going green – jigsaw approach

15
Going Green – Jigsaw Approach 1.Each Analysis Team will present a summary of the feedback on their topic from the pilot, with recommendations. 2.Individually, we will consider the information just presented and brainstorm ways to Go

Upload: leyna

Post on 19-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Going Green – Jigsaw Approach. Each Analysis Team will present a summary of the feedback on their topic from the pilot, with recommendations. Individually, we will consider the information just presented and brainstorm ways to Go Green. Going Green – Jigsaw Approach. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

1. Each Analysis Team will present a summary of the feedback on their topic from the pilot, with recommendations.

2. Individually, we will consider the information just presented and brainstorm ways to Go Green.

Page 2: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

3. After the last presentation and reflection, we will take a break and then use the NCDPI Retreat Planning Doc (http://bit.ly/NCDPIRetreat) for Going Green.

4. As we work, please join a planning group and start prioritizing for Year 1.

Page 3: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

FUTURE PLANNING

ASW Pilot Analysis

Page 4: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Submitter #11 and #12 Evaluator #13 and #14

1) Anonymous NC teacher2) State committee

3) Self4-5) Principal or Central Office

Others: retired teachers, 10+ years exp. or various years of exp. on cmte., district teams with mix of content teachers or teams from similar-sized districts, 3 ratings per submission with evaluators receiving ratings on how well they do as evaluators

1) State committee2) Anonymous NC teacher

3) Self4) Central Office5) Principal-no 1st choice votes

Others: peer in same school as 2nd evaluator

Who would be best to evaluate submissions?

Page 5: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Evaluator/State Committee Qualifications

Page 6: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Evaluator/State Committee Qualifications

1. Leadership Experience2. Teaching Experience3. Graduate degree in content area4. Mentor training or experience5. College degree in licensure area6. Specialized certification or training7. Recognized contributor to the field

Others: graduate degree in education, student teacher supervisor, methods instructor, educator knowledgeable in NCES, master teacher, professional recommendation

Page 7: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Peer Review

Recommendations

Year 1

• State Committees• Application/selection

process• Training with Certificate

Year 2

• State Committees• 1 Anonymous Peer

Reviewer

Year 3

• 2 Anonymous Peer Reviewers

• State Committees when reviews do not match

Page 8: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Creating a Submission Sharing a Submission

Selecting a single Clarifying Objective (CO)

Selecting student work that demonstrates growth

Clarifying how the CO is connected to the student work sample

Writing about your teaching context and other details of submission with clarity (i.e. use of NCES)

Preparing submissions for uploading

Professional Development Topics

Page 9: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Extension of NCEES Training?

Others . . .

Understanding the category ratings

Content-specific examples of each category rating

How to upload samples

How to pick a representative sample

How to select student work samples for pre/post or two points in time

Professional Development Topics

Page 10: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Dissemination of PD

Blended (70-85%) Online PD materials

with face-to-face training

Train-the-Trainer to bring back locally

Face-to-face regionally (62-82%)

Access materials posted online (52-63%)

Webinars/online only (33-59%)

Others: Online quarterly

updates County-wide f2f Mentoring with local

trainer/facilitator Differentiated based

on years of classroom experience

Options so teachers could choose what works best for them individually

Page 11: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Submitters Evaluators

Overwhelming majority: 82%Peer with similar content experience

Almost 40%1) Coordinator/Central Office2) Regional PD Consultant

25%: Principal

< 15%: Peer with different content experience or AP

< 5%: No one

Majority: 52-63%1) Coordinator/Central Office2) Peer with similar content

experience3) Regional PD Consultant

< 15%: AP or Principal

< 10% Peer with different content

experience No one

Who would you consult with locally?

Page 12: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Individually, consider the feedback and recommendations just presented and brainstorm

ways to Go Green with the Analysis of Student Work (ASW) Future Planning

Page 13: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Planning Groups Form & Prioritize for Year 1

Implementation Needs

Page 14: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Year 1 Implementation

Date Activity

May 289 a.m.-4 p.m.

NCDPI Reflection & Planning Retreat

May 28 – June 12 Plan & Create PD materials for ASW Process for Year 1 Implementation

July 1, 2013 2013-2014 academic year begins

July 8 - 24 SI 2013 Design Studio on ASW Process

August - December Various trainings and initial use of the ASW Process with revisions based on feedback for Year 2 Implementation

January - June

July 1, 2014 2014-2015 academic year begins:Year 2 Implementation

July 1, 2015 2015-2016 academic year begins:Year 3 Implementation

Page 15: Going Green – Jigsaw Approach

Work Sessions for Planning Groups

Join a group at http://bit.ly/NCDPIRetreat

1:00 – 3:45 p.m.