formont.ppt

20
1 ON THE EXTENSION OF THE PRODUCT MODEL IN POLSAR PROCESSING FOR UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION USING INFORMATION GEOMETRY OF COVARIANCE MATRICES P. Formont 1,2 , J.-P. Ovarlez 1,2 , F. Pascal 2 , G. Vasile 3 , L. Ferro-Famil 4 1 ONERA, 2 SONDRA, 3 GIPSA-lab, 4 IETR

Upload: grssieee

Post on 19-Dec-2014

204 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Formont.ppt

1

ON THE EXTENSION OF THE PRODUCT MODEL IN POLSAR PROCESSING FOR UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION USING

INFORMATION GEOMETRY OF COVARIANCE MATRICES

P. Formont1,2, J.-P. Ovarlez1,2, F. Pascal2, G. Vasile3, L. Ferro-Famil4

1 ONERA, 2 SONDRA, 3 GIPSA-lab, 4 IETR

Page 2: Formont.ppt

2

K-MEANS CLASSIFIER

Conventional clustering algorithm:

Initialisation: Assign pixels to classes.

Centers computation: Compute the centers of each class as follows:

Reassignment: Reassign each pixel to the class whose center minimizes a certain distance.

kixik x

N

1

ijxxx jikiki ),d(),d(

Page 3: Formont.ppt

OUTLINE

1. Non-Gaussian clutter model: the SIRV model

2. Contribution of the geometry of information

3. Results on real data

4. Conclusions and perspectives

Page 4: Formont.ppt

OUTLINE

Page 5: Formont.ppt

5

CONVENTIONAL COVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATE

With low resolution, clutter is modeled as a Gaussian process.

Estimation of the covariance matrix of a pixel, characterized by its target vector k, thanks to N secondary data: k1, …, kN.

Maximum Likelihood estimate of the covariance matrix, the Sample Covariance Matrix (SCM):

N

i

HiiSCM N 1

1ˆ kkΤ

Page 6: Formont.ppt

66

SCM IN HIGH RESOLUTION

Gamma classification Wishart classification with SCM

Results are very close from each other : influence of polarimetric information ?

Page 7: Formont.ppt

77

THE SIRV MODEL

Non-Gaussian SIRV (Spherically Invariant Random Vector) representation of the scattering vector :

xk

where is a random positive variable (texture) and (speckle).

The texture pdf is not specified : large class of stochastic processes can be described.

Texture : local spatial variation of power.

Speckle : polarimetric information.

Validated on real data measurement campaigns.

),(~ M0x CN

k

Page 8: Formont.ppt

8

COVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATE : THE SIRV MODELCOVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATE : THE SIRV MODEL

88

ML ESTIMATE UNDER SIRV ASSUMPTION

Under SIRV assumption, the SCM is not a good estimator of M.

ML estimate of the covariance matrix:

Existence and unicity.

Convergence whatever the initialisation.

Unbiased, consistent and asymptotically Wishart-distributed.

N

i iFPHi

Hii

N

i iFPHi

Hii

FP N

m

N

m

11

11 ˆˆ

ˆxMx

xx

kMk

kkM

Page 9: Formont.ppt

9

DISTANCE BETWEEN COVARIANCE MATRICES UNDER SIRV ASSUMPTION

• Non Gaussian Process ↔ Generalized LRT ↔ SIRV distance SIRV distance between the two FP between the two FP covariance matricescovariance matrices

• Gaussian Process ↔ Generalized LRT ↔ Wishart distance between the two SCM Wishart distance between the two SCM covariance matricescovariance matrices

Page 10: Formont.ppt

1010

COVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATE : THE SIRV MODELCOVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATE : THE SIRV MODEL

1010

RESULTS ON REAL DATA

Color composition of the region of Brétigny, France

Wishart classification with SCM Wishart classification with FPE

Page 11: Formont.ppt

11

OUTLINE

Page 12: Formont.ppt

1212

Euclidian Mean:

CONVENTIONAL MEAN OF COVARIANCE MATRICES

The mean in the Euclidean sense of n given positive-definite Hermitian matrices M1,..,Mn in P(m) is defined as:

Barycenter:

Page 13: Formont.ppt

13

Riemannian Mean:

A DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRIC APPROACH TO THE GEOMETRIC MEAN OF HERMITIAN DEFINITE POSITIVE MATRICES

The mean in the Riemannian sense of n given positive-definite Hermitian matrices M1,..,Mn in P(m) is defined as:

Geodesic:

Riemannian distance: )log(,dR ABBA 1

Page 14: Formont.ppt

14

OUTLINE

Page 15: Formont.ppt

15

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS

Wishart classification with SCM, Arithmetical mean

SIRV classification with FPE, Arithmetical mean

SIRV classification with FPE, Geometrical mean

Page 16: Formont.ppt

16

CLASSES IN THE H-α PLANE

Page 17: Formont.ppt

1717

PARACOU, FRENCH GUIANA

Acquired with the ONERA SETHI system

UHF band

1.25m resolution

Page 18: Formont.ppt

1818

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS

Classification with Wishart distance, Arithmetical mean

Classification with Wishart distance, Geometrical mean

Classification with geometric distance, Geometrical mean

Page 19: Formont.ppt

19

OUTLINE

Page 20: Formont.ppt

2020

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation of the distance is required.

Interpretation is difficult because no literature.

Span can give information for homogeneous areas.

Further investigation of the distance is required.

Interpretation is difficult because no literature.

Span can give information for homogeneous areas.

Necessity of a non-Gaussian model for HR SAR images.

Geometric definition of the class centers in line with the structure of the covariance matrices space.

Necessity of a non-Gaussian model for HR SAR images.

Geometric definition of the class centers in line with the structure of the covariance matrices space.