franz von baader (richard falckenberg)

2
“Franz von Baader” [This passage is extracted from Section 3 of Chapter 12 of Richard Falckenberg’sHis Modern Philosophy from Nicolas of Cusa to the Present Time , translated by !C! rm !"#$%& Franz von% Baader' the son of a physician' (as )orn in Munich in !*+,' resided the superintendent of mines' and' from !"-+' as professor of speculative do.matics' and also in !"/!0 His (or1s' (hich consisted only of a series of )rief treatises' (ere vols0' !",!2+3% )y his most important adherent' Franz Hoffman ! at his death in !""! professor in 45rz)ur.%0 Baader may )e characterized as a mediaeval thin1er (ho has (or1ed thr critical philosophy' and (ho' a )elievin.' yet li)eral Catholic' endeavors to solve instruments of modern speculation the old 6cholastic pro)lem of the reconciliation 1no(led.e0 His themes are' on the one hand' the development of 7od' and' on the oth and redemption' (hich mean for him' ho(ever' not merely inner phenomena' )ut (orld2 He is in sympathy (ith the Neoplatonists' (ith 8u.ustine' (ith Thomas 89uinas' (ith (ith Paracelsus' a)ove all' (ith ;aco) B<hme' and B<hme=s follo(er >ouis Claude 6t0 !*/$2!"3/%' )ut does not overloo1 the value of the modern 7erman philosophy0 4ith )e.ins the in9uiry (ith the pro)lem of 1no(led.e@ (ith Fichte he finds in self2con essence' and not merely a property' of spirit@ (ith He.el he loo1s on 7od or the a) not only as the o)Aect' )ut also as the su)Aect of 1no(led.e0 He reAects' ho(ever' of the (ill and the spontaneity of thou.ht@ and thou.h he criticises the Cartesian )et(een the thou.ht of the creator and that of the creature' he as little approves identification of the t(o human co.nition participates in the divine' (ithout const of it0 n accordance (ith its three principal o)Aects' D7od' Nature' and Man'D philosophy fundamental science lo.ic or the theory of 1no(led.e and theolo.y%' the philosophy cosmolo.y or the theory of creation and physics%' and the philosophy of spirit et sociolo.y%0 n all its parts it must receive reli.ious treatment0 4ithout 7od (e ca n our co.nition of 7od he is at once 1no(er and 1no(n@ our )ein. and all )ein. is 1no(n )y him@ our self2consciousness is a consciousness of )ein. 1no(n )y 7odE cogi cogito et s#m@ my )ein. and thin1in. are )ased on my )ein. thou.ht )y 7od0 Conscien Aoint 1no(in. (ith 7od=s 1no(in. conscientia%0 The relation )et(een the 1no(n and 1no(er is threefold0 Co.nition is incomplete and lac1s the free co2operation of the 7od merely pervades d#rch$ohnt % the creature' as is the case (ith the devil=s timorous a reluctant 1no(led.e of 7od0 8 hi.her sta.e is reached (hen the 1no(n is present to and d(ells (ith him bei$ohnt %0 Co.nition )ecomes really free and perfect (hen 7od d(ells in$ohnt % the creature' in (hich case the finite reason yields itself freely and in divine reason' lets the latter spea1 in itself' and feels its rule' not as forei.n' 1 Besides Hoffman' >utter)ec1 and Ham)er.er have descri)ed and e pounded Baader=s system0 Baumann=s paper in the %hilosophische &onatshefte' vol0 iv0' !"*"' p0 $-! se'0&

Upload: karlheintz

Post on 03-Nov-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A summary of the thought of Franz von Baader, from Richard Falckenberg's History of Modern Philosophy

TRANSCRIPT

Franz von Baader[This passage is extracted from Section 3 of Chapter 12 of Richard Falckenbergs History of Modern Philosophy from Nicolas of Cusa to the Present Time, translated by A.C. Armstrong, Jr. (1893)]Franz (von) Baader, the son of a physician, was born in Munich in 1765, resided there as superintendent of mines, and, from 1826, as professor of speculative dogmatics, and died there also in 1841. His works, which consisted only of a series of brief treatises, were collected (16 vols., 1851-60) by his most important adherent, Franz Hoffman[footnoteRef:1] (at his death in 1881 professor in Wrzburg). Baader may be characterized as a mediaeval thinker who has worked through the critical philosophy, and who, a believing, yet liberal Catholic, endeavors to solve with the instruments of modern speculation the old Scholastic problem of the reconciliation of faith and knowledge. His themes are, on the one hand, the development of God, and, on the other, the fall and redemption, which mean for him, however, not merely inner phenomena, but world-events. He is in sympathy with the Neoplatonists, with Augustine, with Thomas Aquinas, with Eckhart, with Paracelsus, above all, with Jacob Bhme, and Bhme's follower Louis Claude St. Martin (1743-1804), but does not overlook the value of the modern German philosophy. With Kant he begins the inquiry with the problem of knowledge; with Fichte he finds in self-consciousness the essence, and not merely a property, of spirit; with Hegel he looks on God or the absolute spirit not only as the object, but also as the subject of knowledge. He rejects, however, the autonomy of the will and the spontaneity of thought; and though he criticises the Cartesian separation between the thought of the creator and that of the creature, he as little approves the pantheistic identification of the twohuman cognition participates in the divine, without constituting a part of it. [1: Besides Hoffman, Lutterbeck and Hamberger have described and expounded Baader's system. See also Baumann's paper in thePhilosophische Monatshefte, vol. xiv., 1878, p. 321seq.]]

In accordance with its three principal objects, "God, Nature, and Man," philosophy divides into fundamental science (logic or the theory of knowledge and theology), the philosophy of nature (cosmology or the theory of creation and physics), and the philosophy of spirit (ethics and sociology). In all its parts it must receive religious treatment. Without God we cannot know God. In our cognition of God he is at once knower and known; our being and all being is a being known by him; our self-consciousness is a consciousness of being known by God:cogitor, ergo cogito et sum; my being and thinking are based on my being thought by God. Conscience is a joint knowing with God's knowing (conscientia). The relation between the known and the knower is threefold. Cognition is incomplete and lacks the free co-operation of the knower when God merely pervades (durchwohnt) the creature, as is the case with the devil's timorous and reluctant knowledge of God. A higher stage is reached when the known is present to the knower and dwells with him (beiwohnt). Cognition becomes really free and perfect when God dwells in (inwohnt) the creature, in which case the finite reason yields itself freely and in admiration to the divine reason, lets the latter speak in itself, and feels its rule, not as foreign, but as its own. (Baader maintains a like threefoldness in the practical sphere: the creature is either the object or, rather, the passive recipient, or the organ, or the representative of the divine action, i.e., in the first case, God alone works; in the second, he co-operates with the creature; in the third, the creature works with the forces and in the name of God. Joyful obedience, conscious of its grounds, is the highest freedom). Knowing and loving, thought and volition, knowledge and faith, philosophy and dogma are as little to be abstractly divided as thing and self, being and thought, object and subject. True freedom and genuine speculation are neither blind traditional belief nor doubting, God-estranged thinking, but the free recognition of authority, and self-attained conviction of the truth of the Church doctrine.Baader distinguishes a twofold creation of the world and a double process of development (an esoteric and an exoteric revelation) of God himself. The creation of the ideal world, as a free act of love, is a non-deducible fact; the theogonic process, on the contrary, is a necessary event by which God becomes a unity returning from division to itself, and so a living God. The eternal self-generation of God is a twofold birth: in the immanent or logical process the unsearchable will (Father) gives birth to the comprehensible will (Son) to unite with it as Spirit; the place of this self-revelation is wisdom or the Idea. In the emanent or real process, since desire or nature is added to the Idea and is overcome by it, these three moments become actual persons. In the creation of theat first immaterialworld, in which God unites, not with his essence, but with his image only, the same two powers, desire and wisdom, operate as the principles of matter and form. The materialization of the world is a consequence of the fall. Evil consists in the elevation of selfhood, which springs from desire, into self-seeking. Lucifer fell because of pride, and man, yielding to Lucifer's temptation, from baseness, by falling in love with nature beneath him. By the creation of matter God has out of pity preserved the world, which was corrupted by the fall, from the descent into hell, and at the same time has given man occasion for moral endeavor. The appearance of Christ, the personification of the moral law, is the beginning of reconciliation, which man appropriates through the sacrament. Nature participates in the redemption, as in the corruption.