fort bend isd facilities plan: planning area b community dialogue #2 december 3,4 & 5, 2013

Fort Bend ISDFacilities Plan: Planning Area B

Community Dialogue #2December 3,4 & 5, 2013

Purpose

Data

Options

Key Dates

Purpose of tonight’s meeting:1. To review proposed options;2. Provide written input of your opinion of the options provided;3. Provide suggestions of ways to improve the options provided;4. Provide new ideas for options

IMPORTANT to remember:5. These are just options, no recommendations have been made;6. Options Do NOT suggest timelines or order of projects;7. Other options will be considered, if they consider the impact on

not just an individual school, but how that option effects others8. Options that turn into recommendations will first consider the

students and what will have the least amount of impact to their educational process

Purpose

Planning Area B

School Type" ELEMENTARY

# MIDDLE

^ HIGH

Elementary Boundary

Middle Boundary

High Boundary

Planning Area A

Austin Parkway ES Settlers Way ESBarrington Place ES Sugar Mill ESColony Bend ES Townwest ESColony Meadows ES Dulles MSCommonwealth ES First Colony MSCornerstone ES Fort Settlement MSDulles ES Lake Olympia MSGlover ES Quail Valley MSHighlands ES Sugar Land MSLakeview ES Clements HSLantern Lane ES Dulles HSLexington Creek ES Elkins HSMeadows ES Kempner HSPalmer ES M.R. WoodQuail Valley ES Tech Ed CenterRita Drabek ES

Planning Area B

Boundary in multiple planning areas

DataEnrollment/Utilization & Condition:

2013/14Enrollment Capacity* Utilization Avg.

FCI

Elementary Schools 11,448 11,547 99% 19%

Middle Schools 6,202 7,362 84% 19%

High Schools 6,856 7,455 92% 23%

*Permanent Capacity Only

Planning Area B: Data

Costs Enrollment Capacity Utilization

Campus Name Const. Year Total Area FCIDeficiency +

LifecycleCurrent

2015 Projected

Permanent Current2015 Projected

Austin Parkway Elementary 1989 80,437 30% 3,892,106$ 786 718 821 96% 87%Barrington Place Elementary 1990 80,437 27% 3,804,624$ 789 735 822 96% 89%Colony Bend Elementary 1981 71,706 15% 1,500,222$ 555 467 530 105% 88%Colony Meadows Elementary 1991 81,850 23% 3,632,697$ 761 692 684 111% 101%Commonwealth Elementary 1997 78,794 24% 3,530,990$ 1,040 1,333 743 140% 179%Drabek Elementary 2001 79,706 16% 2,101,917$ 861 802 760 113% 106%Dulles Elementary 1976 88,828 26% 4,019,224$ 675 701 874 77% 80%Highlands Elementary 1986 72,465 29% 3,762,637$ 561 626 644 87% 97%Lakeview Elementary 1918 91,738 32% 5,494,918$ 556 566 616 90% 92%Lantern Lane Elementary 1978 73,865 12% 1,146,572$ 487 440 610 80% 72%Lexington Creek Elementary 1994 80,611 30% 4,223,863$ 532 505 726 73% 70%Meadows Elementary 1973 73,473 34% 4,403,474$ 433 415 469 92% 88%Palmer Elementary 1985 74,839 19% 2,375,307$ 622 655 660 94% 99%Quail Valley Elementary 2008 88,581 1% 32,944$ 559 586 644 87% 91%Settlers Way Elementary 1984 74,826 30% 3,795,542$ 763 789 731 104% 108%Sugar Mill Elementary 1984 74,864 25% 2,860,607$ 692 680 606 114% 112%Townewest Elementary 1978 72,379 37% 4,896,005$ 776 763 607 128% 126%

1,339,399 19% 55,473,648$ 11,448 11,473 11,547 99% 99%

Planning Area B: Data

Lakeview ElementaryMeadows Elementary

Quail Valley Elementary

Dulles Elementary

Townewest Elementary

Lantern Lane ElementaryColony Bend Elementary

Sugar Mill Elementary

Settlers Way Elementary

Palmer Elementary

Highlands ElementaryAustin Parkway ElementaryBarrington Place Elementary

Colony Meadows ElementaryGlover Elementary

Lexington Creek Elementary

Commonwealth Elementary

Drabek Elementary

Cornerstone Elementary

M.R. Wood

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5

FACI

LITY

CO

NDI

TIO

N IN

DEX

+ 5

YEAR

LIF

E CY

CLE

FACILITY UTILIZATION PERCENTANGE

Elementary

Major Renovation

Minor Renovation

General Maintenance

Planning Area B: DataCampus Name Const. Year Total Area FCI

Deficiency + Lifecycle

Current2015 Projected

Permanent Current2015 Projected

Dulles Middle School 1965 208,521 24% 8,881,711$ 1,218 1,352 1,780 68% 76%First Colony Middle School 1985 189,150 26% 8,586,660$ 1,247 1,308 1,198 104% 109%Fort Settlement Middle School 2001 211,280 10% 3,477,108$ 1,214 1,371 1,399 87% 98%Quail Valley Middle School 1978 176,309 28% 8,531,072$ 1,262 1,263 1,555 81% 81%Sugar Land Middle School 1975 178,650 27% 8,053,732$ 1,261 1,223 1,430 88% 86%

963,910 19% 37,530,282$ 6,202 6,517 7,362 84% 89%

Dulles Middle SchoolSugar Land Middle SchoolQuail Valley Middle School

First Colony Middle School

Lake Olympia Middle School

Fort Settlement Middle School

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25

FACI

LITY

CO

NDI

TIO

N IN

DEX

+ 5

YEAR

LIF

E CY

CLE


Middle School

Major Renovation

Minor Renovation

General Maintenance

Planning Area B: DataCosts Enrollment Capacity Utilization

Campus Name Const. Year Total Area FCI Deficiency + Lifecycle

Current 2015 Projected

Permanent Current 2015 Projected

Clements High School 1983 373,305 33% 22,081,484$ 2,502 2,442 2,621 95% 93%

Elkins High School 1992 325,389 21% 11,429,347$ 2,011 2,374 2,434 83% 98%

Kempner High School 1988 334,229 26% 14,154,277$ 2,343 2,355 2,400 98% 98%

1,032,923 23% 47,665,107$ 6,856 7,171 7,455 92% 96%

Clements High School

Kempner High School

Elkins High School

Technical Education Center

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25

FACI

LITY

CO

NDI

TIO

N IN

DEX

+ 5

YEAR

LIF

E CY

CLE


High School

Major Renovation

Minor Renovation

General Maintenance

Facility Data

Planning Area A

Lakeview ElementaryMeadows Elementary

Quail Valley Elementary

Dulles Elementary

Townewest Elementary

Lantern Lane ElementaryColony Bend Elementary

Sugar Mill Elementary

Settlers Way Elementary

Palmer Elementary

Highlands ElementaryAustin Parkway ElementaryBarrington Place Elementary

Colony Meadows ElementaryGlover Elementary

Lexington Creek Elementary

Commonwealth Elementary

Drabek Elementary

Cornerstone Elementary

M.R. Wood

Dulles Middle SchoolSugar Land Middle SchoolQuail Valley Middle School

First Colony Middle School

Lake Olympia Middle School

Fort Settlement Middle School

Dulles High School

Clements High School

Kempner High School

Elkins High School

Technical Education Center

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5

FACI

LITY

CO

NDI

TIO

N IN

DEX

+ 5

YEAR

LIF

E CY

CLE


Major Renovation

Minor Renovation

General Maintenance

Live/Attend Analysis

Austi

n

Bush

Clem

ents

Dulle

s

Elki

ns

High

tow

er

Kem

pner

Mar

shal

l

Ridg

e Po

int

Trav

is

Willo

wrid

ge

Fern

dell H

enry

Ce

nter

Fort

Ben

d Co

. Al

tern

ative

M.R

. Woo

d Ce

nter

for

Lear

ning

Live

In

Live

& A

tten

d

Tran

sfer

Out

Tran

sfer

Out

%

Austin 2,219 7 25 18 7 29 5 17 1 1 2,329 2,219 110 5%Bush 8 1,915 11 12 13 52 4 3 2 59 1 10 2,090 1,915 175 8%Clements 2 2,136 26 14 18 3 2 1 2 2,204 2,136 68 3%Dulles 4 30 1,822 10 39 9 3 5 2 2 2 1,928 1,822 106 5%Elkins 6 116 60 1,873 173 10 46 2 2 6 2 2,296 1,873 423 18%Hightower 3 2 11 20 1,545 3 48 6 3 1,641 1,545 96 6%Kempner 13 13 97 79 7 53 2,293 4 11 7 2,577 2,293 284 11%Marshall 3 11 9 32 18 113 1 1,170 41 3 12 1 10 1,424 1,170 254 18%Ridge Point 1 25 17 24 94 1 1,653 2 4 2 1,823 1,653 170 9%Travis 5 54 30 16 7 53 10 2 2,313 2 3 2,495 2,313 182 7%Willowridge 1 7 10 40 14 108 1 81 65 2 1,253 8 2 1,592 1,253 339 21%Unmatched 6 3 3 5 1 5 12 4 6 6 1Out-of-District 17 26 11 78 1 12 11 26 7 19 5 1Attends 2,274 2,047 2,505 2,214 2,013 2,290 2,339 1,318 1,873 2,435 1,280 26 16 35Live & Attend 2,219 1,915 2,136 1,822 1,873 1,545 2,293 1,170 1,653 2,313 1,253Transfer In 55 132 369 392 140 745 46 148 220 122 27Transfer In % 2% 6% 15% 18% 7% 33% 2% 11% 12% 5% 2%

2013-14 9-12 Live/Attend

Attends

Lives

In

Options Packet

Current/Projected Data

Option Description

Option DataDescription

School within a School ConceptConcept:• Smaller Schools that share site and/or spaces• Create Flexibility of Delivery (time, grade configuration, etc...)• Allow for more capacity without feeling like student is in a large

school• Shared Resources

Facility Issues

• Townewest is over-utilized

• Meadows & Townewest have high FCIs relative to other FBISD facilities

B.E.1—Barrington Place, Meadows, Townewest

Current Information Costs Current

Campus NameConst. Year

Square Footage FCI


2013 Current

2015 Projected

Permanent Capacity

2013 Current

2015 Projected

Barrington Place Elementary 1990 80,437 27% 3,804,624$ 789 735 822 96% 89%Meadows Elementary 1973 73,473 34% 4,403,474$ 433 415 469 92% 88%Townewest Elementary 1978 72,379 37% 4,896,005$ 776 763 607 128% 126%

226,289 27% 13,104,103$ 1,998 1,913 1,898 105% 101%

UtilizationEnrollment

Option 1

• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment into existing facilities.

B.E.1—Barrington Place, Meadows, Townewest

Option 2

• Rebuild Townewest at capacity larger than the current capacity to the District prototype of 850 students.

+ low cost

- Townewest remains over-utilized

Strengths & Challenges

+ Relieves over-crowding

- Higher capital investment

- Swing space during construction

Facility Issues

• Commonwealth is over-utilized

• Austin Parkway & Commonwealth have high FCIs relative to other FBISD facilities

• Colony Meadows (B.E.3.) is over-utilized and can be provided relief from Commonwealth once New ES is built in Riverstone

B.E.2—Austin Parkway, Commonwealth, Settlers Way



Square Footage FCI


2013 Current

2015 Projected

Permanent Capacity

2013 Current

2015 Projected

Austin Parkway Elementary 1989 80,437 30% 3,892,106$ 786 718 821 96% 87%Commonwealth Elementary 1997 78,794 24% 3,530,990$ 1,040 1,333 743 140% 179%Settlers Way Elementary 1984 74,826 30% 3,795,542$ 763 789 731 104% 108%

234,057 22% 11,218,637$ 2,589 2,840 2,295 113% 124%

Enrollment Utilization

Option 1

• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investments into existing schools

• Renovations at Austin Parkway & Commonwealth

• Build 1,200 Capacity ES at Riverstone site

• Relieve utilization at Commonwealth with Rezone to new ES

• Possible (TBD) relief for Colony Meadows into Commonwealth

Option 2

• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment

• Renovations at Austin Parkway & Commonwealth

• Build New ES at Riverstone site (850 prototype)

• Relieve utilization at Commonwealth with rezone to new ES at Riverstone

+ reduces area over-crowding

- Rezoning required

- Shared School Site may be a new concept to the Community

- Site logistics

- Commonwealth ES may not be relieved enough to handle future relief for other elementary schools



- Rezoning required

- Does not provide relief to Settlers Way ES

- May not provide enough seats for the long-term

B.E.2—Austin Parkway, Commonwealth, Settlers Way



Square Footage FCI


2013 Current

2015 Projected

Permanent Capacity

2013 Current

2015 Projected

Colony Bend Elementary 1981 71,706 15% 1,500,222$ 555 467 530 105% 88%Colony Meadows Elementary 1991 81,850 23% 3,632,697$ 761 692 684 111% 101%

153,556 15% 5,132,919$ 1,316 1,159 1,214 108% 95%

UtilizationEnrollment

Facility Issues

• Colony Meadows is over-utilized and will be more over-utilized with addition of new apartments currently being built by boundary

• Colony Bend has approximately 225 students that transfer into the boundary.

B.E.3—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows

Option 1


• Relief for Colony Meadows by rezoning to other area schools

Option 2


• In anticipation of new apartments currently being developed near Costco, rezone to an area elementary that can accommodate an additional approx. 100 students


+can provide a more consistent feeder pattern for this area

- Rezoning required

- Area remains at/near capacity

- Determining which school will provide best option for rezoning



- Finding location for Pre-K program


- Does not provide for feeder pattern consistency

B.E.3 (1/2)—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows

Option 4

• Combination of the Above Options



- Rezoning required


B.E.3 (1/2)—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows

Option 3


• Rezone apartments at Lexington & Austin into Colony Bend boundary

+ reduces utilization at Colony Meadows

+ keeps students in current feeder pattern

- Rezoning required

- Transfer students at Colony Bend ES

- Creating boundary change with least impact on current students

Facility Issues

• Anticipated increased utilization at Lantern Lane ES with the current construction of apartments in the boundary

B.E.4—Lantern Lane, Palmer, Quail Valley



Square Footage

FCIDeficiency +

Lifecycle2013

Current2015

ProjectedPermanent

Capacity2013

Current2015

ProjectedLantern Lane Elementary 1978 73,865 12% 1,146,572$ 487 440 610 80% 72%Palmer Elementary 1985 74,839 19% 2,375,307$ 622 655 660 94% 99%Quail Valley Elementary 2008 88,581 1% 32,944$ 559 586 644 87% 91%

237,285 7% 3,554,822$ 1,668 1,681 1,914 87% 88%


Option 1


• 10 classroom addition to Lantern Lane

+ will accommodate growth

- Additional capital investment


B.E.4—Lantern Lane, Palmer, Quail Valley

Facility Issues

• Drabek and Sugar Mill over-utilized

• Lakeview is a historic facility

B.E.5—Drabek, Lakeview, Sugar Mill



Square Footage

FCIDeficiency +

Lifecycle2013

Current2015

ProjectedPermanent

Capacity2013

Current2015

ProjectedDrabek Elementary 2001 79,706 16% 2,101,917$ 861 802 760 113% 106%Lakeview Elementary 1918 91,738 32% 5,494,918$ 556 566 616 90% 92%Sugar Mill Elementary 1984 74,864 25% 2,860,607$ 692 680 606 114% 112%

246,308 19% 10,457,443$ 2,109 2,048 1,982 106% 103%


Option 1


• Selective Replacement, Historic Renovations and Additions to Lakeview

• Rezone Sugar Mill to Lakeview

• Rezone Drabek to New Townewest (B.E.1)

+ Reduces over-crowding at Drabek and Sugar Mill

- Rezoning required

- Leaves area at capacity


B.E.5—Drabek, Lakeview, Sugar Mill

Option 2


• Selective Replacement, Historic Renovations and Additions to Lakeview

• Build 4 CR Addition to Sugar Mill

+ Reduces over-crowding at Sugar Mill

- Does not provide relief for Drabek

Facility Issues

• Dulles ES is a relatively old facility in FBISD

B.E.6—Dulles, Highlands, Lexington Creek



Square Footage

FCIDeficiency +

Lifecycle2013

Current2015

ProjectedPermanent

Capacity2013

Current2015

Projected

Dulles Elementary 1976 88,828 26% 4,019,224$ 675 701 874 77% 80%Highlands Elementary 1986 72,465 29% 3,762,637$ 561 626 644 87% 97%Lexington Creek Elementary 1994 80,611 30% 4,223,863$ 532 505 726 73% 70%

241,904 23% 12,005,725$ 1,768 1,832 2,244 79% 82%


Option 1

• Renovations to Dulles, Highlands, & Lexington Creek

+ Updates current facilities


B.E.6—Dulles, Highlands, Lexington Creek

Facility Issues

• First Colony MS is overcrowded

B.M.1—Dulles, First Colony, Fort Settlement, Quail Valley, Sugar Land


Campus NameConst. Year Square Footage FCI


2013 Current

2015 Projected

Permanent Capacity

2013 Current

2015 Projected

Dulles Middle School 1965 208,521 24% 8,881,711$ 1,218 1,352 1,780 68% 76%First Colony Middle School 1985 189,150 26% 8,586,660$ 1,247 1,308 1,198 104% 109%Fort Settlement Middle School 2001 211,280 10% 3,477,108$ 1,214 1,371 1,399 87% 98%Quail Valley Middle School 1978 176,309 28% 8,531,072$ 1,262 1,263 1,555 81% 81%Sugar Land Middle School 1975 178,650 27% 8,053,732$ 1,261 1,223 1,430 88% 86%

963,910 19% 37,530,282$ 6,202 6,517 7,362 84% 89%


Option 1


• Addition at First Colony MS

+ Reduces over-crowding


B.M.1—Dulles, First Colony, Fort Settlement, Quail Valley, Sugar Land

Option 2


• Rezone area middle schools

• Repurpose Lake Olympia Facility for Transportation & Service Center

+ Cleans feeder into Ridge Point HS

+ Reduces operational costs

- Repurposing Lake Olympia

- Rezoning

Facility Issues

• Enrollment at Elkins HS is projected to increase due to population growth in the Riverstone subdivision

• Current Clements 9-12th grade live-in is: 1,968

• Current Clements 7-10th grade live-in is 1,807

B.H.1—Clements, Elkins, Kempner


Campus NameConst. Year Square Footage FCI


2013 Current

2015 Projected

Permanent Capacity

2013 Current

2015 Projected

Clements High School 1983 373,305 33% 22,081,484$ 2,502 2,442 2,621 95% 93%Elkins High School 1992 325,389 21% 11,429,347$ 2,011 2,374 2,434 83% 98%Kempner High School 1988 334,229 26% 14,154,277$ 2,343 2,355 2,400 98% 98%

1,032,923 23% 47,665,107$ 6,856 7,171 7,455 92% 96%


Option 1


• Monitor Clements Live-in Enrollment

• Consider moving World Languages Academy when neighborhood population approaches capacity of the facility

+ Renovates current facilities

- Possible movement of a program to another high school facility in time


B.H.1—Clements, Elkins, Kempner

Option 2


• Rezone Cornerstone ES feeder into Austin HS to relieve future utilization at Kempner HS

+ See packet A.H.1

- See packet A.H.1

Questionnaire

Individual Questionnaire1. For each option- Evaluate Independently 2. Select (when applicable) your preferred option3. If you have a suggested option that is not listed please explain in

space provided

Group Questionnaire:4. Goal is to reach consensus- may not occur5. Table facilitator will record group responses6. Please allow all to contribute to the conversation

Process Timeline Update

Key Meeting Dates:

December 4th & 5th - 2nd Community Dialogues

December 16th - Board of Trustees Work Session

December 17th/18th- Recommendations work sessions

January- Steering Committee Recommendations Meetings

January – Board of Trustees Workshop (TBD)

February - Facility Plan Deliverable

Questionnaire

ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE OPTION

fort bend isd facilities plan: planning area b community dialogue #2 december 3,4 & 5, 2013

Documents