framework of inclusive growth indicators 2013: key indicators for asia and the pacific

Upload: asian-development-bank

Post on 14-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    1/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    2/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    3/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    4/102

    2013 Asian Developmen Bank

    All rigs reserve. Publise in 2013.

    Prine in e Pilippines.

    ISBN 978-92-9254-242-9 (Prin), 978-92-9254-243-6 (PDF)

    Publicaion Sock No. RPT135929-2

    Caaloging-In-Publicaion Daa

    Asian Developmen Bank.

    Key inicaors for Asia an e Pacific 2013: Framework of inclusive grow inicaors, special supplemen.Manaluyong Ciy, Pilippines: Asian Developmen Bank, 2013.

    1. Inclusive grow. 2. Inicaors. I. Asian Developmen Bank.

    Te views expresse in is publicaion o no necessarily reflec e views an policies of e

    Asian Developmen Bank (ADB) or is Boar of Governors or e governmens ey represen.

    ADB oes no guaranee e accuracy of e aa inclue in is publicaion an acceps no responsibiliy for any

    consequence of eir use.

    By making any esignaion of or reference o a paricular erriory or geograpic area, or by using e erm

    counry in is ocumen, ADB oes no inen o make any jugmens as o e legal or oer saus of any

    erriory or area.

    ADB encourages prining or copying informaion exclusively for personal an noncommercial use wi proper

    acknowlegmen of ADB. Users are resrice from reselling, reisribuing, or creaing erivaive works for

    commercial purposes wiou e express, wrien consen of ADB.

    Asian Developmen Bank

    6 ADB Avenue, Manaluyong Ciy

    1550 Mero Manila, Pilippines

    Tel +63 2 632 4444

    Fax +63 2 636 2444

    www.ab.org

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    5/102

    Foreword

    dW

    o lea global grow espie a slowown in evelope economies since 2008. Ye, evience on growing

    grow a prioriy for eveloping Asia.

    Te Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013 (FIGI 2013) is e 3r

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    6/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    7/102

    Contents

    Forewor .................................................................................................................................................................. iii

    Guie For Users.......................................................................................................................................................viii

    ....................................................................................................................................ix

    Higligs of e Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors ....................................................................................xi

    SPCIAL SUPPLMNT

    Framework of Inclusive Growt Inicators

    Part I. A Progress Assessment of te 1990s an 2000s in eveloping Asia ........................................................... 1

    1. / ......................................................................................................................................................... 3

    2. Te Meoology ................................................................................................................................................. 5

    3. W^/ ......................................................................................... 64. W/ ............................................................................................................. 17

    5. W///

    A Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 19

    6. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................ 19

    W//d ................................................................... 25

    Poverty an Inequality........................................................................................................................................... 27

    Income Povery .................................................................................................................................................. 27

    Nonincome Povery ............................................................................................................................................ 29

    Policy Pillar One: Growt an xpansion of conomic Opportunity .................................................................... 32

    ' ................................................................................................................... 32

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    8/102

    vi Contents

    Table 2.2 Nonincome Povery an Inequaliy .................................................................................................... 52

    d ' ................................................................................................... 58

    d WWW>z ............... 27

    & Z/^>

    >z .................................................................................................................. 28

    & EZhWZ>z ................................................................ 28

    Figure 2.4 Average Years of Toal Scooling, You, Male an Female, 2010................................................... 30Figure 2.5 Prevalence of Unerweig Cilren uner Five Years of Age, Toal, Lowes an Higes

    t>z .................................................................................................... 31

    & h&Z>>t

    Laes Year ....................................................................................................................................... 31

    & 'Z'WWWW ............................................... 32

    & 'ZW/WWW>W ............. 33

    & E&t

    Laes Year ....................................................................................................................................... 33

    & tEz ..................................34

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    9/102

    Contents

    & EW^W>z ............................ 35

    Figure 2.12 Deposiors i Commercial Banks (per 1,000 Auls), 2004 an 2011 or Neares Years .............36

    & ^>Ez ..........................................................37

    & WEW>z ........................................... 38

    & ddWdW/z

    >t>tZ>z ........ 39&

    ^Wh^&Ez

    2010 or Laes Year .......................................................................................................................... 40

    & WWdZh .............................. 41

    & WWh/^&dhZ ...........42

    & 'WW^d>z .......................................... 43

    & W^tEWEz ...........44

    & >>

    t>tZ>z ........................................ 45

    & ^^W'

    1995 an 2011 or Neares Years ..................................................................................................... 47

    & '^^tWd' Ez ............................................................................... 47

    & ....................................................................................................... 49

    & ' ..................................................................................................... 49

    & ............................................................................................................ 49

    .................................................................................................................................................... 81

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    10/102

    iii

    Guide for Users

    Key Symbols

    aa no available

    0 or 0.0 magniue is less an alf of uni employe

    n.a. no applicable

    Measurement Units

    t

    ata Sources

    d///

    /

    &

    ^dZ

    In par I, summary ables on improvemen inexes of e 45 economies of eveloping Asia uring e 1990s an

    &/'/ / //

    Te 48 economies in e ables are broaly groupe ino 45 eveloping members an 3 evelope members

    Ed

    d

    //

    d

    inercangeably wi economy, is no inene o make any jugmen as o e legal or oer saus of any erriory

    or area.

    //

    d

    //d

    referre o as e earlies year (usually a year beween 1990 an 2000) an laes year (usually any year closes o

    ^

    earlies year an e laes year. Tis is because e years for wic aa are available vary wiely across counries.

    Te acual years wic e aa relae o are inicae in e ables a are use as sources for e cars.

    / W /W/ d /

    &/'/d

    tt'/

    d

    W/d/

    values of CPI no comparable wi earlier years. Te counry scores in CPI 2012 range from 100 (very clean) o 0 (igly

    corrup), an canno be compare o ose from 2011 or previous years, wic range from 10 (very clean) o 0 (igly

    corrup).

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    11/102

    Abbreviations and Acronyms

    ADB Asian Developmen Bank

    AFG Afganisan

    ARM Armenia

    AUS Ausralia

    BAN Banglaes

    BHU Buan

    BRU Brunei Darussalam

    CAM Camboia

    /

    CPA counry performance assessmen

    DHS Demograpic an Heal Survey

    DTP3 iperia, eanus oxoi, an perussis

    FIGI Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaor

    FIJ FijiFSM Feerae Saes of Micronesia

    'W

    ' '

    ' '

    HKG Hong Kong, Cina

    /d

    / /

    / /

    /> />

    /& /&

    IND Inia

    /E /

    /dh /dh

    JPN Japan

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    12/102

    x

    PAL Palau

    PHI Pilippines

    PNG Papua New Guinea

    PPP purcasing power pariy

    WZ WZ

    RMI Republic of Marsall IslansSAM Samoa

    SIN Singapore

    ^>

    ^> ^/

    ^W ^W

    SRI Sri Lanka

    TAJ Tajikisan

    TAP Taipei,Cina

    THA Tailan

    TIM Timor-Lese

    TKM TurkmenisandE d

    dh d

    h/^ hE^/^

    hE hE

    hEW hEW

    hE^ hE

    hE/& hE&

    hE^ hE^

    h h

    E

    / E

    GI orlwie Governance Inicaors

    t t

    tWW tWW

    thW thW

    hh^

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    13/102

    Highlights of the Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators

    Te Asia an Pacific region as experience e fases grow in e worl in recen ecaes, an as coninue o

    lea global grow espie slowown or recession in evelope economies since 2008. Ye evience abou growing

    ispariies in income an nonincome oucomes an access o opporuniy as cause concern, making inclusive

    grow a prioriy for eveloping Asia.

    Te publicaion Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators (FIGI), launce in 2011, presene a framework

    of 35 inicaors were povery an inequaliy oucomes of inclusive grow are measure by ree income- an

    ree nonincome-relae inicaors for assessing progress on income as well as nonincome povery. Te povery

    an inequaliy oucomes are o be acieve roug ree policy pillars a promoe: (i) susaine ig grow

    an creaion of proucive jobs an economic opporuniy, (ii) social inclusion o ensure equal access o economic

    opporuniy by increasing uman capabiliies, an (iii) social safey nes o proec e cronically poor an o miigae

    e risks an vulnerabiliies of people. Te progress on ese pillars is measure by a se of 26 quaniaive inicaors.

    Policies for inclusive grow are suppore by goo governance an insiuions, wic in urn are measure by

    anoer se of ree inicaors.

    Te 2 ecaes1990s an 2000salso saw big callenges for e Asian region. In e early 1990s, economic

    grow ecline in mos economies in Cenral an es Asia; an in e laer par of e 1990s, financial crisis i

    /

    financial crisis since 2008 aversely affece many exporing economies in Asia. Te series of callenging crises as

    well as inernal facors an policies ave impace e social an economic progress in economies of eveloping Asia

    over e 2 ecaes.

    FIGI 2013 as wo pars. Par I aemps o race ow economies of eveloping Asia ave progresse in eac

    of e 2 ecaes of e 1990s an 2000s in 20 selece inicaors of FIGI base on improvemen inexes for eac

    ecae, an o see if e improvemens in e 2000s accelerae over e improvemens in e 1990s. Par II conains

    upae saisical ables an sor commenaries for rens in 35 FIGI inicaors for e regional economies in Asia.

    Part I. A Progress Assessment of te

    1990s an 2000s in eveloping Asia

    Te main objecive of Par I is o assess e

    improvemens in e performance of eveloping Asia

    on 20 selece inicaors of FIGI in e 1990s an 2000s

    an o see if e improvemens in e 2000s accelerae

    over ose in e 1990s. Tis is parially inspire by e

    Millennium Developmen Goals (MDG), were mos

    counries agree o improve eir social an economicconiions significanly by 2015. However, e FIGI is no

    an assessmen of e MDGs.

    Metoology an ata

    Improvemen inexes using e Kakwani (1993)

    2 ecaes using 20 selece inicaors of FIGI for

    economies of eveloping Asia wi sufficien aa

    poins. Te meoology allows e variables o be

    convere ino uni-free inexes. Tis meoology

    also ajuss for effors neee o furer improve

    e performance of an inicaor as e inicaor

    approaces is iges possible level. A posiive

    improvemen inex enoes a real posiive

    improvemen in e inicaor wile a negaive inex

    enoes eerioraion in e inicaor.

    d

    secon as close as possible o 2000, an a ir as

    improvemen inexes for 2 ecaes for eac

    inicaor.

    An acceleraion in e improvemen inex is

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    14/102

    xii ighlights of the Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators

    e improvemen inex in e 2000s from e

    1990s. A eceleraion is a ecline in e value of

    d

    progress is consiere mainaine if e value of

    e improvemen inex of e 2000s is wiin +-

    W

    for most inicators in most economies of

    eveloping Asia

    Progress acieve in e 2 ecaes iffers among

    economies an regions. No counry performe

    well in all inicaors in bo ecaes, bu clearly,

    economies ave acieve improvemens in a far

    greaer number of inicaors an eerioraions in

    bo ecaes.

    Tiry economies a more number of inicaors

    wi posiive improvemen inexes in e 2000s

    an in e 1990swi anoer 5 economies

    aving e same number of inicaors wi

    posiive improvemen inexes as in e 1990s.

    Major improvemens in e 2000s over e 1990s

    (more an one-four aiional inicaors aving

    posiive improvemen inexes) were acieve

    '

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    15/102

    ighlights of the Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators

    fall in per capia consumpion of elecriciy, mos

    bounce back in e 2000s, wi iger per capia

    income grow. You employmen-o-populaion

    raios sow consisen eclines in bo ecaes,

    wi even faser eclines in e 2000s in some cases.

    Among e inicaors of policy pillar 2 (social

    inclusion for equal access), significan gains ave

    been mae in e 2 ecaes in improving scool

    life expecancy (excep in Cenral an es Asian

    economies uring e 1990s, wic winesse a fall

    in scool life expecancy) wi many acceleraions

    in e 2000s. Mos economies also successfully

    in 22 economies in e 2000s.

    Gener pariy in primary eucaion as improvesignificanly in e 2 ecaes, bu gener pariy in

    labor force paricipaion as sown eerioraion

    in many economies paricularly in e 2000s. Tis

    inclue e wo mos populous economies of

    e PRC an Inia. Tis reaens o isor e

    composiion of e labor force an inclusiveness

    employmen.

    Progress as been noewory in improving access

    o clean rinking waer sources, incluing in e

    rural areas in almos all economies in bo e

    1990s an e 2000s. Similar rens of posiive

    improvemen inexes are seen for access o safe

    saniaion bu a a muc slower pace an for

    rinking waer. Tree-fours of e counries ave

    accelerae improvemens in e 2000s in proviing

    access o an improve rinking waer source an o

    an improve saniaion faciliy.

    Te inicaor on pillar 3 (social safey nes) suggess

    some improvemens in social securiy expeniures

    on eal by governmens.

    Lasly, negaive improvemen inexes for inicaors

    of voice an accounabiliy anor governmen

    effeciveness in many economies of eveloping Asia

    in e 2 ecaes poin o e nee for improve

    governance an more accounable insiuions.

    Tis mig be one of e mos persisen callenges

    owar more inclusive grow in e region.

    Conclusions

    Some key conclusions observe from e improvemen

    inexes in e 2 ecaes are e following:

    consumpion, an scool life expecancy appear

    o move ogeer; an improvemens in eal

    (as inicae by consisen reucions in e cil

    moraliy raes), an improvemens in infrasrucure

    of saniaion an rinking waer appear o ave

    aken place irrespecive of e pace of economic

    grow. Tis was evien mosly in e Cenral an

    es Asian economies wen ese counries face

    recession in e 1990s an en recovere in e

    2000s.

    Counries a ave successfully reuce povery

    bu ave winesse increasing income inequaliy

    will nee policies especially esigne o expan

    job opporuniies an access o social services an

    infrasrucure for regions an populaions a are

    lef bein o promoe inclusive grow.

    Furer, for an economic grow a provies

    equal opporuniies o all, innovaive policies

    an approaces will be neee. For example,

    cellular pones ave immense benefis for low-

    income groups an remoely-locae populaions.

    Tus programs a can empower e poor an

    pones, for example, soul be promoe.

    omen an you consiue a large sare of

    proucive uman resources. Falling you

    employmen-o-populaion raio an a ecline

    policy aenion an require innovaive inclusive

    of women an you, susain economic grow, anreuce income inequaliy.

    To implemen inclusive policies successfully an

    o acieve eir inene objecives, governmen

    effeciveness an insiuions will ave o be

    srengene in mos of Asia.

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    16/102

    iv ighlights of the Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators

    Finally, significan effors are neee o give ig

    prioriy o improve availabiliy of imely aa on

    various inicaors by imporan isaggregaions o

    monior progress on inclusive grow.

    W// d

    conomies in eveloping Asia

    Par II provies a glimpse of general rens in FIGI

    inicaors wi a focus on e ispariies on accoun of

    isaggregae saisics are available. I supplemens

    e analysis in Par I, wic is mainly focuse on

    improvemens in counry-level inicaors. Higligs

    following e FIGI srucure are given below.

    Poverty an Inequality Outcomes

    W WWW

    inernaional povery line ecline in almos all

    economies of eveloping Asia, bringing own e

    proporion of poor below e povery line from

    sare of income or consumpion of e iges

    quinile o lowes quinile worsene in 16 of e 33

    economies for wic aa are available beween e

    earlies an laes years in e las 2 ecaes. Tese

    inclue four of e five mos populous economies

    oal populaion.

    In e PRC, Inia, an Inonesiawere aa on

    PPP) povery are availablewie ruralurban

    income gaps are evien. Laes rural povery raes

    respecively, wile corresponing urban povery

    respecively.

    Faser progress as been noe for e average years

    of oal scooling for young females compare o

    young males in eveloping Asia beween 1990 an

    2010reucing e aggregae gap o only 0.3 years

    in 2010.

    h

    resience is a reason for unequal oucomes in

    >

    sugges a in 19 of 29 economies in eveloping

    Asia, a cil in e poores quinile is a leas wice

    as likely o be unerweig as a cil in e ricesquinile.

    Similar ispariies are observe in uner-five

    moraliy raes. In eig economies, cances of

    uner-five eas for cilren in e poores

    ouseols were a leas ree imes as ig as

    ose from e rices ouseols.

    Policy Pillar One: Growt an xpansion of

    conomic Opportunity

    'W WWW

    d

    impac of e economic slowown in e evelope

    economies in recen years.

    Large work force in economies of eveloping Asia

    is employe as own-accoun an conribuing

    family workers (or vulnerable employmen). Tere

    as been a slow ecline in e sare of vulnerable

    workers vis--vis wage an salarie workers.

    However, women coninue o be more likely o be

    in vulnerable jobs an men.

    Houseol income or consumpion surveys

    conuce mosly beween 1998 an 2012 also

    sow a in 12 ou of 20 economies, average

    annual per capia income or consumpion (in 2005

    WWW

    in e lowes quinile an among ouseols in

    e iges quinile. Daa from similar surveys for

    earlier years in e 1990s for 20 economies sowa in only six of em as e per capia income

    or consumpion grown a a faser rae for lowes-

    quinile ouseols.

    ile elecriciy consumpion per capia a

    more an riple from 1990 o aroun 2010, wie

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    17/102

    ighlights of the Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators

    ispariies exis across economies, as e elecriciy

    consumpion per capia is as low as 64 kilowa-our

    (k) in Afganisan bu as ig as 10,356 k in

    Taipei,Cina. Cellular pone subscripions increase

    o nearly 82 per 100 people in eveloping Asia, bu

    were below 20 per 100 people in Kiribai, Myanmar,an e Marsall Islans.

    Policy Pillar Two: Social Inclusion to nsure

    qual Access to conomic Opportunity

    Goo performance is noe for scool life

    expecancy, an gener ispariies also narrowe

    from 1.1 years in 1999 o 0.3 years in 2011. Te

    pupileacer raio improve o 25 in 2011 from

    a raio of 28 in 1990, oug in some economies

    like Afganisan an Camboia, e raio worsene(increase in absolue value) ue o more suens

    pace.

    dW

    slowly from

    /

    were a leas 1.3 imes e rural coverage raes

    /

    e Lao PDR (1.4), e Marsall Islans (3.2), an

    Pakisan (1.3). Cilren in e rices quinile

    PDR (2.0), Afganisan (1.9), e Marsall Islans

    (1.9), an Inonesia (1.8)were more an 1.5

    e poores quinile.

    wiou access o elecriciy are in eveloping

    Asia. ie ruralurban ispariies also exis. Te

    raios of urban-o-rural access were 1.5 or more in

    9 counries wi raios as ig as 3.1 (Myanmar), 4.1(Timor-Lese), an 5.7 (Camboia). Soli fuels are

    e ominan source of cooking fuel in rural areas in

    poorer economies an ou of e nearly 1.97 billion

    populaion in eveloping Asia wo epen on soli

    fuels for cooking, 1.79 billion are in rural areas.

    progress in proviing eir populaions wi access

    o safe rinking waer for bo urban an rural

    areas, us briging e ruralurban gap. However,

    eveloping Asia sill use unimprove saniaion

    &

    rural populaion a access o improve saniaion

    2011, an ou of 1.67 billion people wiou access

    o improve saniaion in eveloping Asia, nearly

    1.24 billion live in rural areas.

    Developing Asia a mae goo progress in

    narrowing e gener gap in all levels of eucaion.

    However, gener pariy in labor force paricipaionpersiss in mos economies an as worsene

    over ime. Also, women coninue o be grossly

    unerrepresene in poliics, paricularly in e

    seas occupie by women.

    Policy Pillar Tree: Social Safety Nets

    Social proecion an labor raings in 2012 range

    from very srong performance of 5.0 in Armenia

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    18/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    19/102

    PART I

    A Progress Assessment of the 1990s and2000s in Developing Asia

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    20/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    21/102

    1. Introduction

    Te Asia an Pacific region as experience e fases

    grow in e worl in recen ecaes, espie e

    However, is grow as been uneven across e region.

    Many Asia an Pacific economies are experiencing

    rising ispariies in income an nonincome oucomes,

    an bo policy makers an evelopmen parners

    are concerne abou susaine an inclusive grow

    (uang an Ali 2010; ADB 2012a, ADB 2011b, ADB

    2012c).

    Inclusive grow, efine as economic grow

    wi equaliy of opporuniy, is one of e ree

    sraegic objecives of e Asian Developmen Bank(ADB) as explaine in is Sraegy 2020 (ADB 2008). Te

    firs wo eiions of e Framework of Inclusive Growth

    Indicators 2011 an 2012 (FIGI 2011 an FIGI 2012)

    special supplemens o e Key Indicators (KI) for Asia

    and the Pacific 2011 an 2012

    a eaile srucure of inicaors of inclusive grow

    (Table 1.1).

    Te FIGI consiss of 35 inicaors. Te oucomes

    of inclusive grow are measure by inicaors of

    income an nonincome povery. Tese oucomes are

    acieve roug ree policy pillars of (i) susaine

    economic grow an evelopmen of proucive

    jobs an economic opporuniies, (ii) social inclusion

    o ensure equal access o economic opporuniy by

    expaning uman capaciies, an (iii) social safey nes

    o proec e cronically poor an o aress e risks

    pillars is escribe by a se of quaniaive inicaors,

    all of wic soul be suppore by goo governance

    an insiuions, again measure by a se of inicaors.

    FIGI 2012 sowe significan correlaions beween e

    oucome inicaors an many inicaors of e policypillars.

    Beginning 1990 unil 2010, e Asia an

    Pacific region successfully acieve e Millennium

    Developmen Goal (MDG) of reucing exreme povery

    [PPP] erms) by alf, 5 years aea of e arge year

    2015. Te average per capia income (consan 2005

    WWW

    an 2010. However, e 2 ecaes1990s an 2000salso saw big callenges for e region. In e early

    1990s, economic grow ecline in mos counries

    in Cenral an es Asia afer e collapse of e

    former Sovie Union. In e laer par of e same

    significan financial crisis a i grow in a number

    of counries. In e 2000s, wo global recessionse

    o-com recession in e early 2000s an a more severe

    financial crisis owar e laer par of e ecae

    aversely affece many exporing economies in Asia.

    Nevereless, in aggregae, e economies of evelopingAsia recovere well from e crises of e 1990s an

    ave performe beer an oer regions in e recen

    perio of volailiy in e global economy.

    Te series of crises as well as inernal facors an

    policies ave impace social an economic progress

    in e 2 ecaes in economies of eveloping Asia. FIGI

    2013, a special supplemen o KI 2013, aemps o race

    ow economies of eveloping Asia ave progresse in

    eac of e 2 ecaes of 1990s an 2000s using selece

    inicaors of FIGI. Tis is also parly inspire by e MDG

    iniiaive a began in e early 2000swi counries

    globally aoping e MDGs an arges o improve

    eir social an economic coniions significanly by

    2015. However, e FIGI is no an assessmen of e

    performance of e counries owar eir MDG goals.

    Tis caper is ivie ino six secions, incluing

    e inroucory firs secion. Te secon secion

    explains e meoology, aa use, an limiaions of

    ^

    e comparaive analysis of e improvemens acieve

    by economies of eveloping Asia in e ecaes of1990s an 2000s base on e improvemen inexes

    calculae for selece inicaors across pillars of FIGI.

    Secion 6 presens conclusions.

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    22/102

    4 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    Table 1.1 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators*

    Poverty and Inequality

    Good Governance and Institutions

    Income

    1 roportion of population living below the national poverty line

    2 roportion of population living below $2 a day at 2005 $

    atio of income or consumption of the highest quintile to lowest quintile

    Nonincome

    4 Average years of total schooling (youth and adults)

    5 revalence of underweight children under five years of age

    nder-five mortality rate per 1,000 live births

    Pillar OneGrowth and Expansion of Economic

    Opportunity

    Economic Growth and Employment

    7 rowth rate of per capita at

    (constant 2005 $)

    8 rowth rate of average per capita

    income or consumption 2005 $

    (lowest quintile, highest quintile, andtotal)

    9 mployment-to-population ratio

    10 per person engaged at constant

    1990 $

    11 Number of own-account and

    contributing family workers per 100

    wage and salaried workers

    Key Infrastructure Endowments

    12 er capita consumption of electricity

    1 ercentage of paved roads

    14 Number of cellular phone subscriptions

    per 100 people

    15 epositors with commercial banks per1,000 adults

    Pillar TwoSocial Inclusion to Ensure Equal

    Access to Economic Opportunity

    Access and Inputs to Education and

    Health

    1 chool life expectancy (primary to

    tertiary)

    17 upilteacher ratio (primary)

    18 iphtheria, tetanus toxoid, andpertussis (T) immunization

    coverage among 1-year-olds

    19 hysicians, nurses, and midwives per

    10,000 population

    20 overnment expenditure on education

    as a percentage of total government

    expenditure

    21 overnment expenditure on health

    as a percentage of total government

    expenditure

    Access to Basic Infrastructure Utilities

    and Services

    22 ercentage of population with accessto electricity

    2 hare of population using solid fuels

    for cooking

    24 roportion of population using an

    improved drinking water source

    25 roportion of population using an

    improved sanitation facility

    Gender Equality and Opportunity

    2 ender parity in primary, secondary,

    and tertiary education

    27 Antenatal care coverage (at least one

    visit and at least four visits)

    28 ender parity in labor force

    participation

    29 ercentage of seats held by women in

    national parliament

    Pillar ThreeSocial Safety Nets

    0 ocial protection and labor rating

    1 ocial security expenditure on health

    as a percentage of government

    expenditure on health

    2 overnment expenditure on social

    security and welfare as a percentageof total government expenditure

    oice and accountability 4 overnment effectiveness 5 Control of corruption

    = gross domestic product, kh = kilowatt-hours, = purchasing power parity.

    * ndicators will be disaggregated by sex, ruralurban residence, and wealth quintiles where applicable and when data are available.ource: eveloped from the policy pillars of inclusive growth as adapted from huang and Ali (2010). Asian evelopment Bank.

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    23/102

    2. The Methodology

    Tis caper assesses e progress of 45 economies

    of eveloping Asia uring e 1990s an 2000s using

    20 inicaors1 of FIGI. Te aim is o assess progress

    in selece inicaors in eac of e 2 ecaes ancompare progress in economies of eveloping Asia.

    >h> >h>h>

    For e secon ype of inicaors, were a lower

    value inicaes iger acievemen (e.g., uner-five

    moraliy rae), e formula for acievemen inex is:

    f(x, U, L) = ((Ln (U-L)- Ln (x-L))Ln (U-L)

    were U is iges possible value an L is e lowes

    possible value of inicaor, x is e value of e inicaor,

    an Ln is e naural logarim.

    1 Only 20 indicators among the 35 indicators of FIGI were used dueto incomplete data and disparities among the countries in termsof availability of data.

    Ten e improvemen inex (or progress)

    beween wo perios 1 an 2 is given by:

    F(x1, x2, U, L) = (f(x2 h > 1, U, L))(2-1)

    were x2 is e value of e inicaor in e en perio

    2 an x1 is e value in e beginning perio 1.

    A posiive improvemen inex for bo kins of

    inicaors as calculae above enoes a real posiive

    improvemen in e acievemen of e inicaor

    beween wo poins in ime, an a negaive value

    enoes a eerioraion. For eac inicaor, a iger

    posiive number enoes a beer performance wile a

    more negaive number means worse performance.

    Daa for e FIGI inicaors are rawn from

    sanar aabases of UN agencies, oer inernaional &

    an inicaor, aa for ree yearsan earlies year

    closes o 1990, a mile year closes o 2000, an a

    ir year closes o 2010were use. Tus for eac

    selece inicaor, only e counries wi ree vali

    aa poins were inclue in e analysis. Tese ree

    aa poins allowe e calculaion of e improvemen

    inexes for eac selece inicaor for e 2 ecaes.

    Limitations. Incomplee aa an ispariies

    among e counries in erms of availabiliy of aa are

    among e limiaions encounere in e suy. Tus,

    only 20 inicaors among e 35 inicaors of FIGI were

    inicaors selece across counries is also isparae.

    Tus, some inicaors woul ave almos complee aa

    for counries wile oers woul ave fewer counries

    represene in e inicaors, wic may affec e

    analysis an inerpreaion of resuls.

    Anoer imporan limiaion is a since e

    number of inicaors is limie only o 20 inicaors,

    e picure is no complee. Te inicaors selecefor e pillars, for example, lack some vial inicaors.

    i ese limiaions in min, e performance of e

    economies of eveloping Asia in e 1990s an 2000s is

    epice using e aforemenione meoology.

    &

    performance in eac inicaor coul no be sown,

    wic woul oerwise be elpful in giving insigs ino

    e iverse performances of e counries. Resuls for

    Part I

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    24/102

    6 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    improvemen inexes of e counries for eac inicaor,

    an e performance of eac counry in e selece

    in e following secions.

    3. Performance of Economiesin the Selected Indicators

    Te performance of economies on e selece

    inicaors is observe base on e improvemen

    inexes of e 2 ecaes. In is secion, some inicaors

    are accompanie by graps a plo improvemen

    inexes for e inicaor o epic counry performance.

    d of economies of eveloping Asia base on e

    improvemen inexes for e selece inicaors in e

    1990s an 2000s. A posiive improvemen inex implies

    progress in e performance of e inicaor beween

    wo poins in ime, wile a negaive value implies a

    eerioraion. To compare progress measure in erms

    of improvemen inexes in e 2 ecaes, Table 1.2 also

    or mainaine eir progress in e 2000s compare

    wi progress uring e 1990s. An acceleraion in e

    of improvemen inex in e 2000s from e 1990s. A

    eceleraion is a ecline in e value of improvemen

    W

    if e value of improvemen inex of e 2000s is wiin

    /

    improvemen inex of e 1990s is negaive, a fall in is

    acceleraion, an an increase in e negaive value (an

    eceleraion.

    Te nex subsecions iscuss e performance ofselece inicaors following e srucure of FIGI.

    3.1 Poverty an Inequality

    Proportion of Population Living below $2-a-Day

    at 2005 PPP$

    As sown by posiive improvemen inexes, e

    a 2005 PPP inernaional povery line sows a mos

    counries improve uring e 2 ecaes of 1990s an

    2000s, excep for e Cenral Asian economies uring

    e 1990s, wic suffere severe economic ecline

    following e issoluion of e former Sovie Union,

    for Malaysia a suffere from financial crisis, an forPacific economies of e Feerae Saes of Micronesia

    an Papua New Guinea in e 2000s. Te Cenral Asian

    economies recovere in e 2000s an so i Malaysia.

    Tus, espie e financial crises, a majoriy of e

    counries in e Asia an Pacific region were able o

    reuce povery in e 2 ecaes an furer accelerae

    inclue for is inicaor, 18 were able o reuce

    counries accelerae eir raes of povery reucion in

    e 2000s from e 1990s, wile 5 ecelerae.

    Figure 1.1 plos e improvemen inexes for

    of ouliers, e counries are clusere in e mile, bu

    mos of e counries in e firs quaran accelerae

    eir povery reucion in e 2000s.

    = purchasing power parity.

    Note: ata points used are all consumption-based except for the ederatedtates of Micronesia and Malaysia, which are income-based. ata forthe eoples epublic of China, ndia, and ndonesia combine the urbanand rural distributions, weighted by share of rural and urban population

    to total population. ata for the ederated tates of Micronesia refer tourban population.

    ources: Authors calculations based on data from ovcalNet atabase nline(orld Bank), accessed 1 May 201; orld evelopment ndicators

    nline (orld Bank), accessed 19 April 201.

    igure 1.1 Improvement Indexes for the Proportion ofPopulation Living below $2 a day at 2005 PPP$, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    BAN

    B

    CAM

    C

    N

    N

    A

    MA

    M

    M

    NA

    N

    TA

    TA

    TM

    0.01

    0.00

    0.01

    0.02

    0.0

    0.04

    0.05

    0.0

    0.07

    0.0

    5

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    3

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    1

    0.0

    0

    0.0

    1

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    3

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    5

    0.0

    6

    0.0

    7

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    25/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    26/102

    8 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    Te economies wi e mos impressive

    were Buan, e PRC, Fiji, Inonesia, Malaysia, e

    d E

    t W Z

    (Lao PDR), Inonesia, an Papua New Guinea, a mus

    evelop inclusive policies o ensure longer reenion of

    pupils in scools an overcome inequaliy of access o

    eucaion especially for e poor an e vulnerable

    populaions.

    ources: Authors calculations based on data from Barro and ee (201); HumanDevelopment Report 2013 (N 201).

    igure 1. Improvement Indexes for

    Average Years of Total Schooling for Adults, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    BAN

    B

    CAM

    N N A

    A

    MA

    M

    MN

    MA

    N

    A

    A

    N

    C

    N

    TA

    TA

    TA

    TN

    0.005

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    20

    Note: ata points used are all consumption-based except for Taipei,China;which are income-based and defined as disposable household income.ata for the eople's epublic of China combine the urban and ruraldistributions, weighted by share of urban and rural population to totalpopulation.

    ources: Authors calculations based on data from ovcalNet atabase nline(orld Bank), accessed 1 May 201; for Taipei,China: economy source.

    igure 1.2 Improvement Indexes for the Ratio of Income orConsumption Share of Highest Quintile to Lowest Quintile,

    1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    BAN

    CN

    A

    MA

    MN

    A

    TATA

    0.04

    0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.0

    0.08

    0.10

    0.12

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    0

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    6

    0.0

    8

    0.1

    0

    0.1

    2

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    27/102

    Coninue improvemens in access o scooling

    is an imporan resul an boes well for proucive

    uman capaciy an fuure grow of e region. Figure

    1.3 presens improvemen inexes for e average years

    for Armenia, Fiji, e Malives, an Tajikisan, all oerslie in e firs quaran sowing posiive inexes in bo

    ecaes. Te performances of e Republic of Korea;

    Malaysia; Palau; Singapore; Sri Lanka an Taipei,Cina

    ave been paricularly impressive in bo ecaes.

    Under Five Mortality Rate per 1,000 live births

    Uner is inicaor, all economies wi sufficien aa

    were able o reuce moraliy for ose uner five

    sufficien aa, 42 improve in bo ecaes an onlyone counry, Nauru, a no improvemen (Figure 1.4).

    Improvemen inexes for 16 counries accelerae in

    e 2000s, 18 mainaine eir progress raes, an 9

    ecelerae. Te economies wi eceleraion in e

    2000s inclue ose wi alreay low cil moraliy

    raes like e Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Singapore,

    an Tailan, bu also inclue ose wi ig raes

    like Afganisan, e Marsall Islans, an PNG. Tis

    inicaor is also a measure for e MDG arge of cuing

    e uner-five moraliy raes by wo-irs from e

    1990 levels an consisen progress in e las 2 ecaes

    is no enoug for many counries o acieve is arge.

    (ADB 2012b).

    Figure 1.4 also sows e improvemen inexes

    for is inicaor for e 2 ecaes, were counries

    cluser aroun e 45-egree line in e firs quaran.

    Many low-income economies like Banglaes, e Lao

    PDR, e Malives, Mongolia, an Timor-Lese sow

    ig reucions in cil moraliy raes.

    Tese posiive avances augur well for aving

    ealier cilren an a proucive labor force for

    fuure benefis o iniviuals, sociey, an e economy.

    Te four oucome inicaors of FIGI iscusse

    above inicae goo progress in povery reucion

    an in eal an eucaion oucomes in eveloping

    Asia. However, income isribuion is a callenge for

    many economies of eveloping Asiawic coul be

    a resul of grow concenrae only in cerain regionsof a counry. Tis income inequaliy may wien regional

    ispariies, ispariies beween an wiin urban an

    rural areas, an among ifferen classes of sociey.

    Acieving inclusive grow erefore requires greaer

    aenion.

    3.2 Pillar One: Growt an xpansion

    of conomic Opportunity

    3.2.1 conomic Growt an mployment

    Gross Domestic Product per Capita at PPP (constant

    2005 PPP$)

    d

    for annual exponenial grow raes of gross omesic

    'WWWW2

    of 36 economies, 24 economies exibie posiive

    inexes in e 1990s, wile grow in 12 economies was

    negaive. Te economies wi negaive grow were

    from e Cenral an es Asia, Brunei Darussalam,

    Mongolia, Palau, an Solomon Islans. In e 2000s,33 ou of 36 economies a posiive grow an

    improvemen inexes, as 24 economies accelerae,

    annual grow level, an 10 counries ecelerae.

    2 Huge differences in the per capita incomes between the poorestand the richest countries yielded some unusual indexes using theKakwani method. Hence, the exponential growth formula was usedfor this indicator. The formula for the exponential annual growth rateis (Ln(x(T))-Ln(x(t)))/(T-t), where x is the GDP per capita in constant2005 PPP$, T is the end year, and t the starting year.

    Part I

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicators

    atabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.4 Improvement Indexes forUnder-Five Mortality Rate per 1,000 Live Births, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    A

    BAN

    B

    B

    CAM C

    C

    N

    NA

    A

    MA

    M

    M

    M

    MN

    MA

    NA

    N

    AA

    N

    AM

    N

    TA

    TA

    TM

    TNTM

    TB

    AN

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    0.025

    0.00

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    25

    0.0

    30

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    28/102

    0 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    Figure 1.5 sows e scaer plo of improvemen

    inexes of e exponenial annual grow rae of GDP

    per capia for e 36 economies for e 1990s an 2000s.

    Te Cenral an es Asian economies of Armenia,

    '

    Number of Own-Account and Contributing Family

    orkers Per 100 age and Salaried orkers

    Tis inicaor sows e exen of low qualiy an

    vulnerable jobs in an economy. Comparaive aa for e

    ese, 7 economies in e 1990s an 8 in e 2000s a

    posiive improvemen inexes implying movemen from

    low-paying informal jobs o formal jobs, wic usually

    enail more permanency an iger pay (ADB 2011a).

    Hong Kong, Cina an Singapore bo sowe ecline

    in e 1990s, wi Hong Kong, Cina furer eclining in

    e 2000s. However, ese economies alreay ave very

    low levels of vulnerable employmen. Improvemen

    inexes for five economies (incluing Inia an Sri Lanka)

    also accelerae in e 2000s wile for four (incluing

    Pakisan an Tailan), ey ecelerae.

    3.2.2. Key Infrastructure nowments

    Per Capita Consumption of Electricity

    Te improvemen inexes of mos counries sow

    increase in per capia elecriciy consumpion, le by

    e iger-income counries in bo e 1990s an e

    2000s. For e lower-income counries, e increase inper capia elecriciy consumpion is muc lower an

    a of e iger-income counries. Mos Cenral an

    es Asian economies suffere eclines in elecriciy

    consumpion in e 1990s ue o eir recession, an

    in some, per capia consumpion furer ecline in

    e 2000s, espie significan economic recovery. Tis

    may be ue o e lack of mainenance of elecriciy

    infrasrucure uring e ecae of ecline or ue o

    significan improvemens in energy efficiency.

    = gross domestic product, = purchasing power parity.

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from orld evelopment ndicatorsnline (orld Bank), accessed 1 uly 201.

    igure 1.5 Improvement Indexes for Growth Ratein GDP Per Capita at Constant 2005 PPP$, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    AM

    A

    BAN

    B

    B

    CAM

    C

    N

    N

    A

    A

    MA

    M

    MN

    NA

    A

    NAM

    N

    TA

    TA

    TN

    TMB

    AN

    0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.0

    0.08

    0.10

    0.12

    0.14

    0.12

    0.10

    0.08

    0.06

    0.04

    0.02

    0.0

    0

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    6

    0.0

    8

    0.1

    0

    0.1

    2

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    29/102

    consumpion in e 1990s wile 10 saw a ecline, wic

    inclue 8 economies of e Cenral an es Asia.

    In e 2000s, is became 31 improvemens, wi 5

    winessing a ecline, 4 of wic were Cenral an es

    accelerae eir per capia elecriciy usage, 1

    mainaine i, an 9 ecelerae in e 2000s compare

    wi e 1990s.

    Te general increase in elecriciy usage is

    common o growing economies, wic owever,

    also enails environmenal repercussions as mos of

    ese economies epen on elecriciy generae by

    /

    impore fuels.

    Per Capita Cellular Phone Subscriptions

    Cellular pone subscripions were almos non-exisen

    uring e early 1990s, excep for a few ric economies.

    During e 2000s, subscripions of cellular pones

    grew exponenially. Tus, wile uring e 1990s only

    e ricer economies increase ownersip of cellular

    pones, mos economies increase cellular pone

    subscripions significanly in e following ecae

    incluing many of e lower-income counries. However,

    many of e Pacific islan economies an Myanmar

    increase eir cellular pone ownersip in e 2000s a

    a muc slower pace an oer eveloping economies.

    Improvemen inexes for 42 economies sow a

    38 increase eir per capia cellular pone subscripion

    in e 1990s. In e 2000s, all 42 economies increase

    eir per capia subscripions an 41 economies

    accelerae eir per capia subscripion raes. Te

    only economy were e improvemen inex in e

    2000s ecelerae in comparison wi e 1990s was

    Taipei,Cina, wic alreay a a ig subscripion levelin e 2000s, an were subscripions mig be reacing

    a sauraion poin.

    Cellular pones ave become par of e lives of

    people in all economies of eveloping Asia, incluing

    e low-income economies. Tey ave ransforme e

    ways in wic people communicae, access informaion

    as well as financial an oer services, inerac wi

    e governmen, increase economic opporuniies, an

    expan eir business. Tey ave immense benefis for

    low-income groups an remoely-locae populaions.

    Tus, programs a can empower e poor an

    soul be suppore.

    In general e improvemen inexes for e

    inicaors of pillar 1excep for e you employmen-o-populaion raioemonsrae posiive resuls

    especially accelerae in e 2000s an consumpion

    of elecriciy increase along wi increasing economic

    grow. Limie aa sugges some eclining ren in

    e proporion of informal an vulnerable jobs in poor

    economies. A e same ime, significan avances

    in e use of cellular pones are an inicaion of e

    progress mae in e informaion an communicaion

    ecnology (ICT) infrasrucure in e region.

    3.3 Pillar Two: Social Inclusion to

    nsure qual Access to conomic

    Opportunity

    3.3.1. Access an Inputs to ucation an Healt

    School Life Expectancy

    Scool life expecancy from primary o eriary

    improve for mos counries in e 1990s an 2000s.

    Improvemen inexes sow a ou of 20 economies,

    12 improve in e 1990s wile 8 economies, wic

    inclue 7 economies from e Cenral an es Asia

    plus Mongolia, observe a ecline. In e 2000s, all

    excep e Pilippines winesse an improvemen. In

    e 2000s e improvemen inexes for 16 economies

    accelerae, 1 mainaine is level, wile 3 ecelerae

    compare wi inexes for e 1990s. Among e ree

    were progress in e 2000s slowe was e Republic

    of Korea, wic alreay as e iges scool life

    expecancy in eveloping Asia.

    Figure 1.6 isplays improvemen inexes for e

    20 economies a ave sufficien aa for is inicaor.

    Cenral an es Asian economies a eerioraions

    in e 1990s ue o eir severe recession. Afganisan

    an Mongolia also eeriorae. Among e bes

    performers are Brunei Darussalam, e Republic of

    Korea, an Tailan. Afganisan, Camboia, Inonesia,

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    30/102

    2 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    Tese resuls, especially for Cenral Asian

    economies, inicae a scooling, like elecriciy

    consumpion, also epen igly on economic grow.

    en ere is a recession, cilren an e you

    may rop ou of scool if ey ave o elp e family

    financially.

    PupilTeacher Ratio in Primary Schools

    Te pupileacer raio is an imporan proxy inicaor

    of eucaion qualiy. In e 1990s, e improvemen

    inexes for a significan number of counries

    eacer recruimen i no keep pace wi increase

    improvemen in is inicaor in e 1990s an 11

    experience ecline. In e 2000s, 24 counries improve

    an, ese nine economies inclue Afganisan an

    W

    ave worsene over ime peraps ue o e increasing

    ey inclue economies like Taipei,Cina a a

    progresse a a fas rae in e 1990s an a alreay

    reace a low raio.

    Te sorage of eacers as a irec implicaion

    on e qualiy of eucaion an ereby on reenion

    eacer raios are also seen o ave large ropou raes

    hE^ /

    ese sorages are in remoe an rural areas, an

    erefore as governmens make effors o acieve e

    MDG of universal primary eucaion, along wi arges

    o enrol all cilren, ey also nee o ave policies

    in place o provie aequae number of qualifie anraine eacers.

    Diphtheria, Tetanus Toxoid, and Pertussis (DTP3)

    Immunization Coverage Among 1-Year-Olds

    Performance in is inicaor sows a mixe picure.

    Aloug e majoriy of economies exibie

    improvemens in eir inexes in e 1990s an 2000s,

    a number of em also exibie a ecline beween

    e saring an en poins. Tose a eeriorae

    inclue economies from all income levels.

    bu 16 eeriorae. Tis worsene a bi in e 2000s

    wi 23 sowing improvemens an e remaining 19

    wi no improvemen or eerioraing coverage raes.

    Improvemen inexes for 21 economies accelerae

    in e 2000s, ecelerae for anoer 20, an was

    mainaine in 1.

    Figure 1.7 sows e improvemen inexes for is

    inicaor. Te PRC an Inia are among e economies

    a saw eclines in eir inexes in e 1990s, along

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from nstitute for tatistics ataCentre (NC), accessed 0 May 201.

    igure 1. Improvement Indexes forSchool Life Expectancy, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AB

    CAM

    C

    NN

    A

    A

    MN

    MA

    TA TA

    B

    0.010

    0.005

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    20

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from lobal ealth bservatoryata epository (), accessed 17 May 201.

    igure 1.7 Improvement Indexes for Diphtheria,Tetanus Toxoid, and Pertussis (DTP3)

    Immunization Coverage Among 1-Year-Olds, 1990s, 2000s

    2

    000s

    1990s

    A

    AMA

    BAN

    B

    B

    CAM

    C

    C

    N

    N

    A

    A MA

    M

    M

    MMN

    MA

    NA

    N

    A

    A

    N

    AM

    N

    TATA

    TN

    TM

    T

    BAN

    0.08

    0.0

    0.04

    0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.0

    0.08

    0.10

    0.0

    8

    0.0

    6

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    0

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    6

    0.0

    8

    0.1

    0

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    31/102

    wi Afganisan, Buan, Myanmar, e Pilippines,

    an some Pacific economies. Te grap also sows a

    many of ese counries improve eir performance in

    e 2000s, noably e PRC, e Cook Islans, Fiji, e

    Marsall Islans, Myanmar, an Nauru. Te eclines in

    some economies may no be alarming. However, every

    e lives of a large number of cilren a risk from ese

    reucing cil moraliy.

    3.3.2 Access to Basic Infrastructure Utilities an

    Services

    Proportion of Population Using an Improved Drinking

    ater Source

    Te percenage of e populaion using an improve

    rinking waer source is one of e MDG inicaors a

    as seen remenous progress in mos economies in

    bo ecaes, increasing access for millions of people.

    rinking waer faciliies a e beginning of 1990 an

    a also mainaine i roug e 2 ecaes were no

    inclue so as no o bias e number of counries a

    i no improve.

    Improvemen inexes of 36 economies, sow a

    31 improve in e 1990s an 32 improve in e 2000s.

    Tiry accelerae e improvemen in e 2000s over

    e 1990s, four ecelerae, an wo mainaine eir

    saus.

    Figure 1.8 sows e improvemen inexes for

    well in bo ecaes inclue e PRC, Fiji, Inia, e

    Z

    Edd

    ecline in bo ecaes. Marginal eclines in e

    improvemen inexes for bo ecaes are seen in e&^ h

    t

    ese economies generally ave coverage of more

    waer soul be reverse. Te 2 ecaes of effors o

    an improve access o safe rinking waer as le o e

    acievemen of e MDG arge of reucing by alf e

    populaion wiou access in mos economies of e

    region (ADB 2012b).

    Proportion of Population Using an Improved Sanitation

    Facility

    Te proporion of populaion using an improve

    saniaion faciliy is also an MDG inicaor. Similar o

    access o rinking waer, mos economies improve

    in e 1990s an 2000s an furer accelerae eir

    improvemens in e 2000s, aloug compare o

    improve rinking waer sources, e progress as no

    e en were omie in e analysis.

    30 improve in e 2000s. In e 2000s, 30 economies

    accelerae eir improvemens, 6 ecelerae an 2

    mainaine eir 1990s saus. Figure 1.9 sows a

    Georgia an Tonga eeriorae in bo ecaes, wile

    ig improvemen inexes were observe in Palau an

    h

    eveloping Asia as improve is recor on access o

    improve saniaion faciliies since e 1990s, many

    economies are far from acieving e MDG arge of

    cuing by alf e proporion of populaion wiou

    access (ADB 2012b).

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicators

    atabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.8 Improvement Indexes for Proportion of PopulationUsing an Improved Drinking Water Source, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    ABAN

    CAM

    C

    N

    N

    A

    A

    MA

    M

    M

    M

    MN

    MAN

    AA

    N

    AM

    TA

    TATM

    TM

    T

    B

    AN

    0.015

    0.010

    0.005

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    0.025

    0.00

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    25

    0.0

    30

    Part I

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    32/102

    4 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    3.3.3 Gener quality an Opportunity

    Gender Parity in Primary Education

    Improvemen inexes for e 1990s an 2000s for

    is inicaor sowe a a majoriy of counries a

    improve gener pariy in primary eucaion in bo

    ecaes, an many also accelerae eir improvemens

    in e 2000s.

    Again, exclue from e analysis are some

    counries a a alreay acieve full gener

    economies, 15 improve in e 1990s an 21 improve

    in e 2000s. Tweny economies accelerae eir

    improvemens in e 2000s an improvemen inexes

    for 6 ecelerae, wic inclue Myanmar an Samoa

    a ave alreay acieve gener pariy in primary

    scooling in 2010.

    Te ecline an eceleraion ere may no becriical since many counries ave acieve or are close

    o gener pariy in primary eucaion. Tose a are

    '

    access o primary scooling in eveloping Asia vis-a-vis

    boys as improve consierably in e las 2 ecaes.

    Gender Parity in Labor Force Participation

    More economies a improve gener pariy in labor

    of 40 economies, 31 improve in e 1990s an 9 i

    no. Tis worsene consierably in e 2000s were 23

    counries improve an 17 i no. Nineeen counries

    accelerae eir improvemens in e 2000s wile 21

    ecelerae.

    Te eerioraion of gener pariy in labor force

    paricipaion espie improvemens in gener pariy in

    eucaion reaens o isor e composiion of e

    labor force an inclusiveness of grow by reucing

    t

    more an more women being eucae, i is a goo

    opporuniy o aress ese inequaliies an inrouce

    innovaive approaces owar employmen policies

    e economy.

    Percentage of Seats held by omen in National

    Parliament

    Tere are slig improvemens for a majoriy of counries

    an slig eerioraion for a few in is inicaor in

    1990s wile 15 i no. In e 2000s, is became beer

    wi 18 improvemens. In e 2000s, 18 accelerae

    eir improvemens wile 10 ecelerae.

    Tere is muc room for improvemen in e

    inclusion of women in e poliical process, wic coul

    sociey an e economy.

    Base on ese inicaors, eveloping Asia overall

    is no performing oo well on gener pariy. Aloug

    poliical process require more aenion.

    3.4 Pillar Tree: Social Safety Nets

    Social Security Expenditure on Health as a Percentage

    of Government Expenditure on Health

    Tere are some improvemens in a majoriy of e

    few economies wi sufficien aa for bo ecaes.

    an e 2000s. Furer, in e 2000s, nine economies

    accelerae eir improvemens wile anoer nine

    ecelerae.

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicators

    atabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.9 Improvement Indexes for Proportion of PopulationUsing an Improved Sanitation Facility, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    A

    BAN

    CAM

    C

    C

    NN

    A

    A

    MA

    M

    M MMN

    MANAN

    A

    A

    N

    AM

    TA

    TM

    TN

    TM

    T

    B

    AN

    0.04

    0.0

    0.02

    0.01

    0.00

    0.01

    0.020.0

    0.04

    0.05

    0.0

    0.0

    1

    0.0

    0

    0.0

    1

    0.0

    2

    0.0

    3

    0.0

    4

    0.0

    5

    0.0

    6

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    33/102

    d

    expeniures on social securiy scemes an oer

    scemes of compulsory eal insurance especially

    o cover e poor an vulnerable secions of e

    populaions improves inclusiveness of grow. If e

    18 economies are a represenaive group, i can be saia governmens in eveloping Asia are making some

    progress in expaning social securiy in eal. Counries

    nee o promoe pro-poor eal financing policies for

    beer safey nes, especially for e poor.

    3.5 Goo Governance an Institutions

    Voice and Accountability

    accounabiliy in e 1990s wile 32 i no. In e 2000s,

    20 improve an 24 accelerae eir improvemens in

    e 2000s wile 19 ecelerae.

    Ta many counries (almos alf in e 2000s)

    i no improve in is inicaor sows a poliical

    inclusion is no keeping pace wi economic an social

    evelopmen.

    Government Effectiveness

    A significan number of counries ave negaive or

    of 40 economies, 19 improve in e 1990s wile

    21 i no. In e 2000s, 23 improve wile 17 i

    no. Tweny-one accelerae in e improvemens in

    e 2000s, 1 mainaine is 1990s posiion, wile 18

    ecelerae. Governmen effeciveness seems o be

    anoer weakness owar acieving goo governance

    in eveloping Asia.

    Figure 1.10 sows e improvemen inexes

    of governmen effeciveness. Mos counries arein e secon, ir, or four quaran, inicaing

    eerioraion uring e 1990s or e 2000s or bo.

    effeciveness in bo ecaes, wic inclue 4

    t

    3 in Soueas Asia.

    Tus, economies of eveloping Asia nee

    improve governance an ransparen an accounable

    insiuions o provie a sronger suppor for e pillars

    of inclusive grow. Tis mig be one of e mos

    persisen callenges owar more inclusive grow in

    e region.

    d/Z

    Growt Process

    Te improvemen inexes of e inicaors for access

    o improve rinking waer sources an improve

    saniaion faciliies isaggregae by rural an

    urban areas for wic sufficien aa are available

    for eveloping Asia ave also been compare. For

    improve rinking waer sources, ou of 36 economies,

    23 a larger improvemen inexes for rural areas an

    for urban areas in e 1990s. Tis furer increase o

    25 in e 2000s, sowing larger effors o brige e

    &

    an 1.11.2 sow e improvemen inexes for access

    o improve rinking waer sources for rural an urban

    areas. Access in rural areas o improve rinking waersources accelerae in 32 economies in e 2000s

    compare wi e 1990s, an in 21 economies in urban

    areas.

    For e saniaion inicaor, ou of 37 economies,

    15 a larger improvemen inexes for rural areas an

    for urban areas in e 1990s. Tis increase o 21 in

    urban gap in saniaion in e 2000s. Figures 1.11.3 an

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from orldwide overnancendicators (orld Bank) available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp, accessed 18 April 201.

    igure 1.10 Improvement Indexes forGovernment Effectiveness, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    AAM

    ABAN

    B

    B CAMC

    NN

    A

    A

    MA

    MMM

    MNMA

    N AN

    AM

    N

    TA

    TA

    TA

    TN

    TM

    BAN

    0.04

    0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.0

    0.08

    0.08

    0.06

    0.04

    0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    Part I

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    34/102

    6 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    1.11.4 presen e improvemen inexes for access o

    improve saniaion faciliies in e 1990s an 2000s for

    rural an urban, respecively. Similar o rinking waer,

    many economies exibi acceleraions in bo rural an

    urban areas in e 2000s, oug improvemen inexes

    are muc lower an e inexes for rinking waer.

    Tus, wile muc more nees o be one o brige

    services, i oes inicae improvemens in e rural

    areas vis--vis e urban areas in e las 2 ecaes.

    Te inclusion of rural areas in evelopmen is

    criical for inclusive grow. Rural areas usually are

    more remoe an ofen lack basic infrasrucure, anwere lower prouciviy (an erefore lower wage)

    employmen ens o be concenrae. Improving

    infrasrucure in e rural areas will promoe grow

    wi inclusion in eveloping Asia.

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicatorsatabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.11.1 Improvement Indexes for Proportion of Rural PopulationUsing an Improved Drinking Water Source, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    ABAN

    CAM

    C

    N

    N

    A

    A

    MA

    M

    M

    M

    MN

    MAN

    AA

    N

    AM

    TA

    TA

    TM

    TM

    T

    B

    AN

    0.015

    0.010

    0.005

    0.000

    0.005

    0.010

    0.015

    0.020

    0.025

    0.00

    0.05

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    05

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    25

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    35

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicatorsatabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.11.2 Improvement Indexes for Proportion of Urban PopulationUsing an Improved Drinking Water Source, 1990s, 2000s

    2

    000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    A

    BAN

    B

    CAM

    C

    N

    N

    A

    AMA

    M

    M

    M

    MN

    MA

    NA

    A

    N

    AM

    TA TA

    TM

    TM

    T

    B

    AN

    0.00

    0.020

    0.010

    0.000

    0.010

    0.020

    0.00

    0.040

    0.050

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    40

    0.0

    50

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicators

    atabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.11. Improvement Indexes for Proportion of Rural PopulationUsing an Improved Sanitation Facility, 1990s, 2000s

    2000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    A

    BANCAMC

    C

    N

    N

    A

    AMA

    M

    M

    M

    MN

    MA

    N

    A

    A

    N

    AM

    TA

    TATM

    TN

    TMT

    B

    AN

    0.00

    0.020

    0.010

    0.000

    0.010

    0.020

    0.00

    0.040

    0.050

    0.00

    0.070

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    10

    0.0

    20

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    40

    0.0

    50

    0.0

    60

    0.0

    70

    ource: Authors calculations based on data from Millennium ndicatorsatabase nline (N), accessed uly 201.

    igure 1.11.4 Improvement Indexes for Proportion of Urban PopulationUsing an Improved Sanitation Facility, 1990s, 2000s

    2

    000s

    1990s

    A

    AM

    A

    BAN

    CAM

    C

    C

    NN

    A

    A

    MA

    M

    M

    M

    MN

    MA

    NA

    N

    A

    A

    N

    AM

    TATA TM

    TN

    TM

    T

    B

    AN

    0.00

    0.015

    0.000

    0.015

    0.00

    0.045

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    00

    0.0

    15

    0.0

    30

    0.0

    45

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    35/102

    3.7 Summary

    In summary, analysis of a number of FIGI inicaors

    sow a economies of eveloping Asia ave mae

    improvemens in e las 2 ecaes, wi more counries

    improving in larger number of inicaors in e 2000s.Many economies also sow acceleraions in a number

    of inicaors in e 2000s inicaing increasing pace of

    improvemen in e policy pillars of inclusive grow

    an is oucomes. Tus, oucome inicaors of povery

    rae, uner-five moraliy rae, an average years of

    scooling ave seen goo progress. However, limie

    aa on raio of income or consumpion sare of iges

    quinile o e lowes quinile sugges worsening of

    e gap beween e ric an e poor in many of e

    economies.

    Among e inicaors of pillar one (grow an

    expansion of economic opporuniy), per capia GDP

    grow rae, elecriciy consumpion, an cellular

    pone subscripions sow muc success. Available aa

    on vulnerable employmen sow some canges wi a

    slow rise in e sare of wage an salary employmen,

    bu you employmen-o-populaion raios ave been

    eclining in mos economies.

    Among e inicaors of pillar wo (social inclusion

    o ensure equal access o economic opporuniy),

    eveloping Asia as mae gains in enroling cilren in

    scools as epice by improving scool life expecancy.

    d

    economies excep in some were increase scool

    enrollmens may ave oupace eacer recruimens.

    DTP3 coverage sows eerioraion in many counries.

    Gener pariy as been a remarkable success in primary

    eucaion, bu e progress is no encouraging in labor

    poliical process. For basic faciliies suc as improve

    rinking waer sources, remarkable progress as been

    mae bo in e rural an urban areas. Use of improvesaniaion faciliies as also consisenly improve in

    rural an urban areas, oug a a muc slower pace

    an rinking waer. Te improvemen in e rural

    areas for rinking waer sources an saniaion faciliies

    augurs well for e inclusion of rural areas in grow.

    Te lone inicaor on social safey nes suggess some

    increases in social securiy expeniures on eal by

    governmens. Finally, goo governance appears weak in

    many economies of eveloping Asia.

    4. Performance on Indicatorsby Economy

    Table 1.3 presens an aggregae picure of eperformance of 45 economies base on e improvemen

    inexes for e 1990s an 2000s on e selece

    inicaors for wic sufficien aa are available. Te

    able sows a ere is ispariy in availabiliy of aa

    across counries. ile Tailan as e larges number

    of inicaors (19) wi sufficien aa, Timor-Lese as

    e lowes (5). Te performance of counries uring e

    2 ecaes is generally posiive.

    More improvemens an eerioraions in

    inicaors occurre in bo e 1990s an 2000s. Duringe 1990s, five economies a more inicaors sowing

    '

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    36/102

    8 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    Table 1. Improvement Indexes, 1990s and 2000s, by Economy: A Summarya

    Economies by regions indeveloping Asia

    No. ofindicators

    included per

    economy

    1990s 2000s No. of indicators with progress in the 2000s

    No. ofindicators with

    positive index

    No. ofindicators with

    negative or

    zero index

    No. ofindicators with

    positive index

    No. ofindicators with

    negative or

    zero index Accelerated Maintained Decelerated

    Central and West Asia

    Afghanistan 12 7 5 11 1 8 4Armeniab 1 9 4 10 8 5

    Azerbaijan 15 9 12 1 2

    eorgia 15 9 14 1 14 1

    azakhstanb 1 8 5 10 8 5

    yrgyz epublic 1 10 10 9 2 5

    akistan 18 1 2 15 12 1 5

    Tajikistan 15 8 7 10 5 11 4

    Turkmenistan 11 4 7 5 1 4

    zbekistan 1 7 7 8 1 4

    East Asia

    China, eoples ep. ofb 17 12 5 1 4 1 4

    ong ong, China 10 7 9 1 8 2

    orea, ep. ofb, c 15 14 1 14 1 7 2

    Mongolia 17 9 8 11 10 7

    Taipei,Chinab 9 8 1 7 2 5 4

    South AsiaBangladesh 14 10 4 1 1 1 1

    Bhutan 11 5 9 2 10 1

    ndia 17 14 1 1 14

    Maldivesb 12 8 4 10 2 11 1

    Nepal 14 11 1 1 9 2

    ri anka 18 1 2 1 5 10 1 7

    Southeast Asia

    Brunei arussalam 12 9 10 2 1 5

    Cambodia 15 14 1 1 2 11 4

    ndonesia 18 14 4 1 2 12 2 4

    ao 17 1 4 15 2 12 1 4

    Malaysia 17 14 15 2 9 8

    Myanmar 14 11 11 9 1 4

    hilippines 18 14 4 14 4 9

    ingaporec, d 12 8 4 10 2

    Thailand 19 14 5 1 12 7

    iet Nam 1 15 1 1 9 2 5

    The Pacific

    Cook slandsd 7 5 2 1 4

    iji 1 10 9 4 7

    iribati 1 8 5 9 4 5 1 7

    Marshall slands 7 4 4 4

    Micronesia, ed. tates ofe 11 5 5 5 2 4

    Nauru 1 5 4 2

    alau 7 4 5 2 4 2 1

    apua New uinea 14 9 5 8 7 7

    amoa 14 11 7 7 8

    olomon slands 12 8 4 7 1 4

    Timor-este 5 2 5 4 1

    Tongad 1 8 5 11 2 7 1 5

    Tuvalu 7 4 5 2 1anuatu 1 8 5 9 4 7 1 5

    a mployment-to-population ratio aged 1524 years is not included in this table.b ender parity in primary education was not included since these economies had achieved gender parity early on. Thus, the improvement index would be zero

    and bias the economys performance negatively.

    c roportion of population with an improved sanitation facility was not included since the economy had achieved 100% access to sanitation facility early on,and zero improvement index may bias the economys performance negatively.

    d roportion of population with an improved drinking water source was not included since the economy had achieved at least 99% accessto improved drinking sources early on, and 0% improvement may bias the economys performance negatively.

    e ata used for proportion of population living below $2-a-day poverty at 2005 $ refers to urban population only.Note: Accelerated, maintained, and decelerated refer to progress of economies in terms of improvement indexes in the 2000s compared to the 1990s as

    explained in section .ource: Authors calculations based on available data.

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    37/102

    low-income counries of 1990 (wi a leas ree-

    fours of inicaors acceleraing in e 2000s) were

    Banglaes, Buan, e PRC, Inia, Inonesia, e Lao

    PDR, e Malives, Nepal, an Timor-Lese. Among

    '

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    38/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    39/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    40/102

    2 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

    consumpion sare of iges quinile o lowes quinile

    sugges a worsening of e gap beween e ric an

    e poor in many economies.

    Among e inicaors of policy pillar one,

    improvemens in per capia GDP grow rae, elecriciyconsumpion, an cellular pone subscripions

    ave been remarkable. Tere ave been slow bu

    posiive canges in e reucions in own accoun

    an conribuing family workers wi an increasing

    sare of salary an wage workers, bu eclining you

    employmen-o-populaion raios can be cause of

    concern in some economies.

    Among e inicaors of policy pillar wo,

    significan gains ave been mae over e 2 ecaes in

    improving scool life expecancy an mos economies

    raios. Gener pariy in primary eucaion as improve

    significanly in e 2 ecaes, bu gener pariy in labor

    force paricipaion as eeriorae in many economies.

    dW

    sows eclines in many counries. Progress as been

    noewory in improving access o clean rinking

    waer sources, incluing in rural areas, an in access o

    improve saniaion faciliies oug a a muc slower

    pace an rinking waer. Te lone inicaor on social

    safey nes suggess some improvemens in social

    securiy expeniures on eal by governmens. Goo

    governance an soun insiuions come ou o be

    weak in many economies as inicae by eclines in e

    inicaors of voice an accounabiliy an governmen

    effeciveness.

    consumpion, an scool life expecancy appear o move

    ogeer; an improvemens in eal (as inicae by

    consisen reucions in e cil moraliy raes) an

    infrasrucure of saniaion an rinking waer appear

    o ave aken place irrespecive of pace of economicgrow. Tis was evien mosly in many Cenral an

    es Asian economies wen ese counries face

    recession in e 1990s an recovere in e 2000s.

    Counries a ave successfully reuce povery

    bu ave winesse increasing income inequaliy will

    nee o esign policies o expan job opporuniies an

    access o social services an infrasrucure in regions

    an populaions a are lef bein for em o acieve

    inclusive grow. Furer, for an economic grow

    a provies equaliy of opporuniy o all, innovaivepolicies an approaces will be neee. For example,

    cellular pones ave immense benefis for low-income

    d

    populaions roug use of mobile pone ecnology

    can be aope. omen an you consiue a large

    sare of proucive uman resources. Falling you

    labor force paricipaion are areas of concerns an

    require

    e proucive poenial of women an you o susain

    economic grow an reuce income inequaliy. To

    implemen inclusive policies successfully an acieve

    eir inene objecives, governmen effeciveness

    an insiuions will ave o be srengene in mos

    economies of eveloping Asia. Finally, significan effors

    are neee o give ig prioriy o improving availabiliy

    of imely aa on various inicaors by imporan

    isaggregaions o monior progress on inclusive grow.

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    41/102

    Part I

    Z

    Asian Developmen Bank (ADB). 2008. Strategy 2020:

    The Long-Term Strategic Framework of the Asian

    Development Bank 20082020. Manila.

    ______. 2012a. Asian Development Outlook 2012:Confronting Rising Inequality in Asia. Manila.

    ______. 2012b. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    2012. Manila.

    ______. 2012c. Framework of Inclusive Growth

    Indicators: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    2012 Special Supplement. Manila.

    ______. 2011a. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    2011. Manila

    ______. 2011b. Framework of Inclusive Growth

    Indicators: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    2011 Special Supplement. Manila.Fukua-Parr, Sakiko an Josua Greensein. 2010. How

    Soul MDG Implemenaion Be Measure:

    Faser Progress or Meeing Targes? International

    Policy Centre for Inclusive Growthorking Paper

    E

    hEW

    Hailu, Degol an Raquel Tsukua. 2011. Acieving e

    Millennium Developmen Goals: A Measure of

    Progress. International Policy Centre for Inclusive

    Growth, orking PaperE

    hEW

    / > />

    International Labour Conference, 101st Session,2012, Report V, The youth employment crisis:

    Time for action:Fifth item on the agenda. Geneva.

    p : w w w . i l o . o r g w c m s p 5 g r o u p s

    public@e_norm@relconfocumens

    meeingocumenwcms_175421.pf

    Kakwani, N. 1993. Performance in Living Sanars:

    An Inernaional Comparison. Journal of

    Development Economics

    ^ '

    How Asia Has Fare?Journal of Reviews on Global

    Economics (forcoming).hE^ Education for All Monitoring Report

    2005: The Quality ImperativehE^W

    uang, J. an I. Ali. 2010. Povery, Inequaliy, an

    Inclusive Grow in Asia in J. uang, e. Poverty,

    Inequality, and Inclusive Growth: Measurement,

    Policy Issues, and Country Studies. Lonon:

    Anem Press an Manila: ADB.

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    42/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    43/102

    PART II

    Trends and Disparities Within Economiesin Developing Asia

    Statistical Tables

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    44/102

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    45/102

    Poverty and Inequality: Income Poverty

    Te Inicators

    Tree inicaors are inclue uner income povery

    an inequaliy:

    W

    W

    WWW

    2005 prices, an

    Z

    Trens in conomies

    E

    an evaluae programs an policies aime a reucing

    d

    PPP) povery line provies a comparable measure

    'W

    eveloping Asia in e las 2 ecaes ave conribue

    d

    poor eclining from 2.20 billion in 1990 o 1.63 billion

    t

    PovCalNe povery aabase. ile e number of poor

    WZWZ

    961 million in 1990 o 359 million in 2010, e number

    of poor in Inia increase from 722 million o 842 million

    uring e same perio.

    Base on e earlies an laes availableouseol survey aa beween 1990 an 2012, e

    eveloping Asia excep for Georgia, were i increase

    &

    Z

    (37.0), e PRC (57.4), Inonesia (38.5), Nepal (31.7),

    dd

    E

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    46/102

    rural areas are more likely o be poor, wi 24 ou of

    26 economies aving muc iger rural povery raes

    &

    d

    Tuvalu were rural povery raes were sligly lower

    an urban povery raes. In all counries for wic aa

    povery raes ecline, excep for Fiji, Georgia, an

    Tuvalu were oug urban povery raes a ecline

    rural povery raes a gone up. In Afganisan an

    Timor-Lese, bo rural an urban povery worsene

    beween earlies an laes years.

    Z

    are only available for e PRC, Inia, an Inonesia.

    >

    ^

    urban povery in e mos populous counries of Asia

    unerline e nee for policies a will improve

    may no be sricly comparable because of canges

    igure 2. National Rural and Urban Poverty Rates, Latest Year (%)

    ao = ao eople's emocratic epublic, C = eople's epublic of China.

    ource: Table 2.1.

    0

    10

    20

    0

    40

    50

    0

    Timor-Leste

    Tajikistan

    Fiji

    KyrgyzRepublic

    Afghanistan

    Mongolia

    Bangladesh

    Armenia

    Cambodia

    India

    LaoPDR

    Myanmar

    Palau

    Nepal

    Pakistan

    VietNam

    Georgia

    Uzbekistan

    Tuvalu

    Azerbaijan

    Bhutan

    Thailand

    Indonesia

    PRC

    SriLanka

    Kazakhstan

    Malaysia

    Percen

    t

    ural rban

    C = eople's epublic of China.ource: Table 2.1.

    igure 2.2 Ratio of Income or Consumption Share of the Highest to Lowest Quintiles, Earliest and Latest Years

    Ratio

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    0

    5

    40

    45

    50

    Singapo

    re

    Malaysia

    PR

    C

    Georg

    ia

    Philippines

    Fiji

    Samoa

    Thailand

    Bhutan

    Maldives

    Mongo

    lia

    Taipei,China

    Tuva

    lu

    Uzbekistan

    Japan

    LaoPD

    R

    VietNa

    m

    SriLanka

    Indonesia

    Cambod

    ia

    Korea,

    Rep.

    of

    Austra

    lia

    KyrgyzRepub

    lic

    NewZealand

    Azerbaijan

    Nep

    al

    Ind

    ia

    Tajikistan

    Bangladesh

    Timor-Les

    te

    Armen

    ia

    Kazakhstan

    Pakistan

    arliest ear atest ear

    8 Framework of Inclusive Grow Inicaors

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    47/102

    Poverty and Inequality: NonincomePoverty

    Te Inicators

    Te ree inicaors in is group are:

    Average years of oal scooling (you an

    aul),

    W

    years of age, an

    h

    Trens in conomies

    Te average number of years of scooling from primary

    inicaor for bo you an auls sow improvemens

    in all e economies of eveloping Asia, excep for e

    Cenral an es Asian economies of Armenia, e

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    48/102

    /EW

    Te average years of oal scooling for young an aul

    males an females increase beween 1990 an 2010

    for eveloping Asia an e gap in e average number

    of years of scooling beween young males an femalesbecame smaller, from 0.6 year in 1990 o 0.3 year in

    2010. In 20 ou of 29 economies, young females enjoye

    more years of scooling an males (Figure 2.4). In

    ^E

    yous now enjoy an average of 1.7 an 1.5 more years in

    Afganisan a e larges gap of 3.6 years in 2010

    wic was an increase from 3.3 years in 1990. Inia an

    Pakisan, wic a a gap of 2.0 or more years, reuce

    i from 2.0 o 1.1 years an from 2.4 years o 1.0 year,

    daul males an females remaine a 1.5 years beween

    economies ave females wi a iger average number

    of years in scool. Tis implies a in e las 2 ecaes,

    economies in eveloping Asia ave pai consierable

  • 7/27/2019 Framework of Inclusive Growth Indicators 2013: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific

    49/102

    ao = ao eople's emocratic epublic.ource: Table 2.2.

    igure 2.5 Prevalence of Underweight Children under Five Years of Age, Total, Lowest and Highest Wealth Quintiles, Latest Year (%)

    0

    10

    20

    0

    40

    50

    0

    Timor-Leste

    India

    Bangladesh

    LaoPDR

    Afghanistan

    Nepal

    Cambodia

    Myanmar

    SriLanka

    Indonesia

    Mald