florida bar news article
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Florida Bar News Article
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/florida-bar-news-article 1/2
Bar foreclosure CLE ready for download http.//www.flo ridabar.or g/DNCOMI JN/J N News0l.nsflArti
The Florida Barwww.flo ridabar.o rg
Sea rch:
The Florida Bar NewsAdvertising Rates. Classifieds r Attorneys Exchange r Archir,ies. Subscribe " Jaurnal
February \ zOtL E g News HOME
Free Bar foreclosure CLE ready fordownload"Foreclosure Litigation in Florida," The Florida Bar's foreclosure plaintiff education program, is now
available to all Bar members at no charge through lhe_rlAiidaEZr-2417 A_nlite_Q!.q_eatqj9g as an online or
downloadable program.
Terry Hill, director of the Bar's Programs Division, said the four-hour program includes an overview offoreclosure filings in Florida, the players and the process, managed mediation in Florida, verified
complaints, securitization, pitfalls to avoid, and rules of civil procedure.
The topics are presented by members of the judiciary as well as practitioners, including 12th Circuit ChiefJudge Lee Haworth, 19th Circuit Judge Burton Conner, Boca Raton attorney Margery Golant, and Bar
Ethics Counsel Elizabeth Tarbert.
The program is available at ilg.Jid_Abaf--o_rj.
As part of the ethics segment of the presentation, Tarbert discussed the issue of what to do when false
affidavits have been filed in foreclosure cases.
Tarbert said the Professional Ethics Committee has opined that an attorney has an affirmative obligation,
under Rule 4-3.3 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, to notify the court of a potential fraud when theattorney knows that a client has deliberately lied at a deposition. That also applies if the attorney receives
information that clearly establishes that the client has perpetrated a fraud on the court by filing a false
affidavit, such as when a false statement has been made in the affidavit or the affidavit has been
improperly verified or notarized. Then the attorney's duty to the court supersedes the attorney's duty tothe client, and the attorney must reveal the fraud to the court.
"An attorney's obligation to make disclosures under Rule 4-3.3 is triggered when the attorney knows thata client or a witness for the client has made material false statements to a tribunal and the client or
witness refuses to rectify the fraud," according to Tarbert.
Tarbert said if an attorney knows that any material false representations have been made on the record by
a client to any court or tribunal, then the attorney must follow the instructions in the Comment to Rule
4-3.3 and ask the client to correct these false statements on the record. If the client will consent to theappropriate disclosure to the court, then the attorney may do so. The disclosure needs to be made to thecourt that the affidavit was improperly verified and notarized or otherwise false.
With regard to the cases that have already been closed and judgment has already been entered, the dutiesand obligations under Rule 4-3.3 continue beyond the conclusion of the proceeding, Tarbert said. She
stated that disclosure to the court needs to occur in cases involving closed cases as well as pending ones,
noting the attorney would have to discuss this with the client and obtain consent.
Tarbert said whether the case is currently pending or already closed, if the client refuses to give consent todisclose, then the attorney must make these disclosures, preferably in an in camera proceeding if possible,
1.1./I4/20tL 2:3
8/3/2019 Florida Bar News Article
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/florida-bar-news-article 2/2
foreclosure CLE ready for download http:/ /www.floridabar.or g/ DIV COM/ JN/J N NewsOl.nsflArt
adding that the court may be willing to give guidance to the attorney.
As set forth in the Comment to Rule 4-3.3, such action causes a conflict with the client, requiringwithdrawal of the attorney from the representation in pending cases, where the client refuses to consent
to disclosure.
Other Rules of Professional Conduct are also implicated with this issue. Rule 4-L2(d) prohibits a lawyerfrom assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is criminal orfraudulent. Similarly, Rule 4-3.4(b) prohibits a lawyer from fabricating evidence or assisting a witness
totestify falsely. Rule 4-8.4(a) prohibits a lawyer from violating the Rules of Professional Conduct or
knowingly assisting another to do so. Finally, Rule 4-8.4(c) prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct
involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, and Rule 4-8,4(d) prohibits a lawyer fromengaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Tarbert said although not ethically required to withdraw if the client will permit the attorney to make therequired disclosure. However, if the attorney feels compelled to withdraw, the attorney should do so in a
manner that neither breaches the duty of confidentiality to the client nor materially prejudices the client.Therefore, any motion to withdraw should state only general grounds. Even if the duties of the attorneyunder Rule 4-3.3 are triggered, putting the information into a motion to withdraw is not a recommended
way to inform the court. The Comment to Rule 4-1.6 explains that where disclosure of confidentialinformation is necessary, the attorney should avoid any unnecessary disclosure, should limit disclosure topersons
having a need to know, and obtain protective orders or make other appropriate arrangements tominimize risk of disclosure.
The Comment to Rule 4-3.3 summarizes the issue: "If perjured testimony or false evidence has been
offered, the advocate's proper course ordinarily is to remonstrate with the client confidentially ifcircumstances permit. In any case, the advocate should ensure disclosure is made to the court. It is for thecourt then to determine what should be done - making a statement about the matter to the trier of fact,
ordering a mistrial, or perhaps nothing."
[Revised: 11-13-2011] News HOME
O 2005 The Florida Bar I Disclaime!- | Top of page I POf l
LI/I4/2011,2:34