fuzzy-control
DESCRIPTION
Fuzzy-Control. Control System Design. plant model. Implementation. Modeling. Controller. Fuzzy- Control. control law. controller design. model. Plant. process. Fuzzy-Control versus classical Control. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Fuzzy-Control
![Page 2: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Control System Design
model
process Plant
plant model
Modeling
controllaw
controllerdesign
Controller
Implementation
Fuzzy-Control
![Page 3: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Fuzzy-Control versus classical Control
Fuzzy controllers are nonlinear state space controllers with no internal dynamics
Control loop contains additional dynamic transfer elements for integration and differentation (PID- fuzzy control)
The dynamic behavior of a fuzzy controller is not different from a classical controller
The main difference is the representation of the controller (parametrization) and therefore the design methodology Classic: model based Fuzzy: knowledge based
![Page 4: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Pros and Cons Classical control
Systematic design Stability and quality specifications are implictly met Model uncertainties and disturbance are rejected by
means of robust control design Fuzzy control
Heuristic design No guarantee of stability Controller is transparent and comprehensible State space controller requires observer, observer
requires state space model, therefore why not directly classical control design
![Page 5: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Fuzzy ControlFuzzy control makes sense if ... there is no system model in form of differential equations (e.g. behavior based robotics, due to environment) the plant is highly nonlinear which complicates or prevents classical control design methods control objectives are vague and imprecise, e.g. smooth switching of an automatic gear box plant and control strategy are so simple that fuzzy control design requires less time and effort than classical control design
![Page 6: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Types of Uncertainty
Stochastic uncertainty example: rolling a dice
Linguistic uncertainty examples : low price, tall people, young age
Informational uncertainty example : credit worthiness, honesty
![Page 7: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Classical Setyoung = { x P | age(x) 20 }
characteristic function:
young(x) = 1 : age(x) 200 : age(x) > 20
A=“young”
x [years]
young(x)1
0
{
![Page 8: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Fuzzy SetClassical Logic
Element x belongs to set Aor it does not:
(x){0,1}
A=“young”
x [years]
A(x)1
0
Fuzzy Logic
Element x belongs to set Awith a certaindegree of membership:
(x)[0,1]
A=“young”
x [years]
A(x)1
0
![Page 9: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Fuzzy Set
Fuzzy Set A = {(x, A(x)) : x X, A(x) [0,1]} • a universe of discourse X : 0 x 100• a membership function A : X [0,1]
A=“young”
x [years]
A(x)1
0
=0.8
x=23
Definition :
![Page 10: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Fuzzy set vs. Probabilty U ist the set of nontoxic liquids
Bottle A belongs to U with probability p=0.9 Bottle B belongs to U with degree of membership =0.9 A has the property „non toxic“ either completely with
p=0.9 or not all (toxic) with p=0.1. B has the property „non toxic“ to a high degree (almost
non-toxic)
A B
( ) 0.9p A U ( ) 0.9U B
![Page 11: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Representation of Fuzzy Sets elementwise specifikation of membership degree
discrete base set
Fuzzy set
definition via membership functions Base set X has values in a continuous range Fuzzy-set is a real-valued scalar function with
values in the unit interval
1 1{( , ( )), ,( , ( )))n nx x x x
1{ , , }nX x x
![Page 12: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Types of Membership Functions
x
(x)1
0 a b c d
Trapezoid: <a,b,c,d>
x
(x)1
0
Gaussian: N(m,s)
m
s
x
(x)1
0 a b
Singleton: (a,1) and (b,0.5)
x
(x)1
0 a b d
Triangular: <a,b,b,d>
![Page 13: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Parametrization of Fuzzy-Sets
Triangular functions
Trapezoidal functions
Bell-shaped functions
, ,
falls
: [0,1], falls0 sonst
a b c
x a a x bb ac xx b x cc b
', ', ', '
' ' '' '1 ' ': [0,1], ' ' '' '0
a b c d
x a falls a x bb a
falls b x cxd x falls c x dd c
sonst
2
, 2( ): [0,1], expm sx mx
s
![Page 14: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Classical truth values for conjunction, disjunction, implication and negation
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 00 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
[ ] [ ]1 00 1
Konjunktion Disjunktion Implikation
Negation
![Page 15: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Truth value functions Restriction: The fuzzy truth value should coincide
with the classical truth values for arguments restricted to the binary inputs 0 and 1.
Example: truth value functions conjunction disjunktion negation Lukasiewicz-Implication
Gödel-Implication
( , ) min{ , }w ( , ) max{ , }w ( ) 1w
( , ) min{1 ,1}w
1( , ) ifwotherwise
![Page 16: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Definition t-Norm
( 1) ( , ) ( , )( 2) ( ( , ), ) ( , ( , ))( 3) Aus folgt ( , ) ( , )( 4) ( ,1)
T t tT t t t tT t tT t
Definition: A function t : [0, 1]2 [0, 1] is called t-Norm (triangular norm), if it complies with the axioms (T1) – (T4).
Monotonic
KommutativityAssociativity
Truth value functions for conjunction
![Page 17: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Examples for t-NormTruth value function t(, ) = min{, } for conjunction
additional t-norms
Lukasiewicz-t-norm: ( , ) max{ 1,0}algebraic product: ( , )
0 1 { , }drastic product: ( , ) min{ , } otherwise
tt
ift
( 1) min( , ) min( , )( 2) min(min( , ), ) min( ,min( , ))( 3) Aus folgt min( , ) min( , )( 4) min( ,1)
TTTT
![Page 18: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Extension Principle
For arbitrary functions f:f(A)(y) = max{A(x) | y=f(x)}
f
x
A(x)
y
f(A
)(y)
Assume a fuzzy set A and a function f:How does the fuzzy set f(A) look like?
f
x
A(x)
y
f(A
)(y)
max
![Page 19: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Operators on Fuzzy SetsUnion
x
1
0
AB(x)=min{A(x),B(x)}A(x) B(x)
x
1
0
AB(x)=max{A(x),B(x)}A(x) B(x)
Intersection
x
1
0
AB(x)=A(x) B(x)A(x) B(x)
x
1
0
AB(x)=min{1,A(x)+B(x)}A(x) B(x)
![Page 20: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Complement
Negation: A(x)= 1 - A(x)
AA(x) 1AA(x) 0
Classical law does not always hold:
Example : A(x) = 0.6 A(x) = 1 - A(x) = 0.4AA(x) = max(0.6,0.4) = 0.6 1 AA(x) = min(0.6,0.4) = 0.4 0
![Page 21: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Fuzzy Relations
classical relation R : X x Y defined by R(x,y) = 1 if (x,y) R
0 if (x,y) R
|{fuzzy relationR : X x Y defined by R(x,y) [0,1]
R(x,y) describes to which degree x and y are relatedIt can also be interpreted as the truth value of the proposition x R y
![Page 22: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Fuzzy Relations
X = { rainy, cloudy, sunny }Y = { swimming, bicycling, camping, reading }
X/Y swimming bicycling camping reading rainycloudysunny
0.0 0.2 0.0 1.00.0 0.8 0.3 0.31.0 0.2 0.7 0.0
Example:
![Page 23: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Fuzzy Sets & Linguistic VariablesA linguistic variable combines several fuzzy sets.
linguistic variable : temperaturelinguistics terms (fuzzy sets) : { cold, warm, hot }
x [C]
(x)1
0
cold warm hot
6020
![Page 24: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Fuzzy Rules
causal dependencies can be expressed in form of if-then-rules
general form:if <antecedent> then <consequence>
example:if temperature is cold and oil is cheap
then heating is high
![Page 25: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
if temperature is cold and oil price is low then heating is high
if temperature is hot and oil price is normal then heating is low
Fuzzy Rule Base Temperature :
cold warm hotOil price:
cheap
normal
expensive
high high medium
high medium low
medium low low
Heating
![Page 26: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
fuzzy knowledge base
Fuzzy Data-Base:Definition of linguistic input and output variables
Definition of fuzzy membership functions
Fuzzy Knowledge Base
Fuzzy Rule-Base:if temperature is cold and oil price is cheap
then heating is high….
x [C]
(x)1
0
cold warm hot
6020
![Page 27: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Schema of a Fuzzy Decision
Fuzzification Inference Defuzzification
t
cold warm hot
measuredtemperature
0.2
0.7
if temp is cold then valve is open
if temp is warm then valve is half
if temp is hot then valve is close
rule-base
cold =0.7
warm =0.2
hot =0.0
v
open half close
crisp outputfor valve-setting
0.2
0.7
![Page 28: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Fuzzification
t
1
0
cold(t)=0.5
If temperature is cold ...
15C p
1
0
cheap(p)=0.3
and oil is cheap ...
$13/barrel
0.5 0.3
Determine degree of membership for each term of an input variable :
temperature : t=15 C oilprice : p=$13/barrel
1. Fuzzification
![Page 29: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Fuzzy Combination2. Combine the terms in one degree of fulfillment for the entire antecedent by fuzzy AND: min-operator
ante = min{cold(t), cheap(p)} = min{0.5,0.3} = 0.3
t
1
0
cold(t)=0.5
if temperatur is cold ...
15C p
1
0
cheap(p)=0.3
and oil is cheap ...
$13/barrel
0.5 0.3
![Page 30: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Fuzzy Inference3. Inference step: Apply the degree of membership of the antecedent to the consequent of the rule
high(h)
... then heating is high
consequent(h)
h
1
0ante =0.3...
h
1
0
high(h)
ante =0.3...
consequent(h)
min-inference:cons. = min{ante , high }
prod-inference: cons. = ante • high
![Page 31: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Fuzzy Aggregation
h
1
0
... then heating is high
... then heating is medium
... then heating is low
4. Aggregation: Aggregate all the rules consequents using the max-operator for union
![Page 32: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Defuzzification5. Determine crisp value from output membership function for example using “Center of Gravity”-method:
h
1
0
consequent(h) COG
73
![Page 33: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Mamdani-ControlerMamdani-Regler is based on a finite set of If-Then-Rules R of the form
(1) ( )1R : Ifi s and ... and is
then is .n
R n R
R
x xy
inputs: x1,...,xnoutputs: y
The fuzzy sets R(i) are often associated with linguisticterms, e.g. vague concepts such as „roughly zero“, „medium large“„negative small “.Fuzzy sets and linguistic terms are often synomously.
![Page 34: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Mamdani-Controller Rules = {R1,...,Rr} can be interpreted as
piecewise, defined, imprecise function
1 1 1(1) ( )
1
1(1) ( )
1
( ,..., )r r r
nR R n R
nn
R R n R
falls x und und xf x x
falls x und und x
![Page 35: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Mamdani-Controller For a crisp input vector (a1,...,an) over the input
variables (x1,...,xn) the resulting output fuzzy set is
Fuzzy set can be interpreted as a fuzzy relation across the product space X1 x ... x Xn and Y
Fuzzy set ,a1,...,an corresponds to the image of the one-element set {(a1,...,an)} under the fuzzy relation .
1, ,..., 1: [0,1], ( ,..., , )
n
outputa a nY y a a yR R
![Page 36: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Mamdani-Controller projection of the crisp input x1 onto output y Rule base = {R1,R2,R3}, Ri : if x is Ai then y is Bi
1,
1
: [0,1]( , )
outputx Y
y x yR
R
: [0,1]
( , ) ( , )X Y
x y x yR
R
![Page 37: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Defuzzifizication Center of gravity (COG)
Center of output fuzzy sets
Center of singletons
1
1
, ,...,
, ,...,
n
n
outputR R a a R
s outputR R a a
yy
( ) ( )
outputs
output
y y dyy
y dy
i i i i
si i i
AcyA
y
1
0
y
10
COG
ys
y
1
0 y1 y2 y3ys
ys
![Page 38: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Defuzzification Mean of maxima (MOM)
Centroid of largest (COL)
y'
y'
(y)=max { (y')}
(y)=max { (y')}
s
y dyy
dyy
10
MOM
ys
y
10
COL
ys
COG
![Page 39: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Defuzzification If X is A then Y is A´ If X is B then Y is B´
x
1
0
A B
y
1
0
A´ B´
Mean of maximaCenter of gravity
![Page 40: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Fuzzy Toolbox
![Page 41: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Fuzzy Toolbox
![Page 42: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Fuzzy Toolbox
![Page 43: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Fuzzy Toolbox
![Page 44: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Mamdani-Fuzzy Controler Tank
u
oh
2ghu o uh KA A A
valve
tank
tank:
max[0, ]h hSaturation
0
x kwu C x
valve:
max[0, ]x xSaturation
w
C0
![Page 45: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Water Level Control
Fuzzy Toolbox: Tank Level Control
Inputs Level error Change of error
Output Change of valve position
Nonlinear system
![Page 46: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Fuzzy-PD-Regler
![Page 47: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Fuzzy-PD-Regler : Linguistische Variablen
Wasserstand h
Änderung des Wasserstand dh/dt
Ventilstellung u
![Page 48: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Fuzzy-PD-Regler : RegelbasisIf (level is okay) then (valve is no change)If (level is low) then (valve is open fast)If (level is high) then (valve is close fast)If (level is okay) and (rate is positive) then (valve is close
slow)If (level is okay) and (rate is negative) then (valve is open
slow)
![Page 49: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Controler Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Controler are based on rules of
the form
rule premise is identical to Mamdani controlers rule conclusion is a crisp (linear) function of the
inputs The rule conclusion is a local model of the input-
output relationship in the region defined by the rule premise
in intermediate regions the output results from interpolation between the individual regions (gain scheduling)
(1) ( )1 1: Ifi s and is then ( ,..., )n
R n R R nR x x y f x x
1
1
, ,..., 1
, ,...,
( ,..., )n
n
R R a a R n
R R a a
f x xy
![Page 50: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler TSK-controler often employ linear functions in the conclusion
Gain-Scheduling An verschiedenen Arbeitspunkten wird ein lineares Modell
der Strecke gebildet, bsw. durch Linearisierung um den Arbeitspunkt.
Für jeden Arbeitspunkt wird aufgrund des dort gültigen lokalen linearen Modells ein linearer Regler entworfen.
Im laufenden Betrieb wird dann je nach Arbeitspunkt zwischen den verschiedenen Reglern bzw. Reglerparametern hin- und hergeschaltet.
Um sprungförmige Änderungen der Eingangsgröße zu vermeiden, erfolgt der Übergang vom alten zum neuen Regler möglichst stetig.
(1) ( )1 0 1 1: is and is then ...n
R n R n nR If x x y a a x a x
![Page 51: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler Input X : {very low, low, high, very high} Non-overlapping input sets
Rules: If X is very low then y=x If X is low then y=1 If X is high then y=x-2 If X is very high then y=3
![Page 52: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler Non overlapping input fuzzy sets
Exact representation of local models
![Page 53: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler input X : {very low, low, high, very high} Overlapping input fuzzy sets
rules: If X is very low then y=x If X is low then y=1 If X is high then y=x-2 If X is very high then y=3
![Page 54: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler Interpolation between local linear models
y=x
y=1
y=3y=x-2
![Page 55: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler Lineare TSK-Regler
ki(z(t)) sei der Wahrheitswert der Prämisse der i-ten Regel für die Eingangsgröße z(t)
Normierung der Wahrheitswerte
Die Ausgangsgröße u des TSK-Reglers ergibt sich aus der mit ki gewichteten Überlagerung der Ausgangsgrößen Fix der einzelnen Regler.
(1) ( )1: is and is thenn
i R n R iR If z z u F x
( ( )) 1ii
k z t
( ( ))i ii
u k z t F x
![Page 56: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler TSK-Modelle lassen sich auch zur Modellierung einer Strecke
heranziehen. Für das Zustandsmodell ergibt sich
Für einen geschlossenen Kreis ohne äußere Anregung ergibt sich als TSK-Modell
Reduktion auf einen Index l mit Hilfe von
ergibt für den geschlossenen Kreis
( ) ( ( ))[ ( ) ( )]i i ii
x t k z t A x t B u t
( ) ( ( )) ( ( ))[ ] ( )i j i i ji j
x t k z t k z t A B F x t
( ( )) ( ( )) ( ( ))l i i j
l i j
A A B F
k z t k z t k z t
( ) ( ( )) ( )l ll
x t k z t A x t
![Page 57: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Positiv und negativ definite Matrizen
Eine Matrix A ist positiv definit wenn für alle x gilt
xT A x > 0
Eine Matrix A ist negativ definit wenn für alle x gilt
xT A x < 0
![Page 58: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Stabilitätssatz für kontinuierliche TSK-Systeme
Gegeben sei ein kontinuierliches System in der Form
Dieses System besitzt eine globale, asymptotisch stabile Ruhelage x=0, wenn eine gemeinsame, positiv definite Matrix P für alle Teilsysteme A existiert so dass die Matrix
für alle l negativ definit (Ml<0) ist.
Die Frage nach der Existenz einer solchen Matrix P lässt sich in ein LMI-Problem (Lineare Matrix Ungleichung) überführen, für welches effiziente Lösungsalgorithmen bereitstehen, so dass die Frage der Stabilität des Systems auf einfachem Wege beantwortet werden kann.
( ) ( ( )) ( )l ll
x t k z t A x t
Tl l lM A P PA
![Page 59: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Linearisiere das nichtlinearen Modell
an den Arbeitspunkten =-0.7, =-0.3, =0.0, =0.3, =0.7
2( ) cos sinM m x bx ml ml F 2( ) sin cosI ml mgl mlx
![Page 60: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Entwerfe mit der Methode der Polplatzierung Zustandsregler für die linearisierten Modelle
Partitioniere Eingangsvariable durch dreieckige Fuzzy-Zugehörigkeitsfunktion, deren Schwerpunkte gerade den Arbeitspunkten entsprechen.
Für jeden Arbeitspunkt beschreibe die Zustandsrückführung als TSK-Regel.
Bilde den gesamten TSK-Fuzzy-Regler aus der Überlagerung (Gain-Scheduling) der Regeln an den verschiedenen Arbeitspunkten.
![Page 61: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Linearisierung um =0>> [A,B,C,D]=linmod('cart_pole');>> k=acker(A,B,[-2, -2, -1+i, -1-i])
k =
-20.7185 -4.8438 -0.5578 -1.1156 TSK-Regel
1 2 3 4if is zero then
if is zero then 20.7 4.8 0.55 1.11
F k k k x k x
F x x
![Page 62: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Gleichgewichtzustand für =0.4>> x=[0.4; 0; 0; 0];>> ix=[1];>> dx=[0; 0; 0; 0];>> idx=[1; 2];>> [x, u, y, dx]=trim('cart_pole',x,[],[],ix,[],[],dx,idx) x= [0.4 0 0 0] u=4.5557 dx=[0 0 0 4.14]
![Page 63: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Linearisierung um Gleichgewichtszustand für =0.4>> [A,B,C,D]=linmod('cart_pole‚x,u);>> k=acker(A,B,[-2, -2, -1+i, -1-i])k = -23.5848 -5.2528 -0.5195 -1.0390
TSK-Regeln
0 1 2 3 4if is ... then
if is pos. small then 4.55 23.5 5.25 0.51 1.03
if is neg. small then 4.55 23.5 5.25 0.51 1.03
F k k k k x k x
F x x
F x x
![Page 64: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Gleichgewichtzustand für =0.7>> x=[0.7; 0; 0; 0];>> ix=[1];>> dx=[0; 0; 0; 0];>> idx=[1; 2];>> [x, u, y, dx]=trim('cart_pole',x,[],[],ix,[],[],dx,idx) x= [0.7 0 0 0] u=9.0799 dx=[0 0 0 8.25]
![Page 65: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
Takagi-Sugeno-Kang-Regler-Entwurf
Linearisierung um Gleichgewichtszustand für =0.7>> [A,B,C,D]=linmod('cart_pole‚x,u);>> k=acker(A,B,[-2, -2, -1+i, -1-i])k = -31.6989 -6.2897 -0.4396 -0.8792 TSK-Regeln
0 1 2 3 4if is ... then
if is pos. large then 9.08 31.69 6.28 0.44 0.88
if is neg. large then 9.08 31.69 6.28 0.44 0.88
F k k k k x k x
F x x
F x x
![Page 66: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
TSK-Regelbasis
![Page 67: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
TSK-Kennfeld
![Page 68: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
Logikbasierte Regler Mamdani-Regler interpretieren Fuzzy-Regeln als stückweise definierte unscharfe Funktionen. Logikbasierte Regler interpretieren Fuzzy-Regeln im Sinne von logischen Implikationen. Betrachte Regeln mit nur einer Eingangs-Fuzzy-Menge if x is then y is Wie beim Mamdani-Regler, ergibt sich als Ausgabe-Fuzzy- Menge exakt die Fuzzy-Menge , wenn der Eingangswert x einen Zugehörigkeitsgrad von Eins zur Fuzzy-Menge aufweist. Im Gegensatz zum Mamdani-Regler wird die Ausgabe-Fuzzy-Menge jedoch umso größer, je schlechter die Prämisse zutrifft, d. h. je geringer der Wert (x) wird.
![Page 69: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
69
Logikbasierte Regler Im Extremfall (x) = 0 erhalten wir als Ausgabe die Fuzzy-Menge, die konstant Eins ist. Der Mamdani-Regler würde hier die Fuzzy-Menge, die konstant Null ist, liefern. Bei einem logikbasierten Regler sollte die Ausgabe-Fuzzy-Menge daher als Menge der noch möglichen Werte interpretiert werden. Wenn die Prämisse überhaupt nicht zutrifft ((x) = 0), kann auf- grund der Regel nichts geschlossen werden und alle Ausgabe- werte sind möglich. Trifft die Regel zu 100 % zu ((x) = 1), so sind nur noch die Werte aus der (unscharfen) Menge zulässig.
![Page 70: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
70
Logikbasierte Regler Eine einzelne Regel liefert daher jeweils eine Einschränkung aller noch möglichen Werte. Da alle Regeln als korrekt (wahr) angesehen werden, müssen alle durch die Regeln vorgegebenen Einschränkungen erfüllt sein, d. h. die resultierenden Fuzzy-Mengen aus den Einzelregeln müssen im Gegensatz zum Mamdani-Regler miteinander geschnitten werden.
![Page 71: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
71
Logikbasierte ReglerSind r Regeln der Form
1 : Ifi s , then is ( 1,..., )iR RR x y v i r
vorgegeben, ist die Ausgabe-Fuzzy-Menge bei einem logikbasierten Regler daher bei der Eingabe x = a
{1,..., }out, logic: min ., i iR Ri r
Y a y vR a
Hierbei muss noch die Wahrheitswertfunktion der Implikation festgelegt werden. Mit der Gödel-Implikation erhalten wir ( ) falls ( ) ( )
1 sonst,i i i
i
R R RR i R
v y v y aa y v
während die Lukasiewicz-Implikation zumin{1 ( ) ( ),1}
i i i iR R R Ra y v v y a führt.
![Page 72: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
72
Fuzzy Gütemasse zur Regleroptimierung
Optimierungs-verfahren
Fuzzy-güte-
anforderungen
StreckeLinearer
dynamischerRegler
Stellgröße : u
skalaresGütemass
Regelgröße : y(t)Führungsgröße : w(t)
Regler-Parameter {K,Tn, Tv}
Regelgröße : y
w
-+
e
![Page 73: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
73
Genetisches Fuzzy System
EvolutionärerAlgorithmus
Bewertungs-Schema
StreckeFuzzy Regler
F: e u
Stellgröße : u
Gütemass
Regelgröße : yFührungsgröße : w
Fuzzy-RegelnFuzzy-Mengen
Regelgröße : y
w
-+
e
![Page 74: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
74
Traditionelle KI Robotik
Beschränkungen des SMPA-Ansatzes Unsicherheiten in der Sensorik und den
Aktuatoren Unvollständiges Wissen über die Umgebung Fehlende Rückkopplung während der
Ausführung
Wahr-nehmen
Modell-ieren Planen Handeln
Wahrnehmung Kartierung Wegplanung Ausführung
![Page 75: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
75
Verhaltensbasierte Robotik Keine explizite Modellierung der Umgebung Körperlichkeit und Situiertheit Enge Kopplung zwischen Wahrnehmung und Handeln Ein primitives Verhalten implementiert eine
Regelung für eine spezifische Teilaufgabe Das Gesamtverhalten erwächst aus der Integration
und Wechselwirkung der primitiven Verhalten
Wahrnehmung
Handeln
![Page 76: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
76
Verhaltensbasierte Robotik mit Fuzzy-Reglern
Hindernisvermeidung If obstacle is close and obstacle is left then turn right If obstacle is close and obstacle is right then turn left If obstacle is close and obstacle is ahead then turn
sharp left If obstacle is far then turn zero
Zielpunktansteuerung If goal is far and goal is left turn left If goal is ahead turn zero If goal is far and goal is right turn right If goal is near turn zero
![Page 77: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
77
Hierarchische Verhaltensbasierte Architekturen
Wandfolgen
Türpassieren
Zielpunktansteuern
Hindernis-vermeidung
NavigationManipulation
reichen
greifenabstellen
…
primitive Verhalten
koordinierende Verhalten
![Page 78: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
78
Kontextabhängiges Überlagern von Verhaltensweisen
schlichtende Fuzzy-Regeln aktivieren oder deaktivieren Verhalten anhand des aktuellen Kontext
if obstacle-close then obstacle-avoidance if obstacle-far then go-to-target
fusionierende Fuzzy-Regeln kombinieren die Präferenzen für Handlungen der aktiven Verhalten
kombiniere Handlungen kombiniere Präferenzen1(a)
a2(a)
a1
a2
a1+2
1(a)
2(a) a1 2
![Page 79: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
79
Situationsbedingte Fuzzy-Regeln zur Planung
Fuzzy- Plan zur sequentiellen Aktivierung von Verhalten If obstacle then avoid If not obstacle and in(Corr1) and not in(Corr2) then
follow(Corr1) If not obstacle and in(Corr1) and not near(Door2) then
follow(Corr2) If not obstacle and near(Dorr5) and not in(Room5) then
cross(Dorr5) If in(Room5) then still
![Page 80: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
80
Fuzzy Behavior Coordination for Robot Learning from Demonstration
Frank HoffmannUniversity of Dortmund, Germany
![Page 81: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
81
Outline
robotic behaviors based on fuzzy preferences fuzzy obstacle avoidance behavior coordination of multiple behaviors learning behaviors from demonstration
![Page 82: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
82
Learning Robotic Behaviors from Demonstration
human teacher drives robot manually while perception action pairs are recorded
learning task: adapt a collection of robotic behaviors to mimic the demonstrated behavior
problems partially observable decision process credit assignment: Which behavior is
responsible for the observed action? ambiguity of training examples due to
ambigious control actions perceptual aliasing
![Page 83: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
83
Behavior Based Robotics robotic behavior: direct mapping from perceptions to
actions the overall behavior emerges from the cooperation
and coordination of concurrently active primitive behaviors
perception s
response r
![Page 84: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
84
Behavior Coordination and Command Fusion
Behavior coordination is concerned with how to decide which behavior to activate at each moment.
Command fusion is concerned with how to combine the desired actions of multiple behaviors into one command to be sent to the robot‘s actuators.
![Page 85: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
85
Behavior Coordination Mechanismsbehavior
coordinationmechanisms
arbitrationcommand
fusion
priority-based
state-based
winner-take-all
voting super-position
fuzzy multipleobjective
![Page 86: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
86
Fuzzy Behavioral Responses Each behavior states its preferences for all
possible responses instead of a single crisp response r.
Preferences for actions are described by fuzzy sets.
B(r) denotes the desirability of behavior B for executing action r.
B()
heading
preference for a responseB()
crisp response
heading
![Page 87: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
87
Fuzzy Behavior Coordination aggregate preferences for actions of active
behaviors
fuse actions fuse preferences1(a)
a2(a)
a1
a2
a1+2
1(a)
2(a) a1 2a1+2
![Page 88: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
88
Fuzzy Behavior for Obstacle Avoidance
Mapping from perceptions to preferences are described by fuzzy rules. If distance is small then preference is low If distance is large then preference is high
Preference as a function of proximity
1.0
d dmin dmax
D d
![Page 89: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
89
Fuzzy Behavior for Obstacle Avoidance
Preference for a heading depends on distances to obstacles di according to D(di) similarity of heading with obstacle
direction i
1.0
Ddi
K
ilocal perceptual space
![Page 90: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
90
Fuzzy Behavior for Obstacle Avoidance
180° 45° 90° 135°
1.0
180° 45° 90° 135°
1.0
D 2d
D 3d
D 1d
K
( ) min ( )kk
total response
![Page 91: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
91
Priority Based Behavior Coordination of Preferences
behaviors are characterized by activation s (dynamic)
applicability: environmental context desirability: task context
priority (static) behavior coordination mechanism
1.0
d dmin dmax
dos
s1
s2
s3
s4
activationw1
w2
w3
actual strength
min{ ,1 }i i jj i
w s s
1.0
![Page 92: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
92
Priority Based Behavior Coordination of Preferences
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ri
R1
Ri
R2
Ri
R3
1.0
R
( )( ) ii RiR
ii
ww
w1=0.5
w2=0.25
w3=0.25
![Page 93: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
93
Priority based behavior coordination
![Page 94: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
94
Priority based behavior coordination
![Page 95: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
95
Priority based behavior coordination
![Page 96: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
96
Learning Behavioral Responses from Demonstration
training set<st,rt>
behaviors andbehavior
coordination
match preferenceresponse with examples
optimizationscheme (EA, PSO)
i(s,r)
s,r1 s,r2
fitness
behaviorparametersdemonstration
![Page 97: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
97
Criteria for Matching Preferences with Training Examples
Consistency: demonstrated actions rt associated with a perceptual state st should have a high preference i(st,rt) if the behavior is active wi(st)>0 in the context st.
Preferences should be as general as necessary.( , ) ( )( )
i t t i tcon
t i t
s r w sfw s
i(s,r)
s,r1 s,r2
![Page 98: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
98
Criteria for Matching Preferences with Training Examples
Specificity: the preference i(st,r) for actions r that have not been demonstrated in a perceptual state st should be low.
Preferences should be as specific as possible.
i(s,r)
s,r1 s,r2
( , )( ) ( )( )
i t ti t
t i t rspec
i tt
s rw ssf
w s
![Page 99: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
99
Criteria for Matching Preferences with Training Examples Smoothness: similar responses for the same
state should have similar preferences Inherently achieved by fuzzy representation of
behavioral preferences Optimal compromise among all criteria
i(s,r)
s,r1 s,r2
con specff f
![Page 100: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
100
Example
00.5
11.5
2
22.5
33.5
4210
220
230
240
250
260
270
dmindmax
fitne
ss
dmin
d max
0 0.5 1 1.5 22
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
x
200 state-action pairs generated from random distribution of obstacles based on three behaviors
identification of parameters dmin, dmax for obstacle avoidance
original: dmin=1, dmax=3 , fitness=265 PSO optimum: dmin=0.92, dmax=3.76 , fitness=267x
![Page 101: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
101
SimulationOriginal trajectorydmin=10, dmax=20
trajectory with adaptedparametersdmin=12.5, dmax=16
![Page 102: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
102
Conclusions
fuzzy framework for learning robotic behaviors from demonstration
matching of ambigious and uncertain perception action pairs with behavioral responses
evaluation on synthetic datasets
![Page 103: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
103
Preference Responses for ...min
minmin max
max min
max
0 :
( ) :
1D
d dd dd d d d
d dd
(1)
min
min
min
min
1 :
( ) * (1 ) :(1 ( ))( ) ( ) :
( ) * (1 ) :(1 ( ))1 :
kD k
D k
k D k
kD k
D k
a
d a bd
d b c
d c dd
d c
(2)
![Page 104: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
104
Preference Responses for ...( ) min ( )kk
(3)
min
max0 min max
max min
max
1 :
:
0
d dd ds d d d
d dd d
(4)
![Page 105: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
105
Preference Responses for ...min{ ,1 }i i j
j iw s s
(5)
( )( ) ii RiR
ii
ww
(6)
max ( )crisp R (7)
22
( )
max ( )crisp Re d
(8)
![Page 106: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
106
Learning Behavioral Response ...( , ) ( )con i t t i tf s r w s (9)( , ) ( )
( )i t t i t
cont i t
s r w sfw s
(10)
max
min
max min
( , )( )
ri tr
i t r
s r drs
r r
(11)
( , )( ) ( )i t t
spec i ti t r
s rf w ss
(12)
![Page 107: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
107
Learning Behavioral Response ...( , )( ) ( )
( )
i t ti tt
i t rspec
i tt
s rw ssf
w s
(13)
( , ) ( ) ( , )j t t i t i t ti j
m s r w s s r
(14)
![Page 108: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
108
Fuzzy Behavioral Responses Each behavior states its preferences for all
possible responses instead of a crisp response Ri.
Preferences for actions are described by fuzzy sets, where the degree of membership B(R) denotes the desirability of behavior B for executing action R.
B()
obstacle avoidanceB()
goal seeking
![Page 109: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
109
Defuzzifizication Center of gravity (COG)
Mean of maxima (MOM)
Centroid of largest (COL)
( ) ( ) s
y y dyy
y dy y
10
COG
ys
y'
y'
(y)=max { (y')}
(y)=max { (y')}
s
y dyy
dyy
10
MOM
ys
y
10
COL
ys
COG
![Page 110: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
110
Fuzzy Behavior Coordination
fuse preferences
fuse actions
![Page 111: Fuzzy-Control](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081520/56815d52550346895dcb5c63/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
111
Fuzzy Command Fusion defuzzification of multimodal output sets in case
of conflicting preferences might result in “undesirable” control actions
centroid of largest defuzzification operator additional external constraint-based fusion
mechanism segregate rules with mutually exclusive output
recommendations and use winner-takes-all heuristic
COG fails COL ok COL fails