functional flows: a practical strategy for healthy rivers stewart rood university of lethbridge
DESCRIPTION
Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge. Fundamental principle: river ecosystems require instream flow. Trees. Trout. Science: Instream Flow Needs – Flow amount and pattern required to sustain an organism - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Functional flows:A practical strategy for healthy rivers
Stewart RoodUniversity of Lethbridge
![Page 2: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Trees
Trout
Fundamental principle:
river ecosystemsrequire instream flow
![Page 3: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Management:
Old:Minimum Flow for survivalInstream Objective – Flow target for human use & the environment
New (2006):Water Conservation Objective (WCO)
= Instream Objective + 10%; or 45% of natural flow
Science:
Instream Flow Needs – Flow amount and pattern required tosustain an organism
Environmental Flow Needs – Flows to sustain the aquatic and riparian ecosystems
AbEnv-IFN group: 85% of natural flow
![Page 5: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Tennant (Montana) method
good poorOldman River – pre-Dam
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% Discharge
Hea
lth
85%60%
45%
![Page 6: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
‘the proper way to do toast …… wait ‘til it burns, then 5 seconds less’
(Ogden Nash?)
St. Mary
another empirical approach
![Page 7: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
but … hysteresis
cond
ition
discharge
decline
recovery
conservation vs. restoration
![Page 8: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Hydrograph components for:
1. Channel Formation
2. Riparian (Streamside) Community
3. Aquatic (Instream) Community
4. Water Quality
RiparianEcosystem
AquaticEcosystem
![Page 9: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
0
50
100
150
200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Scaled to the Bow River at Banff
1. High flows forChannel development
2. RiparianPost-flood ramping
for cottonwoodrecruitment
3. AquaticSufficient flow
for T & O2O2 under
ice
4. Water Quality
Winter AutumnSummerSpring
Dis
cha
rge
= F
low
Rat
e (m
3/s
)
![Page 10: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
BioScience 1997
… yes, but it’s not feasible to restore natural flow regimes …
![Page 11: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
0
50
100
150
200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Wet 1/4Normal 2/4Dry 1/4
Dis
cha
rge
= F
low
Rat
e (m
3/s
)High flows for
Channel development
RiparianPost-flood ramping
for cottonwoodrecruitment
TheParadox of Water Management
Demand is high when supply is low
Functional FlowsHigh flow functions occur
in high flow years
![Page 12: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
0
50
100
150
200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Dry 1/4
Dis
cha
rge
= F
low
Rat
e (m
3/s
)
RiparianSurvival
AquaticSufficient flow
for T & O2O2 under
ice
Water Quality
Uniform reduction to 45%= system stress
A management opportunity:Storage is proportionally greater in low flow years
Functional Flow= flow when most needed
![Page 13: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Oldman River near MonarchJuly 1988 – pre-Oldman Dam
Insufficient flow = degraded system
![Page 14: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Oldman River Dam Project
1991 increased minimum flows
1993 flow ramping
1995 flood
People cared
![Page 15: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Validating the model
![Page 17: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Oldman 1995
-7.5
-5
-2.5
0
2.5
5
7.5
Sta
ge
ch
an
ge
(cm
/da
y)
Month
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Sta
ge
ab
ove
ba
se (
m)
South Saskatchewan River 1995
May OctSepAugJulyJune
seeddispersal
2.5cm/daydecline
lethal
stressful
favorable
S. Sask.
![Page 18: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Management:
Water Conservation Objective (WCO) 45% of natural flow
Functional Flows
1. Deliberately non-natural pattern
2. Support aquatic and riparian populations
3. Environmental benefit during wet years to compensate forEnvironmental stress during dry years
Science:
Instream Flow Needs – Flow to sustain an organism
Environmental Flow Needs – Flows to sustain aquatic and riparian ecosystems - The Natural Flow Regime
AbEnv-IFN group: 85% of natural flow
![Page 19: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Different management objectives:
Condition Flow Objective Strategy Quantity
Dry 1/4 year
Low flow Survival
Sufficient late
summer flow
45%
Normal 2/4 years
Normal flow
Growth
Additional early
summer flow
60%
Wet 1/4 year
High flow Reproduction
High spring flow and gradual
recession
85%
![Page 20: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
1988
2008
Rejuvenatingthe Oldman
Decrepit population
Healthy population
![Page 21: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
River FishFirst
Nations Other
Truckee, NV Cui-ui sucker
Paiute - Partnership:Army COE – The Nature Conservancy
Oldman, AB x Peigan/Piikani
- Oldman River Dam controversy- Federal-Provincial jurisdiction
Bill Williams, AZ
- Compensate for environmental degradation
Kootenai, MT, ID, BC
Whitesturgeon
Kootenai - Channel & Floodplain reconstruction
Snake, ID x - Extensively dammed river, compensation- FERC relicensing
Bridge, BC x - Dept. Fish. & Oceans lawsuit
Duncan, BC x - Environmental benefit, without economic cost
Waterton, St. Mary, AB
x - Environmental benefit, without economic cost
Implementing Environmental & Functional Flows
![Page 23: Functional flows: A practical strategy for healthy rivers Stewart Rood University of Lethbridge](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568132b8550346895d99720e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Functional flows:A practical strategy for healthy rivers
Stewart RoodUniversity of Lethbridge