geology, archaeology, and the ‘raging vortex of the “eolith” controversy’
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Geology, archaeology, and the ‘raging vortex of the “eolith” controversy’](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081823/575074d01a28abdd2e96633b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Erratum
Geology, archaeology, and the 'raging vortex of the "eolith"controversy'
Anne O'ConnorDepartment of Archaeology, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DHI 3LE
Manuscript received 29 August 2002; revised typescriptaccepted II December 2002
The above paper was published in Proceedings of theGeologists' Association, 114 (2003), 255-262. It contains an error on p. 258, l.h. col.: In the sentencebeginning 'The third paper came out in the Britishequivalent to l'Anthropologie, the journal Man, .... '
Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 115, 378.
Man should be changed to Journal of the RoyalAnthropological Institute. Correspondingly, in theReferences, under Warren, S.H. 1905, the journaland volume no. should be changed from Man,S,to Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 35.The pagination remains unchanged.
The author apologises for this error.
0016-7878/04 $15.00 © 2004 Geologists' Association