainstorm
ways to Go Green with the Analysis of Student Work (ASW) Future Planning
Planning Groups Form & Prioritize for Year 1
Implementation Needs
Year 1 Implementation
Date Activity
May 289 a.m.-4 p.m.
NCDPI Reflection & Planning Retreat
May 28 – June 12 Plan & Create PD materials for ASW Process for Year 1 Implementation
July 1, 2013 2013-2014 academic year begins
July 8 - 24 SI 2013 Design Studio on ASW Process
August - December Various trainings and initial use of the ASW Process with revisions based on feedback for Year 2 Implementation
January - June
July 1, 2014 2014-2015 academic year begins:Year 2 Implementation
July 1, 2015 2015-2016 academic year begins:Year 3 Implementation
Work Sessions for Planning Groups
Join a group at http://bit.ly/NCDPIRetreat
1:00 – 3:45 p.m.