gis project - jwl · 2018-09-10 · within the bounds of the sparrow model gis data for estuaries...
TRANSCRIPT
!
!
Harmful Algal Bloom Intensity and Estuarine Nutrient Loading
BSEN 5220: Geospatial Technologies in Biosystems John Llorens | Paisley Guo
December 2, 2015
___________________
Abstract: Analysis was conducted on publically available geospatial data to determine the strength of any correlation, should one exist, between harmful algal bloom cell count intensity and the nitrogen and phosphorous yields predicted by the SPARROW watershed model. Additionally, analysis was conducted on this data to examine any potential relationships between water temperature or salinity and bloom event intensity. The results of the analysis attempting to find a correlation between salinity or temperature and cell count were inconclusive. The results of the analysis attempting to find a correlation between total nitrogen or phosphorous loads delivered by the estuary and the average cell count of all samples within the estuary yielded low R2 values of 0.15 and 0.01, suggesting that the analysis was inconclusive. This is likely due to the fact that total load does not account for the area of the estuary. The results of the analysis attempting to find a correlation between total nitrogen or phosphorous yields and bloom event intensity suggested a correlation between nitrogen and phosphorous yields and the average bloom event cell count, with R2 values of 0.83 and 0.75, respectively.
!
!
!
!
1!!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
!
Introduction………………………….……………………..………………………2-3 !
Objectives……………….…..………………………………….……………………...3 !
Methods……..…………………….………………….………….…………………..3-5 !
Results……………………….………………..………………….………………….5-6 !
Conclusions……………….…………………………………………………………6-7 !
References……………………..………………………………………………………8 !
Appendix……………………………………………………………………………9-17 !
!
2!!
Introduction:
Harmful algal blooms are a growing threat to U.S. coastal waters, capable of causing both
ecological and economic damage and endangering human health. Harmful algal blooms, often
referred to as “red tides,” are caused by a sudden and dramatic increase in the concentration of
biotoxin producing or oxygen depleting species of phytoplankton within estuarine, marine, or
fresh water. In large concentrations, these phytoplankton may cause enough oxygen depletion or
produce high enough concentrations of biotoxins to cause very high levels of wildlife mortality
in the affected area. As phytoplankton may contain photosynthetic pigments ranging from green
to red, harmful algal blooms may appear red or brown in color. This pigmentation is illustrated
in Figure 1.
Harmful algal blooms in the Gulf of Mexico are caused by high concentrations of the
phytoplankton Karenia Brevis. This species produces a biotoxin that paralyzes the central
nervous system of marine life to an extent where respiration is difficult, leading to high levels of
wildlife mortality (Texas Parks and Wildlife). The high levels of biotoxin and wildlife mortality
facilitates the growth of harmful diseases within surviving wildlife, rendering it unfit for human
consumption and causing other effects on associated ecosystems. Birds in the area may die after
consuming contaminated fish. Commercial fisheries may be closed to prevent harvesting of
contaminated seafood. Even air quality in the surrounding area may suffer, leading to unpleasant
symptoms in humans.
Harmful algal blooms are generally considered to be a naturally occurring phenomenon
(Texas Parks and Wildlife). As the growth of marine phytoplankton is limited by nitrogen and
phosphorous content within the water, it is reasonable to assume that areas which may contain
elevated levels of these nutrients may have an impact on the potential for harmful algal bloom
3!!
events. These areas may include coastal upwelling zones or estuaries that transport large
amounts of agricultural runoff (Lam and Ho, 1989).
As water flows from the mainland into the Gulf of Mexico, it generally follows a path
which can be modeled. Areas that collectively discharge into a specific body of water are known
as watersheds. In-stream water nutrient loading is often modeled using statistical methods which
account for water quality upstream and watershed properties. One such model is known as
SPARROW (SPAtially-Referenced Regression On Watershed attributes) and it integrates
monitoring data with landscape information (Preston et al, 2009). This model can be used to
produce geospatial data pertaining to estuaries that deliver to the Gulf of Mexico. This model is
shown in Figure 2.
Objectives:
The objective of this analysis is to determine if any correlation can be made between
harmful algal bloom cell count densities within west coast Florida estuaries and the predicted
yearly yields and loads of nitrogen and phosphorous within each estuary as modeled by
SPARROW. Additionally, water temperature and salinity within the Gulf of Mexico were also
analyzed in relation to harmful algal bloom cell counts to determine a statistical correlation, if
any, exists.
Methods:
Geospatial data containing the locations, dates, cell counts of harmful phytoplankton, and
other varying information regarding samples of water taken is publically available from the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Florida Fish and Wildlife Research
4!!
Institute. This data was acquired in the form of a GIS shape file, which illustrates the locations
where each individual sample was taken. In order to produce a sufficient sample size that falls
within the bounds of the SPARROW model GIS data for estuaries delivering to the Gulf of
Mexico, several collections of data spanning a wide range of dates was selected for analysis.
The sample data ranges from 08/18/1953 to 07/30/2015. This data was separated into several
shape files spanning approximately 10 years of data collection each.
As the selected data pertaining to harmful algal blooms is predominately collected within
the Gulf of Mexico and around the Florida coast, the geospatial estuary data generated by the
SPARROW model along the Gulf of Mexico coast was selected. This data is available from the
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. The data is also provided as a GIS
shape file.
ArcMap was utilized to view and analyze the selected data. Once the SPARROW model
geospatial data was imported into ArcMap, the individual polygons along the Gulf of Mexico
coast were first filtered to eliminate all polygons lying outside of Florida’s state boundary.
Additionally, polygons that had not yet been modeled for nitrogen and phosphorous yields and
loads were also excluded. Finally, neighboring polygons within the same estuary were merged if
and only if the total nitrogen and phosphorous yields and loads were identical, so as to increase
the potential for additional sample sites to lie within the new larger polygon to provide a more
reliable cell count average.
The geospatial data representing the test sites during harmful algal bloom events was then
analyzed. As the data was provided in multiple packages spanning ranges of dates, feature
points representing harmful algal bloom samples were first merged into a single shape file and
the attribute tables were associated. The data was then filtered to exclude feature points deemed
5!!
irrelevant for the objective. All feature points with a cell count of zero were excluded, as it was
determined that these may either represent samples that were not tested for cell count or were
tested and returned a result of zero. Feature points with a zero value for the salinity or
temperature attribute were assumed to have no data in that field, and subsequently excluded
when exporting the data tables from ArcMap for analysis of that particular variable. The cell
count density for each feature point with an associated temperature measurement was analyzed,
and then the cell count density for each feature point with an associated salinity measurement
was analyzed.
To determine a potential association between the intensity of harmful algal bloom events
and SPARROW modeled estuary nutrient yields, only feature points lying within the estuaries
were considered. The diffusion of nitrogen and phosphorous in the Gulf of Mexico after leaving
the estuary is likely influenced by several factors that may include currents, atmospheric
conditions and pressure, or temperature. It was therefore not deemed feasible to associate these
feature points with specific polygons by proximity or any other factor given the timespan over
which the sample data was collected and the number of factors that could influence these
associations should they exist. Each polygon representing an estuary with a unique nitrogen and
phosphorous yield and total load was then exported in a table, along with the average cell density
of all feature points representing harmful algal bloom samples that lie within that particular
polygon. This resulting table was then graphed and analyzed to determine a correlation, if any.
Results:
The results of the analysis conclude that the SPARROW watershed model has potential
to illustrate estuaries that are at high risk for particularly intense harmful algal bloom events.
6!!
While harmful algal bloom events may be a natural occurrence and inherently unpredictable, it
does appear that nitrogen and phosphorous yields in estuaries by the upstream may influence the
intensity of these blooms, at least within the estuary itself or in the general vicinity of the
estuary.
Figure 3 can be compared with Figures 5, 6, and 7 and from these comparisons it can be
seen that the number of samples taken, which may be indicative of the number of harmful algal
bloom events, may be related to the phosphorous loads and yields and nitrogen yields in each
estuary. Comparing figures 3 and 4 suggest no relationship.
Figures 12 and 13 illustrate the cell count plotted against temperature and salinity,
respectively. These figures suggest very little relationship between these variables.
Figures 8 and 9 demonstrates that plotting the average cell count for all samples within
the estuary against the estuary’s total nitrogen and phosphorous loads delivered yields an R2
value of 0.15 and 0.01, respectively.
Figures 10 and 11 demonstrate that plotting the average cell count for all samples within
the estuary against the estuary’s total nitrogen and phosphorous yields achieves an R2 value of
0.83 and 0.75, respectively.
Conclusions:
The number of samples, while potentially related to the number of individual harmful
bloom events, is not indicative of such a statistic. Multiple samples may appear for the same
event, or no samples for a particular even may be present. While interesting, visual comparison
of Figures 3 through 7 does not offer conclusive evidence of a correlation between frequency or
number of bloom events and estuary nutrient yields.
7!!
The apparent lack of relationship between salinity or temperature and harmful algal
bloom cell count intensity suggests that the analysis is inconclusive
The linear relationship and corresponding high R2 values seen in Figures 10 and 11 this
suggests a correlation between the average cell count density of a harmful algal bloom event and
the nitrogen and phosphorous yields of an estuary as predicted by the SPARROW model.
The analysis of estuary total loads delivered in relation to average cell count intensity was
also inconclusive, yielding very low R2 values. This is likely due to the fact that total load
represents the total amount of the nutrient delivered by the estuary, and does not account for the
water volume and the resulting concentration of the aforementioned nutrient.
The results of these analyses may illustrate the potential for use of watershed models such
as the SPARROW model in unexpected applications, and potentially illustrates the importance of
watershed modeling due to the impact that agricultural runoff may have on ecosystems,
economies, and human health in distant areas.
8!!
References:
United States Department of the Interior and United States Geological Survey. 2 November
2011. Retrieved 2 December 2015. http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/index.html
Preston, S.D., Alexander, R.B., Woodside, M.D., and Hamilton, P.A., 2009, SPARROW
MODELING—Enhancing Understanding of the Nation’s Water Quality: U.S. Geological
Survey Fact Sheet 2009–3019
Texas Parks and Wildlife. 15 September 2015. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
https://tpwd.texas.gov/
9!!
R²!=!0.15173!
0100000!
0!
100000!
200000!
300000!
400000!
500000!
600000!
700000!
800000!
900000!
1000000!
0! 2000! 4000! 6000! 8000! 10000! 12000! 14000! 16000! 18000!
Cell!Co
unt(Ce
lls/Litre)!
Total!Nitrogan!Load!Deliverd(Metric!Ton/Yr)!
Figure!8:!Cell!Count!vs!Total!Nitrogen!Load!Delivered!
R²!=!0.00707!
0!
100000!
200000!
300000!
400000!
500000!
600000!
700000!
800000!
900000!
1000000!
0! 200! 400! 600! 800! 1000! 1200! 1400!
Cell!Co
unt(Ce
ll/Litre)!
Total!!Phosphorus!Load!Deliverd(Metric!Ton/Yr)!
Figure!9:!Cell!Count!vs!Total!Phosphorus!Load!Deliverd!
10!!
R²!=!0.83229!
0!
100000!
200000!
300000!
400000!
500000!
600000!
700000!
800000!
900000!
1000000!
0! 2000! 4000! 6000! 8000! 10000! 12000! 14000! 16000!
Cell!Co
unt(Ce
ll/Litre)!
Total!Nitrogan!Yield(kg/km/yr)!
Figure!10:!Cell!Count!vs!Total!Nitrogen!Yield!
R²!=!0.75137!
0!
100000!
200000!
300000!
400000!
500000!
600000!
700000!
800000!
900000!
1000000!
0! 500! 1000! 1500! 2000! 2500! 3000! 3500!
Cell!Co
unt(Ce
ll/Litre)!
Total!!Phosphorus!Yield(kg/km/yr)!
Figure!11:!Cell!Count!vs!Total!Phosphorus!Yield!
11!!
0!
20000000!
40000000!
60000000!
80000000!
100000000!
120000000!
0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! 35! 40! 45!
Cell!Co
unt(Ce
llS/Litre)!
Temperature(°C)!
Figure!12:!Cell!Count!vs!Temperature!
0!
20000000!
40000000!
60000000!
80000000!
100000000!
120000000!
0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! 35! 40! 45!
Cell!Co
unt(Ce
lls/Litre)!
Salinity!(Parts/Thousand)!
Figure!13:!Cell!Count!vs!Salinity!
!
!!!!
! Appendix:
Figure!1:!Harmful!Algal!Bloom!“Red!Tide”!
Source:!http://strangesounds.org!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !
!
Figure!2:!SPARROW!Watershed!Model!
! Source:!http://water.usgs.gov! ! ! !
!
!
!