functionalized composite electrodes for electrocatalytic hydrogenation c. m. cirtiu, n.-a. bouchard,...

1
Functionalized Composite Electrodes for Functionalized Composite Electrodes for Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation C . M . Cirtiu , N.-A. Bouchard, H. Oudghiri-Hassani, P. A. Rowntree and H. Ménard Département de Chimie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, (QC), Canada, J1K 2R1 Electrocatalytic Electrocatalytic hydrogenation hydrogenation Hydrogen generation: H 3 O + + e - + M ↔ MH ads + H 2 O (Volmer reaction) H 3 O + + MH ads + e - ↔ M + H 2 + H 2 O (Heyrovsky reaction) 2 MH ads ↔ 2 M + H 2 (Tafel reaction) ECH of unsaturated organic compound: Y=Z + A ↔ (Y=Z) ads A (Y=Z) ads A + 2MH ads ↔ (YH-ZH) ads A (YH-ZH) ads A YH-ZH + A M – Pd, Pt, Ni, Rh, etc. H ads – adsorbed hydrogen A – catalyst matrix Y=Z – unsaturated molecule YH-ZH – saturated molecule Design and characterization of the Design and characterization of the catalyst catalyst Alumina is able to adsorb the aliphatic acids and to generate an organic monolayer on the surface of the matrix (functionalization). This functionalization can be carried out in situ in the electrolysis cell. The presence of the aliphatic acids adsorbed as carboxylate on alumina is confirmed by DRIFT spectra. This new organic phase is stable for all temperature below to 200 ºC. ECH results ECH results Concentration of co-solvent (MeOH) Aliphatic carboxylic acid is more strongly adsorbed than phenol on catalyst (10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 ). Functionalized alumina supported Pd catalysts adsorb significantly more phenol than a Pd unsupported catalyst. As predicted, the aliphatic chains adsorbed on alumina also influence the adsorption of phenol; as the chain lengthens, the adsorption is favoured. The ECH efficiency increases with the length of the aliphatic chain (butyric acid > propionic acid > acetic acid). The presence of a co-solvent (MeOH) modifies the polarity of the medium and also influences the adsorption of the target molecule to the functionalized catalyst surface; this too is predicted by the comparison with the reverse –phase chromatography. A new concept is presented here: in situ functionalized materials for electrocatalytic hydrogenation processes. These new materials are based on the strong controllable adsorption of aliphatic carboxylic acids onto the catalyst support. This surface modification plays a key role in the adsorption/desorption phenomena of the target molecule onto catalyst surface. A direct correlation has been established between current efficiency and adsorption phenomena for the phenol ECH, under our experimental conditions. This sequence is predicted if This sequence is predicted if the functionalized surface the functionalized surface behave as a reverse-phase behave as a reverse-phase chromatographic support chromatographic support ECH of phenol in water: methanol solution (80:20v/v) using different support electrolyte: (■) - acetic acid; (●) - propionic acid; (▲) - butyric acid; 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PhenolC oncentration (% ) C h arg e (C ) Adsorption isotherms of phenol on 10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 in water: methanol solution (80:20v/v) in the presence of different electrolytes: (●) - acetic acid; (■) - propionic acid; (▲) - butyric acid; 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 Q ads ( m olg -1 ) C e ( m olm L -1 ) Introduction Introduction The aim of our research is to develop «intelligent electrodes» that are able to make use of molecular recognition at interface to facilitate electrocatalytic hydrogenation (ECH). The present study demonstrates that the efficiency of the ECH process is related to the controllable adsorption phenomena. A functionalized surface can be obtained by in situ adsorption of aliphatic carboxylic acids on the catalyst matrix, adsorption which is supported by energy considerations. These organically functionalized materials promote the adsorption of the target molecules under our experimental conditions, and may permit the development of selective ECH electrodes. C e = 0.1 µmole mL -1 Q= 100 C ECH of phenol using different concentrations of MeOH as co-solvent: ( ) - 0 % MeOH; (●) - 20 % MeOH; (■) - 50 % MeOH; (▲) - 60 % MeOH; T = 298 K; 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 P henolC o n cen tratio n (% ) C h arg e (C ) Adsorption isotherms of phenol on 10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 in 0.5 M acetic buffer solution (pH = 5) for different concentrations of co-solvent: ( ) – 0 % MeOH; (●) – 5 % MeOH; (■) – 20 % MeOH; (▲) – 50 % MeOH; T = 323 K; 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 0,00 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,04 0,05 0,06 Q ads ( m olg -1 ) C e ( m olm L -1 ) 0,000 0,005 0,010 0,015 0,020 0,025 0,030 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 E fficien cy (% ) Q ads ( m olg -1 ) The ECH efficiency depends on the adsorption of phenol onto functionalized alumina catalyst surface Micrographics of the secondary electrons (1) and cartography of the elements (2,3,4) for a ultra thin cut of 10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 catalysts Pd Alum ina Pd Y=Z Y=Z Y=Z YH -ZH YH -ZH H H H H H H H Y=Z organic chains Al 2 O 3 Pd 4 10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 1 Thermal analysis - mass spectroscopic data for Pd/Al 2 O 3 butyric acid modified catalyst (under Ar) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 H 2 Tem p eratu re (°C ) CO 2 M a s s S p e c tro m e te r S ig n a l (a .u .) DRIFT spectra of the Pd/Al 2 O 3 catalyst aliphatic acids modified: (a) - acetic acid; (b) - propionic acid; (c) - butyric acid TEM image of a ultra thin cut of 10% Pd-alumina catalyst (TEM Mag = 200000 x; HV= 80 kV) Conclusions Conclusions Catalyst support Electrolyte: 0.5 M organic acid buffer (pH=5); Solvent: H 2 O / H 2 O – MeOH; Current intensity: 20 mA Working electrode: CVR 100 ppi; Catalyst: 200 mg 10%Pd/Al 2 O 3 ; Phenol concentration: 8.8510 -3 M; T = 298 K; Experimental conditions for ECH Experimental conditions for ECH Electrochemical dynamic cell 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PhenolC o n cen tratio n (% ) C h arg e (C ) ECH of phenol in aqueous medium 0.5 M acetic buffer (pH = 5); catalyst: (■) – Pd submicron; (●) – 10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 ; 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 0,00 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,04 0,05 0,06 Q ads ( m olg -1 ) C h arg e (C ) Adsorption isotherms of phenol on: (■) – Pd 63 μm and (●) – 10% Pd/Al 2 O 3 in 0.5 M acetic buffer solution (pH = 5); 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 Q ads ( m o le g -1 ) C e ( m o le m L -1 ) Adsorption isotherms of (▲) phenol and (■) acetic acid (pH=5) in water using 10% Pd- alumina supports. References References « Modification of the surface adsorption properties of alumina supported Pd catalysts for the electrocatalytic hydrogenation of phenol » Ciprian M. Cirtiu , Hicham Oudghiri Hassani, Nicolas-A. Bouchard, Paul A. Rowntree and Hugues Ménard, accepted for publication in Langmuir Organic phase nature Acknowledgement Acknowledgement s s We would like to thank: Irène Kelsey Lévesque (SEM analyses) Charles Bertrand (TEM analyses) NSERC ($$$) & FQRNT ($$$)

Upload: lesley-beasley

Post on 18-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Functionalized Composite Electrodes for Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation C. M. Cirtiu, N.-A. Bouchard, H. Oudghiri-Hassani, P. A. Rowntree and H. Ménard

Functionalized Composite Electrodes for Electrocatalytic Functionalized Composite Electrodes for Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation Hydrogenation

C. M. Cirtiu, N.-A. Bouchard, H. Oudghiri-Hassani, P. A. Rowntree and H. MénardDépartement de Chimie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, (QC), Canada, J1K 2R1

Electrocatalytic hydrogenationElectrocatalytic hydrogenation Hydrogen generation:

H3O+ + e- + M ↔ MHads + H2O (Volmer reaction)

H3O+ + MHads + e- ↔ M + H2 + H2O (Heyrovsky reaction)

2 MHads ↔ 2 M + H2 (Tafel reaction) ECH of unsaturated organic compound:

Y=Z + A ↔ (Y=Z)adsA

(Y=Z)adsA + 2MHads ↔ (YH-ZH)adsA

(YH-ZH)adsA ↔YH-ZH + A

M – Pd, Pt, Ni, Rh, etc.

Hads – adsorbed hydrogen

A – catalyst matrix

Y=Z – unsaturated molecule

YH-ZH – saturated molecule

Design and characterization of the catalystDesign and characterization of the catalyst

Alumina is able to adsorb the aliphatic

acids and to generate an organic

monolayer on the surface of the matrix

(functionalization).

This functionalization can be carried

out in situ in the electrolysis cell.

The presence of the aliphatic acids adsorbed as carboxylate on alumina is confirmed by DRIFT spectra.

This new organic phase is stable for all temperature below to 200 ºC.

ECH resultsECH results

Concentration of co-solvent (MeOH)

Aliphatic carboxylic acid is more strongly adsorbed than phenol on catalyst (10% Pd/Al2O3).

Functionalized alumina supported Pd catalysts adsorb significantly more phenol than a Pd unsupported catalyst.

As predicted, the aliphatic chains adsorbed on alumina also influence the adsorption of phenol; as the chain lengthens, the adsorption is favoured.

The ECH efficiency increases with the length of the aliphatic chain (butyric acid > propionic acid > acetic acid).

The presence of a co-solvent (MeOH) modifies the polarity of the medium and also influences the adsorption of the target molecule to the functionalized catalyst surface; this too is predicted by the comparison with the reverse –phase chromatography.

A new concept is presented here: in situ functionalized materials for electrocatalytic hydrogenation processes.

These new materials are based on the strong controllable adsorption of aliphatic carboxylic acids onto the catalyst support.

This surface modification plays a key role in the adsorption/desorption phenomena of the target molecule onto catalyst surface.

A direct correlation has been established between current efficiency and adsorption phenomena for the phenol ECH, under our experimental conditions.

This sequence is predicted if the This sequence is predicted if the functionalized surface behave as a functionalized surface behave as a

reverse-phase chromatographic supportreverse-phase chromatographic support

ECH of phenol in water: methanol solution (80:20v/v) using different support electrolyte: (■) - acetic acid;

(●) - propionic acid; (▲) - butyric acid;

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Phen

ol C

once

ntra

tion

(%)

Charge (C)

Adsorption isotherms of phenol on 10% Pd/Al2O3 in

water: methanol solution (80:20v/v) in the presence of different electrolytes: (●) - acetic acid; (■) - propionic

acid; (▲) - butyric acid;

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,50,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

1,1

1,2

Q ad

s (m

ol g

-1)

Ce ( mol mL

-1)

IntroductionIntroductionThe aim of our research is to develop «intelligent electrodes» that are able to make use of molecular recognition at interface to facilitate electrocatalytic hydrogenation (ECH).

The present study demonstrates that the efficiency of the ECH process is related to the controllable adsorption phenomena. A functionalized surface can be obtained by in situ adsorption of aliphatic carboxylic acids on the catalyst matrix, adsorption which is supported by energy considerations.

These organically functionalized materials promote the adsorption of the target molecules under our experimental conditions, and may permit the development of selective ECH electrodes.

Ce= 0.1 µmole mL-1

Q= 100 C

ECH of phenol using different concentrations of MeOH as co-solvent: (♦) - 0 % MeOH; (●) - 20 %

MeOH; (■) - 50 % MeOH; (▲) - 60 % MeOH; T = 298 K;

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Ph

eno

l Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

%)

Charge (C)

Adsorption isotherms of phenol on 10% Pd/Al2O3 in 0.5 M acetic buffer solution (pH = 5) for different

concentrations of co-solvent: (♦) – 0 % MeOH; (●) – 5 % MeOH; (■) – 20 % MeOH; (▲) – 50 % MeOH; T = 323 K;

0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1

0,00

0,01

0,02

0,03

0,04

0,05

0,06

Q ad

s (m

ol g

-1)

Ce (mol mL

-1)

0,000 0,005 0,010 0,015 0,020 0,025 0,0300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Eff

icie

ncy

(%)

Q ads

(mol g-1)

The ECH efficiency depends on the adsorption of phenol onto functionalized alumina catalyst surface

Micrographics of the secondary electrons (1) and cartography of the elements (2,3,4) for a ultra thin cut of 10% Pd/Al2O3

catalysts

Pd

Alumina

PdY=Z

Y=Z

Y=Z

YH-ZHYH-ZH

HHHH

H

H

H

Y=Z

organicchains

Al

2

O

3

Pd

4

10% Pd/Al2O3

1

Thermal analysis - mass spectroscopic data for Pd/Al2O3 butyric acid modified catalyst (under Ar)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

H2

Temperature (°C)

CO2

Mass S

pectr

om

ete

r S

ign

al (a

.u.)

DRIFT spectra of the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst aliphatic

acids modified: (a) - acetic acid; (b) - propionic acid; (c) - butyric acid

TEM image of a ultra thin cut of 10% Pd-alumina catalyst (TEM Mag = 200000 x; HV= 80 kV)

ConclusionsConclusions

Catalyst support

Electrolyte: 0.5 M organic acid buffer (pH=5);

Solvent: H2O / H2O – MeOH;

Current intensity: 20 mA

Working electrode: CVR 100 ppi;

Catalyst: 200 mg 10%Pd/Al2O3;

Phenol concentration: 8.8510-3 M;

T = 298 K;

Experimental conditions for ECHExperimental conditions for ECH

Electrochemical dynamic cell

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Ph

eno

l Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

%)

Charge (C)

ECH of phenol in aqueous medium 0.5 M acetic buffer (pH = 5); catalyst: (■) – Pd submicron; (●) – 10% Pd/Al2O3;

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0

0,00

0,01

0,02

0,03

0,04

0,05

0,06

Q ad

s (

mo

l g-1)

Charge (C)

Adsorption isotherms of phenol on: (■) – Pd 63 μm and (●) – 10% Pd/Al2O3 in 0.5 M acetic buffer

solution (pH = 5);

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,20,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

1,1

1,2

Q ad

s (

mo

le g

-1)

Ce (mole mL-1)

Adsorption isotherms of (▲) phenol and (■) acetic acid (pH=5) in water using 10% Pd-alumina supports.

ReferencesReferences

« Modification of the surface adsorption properties

of alumina supported Pd catalysts for the

electrocatalytic hydrogenation of phenol  »

Ciprian M. Cirtiu, Hicham Oudghiri Hassani, Nicolas-

A. Bouchard, Paul A. Rowntree and Hugues Ménard,

accepted for publication in Langmuir

Organic phase nature

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsWe would like to thank:

Irène Kelsey Lévesque (SEM

analyses)

Charles Bertrand (TEM analyses)

NSERC ($$$) & FQRNT ($$$)