from a field experience to technology for the next- generation … · from a field experience to...
TRANSCRIPT
From a field experience to technology for the next-generation robotics and automation
- Making technology make sense
Alain Patchong
Nov. 30, 2016
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Faurecia produces up to 25% of a car’s components 4 Business Groups | Sales: ~€20B | Employees: ~100K | ~250 plants
Exterior
2
Emission Interior Seating
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Overview
3
Business background & Needs Initial situation Implementation Takeaways Technology that makes sense Conclusion
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Business background & Needs
4
Assumption of benefits from competitors benchmark Productivity Ergonomics & Safety Pull system (stable transportation time)
Outcome of pilot project in Crévin
Confirmed expected benefits Excellent payback: ≈ 10.6 months But CAPEX: average running AGV ≈ €40K Key competences needed: PC&L, ME, Supplier
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Introducing Crévin Plant: Seats production for Citroën C5 and Peugeot 508 | 800 Carsets /day | 2 shifts
Démontage zone école + déplacement zone qualité
Déplacement de la gare AT / ACC AR
Réaménagement des gares KB + Intégration des IS AR MPAP
SM: IS/covers/foam
Delivery point
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Situation with AGVs
Picking
Full Trolley
Empty Trolley
Delivery RS BR
Delivery RS CU Trajets :
Empty trolley
Full trolley SM: IS/covers/foam
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
7
Crévin pilot project: Snapshots & Economics
CAR #315673Project 1
RS FS - Left FS - Right Total project 2 TOTAL projects 1&2AGV CAPEX 37 500 € 37 500 € 37 500 € 75 000 € 112 500 €Batteries CAPEX 10 378 € 7 743 € 7 743 € 15 486 € 25 864 €Installation CAPEX 9 600 € 7 160 € 7 160 € 14 320 € 23 920 €Programming CAPEX 3 000 € 2 250 € 2 250 € 4 500 € 7 500 €Supervision CAPEX 10 849 € 2 145 € 2 145 € 4 290 € 15 139 €
Documentation Mfg cost 2 500 € 250 € 250 € 500 € 3 000 €Training 0 € 0 € 0 € 0 €Travel fees Mfg cost 5 760 € 2 785 € 2 785 € 5 570 € 11 330 €Controlling system Mfg cost 7 998 € 2 895 € 2 895 € 5 789 € 13 787 €Spare AGV 0 € 0 €Logistics / picking area works Mfg cost 2 355 € 2 165 € 2 165 € 4 330 € 6 685 €Trolleys, wiring, tracks Mfg cost 13 023 € 21 621 € 21 621 € 43 241 € 56 264 €Taxes Mfg cost 327 € 327 €Total Cost 103 289 € 86 513 € 86 513 € 173 026 € 276 315 €
Total CAPEX 71 327 € 56 798 € 56 798 € 113 596 € 184 923 €Total Mfg cost 31 962 € 29 715 € 29 715 € 59 430 € 91 392 €
Saving MOD - 1/Shift 70 400 € 70 400 € 70 400 € 211 200 €MOD Metal 35 200 € 35 200 € 70 400 €
Small trains - 2 / Project 10 800 € 10 800 € 10 800 € 32 400 €Total / year 116 400 € 116 400 € 81 200 € 314 000 €
Payback (months) 10,6 8,9 12,8 10,6
CAR #317221Project 2
8 jobs saved €276K for 7 AGVs: – 60% AGV, Batteries & others – 20% Dolly – 20% Process control & Electronics
Payback: 10.6 Months
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Business background & Needs : Summary
8
Estimated CAPEX for full deployment in Europe: €8M
AGV is very profitable… But requires huge CAPEX!
How and where to deploy AGVs while minimizing CA$H need?
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
9
Implementation: Initial situation – European plants
Internal material transportation: 166 small trains 322 train drivers
Total train drivers wages: ≈ €8M/yr Small trains are leased: Total leasing cost estimate: ≈ €600K/yr
(€300 / train / month)
Productivity goldmine: The hidden plant! Internal material transportation = 1 plant
Replace leased small trains by leased AGVs No more CA$H needed! But not the same cost structure.
Cost Structure AGV Implementation
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
10
Implementation: framework for deployment
Customers = Deployment plan: o List of European plants for 2013 & 2014
Doers = Organization agreed: o Execution: Local plant (Lean, PC&L, ME) o Methodologies & standards: Central Ops
Suppliers = Agreement with selected suppliers
o Solution defined and shared with supplier: Standard AGV attributes, Safety requirements, Cost, Maintenance
o Supplier role: AGV, % installation, Maintenance o FAS role: Dollies, % installation, Maintenance level1 Faurecia
Supplier
Leipzig & Siemar
Crevin
Golden Triangle: Customer – Doer – Supplier
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Key takeaways on mixing manual and automated solutions
11
Automa'on)from)manual)tasks)follows)a)simple)rule:)))«)stay)away)from)50850)»)
To)minimize))troubles)follow)the)«)big)bang)»)approach)
100% 0% 50%
Level of automation
Leve
l of t
roub
les
Initial Time
Leve
l of a
utom
atio
n
Final 0%
100%
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
12
AGV improves productivity and more… with a good payback Caveat: CA$H is King Do leasing!
Implementation: Golden Triangle Beware: you need experienced and knowledgeable third party
Need for next-generation technology that makes sense
More takeaways…
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Technology that makes sense Current situation : Few facts on what’s wrong
Several customized solutions: What if product / volume changes? Lack of customer voice Customer: “I want to improve my competitiveness” Cost issue as an “iceberg-tip”
€18,500 €18,500
=
© Alain Patchong | confidential
1
2
3
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Eliminate the “cash barrier” for high-cost countries’ SMEs: Average cost of a running AGV in Crevin plant = 46 KE
Industrial footprint expansion toward low-wage countries
Technology that makes sense Why is the cost an important factor?
© Alain Patchong | confidential
1
2
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Most companies decide on ROI Overall AGV target cost for a 24-month ROI
Manufacturing footprint is moving to low-cost countries: Running AGV cost should be < 32 K€ (-30% vs. today)
© Alain Patchong | confidential
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Technology that makes sense Market requests “smart automation”: 6 key assessment criteria
16
Standard (low-cost)) Equipment an/or components are standard and can be / are used for other activities. Standard equipment or components are “good deals”
Reliability) Efficiency above 98% and most breakdowns can
be fixed by local staff (no external support, no hiring)
Plug and play) Installation in a few hours to less than 1 day (max
2 WE days) by local people after short training, no need for external expert
2
4
1
SMED)) Performed automatically or by people around on the shopflloor (an operator or a team leader)
3
Modularity) CAPEX function of the production volume 5 Reconfigurability)
Changes can be done within a few minutes to less than a day (max 2 WE days) by local people after short training, no need for external expert
6
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Technology that makes sense Example of assessment: Universal Robots and the “Best AGV offer”
Universal Robot Best AGV offer
Standard low-cost
Reliability
SMED by shop-floor team
Plug and play
Modularity
Reconfigurability
Overall assessment
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Technology that makes sense Mexence’s first project: Create the next-generation mobile robot
18
6)crite
ria)of)smart)
automa'
on)
Dras'c)cost)red
uc'o
n))
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Conclusion
• The “golden triangle” is key for success in deployment
• When it comes to mixing manual – automated solutions, “Stay away from 50-50” by going for “big bang”
• There are significant gaps between customer needs and current offer of automation solutions
• Assess your solutions on the six-criterion grid before adoption
19
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Thank you !
20
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
21
Prioritized plan for AGV deployment in Europe
smal
l tra
ins
driv
ers/
shift
MO
D C
ost
SOP
2013
Soci
al N
OK
"Mak
es n
o se
nse"
Loca
l tea
m
NO
T m
atur
e
2013
Pr
iorit
ies
2014
Pr
iorit
ies
CommentsACL, valladolid 5 4 36 300 € 2 Cercy 6 10 33 626 €Nompatelize 8 8 43 130 €Nogent 12 4 38 639 € 1st Frames 1st Frames experience: Improve logisitcs firstSiemar (Sandouville) 5 5 35 033 € 3 Sielest (Pulversheim) 5 5 36 785 €Sotexo (Brèbrière) 9 9 44 145 €Siedoubs (Montbelliard) 11 11 36 126 € 5 Huge potential but launch in 2013Sienor (Hordain) 9 8 39 510 € Cannot be considered in 2012/2013 S1Trnava 3 3 14 400 € 1 Pay back to be checkedTogliatti 3 3 8 442 €Teheran 2 2 8 447 €Sao Joao da Madeira 16 16 12 002 € 6 Pick up learning from NSVVigo 14 14 29 936 € 7 Huge potential but launch in 2013Nelas 7 5 11 166 € 8 Grojec Frames 5 13 14 284 €Jelcz (JIT) 2 4 11 738 € ME being built up / Ford closing Genk plantLozorno 3 9 17 808 € Launch mid 2014Pisek Frames 7 14 15 381 € X TBC (PC&L and Frames APP)Walbrzych Frames 11 33 11 709 € X TBC (PC&L and Frames APP) / common work to be done with SEOMadrid Frames 2 6Pamplona 2 6 40 698 € X Huge PC&L work to be done up frontVitoria 1 2 35 595 € X End of 2014Neuburg A3 X Solve the budget issueNeuburg A4 6 15 42 151 € X Solve the budget issueNeuenstadt 1 3 39 448 €Sittard 2 4 39 185 € X PC&L manager leaving / high probability for BMW mini NedcarPlisenBanbury 2 4 33 574 € Solve the budget issueGeiselhöring Frames 6 15Leipzig 34 553 €Lohr am MainStadthagenKaluga 1 3
Selection Criteria
SEO
NEO
Estimated compensation cost at stake: ≈ €4M / yr
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
22
Two support documents needed - PC&L booklet (methodology to modify material storage, picking, flow & feeding) - ME booklet (Standard solutions & methodology “How to design and validate new solutions”)
6Prope
rtyof*Fau
recia*0Dup
lication*proh
ibite
d
HOW*TO*IMPL EMENT*AGV*?Methodology used ?
1) Synchronize & mutualize the trains to reduce transport variability
2) Reduce the number of delivery point at the production line (sequencing)
3) Compact the trolley & optimize the order lot
4) Compact the supermarket & optimize the picking (X-dock)
5) Separate picking activities from delivery activities
6) Implement Pull system (call off by cars)
7) Make the supermarket compatible with AGV (less faster in the bends)
Production Control & Logistics
Manufacturing Engineering
5
Pro
pert
y of
Fau
reci
a -D
uplic
atio
n pr
ohib
ited
HOW$TO$DESIGN$A$TRUCK$/$TROL LEY1/$Search$one$from$the$Booklet$of$standard$trucks2/$If$not$satisfactory$then$use$“How$to$design$and$validate$a$truck”
Early&vers ion Optimizingthe&solution
Trolley&tested« manually »F inalized&Trolley F inal&AGV
1
2
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Supplier contribution and dependability is key
23
The supplier is a key contributor It’s not only about € but also the impact on the factory flow (Just In Time)
Supplier Faurecia
Faurecia and supplier
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Supplier selection: Market Overview, Criteria For Panel Definition & Narrow Down
24 24
MANUFACTURER DISTRIBUTOR
CREFORM x (Japan & Germany)
INDEVA x (Italy)
TRILOGIG x (Japan)
DS AUTOMOTION x (France)
EISENMANN x (Germany)
LINDE x (partnership)
JUNGHEINRICH x
CATERPILLAR x (partnership)
BA SYSTEMS x (France)
Criteria used to identify suppliers as PANEL
Supplier which is manufacturer and/or distributor, specialized in AGVs Request For Information completed Signature of master agreement, General Purchasing conditions & confidentiality agreement Footprint / Ability to work with all Faurecia plants in Europe in a first step and ROW in a second step Penetration rate (Faurecia sales vs supplier total sales) RFQ benchmark
Identified as AGV manufacturers/distributors Spec compliant Responded to RFI Penetration rate % Insurance Validate MA Pre selected
1 CREFORM CREFORM CREFORM CREFORM CREFORM CREFORM* CREFORM
2 INDEVA INDEVA INDEVA INDEVA INDEVA INDEVA* INDEVA
3 TRILOGIQ TRILOGIQ TRILOGIQ TRILOGIQ TRILOGIQ TRILOGIQ* TRILOGIQ
4 DS AUTOMOTION
5 EISENMANN
6 LINDE
7 JUNGHEINRICH * In progress,
8 CATERPILLAR minor discussion
9 BA SYTEMS Creform Indeva Trilogiq
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
Supplier selection: Example of non-cost criteria
25
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
26
Supplier selection: Prices & Leasing rates
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
27
- Compact the logistic supermarket - Separate picking from delivering activities - Make the supermarket compatible with AGV
• Supermarket have been reduced by 20% (X-dock)
PICKING
Faurecia’s role PC&L
Pro
perty
of F
aure
cia
- Dup
licat
ion
proh
ibite
d
28
Trolley building: From the initial container to the final trolley
Early version
Optimizing the solution
Use of trolley with small train
tested
Finalized trolley
Final AGV
Rail guiding structure
Initial
Faurecia’s role ME