global parliamentary-network-oct2014 education-at-a-glance
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher, OECD Director for Education and Skills during the OECD Global Parliamentary Network meeting on 2 October 2014. International comparisons aren’t perfect, but they show what is possible in education and help countries see themselves in the mirror of the results and opportunities delivered by the world’s educational leaders. This raises the question of what we can learn from the world’s top performing school systems and if what works in one context could provide a model elsewhere. What we’ve learned from PISA is that the leaders in high performing systems have convinced their citizens to make choices that value education, their future, more than consumption today. But placing a high value on education is just part of the equation. Another part is the belief in the possibilities for all children to achieve. Interestingly, many of the world’s top performing school systems combine strong and equitable performance, where students from all social backgrounds do well; pay attention to how they select and train their staff, provide intelligent pathways for teachers to grow in their careers and support their teachers to make innovations in pedagogy; and tend to align policies and practices across all aspects of the system and implement them consistently.TRANSCRIPT
1
Education at a Glance 2014
Qualification levels have risen markedly…
…but don’t always translate into strong foundation skills
2
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1995
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate (%)
Cost
per
stu
dent
Graduate supply
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1995
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate (%)
Cost
per
stu
dent
Graduate supply
United States
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2000
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
United Kingdom
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2001
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2002
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2003
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2004
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2005
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2006
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2007
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2008
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2009
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2010
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2011
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2011
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
Iceland Poland
UK
Australia
New Zealand
Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States
A world of change – higher education
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2011
Expen
diture
per
stu
den
t at
ter
tiar
y le
vel (U
SD)
Tertiary-type A graduation rate
US
P
China has almost caught up with the US in terms of high-school completion
Upper secondary graduation rates (2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Slo
veni
a
Icel
and
Ger
man
y
Net
herla
nds
Hun
gary
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Irela
nd
Japa
n
Spa
in
Finl
and
Den
mar
k
Kor
ea
Nor
way
Can
ada
Isra
el
Slo
vak
Rep
ublic
EU
21
aver
age
New
Zea
land
Pol
and
Chi
le
Italy
OE
CD
ave
rage
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Sw
eden
Chi
na
Gre
ece
Luxe
mbo
urg
Aus
tria
Turk
ey
Mex
ico
Total <25 years old ≧25 years old
Chart A2.1
%
In many countries those without an upper secondary education face an increasing unemployment risk
Unemployment rates among 25-64 year-olds, by educational attainment (2005, 2010 and 2012)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Kore
aM
exic
oBr
azil
Nor
way
Chi
leAu
stra
liaLu
xem
bour
gN
ew Z
eala
ndN
ethe
rland
sIc
elan
dAu
stria
Switz
erla
ndTu
rkey
Den
mar
kIs
rael
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Can
ada
Finl
and
Belg
ium
Rus
sian
Fed
erat
ion
Italy
Swed
enG
erm
any
OEC
D a
vera
geFr
ance
Slov
enia
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Portu
gal
EU21
ave
rage
Pola
ndEs
toni
aH
unga
ryLa
tvia
Irela
ndG
reec
eC
zech
Rep
ublic
Spai
nSl
ovak
Rep
ublic
2012 2005 2010
Below upper secondary education
Chart A5.2 - BS
%
Qualification don’t always translate into strong foundation skills
22
Literacy proficiency is determined by educational attainment but not in the same way across countries
Mean literacy score, by educational attainment (2012)
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Japa
n
Net
herla
nds
Finl
and
Swed
en
Aust
ralia
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Flan
ders
(Bel
gium
)
Nor
way
Uni
ted
Stat
es
Aver
age
Pola
nd
Aust
ria
Engl
and/
N. I
rela
nd (U
K)
Slov
ak R
epub
lic
Fran
ce
Ger
man
y
Den
mar
k
Irela
nd
Kore
a
Can
ada
Esto
nia
Spai
n
Italy
Rus
sian
Fed
erat
ion
Below upper secondary educationUpper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary educationTertiary education
Chart A1.4
The shares of highly literate tertiary graduates are very different across countries
Percentage of adults scoring at literacy proficiency Level 4/5, by educational attainment (2012)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Japa
n
Finl
and
Net
herla
nds
Swed
en
Aust
ralia
Nor
way
Flan
ders
(Bel
gium
)
Engl
and/
N. I
rela
nd (U
K)
Uni
ted
Stat
es
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Aver
age
Pola
nd
Can
ada
Aust
ria
Ger
man
y
Irela
nd
Fran
ce
Den
mar
k
Esto
nia
Slov
ak R
epub
lic
Kore
a
Rus
sian
Fed
erat
ion
Spai
n
Italy
Below upper secondary educationUpper secondary or post-secondary non-tertiary educationTertiary education
%
Chart A1.5
The rising tide has not lifted all boats…
…and in some countries educational mobility is slowing down
25
Between 20% and 60% of adults are more educated than their parents
Percentage of 25-64 year-old non-students whose educational attainment is higher than (upward mobility) or lower than (downward mobility) that of their parents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cze
chR
epub
lic
Ger
man
y
Aus
tria
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Slo
vak
Rep
ublic
Italy
Nor
way
Den
mar
k
Eng
land
/N.
Irela
nd (U
K)
Spa
in
Ave
rage
Aus
tralia
Japa
n
Sw
eden
Est
onia
Can
ada
Net
herla
nds
Pol
and
Irela
nd
Fran
ce
Flan
ders
(Bel
gium
)
Finl
and
Kor
ea
Rus
sian
Fede
ratio
n
Downward mobility Upward mobility%
Chart A4.3 - Mob
In most countries, upward educational mobility tends to be lower in the younger generations
Proportion of upward mobility across age groups
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34
Upw
ard
Mob
ility
Age groups
Average Italy United States
Graph Mobility A4
Europe is now driving international student mobility…
…the US accommodates a large but declining share of the market.
28
In 2012, more than 4.5 million students were enrolled in tertiary education outside their country of citizenship Chart C4.1
Evolution in the number of students enrolled outside their country of citizenship, by region of destination (2000 to 2012)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Worldwide OECD G20 countriesEurope North America Oceania
Million students
In 2012, more than one in two foreign students were enrolled in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom or the United States
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by country of destination (2012)
United States¹ 16%
United Kingdom¹ 13%
Germany 6%
France 6% Australia¹,³ 6% Canada² 5%
Russian Federation 4%
Japan 3%
Spain 2% China 2% Italy 2%
Austria 2% New Zealand 2%
South Africa 2% Switzerland 1% Netherlands 1%
Korea 1% Belgium 1%
Other OECD countries 8%
Other non-OECD countries 17%
Chart C4.2
New players are emerging in the international education market
Trends in international education market shares (2000, 2012). Percentage of all foreign tertiary students enrolled, by destination
0
5
10
15
20
25
Uni
ted
Stat
e
Uni
ted
King
dom
Ger
man
y
Fran
ce
Aust
ralia
Can
ada
Rus
sian
Fed
erat
ion
Japa
n
Spai
n
Chi
na
Italy
Aust
ria
New
Zea
land
Sout
h Af
rica
Switz
erla
nd
Net
herla
nds
Kore
a
Belg
ium
Oth
er O
ECD
Oth
er G
0 an
d no
n-O
ECD
20002012
Market share (%)
OECD countries Other G20 and non-OECD countries
2000 2012
Chart C4.3
More than half of foreign students in tertiary education come from Asia
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education, by region of origin (2012)
Asia 53%
Europe 23%
Africa 12%
Latin America and the Caribbean 6%
North America 3% Oceania 1%
Not specified 3%
Chart C4.5
Education remained a priority during the crisis…
33
Between 2008 and 2011, only six countries cut public expenditure on educational institutions
Impact of the economic crisis on public expenditure on education
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Cze
ch R
epub
licN
ew Z
eala
ndD
enm
ark
Slo
vak
Rep
ublic
Bra
zil
Finl
and
Aus
tralia
Irela
ndN
ethe
rland
sJa
pan
Sw
itzer
land
Ger
man
yS
love
nia
Chi
leC
anad
aP
ortu
gal
Mex
ico
Kor
eaO
EC
D a
vera
geA
ustri
aS
pain
EU
21 a
vera
geN
orw
ayB
elgi
umFr
ance
Sw
eden
Isra
elIc
elan
dU
nite
d S
tate
sus
sian
Fed
erat
ion
Pol
and
Est
onia
Italy
Hun
gary
Index of change (2008=100)
Change in public expenditure on educational institutionsChange in Gross Domestic ProductChange in expenditure on education institutions as a percentage of GDP
Chart B2.3 - T
Expenditure per primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary student increased by at least 10% in most countries
Relationship between annual expenditure per student in 2011 and change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011
Brazil Mexico Chile Hungary
Slovak Republic Estonia Poland Czech Republic Israel Portugal
Korea Italy Spain Iceland Japan Finland
France Australia Germany United Kingdom Ireland Canada Denmark Netherlands Sweden Belgium
United States Austria
Switzerland
Norway
New Zealand
R² = 0.2707
01 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 0008 0009 000
10 00011 00012 00013 00014 00015 00016 00017 00018 00019 00020 000
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Annual expenditure per student (2011, USD)
Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%)
OECD average
Primary, secondary, and post-secondary non-tertiary
OECD average
Chart B1.5 - PS
Few countries have sustainable financing for tertiary education
38
In 2011, OECD countries spent an average of 1.6% of their GDP on tertiary education
Expenditure on educational institutions as a percentage of GDP (2011). From public and private sources, by level of education and source of funds
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Finl
and
Den
mar
kN
orw
ayC
anad
aSw
eden
Esto
nia
Aust
riaSw
itzer
land
Belg
ium
Net
herla
nds
Fran
ceEU
21 a
vera
geAr
gent
ina
Irela
ndC
zech
Rep
ublic
Slov
enia
Ger
man
yIc
elan
dSp
ain
Pola
ndN
ew Z
eala
ndLa
tvia
Portu
gal
Hun
gary
Uni
ted
Stat
esBr
azil
Isra
elM
exic
oU
nite
d Ki
ngdo
mR
ussi
an F
eder
atio
nC
olom
bia
Slov
ak R
epub
licC
hile
Italy
Kore
aAu
stra
liaJa
pan
% of GDP
Tertiary education
Public expenditure on education institutions Private expenditure on education institutions
OECD average (total expenditure)
Chart B2.2 - T
Mobilising resources for education
Share of private expenditure on tertiary educational institutions (2000, 2008 and 2011)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Chi
le
Kor
ea
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Japa
n
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Aus
tralia
Isra
el
Can
ada
Rus
sian
Fed
erat
ion
Italy
Mex
ico
Por
tuga
l
OE
CD
ave
rage
Net
herla
nds
Pol
and
Slo
vak
Rep
ublic
Spa
in
EU
21 a
vera
ge
Est
onia
Irela
nd
Fran
ce
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Ger
man
y
Slo
veni
a
Aus
tria
Sw
eden
Bel
gium
Icel
and
Den
mar
k
Finl
and
Nor
way
% 2011 2008 2000
Chart B3.3 - T
Nearly 22% of public spending on tertiary education is devoted to supporting students, households and other private entities
Public support for tertiary education (2011)
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Uni
ted
King
dom
Uni
ted
Stat
esSl
oven
iaD
enm
ark
Italy
Chi
leSl
ovak
Rep
ublic
Aust
riaG
erm
any
Portu
gal
New
Zea
land
Belg
ium
Latv
iaFi
nlan
dAu
stra
liaO
ECD
ave
rage
Net
herla
nds
Irela
ndH
unga
ryPo
land
Nor
way
Isra
elSw
eden
Spai
nFr
ance
Switz
erla
ndC
anad
aM
exic
oBr
azil
Turk
eyKo
rea
Esto
nia
Indo
nesi
aC
zech
Rep
ublic
Arge
ntin
aJa
pan
Icel
and
% of total public expenditure on tertiary education
Student loansTransfers and payments to other private entitiesScholarships/ other grants to households
Chart B5.3. Public subsidies for education in tertiary
Chart B5.3
A smart investment for individuals and countries
Net private and public returns associated with a man attaining tertiary education (2010)
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
350 000
400 000
450 000
500 000
Turk
ey
Den
mar
k
Spai
n
Esto
nia
Swed
en
New
Zea
land
Gre
ece
Kore
a
Japa
n
Can
ada
Slov
ak R
epub
lic
Pola
nd
Nor
way
Isra
el
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Fran
ce
Aust
ralia
Finl
and
OEC
D a
vera
ge
Portu
gal
EU21
ave
rage
Aust
ria
Uni
ted
King
dom
Net
herla
nds
Italy
Belg
ium
Slov
enia
Ger
man
y
Uni
ted
Stat
es
Hun
gary
Irela
nd
Equ
ival
ent U
SD
Private net returns Public net returns
Chart A7.1
43
43 Thank you
Find out more about our work at www.oecd.org/eag/eag2014
– The publication – The methodologies – The complete database
Email: [email protected] Twitter: SchleicherEDU
and remember: Without data, you are just another person with an opinion