generated by plan4learning.com 24 of 49

GoalsGoal 1: Killeen ISD will equip and empower campus leadership, faculty, and staff to consistently provide research-based best practices, resulting in futureready students.

Performance Objective 1: By June 2021, 90% of students in grades 3-5 will meet the student achievement standard in READING. 90% of the Pre-K-2ndgrade students will meet grade level standard as measured by CIRCLE, MAP.

Evaluation Data Sources: Formative Assessments, STAAR Results, CIRCLE, MAP, Curriculum Unit Assessments

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Teachers will implement the Readers Workshop model focused on the 4 Components of balanced Literacyin every classroom.A. Read AloudB Shared ReadingC. Guided/Small group (based on F&P, MAP, Running Records), D. Independent Reading

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased learning and improved reading fluency and comprehension skills.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, teachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and math, Improvelow-performing schoolsProblem Statements: Student Learning 1, 5Funding Sources: Guided (complex texts) Reading Books/Materials - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6329.00.121.30.AR0 - $830, Guided (complex texts) Reading Books/Materials - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6329.00.121.30.000 - $739, Materials/Supplies for Title I Guided Reading Groups - 211 - ESEA, Title IPart A - 211.11.6399.00.121.30.000 - $0, Consumable instructional books - 165/ES0 - ELL - 165.11.6399.00.121.25.ES0 - $1,120

Formative SummativeNov Jan Mar June

Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: Teachers will administer to all students an F & P assessment at the beginning of the year by September 18,2020 and at the end of the year (New students administered upon enrollment). Struggling (2 grades below) readers willalso be assessed every nine weeks.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers will have specific reading data about every student to help informreading instruction.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, principals, teachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 1, 5


Mountain View Elementary SchoolGenerated by Plan4Learning.com 24 of 49

Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: Teachers will implement high impact strategies (collaboration, close reading, Gradual Release Model,Accountable Talk) that promote rigor and thinking at high cognitive levels in all PK-5 classrooms.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will think and perform at higher cognitive levels.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, Assistant principals, CIS, Teacher LeadersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and math, Improve low-performing schoolsProblem Statements: Demographics 1


Strategy 4 Details ReviewsStrategy 4: Teachers will provide differentiated small group, project-based instruction in accordance with the TexasTPSP project to meet the unique needs of GT students.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will plan and create projects that meet the state GT standards.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, Classroom TeachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Connect high school to career and collegeProblem Statements: Student Learning 2Funding Sources: Nonfiction texts for GT students - 177 - Gifted/Talented - 177.11.6329.00.121.21.000 - $800, Supplies/Materials for TPSP Projects - 177 - Gifted/Talented - 177.11.6399.00.121.21.000 - $1,500, Virtual FieldTrip for GT. Students - 177 - Gifted/Talented - 177.11.6299.OL.121.21.000 - $1,283.19


Strategy 5 Details ReviewsStrategy 5: The campus will provide additional reading support to identified at-risk students in grades K-5 by twoinstructional aides and after school tutors under teacher direction of the classroom teacher .

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will have needed intervention support in reading and math.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, CIS, Classroom TeachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and math - ESF Levers:Lever 2: Effective, Well-Supported TeachersProblem Statements: Student Learning 1Funding Sources: Instructional Aides for at risk students - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6129.00.121.30.AR0 - $43,202


Strategy 6 Details ReviewsStrategy 6: Teachers will implement CFA 2.0 and study the IFD, plan units focusing on higher level questioning andtasks, examine student work, and implement common assessments to increase performance of at-risk population.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers and grade levels will use lesson plans that are aligned to the TEKSResource System curriculum and state standards.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, principalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 7 Details ReviewsStrategy 7: Grade level teams will plan and execute "Next Generation" Balanced Literacy and Comprehension at theCore strategies.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased learning and improved reading fluency and comprehension skills.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CISTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1 - Student Learning 1, 5


Strategy 8 Details ReviewsStrategy 8: Teachers will utilize Imagine Learning and other online programs for ELL students that focus onvocabulary and reading skills.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: ELL students will demonstrate improved assessment results.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: AP'sELL TeachersProblem Statements: Student Learning 1Funding Sources: Phonics manuals for teachers of ELL students - 165/ES0 - ELL - 165.13.6329.00.121.25.ES0


Strategy 9 Details ReviewsStrategy 9: Teachers will plot Standards, target, and tasks on the Cognitive Rigor Matrix when planning to ensure highrigor and complexity.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Lesson plansStaff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers will plan lessons that are aligned and promote higher level thinkingby students.Title I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Connect high school to career and collegeProblem Statements: Demographics 1


Strategy 10 Details ReviewsStrategy 10: Teachers will provide additional Targeted Support to the Asian student population in reading through useof small group, guided reading strategies and implement high impact strategies (collaboration, close reading, GradualRelease Model, Accountable Talk) that promote rigor and thinking at high cognitive levels daily in order to increaseacademic achievement.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Asian students will think and perform at higher cognitive levels.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, classroom teachers, principalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and math - AdditionalTargeted Support StrategyProblem Statements: Student Learning 1



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 11 Details ReviewsStrategy 11: The campus will provide two Instructional Coach / Interventionist to work with teachers , with anemphasis on teachers with 5 years or less experience, on Balanced Literacy support through model lessons, coachingand feedback, and lesson design.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: The learning curve for newer teachers will be shortened in regard toplanning and delivery of instruction. As a result, student learning will increase.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals and CISTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Recruit, support, retain teachers and principals,Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1Funding Sources: Instructional Literacy Coaches - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6119.00.121.30.000 - $147,750, Professional Books for Teachers - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.13.6329.00.121.30.000 - $0


Strategy 12 Details ReviewsStrategy 12: The parent liaison and campus staff will provide Parent Education events focusing on literacydevelopment, grade level curriculum, and strategies that promote parental involvement in the learning process eachsemester for parents of Title I and ELL students.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase the number of parents that are engaged in the learning process andhelp parents learn new skills that help their child be a better reader.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Parent Liaison, PrincipalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 3.1, 3.2 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 1 - Perceptions 2Funding Sources: Refreshments for Families - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.61.6499.00.121.30.000 - $600


Strategy 13 Details ReviewsStrategy 13: The librarian will conduct a Summer Reading event for Title I Students (Summer, 2021).

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase the number of students who are engaged in reading during thesummer.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Librarian, PrincipalsTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 1, 5Funding Sources: Books for Summer Reading Event - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.12.6299.OL.121.30.000 - $1,500



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 14 Details ReviewsStrategy 14: Teachers will utilize LLI and Imagine Learning for instruction during intervention time for strugglingreaders.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Struggling readers will improve their reading fluency and comprehension.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, AP'sClassroom teachersTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 1, 5 - School Processes & Programs 3Funding Sources: Cases for iPads - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6399.00.121.30.AR0 - $4,600, Headphones forat risk student interventions - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6399.00.121.30.000 - $700, Cases for iPads - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6399.00.121.30.000 - $1,840, iPads for Tier I and II interventions (Splitfunding 19-20/20-21) - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6398.00.121.30.000 - $2,490, iPad charging carts - 211- ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6394.00.121.30.000 - $724, iPad charging carts - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6394.00.121.30.AR0 - $724, iPads for Tier I and II interventions - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6398.00.121.30.AR0 - $7,060


No Progress Accomplished Continue/Modify Discontinue

Performance Objective 1 Problem Statements:

DemographicsProblem Statement 1: Fifty-one percent of our teachers have between 0 and 5 years of experience. Beginning teachers struggle to plan higher level tasks, higher level lessons,and ask higher level questions.

Student LearningProblem Statement 1: Reading STAAR scores for all students for the past 5 years are trending down from 88% (14-15) to 84% (15-16) to 81% (16-17), to 82% (17-18), and79% in 18-19, the ELL student group in grades 3 and 5 scored below the grade level average.Problem Statement 2: 78% of the 5th grade students met the Approaching standard for Science with 19% of the total and 100% of GT students at Mastered level for STAAR18-19.Problem Statement 5: 43% of 3rd grade, 50% of 4th grade and 70% of 5th grade special education students scored at the approaching level on the STAAR Reading test.

School Processes & ProgramsProblem Statement 3: Due to COVID 19, there is a need to increase the number of technology devices available to support both virtual and face-to-face instruction.

PerceptionsProblem Statement 2: Spring 2020 survey results indicated 12% of our parents do not feel they have adequate communication with their child's teacher and 6% do not feelparents and guardians are encouraged to be actively involved in their child's education.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Goal 1: Killeen ISD will equip and empower campus leadership, faculty, and staff to consistently provide research-based best practices, resulting in futureready students.

Performance Objective 2: By June 2021, 90% of students in grades 3-5 will meet the student achievement standard in MATH. 90% of the Pre-K-2ndgrade students will meet grade level standard as measured by CIRCLE, MAP.

Evaluation Data Sources: Formative Assessments, STAAR Results, CIRCLE, MAP, Curriculum Unit Assessments

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Teachers will implement high impact strategies (collaboration, Gradual Release Model math lessonderived from CFA 2.0 design, Accountable Talk) that promote rigor and thinking at high cognitive levels in all PK-5classrooms.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will think and perform at higher cognitive levels.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS, Teacher LeadersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: Teachers will collaborate, study the IFD, plan units focusing on higher level questioning and tasks,examine student work, and create common assessments to increase performance of at risk population to increase teacherquality.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers and grade levels will use lesson plans that are aligned to the TEKSResource System curriculum and state standards.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, principals, CISTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1Funding Sources: Substitutes for planning days for teachers of at risk students - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6116.00.121.30.AR0


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: Teachers will utilize small group instruction to include the use of manipulatives and hands on materials toprovide opportunities for reteaching and remediation after core instruction and formative assessments.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Student learning in math will increase.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, collaborative teams, CIS, principalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 4Funding Sources: Materials to support reteaching and remediation in math (19-20 funds) - 211 - ESEA, Title IPart A - 211.11.6399.00.121.30.000



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 4 Details ReviewsStrategy 4: Teachers will plot Standards, target, and tasks on the Cognitive Rigor Matrix when planning to ensure highrigor and complexity.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers will plan lessons that are aligned and promote higher level thinkingby students.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS, TeachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1


Strategy 5 Details ReviewsStrategy 5: Teachers will provide additional Targeted Support to Asians in math through use of small group instruction,and implement high impact strategies (collaboration, Gradual Release Model, Accountable Talk) that promote rigor andthinking at high cognitive levels daily in order to increase academic achievement.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Asian students will demonstrate increased learning in math.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, classroom teacher, principalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and math - AdditionalTargeted Support StrategyProblem Statements: Student Learning 4


Strategy 6 Details ReviewsStrategy 6: Teachers will utilize Do The Math and Imagine Math for instruction during intervention time for strugglingmath students.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Improved learning on MAP and STAAR TestsStaff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, PrincipalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.6Problem Statements: Student Learning 6Funding Sources: iPad charging carts - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6394.00.121.30.000 - $724, iPads forTier I and II interventions - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.11.6398.00.121.30.AR0 - $7,060, iPads for Tier I and IIinterventions - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6398.00.121.30.000 - $7,060





Student LearningProblem Statement 4: Twenty-nine percent of Mountain View students in grades 3-5 and 83% of GT students scored at the Mastered Level on the STAAR math assessment.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Student LearningProblem Statement 6: All students have experienced gaps in learning as a result of COVID 19 and the extended school closure.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM


Performance Objective 3: By June 2021, 85% of students in grades 5 will meet the student achievement standard in SCIENCE.

Evaluation Data Sources: STAAR Results, Curriculum Unit Assessments, MAP Data

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Teachers will implement high impact strategies (collaboration, close reading, Gradual Release Model,Accountable Talk) that promote rigor and thinking at high cognitive levels in all PK-5 classrooms.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Students will think and perform at higher cognitive levels.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS, Teacher LeadersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4 - TEA Priorities: Connect high school to career and collegeProblem Statements: Student Learning 2


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: Teachers will utilize unit mapping and planning of the IFD in science. The science mapping will identifykey concepts vertically aligned from PK - 5.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers will plan and implement aligned lessons resulting in increasedlearning in science.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS, teachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4Problem Statements: Student Learning 2


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: Teachers will utilize performance assessments in science to demonstrate understanding of science concepts.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Performance assessment data will provide information to inform planningand reteaching of skills and concepts.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS, teachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4Problem Statements: Student Learning 2


Strategy 4 Details ReviewsStrategy 4: Students will participate in a monthly STEM project and a culminating Spring STEM Fair that utilizes the(STEM) engineering design process and incorporating writing, research, and problem-solving.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased numbers of students engaged in science learning.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS teachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Connect high school to career and collegeProblem Statements: Student Learning 2



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 5 Details ReviewsStrategy 5: Teachers will provide 30-45 minutes of science instruction daily which include "hands on" lab experiences.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased learning of science skills and concepts.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, principals, teachersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.6Problem Statements: Student Learning 2




Student LearningProblem Statement 2: 78% of the 5th grade students met the Approaching standard for Science with 19% of the total and 100% of GT students at Mastered level for STAAR18-19.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM


Performance Objective 4: By June 2021, 85% of students in grades 4 will meet the student achievement standard in WRITING.

Evaluation Data Sources: STAAR Results, Formative Writing Assessments, Curriculum Unit Assessments

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Within the Balanced literacy block teachers will utilize the Empowering Writers guide and Patterns ofPower to provide explicit writing instruction including the revising and editing process.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased writing skills and fourth grade writing STAAR scores.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, CIS, principalsTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 3Funding Sources: Empowering Writer's Resources (19-20 funds) - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.11.6399.00.121.30.000


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: As a part of Balanced Literacy, students will produce authentic writing daily within and across contentareas.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased writing skills and fourth grade writing STAAR scores.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, CIS, principalsTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and math


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: Teachers will implement CFA 2.0 including high impact strategies (collaboration, close reading, GradualRelease Model, Accountable Talk) that promote rigor and thinking at high cognitive levels in all PK-5 classrooms.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased writing skills and fourth grade writing STAAR scores.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CIS, Teacher LeadersTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1 - Student Learning 3






Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Student LearningProblem Statement 3: 62% of the 4th grade students met the Approaching standard for Writing with 6% at Mastered level for STAAR 17 -18.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM


Performance Objective 5: By June 2021, 60% of special education students in grade 3-5 will score at the approaching level in the STAAR Reading Test.

Evaluation Data Sources: STAAR Results, MAP Data, Curriculum Unit Assessments

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Teachers will administer an F & P assessment to all special educations students at the beginning and end ofthe year to make instructional decisions. Struggling (2 grades below) readers will also be assessed every nine weeks.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers will have specific reading data about every student to help informreading instruction.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: special education teachersTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 5


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: Teachers will implement 4 Components of balanced Literacy weekly in every classroom.A. Read AloudB Shared ReadingC. Guided/Small group (based on F&P, MAP, Running Records), D. Independent Reading

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased learning and improved reading fluency and comprehension skills.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: special education teachersTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 5


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: Students will have access to challenging texts on a daily basis.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased learning and improved reading fluency and comprehension skills.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Special education teachersTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 1, 5





Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Student LearningProblem Statement 1: Reading STAAR scores for all students for the past 5 years are trending down from 88% (14-15) to 84% (15-16) to 81% (16-17), to 82% (17-18), and79% in 18-19, the ELL student group in grades 3 and 5 scored below the grade level average.Problem Statement 5: 43% of 3rd grade, 50% of 4th grade and 70% of 5th grade special education students scored at the approaching level on the STAAR Reading test.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Goal 2: Killeen ISD will recruit, retain, and develop excellent, creative educators to maximize student achievement.

Performance Objective 1: During the 2020-21 school year, 100% of the grade level and department PLC teams will participate in staff development that isaligned with building and district goals.

Evaluation Data Sources: District and campus Coaching Walks, Walk throughs, Walkabouts,

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Grade level teams will meet weekly with a focused agenda to address school/district goals, instructionalstrategies, common assessments, and other topics based on improving student learning.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers and grade levels will use lesson plans that are aligned to the TEKSResource System curriculum and state standards, resulting in increased student learning.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Grade Level/Department MembersTEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: The campus will provide professional development to develop improvement on Essential Questions; acommon understanding of quality instruction and strategies to promote student thinking at higher levels, alignment/IFDstudy.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers will demonstrate improved instructional skills.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: PrincipalsTEA Priorities: Recruit, support, retain teachers and principals, Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: The Leadership Team will conduct KISD required Coaching Walks to collect data on progress towardsimplementation of the Gradual Release instructional model and instructional practices that improve learning for allstudents including at-risk, special education, ELL, and low socioeconomic students. Take appropriate action on datacollected.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Feedback will be provided that increases teacher knowledge and skills.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, CISTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Student Learning 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Funding Sources: ELAR Professional Development for teachers of ELL Students - 263 - ESEA, Title III Part A - 263.13.6411.LE.121.25.000 - $0



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 4 Details ReviewsStrategy 4: Professional development opportunities will focus on strengthening ELAR, improving collaboration,increase the complexity of student thinking and classroom tasks, and address best practices in literacy for teachers ofidentified GT, identified ELL and at-risk students in Professional Learning Communities. Professional development forteachers of ELL students will focus on the unique needs of those learners.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: PD will be shared with support team members and implemented as neededon campusStaff Responsible for Monitoring: Campus LeadershipTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Recruit, support, retain teachers and principals,Build a foundation of reading and mathProblem Statements: Demographics 1 - Student Learning 1, 5Funding Sources: Professional Development for Title I teachers - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.13.6299.OL.121.30.000 - $0, Writing Professional (Empowering Writers On-site Coaches) for teachers of atrisk students - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.13.6299.00.121.30.AR0 - $15,750, Online registration for teachers of atrisk students - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.13.6299.OL.121.30.AR0, Professional development books for teachersof ESL students - 165/ES0 - ELL - 165.13.6329.00.121.25.ES0 - $2,427, Professional books for book studies andteacher professional growth (19-20 funds) - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.13.6329.00.121.30.000, Professionaldevelopment for teachers of ESL students - 165/ES0 - ELL - 165.13.6239.OL.121.25.ES0 - $125, Registration,Expenses for teachers of at risk students - 166 - State Comp Ed - 166.13.6411.00.121.30.AR0, ProfessionalDevelopment for Title I teachers - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.13.6411.00.121.30.000 - $0, Professionaldevelopment for teachers of ESL students - 165/ES0 - ELL - 165.13.6411.00.121.25.ES0 - $517.50


Strategy 5 Details ReviewsStrategy 5: The campus will provide teacher planning/collaboration time during district professional development daysand PLC's for unit planning and grade level/department learning.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Teachers and grade levels will use lesson plans that are aligned to the TEKSResource System curriculum and state standards.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CIS, principalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 - TEA Priorities: Recruit, support, retain teachers and principalsProblem Statements: Demographics 1






Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Student LearningProblem Statement 1: Reading STAAR scores for all students for the past 5 years are trending down from 88% (14-15) to 84% (15-16) to 81% (16-17), to 82% (17-18), and79% in 18-19, the ELL student group in grades 3 and 5 scored below the grade level average.Problem Statement 2: 78% of the 5th grade students met the Approaching standard for Science with 19% of the total and 100% of GT students at Mastered level for STAAR18-19.Problem Statement 3: 62% of the 4th grade students met the Approaching standard for Writing with 6% at Mastered level for STAAR 17 -18.Problem Statement 4: Twenty-nine percent of Mountain View students in grades 3-5 and 83% of GT students scored at the Mastered Level on the STAAR math assessment.Problem Statement 5: 43% of 3rd grade, 50% of 4th grade and 70% of 5th grade special education students scored at the approaching level on the STAAR Reading test.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Goal 3: Killeen ISD will engage all stakeholders in the work of developing lifelong learners through positive, collaborative relationships and meaningfulcommunication.

Performance Objective 1: Ninety percent of parents will feel that that there is adequate communication with their child's teacher(s) and are encouraged tobe involved at Mountain View.

Evaluation Data Sources: Parent survey, Parent Advisory feedback, SBDM agendas and minutes

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: The campus will conduct monthly Parent Advisory Committee meetings.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased engagement of parents in the learning process.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: PrincipalTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 3.2Problem Statements: Perceptions 2


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: The campus will develop and communicate common standards for parent/teacher communication (Tuesdayfolders, planners/daily folders, websites).

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increased parent communication between home and school.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Classroom Teachers, PrincipalsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 3.2Problem Statements: Perceptions 2


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: The campus will conduct parent teacher conference contact (phone as a last resort) between October 1st andthe 16th and prior to Spring Break ( no later than March 6th) for students struggling and students at risk of failure.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Initiate and Maintain parent communication.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, counselorsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 3.2Problem Statements: Perceptions 2


Strategy 4 Details ReviewsStrategy 4: Each grade level will offer a virtual "open house" presentation to parents during the month of September.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Initiate and maintain parent communication.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Grade level, team leadersTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 3.1, 3.2Problem Statements: Perceptions 2Funding Sources: Light Refreshments for September Parent meeting - 211/PAR - ESEA, Title I ParentInvolvement - 211.61.6499.00.121.24.PAR - $161.67



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 5 Details ReviewsStrategy 5: Parent Liaison will coordinate volunteers and plan Title I and ELL parent/family educational opportunities(Grade level curriculum, grading procedures, Assessment results, grade level ELAR and math strategies, and parentresources).

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Increase volunteers and increase perceptions about communication andinvolvement.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principal, CIS, CounselorsTitle I Schoolwide Elements: 3.1, 3.2Problem Statements: Perceptions 2Funding Sources: Parenting Conscious Discipline Training for Parent Liaison - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.13.6299.OL.121.30.000 - $0, Materials/instructional supplies for families of ELL students. - 263 - ESEA,Title III Part A - 263.61.6399.LE.121.25.000 - $1,425, Parent Liaison - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.61.6129.00.121.30.000 - $13,098, Materials/Books for parents and families of Title I students - 211/PAR -ESEA, Title I Parent Involvement - 211.61.6329.00.121.24.PAR - $1,086.33, Materials/Supplies for parent andfamily workshops - 211/PAR - ESEA, Title I Parent Involvement - 211.61.6399.00.121.24.PAR - $962, ParentingConscious Discipline Training for Parent Liaison - 211 - ESEA, Title I Part A - 211.61.6411.00.121.30.000 - $0, Light Refreshments for February Math Night - 211/PAR - ESEA, Title I Parent Involvement - 211.61.6499.00.121.24.PAR




PerceptionsProblem Statement 2: Spring 2020 survey results indicated 12% of our parents do not feel they have adequate communication with their child's teacher and 6% do not feelparents and guardians are encouraged to be actively involved in their child's education.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Goal 4: Killeen ISD will provide a safe and healthy learning environment, and identify and address social, emotional, and behavioral distractors; therebyimproving student achievement.

Performance Objective 1: By June 2021, 90% of the students report they feel emotionally and physically safe at school as measured by a student survey.

Evaluation Data Sources: Student survey

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: Teachers will conduct daily "Morning Meetings" campus-wide. The Morning Meetings provide a powerfulteaching model for building community, increasing student investment, decreasing bullying, and improving academicand social skills for students.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Improved feeling of student belonging and sense of classroom and schoolcommunity as well as, a decrease in student misbehavior.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, teachersProblem Statements: Perceptions 1


Strategy 2 Details ReviewsStrategy 2: Students will participate in PE and meet the required number of minutes of movement activities each day.Physical Education Teachers will utilize sound instructional strategies that promote health and fitness as targeted by thestandard of Teks Resources. Each student has 90 minutes of physical education weekly with highly qualified teachers.Each child has 15 minutes of lunch recess . Healthy habits instruction are promoted by all teachers and programs.Physical Fitness testing, Jump Rope For Heart are also offered throughout the year.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Compliance with state and KISD rules and regulations.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Teachers, principals


Strategy 3 Details ReviewsStrategy 3: Students will practice safety drills monthly.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Compliance with state and KISD rules and regulations.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals


Strategy 4 Details ReviewsStrategy 4: Campus leadership will monitor behavioral referrals, attendance, and provide interventions throughbehavior plans and the RtI process.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Reduction in office referrals and student misbehavior.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals, Counselors, TeachersProblem Statements: School Processes & Programs 1 - Perceptions 1



Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Strategy 5 Details ReviewsStrategy 5: Counselors will integrate bully prevention strategies into regular classroom instruction and weeklyclassroom guidance. Counselors will also provide targeted guidance sessions for anti-bullying strategies Incidents ofsuspected bullying will be investigated and reported per KISD and state policies.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Improved feeling of student belonging and sense of classroom and schoolcommunity as well as, a decrease in student misbehavior.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: CounselorsProblem Statements: School Processes & Programs 1 - Perceptions 1


Strategy 6 Details ReviewsStrategy 6: Staff will receive training in Conscious Discipline, Response to Intervention procedures, and school-wideprocedures/expectations will be offered. The campus will also provide ongoing learning (School Family Assemblies)and implementation during the school year.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Staff will maintain their calm and composure when dealing with studentmisbehavior.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Counselors, Teachers, Principals. CISProblem Statements: School Processes & Programs 1 - Perceptions 1




School Processes & ProgramsProblem Statement 1: Forty-three students had two or more serious referrals and 37% (16 students) of those students did not have a Student Success Plan, 504 or IEP BehaviorPlans.

PerceptionsProblem Statement 1: There was a 67% increase in discipline referrals from 2016 to 2019.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

Goal 5: Killeen ISD will effectively and efficiently manage district resources and operations to maximize learning opportunities for all students and staff.

Performance Objective 1: By June 2021, the Mountain View SBDM Team will monitor progress toward goals and management of resources andoperations to ensure maximum efficiency and effectiveness throughout the 2020-21 school year,

Evaluation Data Sources: SBDM AgendasSBDM Minutes

Strategy 1 Details ReviewsStrategy 1: SBDM will meet monthly focusing on campus goals and allocation of resources.

Strategy's Expected Result/Impact: Involvement of all stakeholders in the educational process on campus.Staff Responsible for Monitoring: Principals,Problem Statements: School Processes & Programs 2




School Processes & ProgramsProblem Statement 2: During the 2019-20 school year, Mountain View was 100% compliant or successful in all budgetary areas. We need to maintain this success rate.


Campus #121March 12, 2021 1:08 PM

generated by plan4learning.com 24 of 49

Documents